> Hmmm,
> Spin doctors at work again. Can't tell the truth with straight face.
> The more dragging it on, the worse it looks. At least those guys who
> did it, what is different between them and terrorists?
The terrorists don't prosecute their troops for murdering civilians, that's
the difference, one even you should have been able to figure out.
War is an acid test, it drives some men to do things they otherwise would
not, it exposes the flaws in people's characters, like the man said, it is
hell. My view is the invasion of Iraq was a huge blunder, but that doesn't
mean the coalition is on the same moral plane as the savages who are bombing
mosques and weddings and assassinating anyone who is trying to restore order
to the county and doing everything in their power to bring about a civil
war. One side in this conflict wants the violence to stop, the other wants
it to continue and escalate, if you really can't tell the difference. . . .
He never sdo much as a wore the uniform of any service Tony-
You might tell him one of your VN patrol stories, it'll gove
this phuctarded chickenhawk a hardon :-) mvm
He's never so much as a worn the uniform of any service Tony-
You might tell him one of your VN patrol stories, it'll give
this phuctarded chickenhawk a hardon :-) mvm
He's never so much as worn the uniform of any service Tony-
You might tell him one of your VN patrol stories, it'll give
this phuctarded chickenhawk a hardon :-) mvm
By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 8, 2006; 6:10 PM
The U.S. military officer overseeing the investigation into 24 civilian
killings in Haditha, Iraq, has concluded that Marine leadership failed
multiple times, including in pre-deployment training, in the tone set by
commanders, and in how information was reported up the chain of command,
defense officials said.
Army Lt. Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, the No. 2 officer in Iraq, found that
commanders and staff at the regimental and division levels were
negligent in how they conveyed orders about how to deal with Iraqi
civilians and also in how they responded to conflicting reports they
received from units about the Haditha incident, the officials said.
Most of Chiarelli's "Findings and Recommendations" endorse the
conclusions of an investigation led by Army Maj. Gen. Eldon A.
Bargewell, the officials said. Bargewell concluded that Marine
commanders should have asked more questions about how and why 15 Iraqi
civilians -- the number first reported -- were killed, especially after
a discrepancy emerged between the first report, that they had been
killed by a roadside bomb, and a later report, that they all had died of
gunshot wounds. Chiarelli told colleagues that he was stunned to learn
that no investigation of the incident had been conducted even after it
was evident that the facts of the matter were in dispute, an official said.
Bargewell's report also criticizes the Marine Corps for letting stand a
statement, released in November by one of its public affairs officers,
that the Iraqis had been killed by a roadside bomb, instead of
correcting the record when it was clear the statement was incorrect.
Chiarelli long has been concerned that the U.S. military was
inadequately prepared to conduct an effective counterinsurgency campaign
in Iraq. He also included thoughts about how better to prepare troops
and commanders, the official added.
"You've got to prepare for the fight you're in today," said a second
defense official, summarizing Chiarelli's findings on the military's
inadequate training for counterinsurgency operations. "It's totally
different" than fighting in Iraq two or three years ago, he said.
The Army, for example, tends in its training to emphasize using heavy
firepower against the enemy, although classic counterinsurgency doctrine
teaches that soldiers should use the minimal amount of force necessary
to accomplish the mission.
Also, the Army early in Iraq tended to focus on killing or capturing
insurgents, although counterinsurgency doctrine teaches that the best
way to deal with an insurgent is to persuade him to change sides or to
desert. Also, in contrast to a spate of cases of the abuse of detainees,
counterinsurgency theorists recommend treating captured fighters well,
to encourage them to desert and to persuade others to give themselves
up. Above all, people are seen as the prize in the war, not as its
playing field.
When stacked up, Bargewell's exhaustive investigation stands more than
four feet high. His report will not be released, but, later this week,
Chiarelli is expected to release a redacted version of his 30-page
report. On Friday, Chiarelli gave his report to Army Gen. George W.
Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, but Casey is not expected to
ask for major changes, an official said.
The two generals' inquiry into the role of the Marine Corps chain of
command in the incident is different from a criminal investigation being
conducted by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). That
investigation involves more than 45 agents and is expected to conclude
this summer, Pentagon officials have said.
No charges have been filed, but people familiar with the case say they
expect charges of homicide, making a false statement and dereliction of
duty, among others. Defense attorneys are expected to respond that the
Marines involved were operating within the rules of engagement they had
been given.
Staff Sgt. Frank D. Wuterich, a squad leader who was at Haditha, told
his attorney last month that several civilians were killed last November
when his squad went after insurgents who were firing at them from inside
a house after a Marine convoy was hit by a roadside bomb. Wuterich said
there was no vengeful massacre, even though women and children were
killed. He instead described a house-to-house hunt that went awry on a
chaotic battlefield.
"It will forever be his position that everything they did that day was
following their rules of engagement and to protect the lives of
Marines," Neal A. Puckett, who represents Wuterich, said then.
NCIS is investigating members of Kilo Company of the 3rd Battalion of
the 1st Marine Regiment, based at Camp Pendleton, Calif. While in Iraq,
the battalion was attached to the 2nd Marine Division based at Camp
Lejeune, N.C. Chiarelli blames Gen. Richard A. Huck, who then commanded
that division, for leadership failure, the official said. Huck recently
retired from the Marines and could not be reached for comment yesterday.
The Bargewell investigation began in January after a Time magazine
reporter began asking questions about the Haditha incident. Time's
report appeared in March. A few weeks later, Lt. Col. Jeffrey R.
Chessani, was relieved of command of the 3rd Battalion of the 1st
Marines, Kilo Company's parent unit. Two subordinates also were removed.
The Marines did not specify why the actions were taken, beyond saying
that the officers had lost their superiors' confidence.
But Haditha did not become a major issue until May, when Rep. John P.
Murtha (D-Pa.), who has turned sharply against the Iraq war, said at a
news conference that Marines had "killed innocent civilians in cold
blood." Murtha is a former Marine and had been briefed by a senior
Marine officer on the probe.
Spokesmen for the Marine Corps and for the Central Command, which
oversees U.S. military operations in Iraq and the rest of the Middle
East, declined to comment. Some of the details of Chiarelli's findings
were reported Friday night by CBS News and the New York Times.
> Hi,
> What a big difference, Eh?!
Yes, a huge difference, one side wants stability restored so they can go
home, the other wants the bloodshed to escalate so they can profit from a
civil war, are you seriously saying there is no difference?
> BTW, have you been to war? If you have, what was your MOS?
There wasn't a war going on when I was in uniform, at least one the nation
wanted to participate in. If *you* served in combat, do the immoral and/or
illegal acts of some of the people who wore the same uniform as you make you
a terrorist as well? Do the acts of a handful of soldiers out of hundreds
of thousands mean the whole army is the same as the terrorists who blow up
weddings? If a cop shoots someone without cause does that mean the whole
police dept. is a bunch of murderers? Grow up Tony, it's a stinking lousy
war and in any war some guys will either crack or they were bent to start
with, but that doesn't mean the whole army is no different that the scumbags
who are happily blowing up as many people as they can as a matter of
deliberate policy.
> There wasn't a war going on when I was in uniform, at least one the nation
> wanted to participate in.
The Cub Scouts are under age. Give the neocons more time and that too
would change ;-).
Devin will print that out and cum all over it many times.
Let's watch him fantasize an MOS now.
mvm
USN '81-88
Designator 1315
As usual, A+
> Hi,
> Just let me say, war is mad/crazy thing. There are terrorist who is good
> human too. Like good husband, good father to his own kids. What drove them
> do things what he does? Ideology is deadly stuff.
> Since WW II, super powers have to share most of the blame on what world
> has to deal with now.
The superpowers didn't motivate much of the Islamic world to believe men
need to murder female relatives who "dishonor" the family by being raped,
that kind of love-affair with death is part of what is driving the horror in
the middle-east today. Lots of people around the world have endured
horrific situations, yet managed not to descend to strapping explosives to
their children and sending them out to blow up other children. As you say,
ideology, in this case one that wants to return hundreds of millions of
people to the middle-ages.
> Time to dig into history, Eh?
You obviously haven't seen our library.
Sure, and I live in a trailer on Long Island too, as a detective you're
about as "accomplished" as you are a musician.
Seen? How about read?
You might fiddle around with
BMaj.9--AMaj.9--Gbm7---Dbm11
It'll give your self-abused pisser a break ;-)
> It'll give your self-abused pisser a break ;-)
You sure are fascinated with other guy's schlongs Marc. Gotta make us
wonder. . . .
He's just a gay man trapped in a straight man's body.
Give up your obsession marc
--
Ken Wilson
Fascinated?
You post in a way that makes slugs and other invertebrates look like
Nobel Prize winners yet there's nothing wrong with you that couldn't be
cured with a size 11 up the ass and a baseball bat.
How's that MOS coming along? ;-). The only uniform you ever wore
was a paper cap in burger flippin' hole, McJerkoff.
You're just an asshole trapped in a fat ass.
That'll be $10MM -in U.S. currency- just to cease
bitchslapping you. Now as obsessions go, how's
your's with the density of excrement in solution?
A. You'd get a + for brevity too, but you're attempting honest dialogue
with one of AGA's dishonidiots.
>> You sure are fascinated with other guy's schlongs Marc. Gotta make us
>> wonder. . . .
> Fascinated?
Based on the frequency and enthusiasm with which you post about them. Why
is it that most everyone else here can argue all day without mentioning the
other guy's genitals and/or ass, but you can't get through two sentences
without zooming in on them? Just seems to be an area of anatomy that is
uppermost in your thoughts. Wait, let me do it for you, "Humor ack ack. . .
."
> How's that MOS coming along? ;-). The only uniform you ever wore
> was a paper cap in burger flippin' hole, McJerkoff.
"Last week I couldn't spell officer and now I are one," was the way it
happened. It was their idea, not mine, frankly I was embarrassed to
suddenly show up outranking guys who had been working their little fingers
to the bone to get there. Whether you believe it or not (and you'll deny it
even if you do believe it) is no matter to me, the opinion of a heavily
self-documented psycho who lies through his teeth without missing a beat is
hardly something for anyone to be concerned with.
And now I realize I've actually wasted time and soiled my shoes responding
to a third-rate sewage merchant, back in your box trollboy, this is way more
attention than you deserve.
I could always add you to the list of the unwashed and un-flushed
should that be your deepest yearning today.
--
Ken Wilson
>
>>How's that MOS coming along? ;-).
>
>
> "Last week I couldn't spell officer and now I are one," was the way it
> happened. It was their idea, not mine, frankly I was embarrassed to
> suddenly show up outranking guys who had been working their little fingers
> to the bone to get there.
Is that right? Which branch of the service? What's your rank? What have
I lied about -in your opinion?
Filter me, -bitch :-).
If you're not being a scumbag liar, (which is more than probable, -Army.
Yer Raiders fan buddy Paul (MOS 63W--Wheel Vehicle Repairer), probably
sneers down his big-filthy-pore schnozz at your MOS 79T--Recruiting and
Retention NCO (Army National Guard). Tony's post left you spastic with
post jerkwater shivers, but it pales compared to those campfire showings
of Kent State: HOW A *MAN* HANDLES STUDENTS DISRESPECTING AUTHORITY.
Fact is, you're an uneducated shitbag---> D. Mawnkay!
A man doesn't have to do that, bitch.
--
Ken Wilson
No one ever concluded you were a man, -twist.
No matter, but, in your case, it is called jumping to a contusion
because you probably get bitch slapped shortly after opening your yap.
--
Ken Wilson
Sounds like you've been working your humor line with Devin. ;-)
INTERVIEW-Israeli envoy says no truce unless soldiers freed
Fri 4 Aug 2006 6:46 PM ET
By Sue Pleming
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Israel's ambassador to the United States
said on Friday the Jewish state would only agree to a cessation of
hostilities if Hizbollah released two Israeli soldiers whose capture
sparked the 24-day conflict.
"The immediate one (goal of Israel) is the unconditional release of the
two hostages, the two soldiers that were kidnapped, which would
constitute the end of hostilities," Israeli Ambassador Daniel Ayalon
told Reuters.
To be acceptable to Israel, he said a final U.N. resolution on ending
hostilities would have to include freedom for the soldiers, who could be
passed on by Hizbollah to the Lebanese government for release.
The United States and France are still hashing out details of U.N.
resolutions aimed at bringing an end to the fighting and for an
international force to move into southern Lebanon.
The French draft at the heart of negotiations between Paris and
Washington to end the fighting refers to the importance of the Israeli
soldiers' release.
Ayalon said Israel was pressing for implementation of U.N. Resolution
1559, which includes the disarming of Hizbollah and the deployment of
the Lebanese Army into southern Lebanon.
In addition, he said there needed to be safeguards included in the
resolution to prevent Hizbollah's main backers, Syria and Iran, from
shipping arms to militias fighting Israel in southern Lebanon.
Two resolutions are currently under discussion at the United Nations,
one which would lead to an immediate cessation of hostilities and
outlines a political framework for a lasting peace, and another dealing
with an international force.
"Whether it is one resolution or two is a technical matter. Most
important is to make sure that it can be implemented," Ayalon said.
What Israel fears most is that there will be a security vacuum in
southern Lebanon after a truce is declared and before international
forces can arrive.
"The earlier this force can be dispatched the earlier we can leave,
provided that the kidnapped soldiers have been freed and Iran and Syria
have stopped their shipments" to Hizbollah, he said.
He said Israel would like to see as robust a force as possible, one not
intimidated by Hizbollah, and which would have intelligence
capabilities. "We don't want to be sitting ducks for Hizbollah," he added.
The United Nations has postponed several meetings to try to get
contributions for an international force for Lebanon.
So far, Ayalon said troops had been offered by Germany Italy, Spain,
Turkey, Poland and France. The United States and Britain have offered
logistical support.