Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Lawyer Jim is a Criminal - belongs in prison

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

unread,
May 24, 2012, 4:49:27 PM5/24/12
to
Zat enough to get your attention?

Post your full name and contact information.
I have every intention of getting you disbarred and prosecuted.


Lump


RichL

unread,
May 24, 2012, 5:08:11 PM5/24/12
to
"Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke" <lu...@LumpyMusic.com> wrote in message
news:jpm6ta$28l$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Zat enough to get your attention?
>
> Post your full name and contact information.
> I have every intention of getting you disbarred and prosecuted.

Grow the fuck up.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

unread,
May 24, 2012, 5:50:35 PM5/24/12
to
RichL wrote:

> Grow the fuck up.

Irony meter

0 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
(o)



Lump



jim

unread,
May 24, 2012, 7:00:27 PM5/24/12
to
Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-2921. Harassment; classification; definition

A. A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass or with
knowledge that the person is harassing another person, the person:

1. Anonymously or otherwise contacts, communicates or causes a
communication with another person by verbal, electronic, mechanical,
telegraphic, telephonic or written means in a manner that harasses.

2. Continues to follow another person in or about a public place for no
legitimate purpose after being asked to desist.

3. Repeatedly commits an act or acts that harass another person.

4. Surveils or causes another person to surveil a person for no
legitimate purpose.

5. On more than one occasion makes a false report to a law enforcement,
credit or social service agency.

6. Interferes with the delivery of any public or regulated utility to a
person.

B. A person commits harassment against a public officer or employee if
the person, with intent to harass, files a nonconsensual lien against
any public officer or employee that is not accompanied by an order or a
judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the filing
of the lien or is not issued by a governmental entity or political
subdivision or agency pursuant to its statutory authority, a validly
licensed utility or water delivery company, a mechanics' lien claimant
or an entity created under covenants, conditions, restrictions or
declarations affecting real property.

C. Harassment under subsection A is a class 1 misdemeanor. Harassment
under subsection B is a class 5 felony.

D. This section does not apply to an otherwise lawful demonstration,
assembly or picketing.

E. For the purposes of this section, "harassment" means conduct that is
directed at a specific person and that would cause a reasonable person
to be seriously alarmed, annoyed or harassed and the conduct in fact
seriously alarms, annoys or harasses the person.

gonjah

unread,
May 24, 2012, 7:33:36 PM5/24/12
to

-- X-No-Archive: Yes
What if the person *being* harassed is anonymous and just goes by the
name, let's say.... Jim?

BTW: That's my name. Can I sue too? Maybe we can get a class action
lawsuit against Lumpy. ;)

Pt

unread,
May 24, 2012, 7:36:17 PM5/24/12
to
> lawsuit against Lumpy. ;)-

Stand in line.

Pt

gonjah

unread,
May 24, 2012, 7:59:02 PM5/24/12
to
-- X-No-Archive: Yes
PTs of the world unite and trample down the mighty Lumpy!

Word is "Jim" is a pretty good attorney.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

unread,
May 25, 2012, 12:38:08 AM5/25/12
to
jim wrote:
> Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-2921. Harassment; classification; definition
>
> A. A person commits harassment if, with intent to harass or with
> knowledge that the person is harassing another person, the person:
>
> 1. Anonymously or otherwise contacts, communicates or causes a
> communication with another person by verbal, electronic, mechanical,
> telegraphic, telephonic or written means in a manner that harasses.

So if I repeatedly communicated to this newsgroup that I believed
you were a criminal and deserved to be disbarred and put in prison
because you admitted to committing a crime,
that would be statutory harassment?

Do you need the address of the appropriate AZ municipal court
so that you can file a misdemeanor complaint against me?


Lump



Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

unread,
May 25, 2012, 12:40:39 AM5/25/12
to
Pt wrote:
> Stand in line.

What if Jim steals the line? After all, he's the rightful
owner of SOME line. Therefore he's the rightful owner of
all lines.


Lump

Jim

unread,
May 25, 2012, 1:57:07 AM5/25/12
to
That won't save his sorry behind. The law is punishing the harassment.
You don't have to know the identity of the "victim" to commit the
offense.

Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke

unread,
May 25, 2012, 2:55:32 AM5/25/12
to
Jim wrote:
> That won't save his sorry behind. The law is punishing the
> harassment. You don't have to know the identity of the "victim" to
> commit the offense.


Blah blah blah.

Then file charges against me you thief.

Ask your daddy, the other unethical lawyer, what to do.
Hell, while you're asking, ask your wife, your mistress,
your gay boyfriend and your drug dealer what to do.

Come on, legal boy. File charges against me. If you don't think
you have enough evidence, post your contact information. Then
I'll take you out of the "anonymous, might be a guy named Jim"
category and post that [your name] is an unethical thief and
should be put in prison. I'll write to your bar assoc, your
local newspaper, your church, your kid's schools, your corner
hardware store. Hell, this is a fun hobby, eating your ass out.
I'll tell the entire WORLD about your criminal escapades.

What lawyer with ANY respect for the legal system and his own
profession would behave as you are? The unethical and criminal
kind, that's who.

What'll it be, thief?

Put up? Shut up? You big pussy, hiding behind your anonymous
nym. You'll never come out. You haven't got the man-guts to
confront me. I've got cunt hairs on my bathroom floor
bigger than you.


Lump


gonjah

unread,
May 25, 2012, 9:17:03 AM5/25/12
to
Usually it's the other way around. Can you point to a specific case or
statute?

<snip>
0 new messages