On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:47:43 -0400, ghetto.edu wrote:
|>'Dear Representative':______________
|>
|>We The People Our Constitutional RIGHT to Bear Arms.
|>WE are angry that Our RIGHTS are being denigrated and destroyed.
|>Our VOTE for this for ill-conceived, Anti-Gun Laws is NO!
|>Further:
|>Any politician who Votes in Favor of this type of unconstitutional
|>regulation will be HIGHLIGHTED, and Voted AGAINST when they come up
|>for their Re-election.
|>
|>There are currently over 20,000 existing Gun Laws on the books and
|>they do nothing to stop or curtail criminals. Reducing restrictions to
|>Lawful Gun Ownership does just that. The Statistics are clear.
|>Wherever Lawful Gun Ownership flourishes, crime rates, by all
|>measures, are reduced. In States with Lawful Handgun Carry Laws, crime
|>rates are lower. The rate of crimes committed by lawful owners of
|>firearms is a very small percentage of the overall rate of crimes
|>committed with firearms and those numbers are undeniable.
|>
|>The Federally required NICS is an excellent tool in determining the
|>eligibility of an individual to legally purchase a handgun or rifle.
|>In the city of Kennesaw, Ga., just outside of Atlanta, it is required
|>by law that every home has a gun. After that law was passed in 1982,
|>the crime rate immediately dropped by 89% and has remained among the
|>lowest in the State ever since. Instance after instance shows that
|>high legal gun ownership relates to lower crime, and places that make
|>it hard to own guns or ban them altogether relates to a higher crime
|>rate. Look at many of the larger, supposedly 'progressive' cities and
|>states in the Northeastern U.S. They have the highest rates of gun
|>crime because criminals know there is little chance of being
|>confronted by law abiding gun owners. Stop criminalizing lawful and
|>law abiding gun owners. Studies by the Department of Justice prove
|>that Legal weapons are used in an insignificant portion of crimes. And
|>if they were used, their use would certainly not have been prevented
|>by 'Legislation'.
|>
|>History and statistics both prove that such bills are destructive to
|>the Citizenry. If this bills' purported purpose is to "protect the
|>public against the unreasonable risk of injury and death" then
|>Congress should realize that the greatest threats to the Public are
|>from criminals and from Big Government itself. Bills (like the
|>myriad other Laws that already exist and aren't enforced by Liberal
|>Judges) will not address our Greatest Peril. Some think it could not
|>happen here, but as our Government is becoming more and more
|>intrusive, and "We The People" weaker, we should consider these
|>Historical Precedents:
|>* In 1929, the Soviet Union established Gun Control. From 1929 to
|>1953, over 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves were
|>rounded up and exterminated. That doesn't include the 30,000,000
|>"Uncle Joe Stalin" starved to death in the Ukraine.
|>* In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917,
|>1,500,000 Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
|>exterminated.
|>* China established Gun Control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million
|>political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up &
|>exterminated.
|>* Guatemala established Gun Control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981,
|>100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up &
|>exterminated.
|>* Uganda established Gun Control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
|>Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up &
|>exterminated. The total dead are over 3,000,000.
|>* Cambodia established Gun Control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, over
|>2,000,000 million "educated" people unable to defend themselves, were
|>rounded up and exterminated.
|>
|>OVER 56,000,000 Defenseless People EXTERMINATED because of 'Gun
|>Control'
|>
|>WW II JAPAN DIDN'T INVADE THE USA BECAUSE WE WERE ARMED!
|>
|>Note: Admiral Yamamoto, who crafted the Attack on Pearl Harbor, had
|>attended Harvard University and was a Naval Attaché to the USA. After
|>Pearl Harbor, our Army being underfunded by 'Progressive" Politicos,
|>was unprepared to defend our Country. When Yamamoto was asked why
|>Japan did not follow up the Pearl Harbor attack with an invasion of
|>the U.S. Mainland, his reply was: "I lived in the U.S. and I know that
|>most households have Guns."
|>
|>IN CONTRAST:
|>" Gun owners in Australia were forced by law to surrender
|>640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a
|>program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500,000,000 Dollars.
|>The first year results: Australia-wide, homicides went up 3.2 percent;
|>Australia-wide, assaults went up 8.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed
|>robberies went up 44 percent! (yes, 44 percent). While figures over
|>the previous 25 years had showed a steady DECREASE in armed robbery
|>with firearms, which changed drastically UPWARD in the first year
|>after gun confiscation since criminals are now guaranteed that their
|>prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins
|>and assaults on the Elderly.
|>" Australian politicians are at a 'loss' to explain how Public
|>Safety has decreased, after such monumental effort & wasteful expense
|>was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The
|>Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it is
|>antithetical to DISARM Citizens.
|>
|>With guns... We are "CITIZENS". Without Them... We are "subjects".
|>
|>WE THE PEOPLE do not give our government the right to track our every
|>movement and location, registration of our personal property, track
|>commerce of our personal property, keep our personal identification
|>information (or property {whether firearms or ammunition} or
|>possessions) in a federal or state database, the federal government to
|>run laws in our state or local municipalities, or confiscate our
|>firearms for any reason.
|>
|>We are not criminals, and WE THE PEOPLE do not want our elected
|>representatives to treat us as criminals.
Apart from that, there is really nothing to talk about regarding
"gun control" advocates, and their payola they get to ARM THEMSELVES by
disarming US, or profiting from the NET PROCEEDS they get from gun grabbing
sales to the Gun Shops consignment sections.
These "destroyed" gungrabbed guns, are the ground work "base" of an
admission to (Policy) false statements made in ALL LAWS and
confiscations......therefore nearly ALL LAWS are redundant rules, and the
only remedy at this point is to NOT APPLY them, unless THEY are pointed at
the "very obvious" Criminal, who doesn't give a shit about all these laws,
and even sees RKBA as a useless LAW.....
Bob
|
