Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NIST admits they did NOT look at actual steel samples from Building 7 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS

unread,
Aug 21, 2008, 3:24:22 PM8/21/08
to


http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html

Why didn't the investigators look at actual steel samples from WTC 7?

Steel samples were removed from the site before the NIST investigation
began. In the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, debris was removed rapidly
from the site to aid in recovery efforts and facilitate emergency
responders’ efforts to work around the site. Once it was removed from the
scene, the steel from WTC 7 could not be clearly identified. Unlike the
pieces of steel from WTC 1 and WTC 2, which were painted red and contained
distinguishing markings, WTC 7 steel did not contain such identifying
characteristics.

----------------------

The dog ate my homework.

SHOOTER586

unread,
Aug 21, 2008, 4:25:27 PM8/21/08
to
On Aug 21, 12:24 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

So, once again, the CT crowd is using the lack of evidence as evidence
of a crime? I guess this is how they can claim anything they want
since they have no evidence.

Looks like NIST slammed every CTist on the internet all in one blow.
Looks like SADDAM needs to go back to the drawing board to make up new
stories of what happened on 9-11. I hear Judy is still lookng for new
recruits.

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS

unread,
Aug 21, 2008, 5:05:24 PM8/21/08
to
On Aug 21, 2:25 pm, SHOOTER586 <shooter...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 21, 12:24 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
>
>
>
> <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html
>
> > Why didn't the investigators look at actual steel samples from WTC 7?
>
> > Steel samples were removed from the site before the NIST investigation
> > began. In the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, debris was removed rapidly
> > from the site to aid in recovery efforts and facilitate emergency
> > responders’ efforts to work around the site. Once it was removed from the
> > scene, the steel from WTC 7 could not be clearly identified. Unlike the
> > pieces of steel from WTC 1 and WTC 2, which were painted red and contained
> > distinguishing markings, WTC 7 steel did not contain such identifying
> > characteristics.
>
> > ----------------------
>
> > The dog ate my homework.
>
> So, once again, the CT crowd is using the lack of evidence as evidence
> of a crime?

Well - it would be nice if they had some physical evidence, wouldn't
it?? As it is, all they have is conjecture and anybody can say
anything. Bear in mind that the collapse of 7 is so mysterious the
burden of proof is on THEM!!! And they don't have it.

SHOOTER586

unread,
Aug 21, 2008, 5:43:31 PM8/21/08
to
On Aug 21, 2:05 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
> burden of proof is on THEM!!!  And they don't have it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That is funny to see a CTists that uses speculation, guesses, non-
expert hearsay as evidence of a claim and then complains when others
use scientific analysis without physical evidence.

I guess the hypocrisy is still too stunning for some to imagine.

I take it you massive evidence of "it looked like" to prove a
controlled demolition is all you have? You realize that explosives
experts are all in agreement that several signs of a CD are missing.

Lack of primary and secondary explosions prior to collapse.
Lack of specific timed blasts to coordinate with the cutting charges
Lack of explsoive residue
Lack of thermite residue (as if thermite has ever been used in a CD)
Lack of steel beams showing specific prep work of a CD.
Lack of any devices used in a CD.

The list goes on and on.

Maybe you can have one of your explosives experts help you with your
talking points.

BDK

unread,
Aug 22, 2008, 2:46:39 AM8/22/08
to
In article <Xns9B01885EF4354r...@216.168.3.70>, xeton2001
@yahoo.com says...

>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html
>
> Why didn't the investigators look at actual steel samples from WTC 7?
>
> Steel samples were removed from the site before the NIST investigation
> began. In the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11, debris was removed rapidly
> from the site to aid in recovery efforts and facilitate emergency
> responders=3F efforts to work around the site. Once it was removed from the
> scene, the steel from WTC 7 could not be clearly identified. Unlike the
> pieces of steel from WTC 1 and WTC 2, which were painted red and contained
> distinguishing markings, WTC 7 steel did not contain such identifying
> characteristics.
>
> ----------------------
>
> The dog ate my homework.
>


More likely, the tumor ate your brain.

Maybe the dog snacked on it...chomp chomp..

He couldn't finish it, it had turned, so he left you whatever you are
running on now..
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

0 new messages