Re: The gun goofball philosophy ;-)
Fred J. McCall
:
:If Strathclyde had worked to those rules, Thomas Hamilton wouldn't have
:been using legal weapons at Dunblane... when his club threw him out and
:warned that they considered him unfit to hold firearms, the police
:declined to act.
:
So, in other words, the existing laws were more than adequate if only
they had been enforced. Having failed to enforce them and gotten a
publicity disaster, the solution was to take away the guns from
everyone.
This is why we worry about gun control advocates over here...
--
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to
live in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Dryden
William Black
> "Paul J. Adam" <ne...@jrwlynchANDNOTTHIS.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> :
> :If Strathclyde had worked to those rules, Thomas Hamilton wouldn't have
> :been using legal weapons at Dunblane... when his club threw him out and
> :warned that they considered him unfit to hold firearms, the police
> :declined to act.
> :
>
> So, in other words, the existing laws were more than adequate if only
> they had been enforced.
The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
fail again and it is time for a new law...
I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
their point of view in recent years.
--
William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
Bruce Bartho
> The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
> fail again and it is time for a new law...
>
> I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
> their point of view in recent years.
Uh, so you agreed that the bad laws you didn't initially agree with
failed again and again were bad, and you "came around" to agree that
failed/bad laws are a good thing to continue?
EGAD!
You are the perfect UK SUBJECT!
Your nose is so very "queen brown", that even your breath smells like
her poop!
If I were you, I would terminate Tom Binns job for saying the BITCH you
admire was "Bor-Ring!"
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20091230/tod-british-dj-sacked-for-pulling-plug-o-6058bda.html
OH MY! You blokes also don't have Freedom of speech!
William Black
> William Black wrote:
>
>> The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
>> fail again and it is time for a new law...
>>
>> I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
>> their point of view in recent years.
>
>
> Uh, so you agreed that the bad laws you didn't initially agree with
> failed again and again were bad, and you "came around" to agree that
> failed/bad laws are a good thing to continue?
Piss off child, you're boring.
SaPeIsMa
"William Black" <willia...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hhg8hn$g2k$6...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Fred J. McCall wrote:
>> "Paul J. Adam" <ne...@jrwlynchANDNOTTHIS.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> :
>> :If Strathclyde had worked to those rules, Thomas Hamilton wouldn't have
>> :been using legal weapons at Dunblane... when his club threw him out and
>> :warned that they considered him unfit to hold firearms, the police
>> :declined to act.
>> :
>>
>> So, in other words, the existing laws were more than adequate if only
>> they had been enforced.
>
> The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
> fail again and it is time for a new law...
>
> I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
> their point of view in recent years.
>
Yup
Until the next one shoots up a bunch of people
Only idiots believe that criminals and loons will not be able to arm
themselves one way or another to do their dirty deeds
SaPeIsMa
> Bruce Bartho wrote:
>> William Black wrote:
>>
>>> The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
>>> fail again and it is time for a new law...
>>>
>>> I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
>>> their point of view in recent years.
>>
>>
>> Uh, so you agreed that the bad laws you didn't initially agree with
>> failed again and again were bad, and you "came around" to agree that
>> failed/bad laws are a good thing to continue?
>
> Piss off child, you're boring.
>
LOL
Weewee willy got bitch-slapped again so naturally he runs away instead of
admitting that the light has been shined on his shit.
Aren't you going to ask him if English is his first language while your
at it ?
Fred J. McCall
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> "Paul J. Adam" <ne...@jrwlynchANDNOTTHIS.demon.co.uk> wrote:
:>
:> :
:> :If Strathclyde had worked to those rules, Thomas Hamilton wouldn't have
:> :been using legal weapons at Dunblane... when his club threw him out and
:> :warned that they considered him unfit to hold firearms, the police
:> :declined to act.
:> :
:>
:> So, in other words, the existing laws were more than adequate if only
:> they had been enforced.
:
:The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it will
:fail again and it is time for a new law...
:
With no more guarantee that that law won't fail just like the last one
did. They never learn.
:
:I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around to
:their point of view in recent years.
:
You never learn, either. So what happens next time? Yet another new
law?
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
Scout
> Bruce Bartho wrote:
>> William Black wrote:
>>
>>> The point the politicians made was that if the law failed once it
>>> will fail again and it is time for a new law...
>>>
>>> I disagreed at the time, but I have to admit that I've come around
>>> to their point of view in recent years.
>>
>>
>> Uh, so you agreed that the bad laws you didn't initially agree with
>> failed again and again were bad, and you "came around" to agree that
>> failed/bad laws are a good thing to continue?
>
> Piss off child, you're boring.
Once again we see William running up the white flag due to his sticking his
foot in his mouth.