Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How are you doing?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ragnarth

unread,
Jan 15, 2009, 10:30:20 AM1/15/09
to
Hi all. How are you doing?

I found this great collection of PSD tutorials. Recommend that you
check it out!

http://elitebydesign.com/23-most-incredible-photoshop-tutorials/

Message has been deleted

Ragnarth

unread,
Jan 15, 2009, 10:31:51 AM1/15/09
to

Dave

unread,
Jan 15, 2009, 10:53:36 AM1/15/09
to
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:31:51 -0800 (PST), Ragnarth
<ragnar.va...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi all. How are you doing?
>
>I found this great collection of PSD tutorials. Recommend that you
>check it out!

I am doing fine, thanks. How about you?
I visited al 3 links. They are very similar.
Thanks for the links.


Ragnarth

unread,
Jan 15, 2009, 10:58:28 AM1/15/09
to
On Jan 15, 3:53 pm, Dave <d...@durbs.koza> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 07:31:51 -0800 (PST), Ragnarth
>
> <ragnar.valgeirs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi all. How are you doing?
>
> >I found this great collection of PSD tutorials. Recommend that you
> >check it out!
>
> I am doing fine, thanks. How about you?
> I visited al 3 links. They are very similar.
> Thanks for the links.

i'm good. these grups are awsome

Message has been deleted

gar

unread,
Jan 16, 2009, 9:06:00 AM1/16/09
to
Looks like they were "influenced" by this site ------

http://psdtuts.com/

check it out

Gary W. Chmura

Dave

unread,
Jan 16, 2009, 9:28:16 AM1/16/09
to

it surely is... but some of the posters certainly not

Message has been deleted

Dave

unread,
Jan 16, 2009, 2:00:55 PM1/16/09
to
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:03:20 -0500, Voivod <V...@vod.con> wrote:


>Is it Befriend the Spammer day again?
>

why no comment when I said:
>Ragnarth, fuck off and never come back.
>My apology to the rest for being friendly to him.
in the other thread?


Message has been deleted

Dave

unread,
Jan 17, 2009, 1:09:02 AM1/17/09
to
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:43:54 -0500, Voivod <V...@vod.con> wrote:

>Because the humor was in this not that.

This was not overlooked, believe me

0 new messages