nice boots (the sex thread)
oonh
let's see...
(any stalkers can (with little trouble) figure out where on
the Kinsey spectrum I lie, so, with further ado):
#### ##
#### ######
## ########
# #### #
# #### #
# #### ##
# #### ##
######## ####
#####
#####
###########
##############
## # ##
# # #
# # #
# # ##
# ########
## ######
###
# #
# ##
### #####
# ### #######
######## #
#######
# #########
###### ### #
### ###
# #
(courtesy of "banner -w 40 sex")
now we need some thread. here:
#
#################
####################
####################
## #
##
#
# #
###########################
###########################
###########################
#
##
##
################
###############
############
# #
################
################
################
##
##
#####
######
#####
#####
###########
##############
## # ##
# # #
# # #
# # ##
# ########
## ######
###
###
####### ##
######### ####
## ## # ##
# ## #
## # ##
###############
##############
#
#######
############
###############
## ###
# ##
# ##
## # #
###########################
###########################
#
oonh
firefey
> let's see...
>
> (any stalkers can (with little trouble) figure out where on
> the Kinsey spectrum I lie, so, with further ado):
>
do you really think the average stalker knows what the kinsey spectrum
is? mind, they might be slightly more worth while if they do. a
touch of education is a nice trait in anyone. even stalkers.
oonh
> do you really think the average stalker knows what the kinsey spectrum
> is? mind, they might be slightly more worth while if they do. a
> touch of education is a nice trait in anyone. even stalkers.
probably not, and I know there's at least one attempt to get the more or
less nontrivial paraphilias out of that foul monstrosity that is the
DSM-V (or will be)
not that I get much of the way in stalkers anyway.
oonh
Jennie Kermode
> do you really think the average stalker knows what the kinsey spectrum
> is? mind, they might be slightly more worth while if they do. a
> touch of education is a nice trait in anyone. even stalkers.
Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
of an insult.
Jennie
--
Jennie Kermode
jen...@innocent.com
www.jenniekermode.com
Troia
Did you mean "trivial" rather than "nontrivial" in the above?
BTW, thanks for making the sex thread easy to find.
BTW2, why remove the paraphilias, when they are apparently presented on
the basis of being diagnosable only if they evidence to a destructive
extent?
-- Troia
a bit ignorant of the topic, admittedly
Fnord Prefect Fnord
> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
> of an insult.
>
> Jennie
I'll be glad to stalk you if you like.
Fnord Prefect Fnord
*hide behind a sofa*
*chase away any Dalek-fearing children*
*stare intently at Jennie*
*make soft chattery noises*
*violently twitch my tail*
*wiggle my butt*
TenshiKurai9
Then I'll stalk ikins at the same time. Who will stalk me then?
-TenshiKurai9, who'll cover for you if you need a day-off, gladly.
oonh
> oonh wrote:
>> firefey <twig...@yahoo.com> scrawled:
>>> do you really think the average stalker knows what the kinsey spectrum
>>> is? mind, they might be slightly more worth while if they do. a
>>> touch of education is a nice trait in anyone. even stalkers.
>>
>> probably not, and I know there's at least one attempt to get the more or
>> less nontrivial paraphilias out of that foul monstrosity that is the
>> DSM-V (or will be)
the link in question is http://www.zilledefeu.com
>>
>> not that I get much of the way in stalkers anyway.
>>
>>
>> oonh
>
> Did you mean "trivial" rather than "nontrivial" in the above?
yes, I did.
>
> BTW, thanks for making the sex thread easy to find.
Not a problem.
>
> BTW2, why remove the paraphilias, when they are apparently presented on
> the basis of being diagnosable only if they evidence to a destructive
> extent?
I think. I'm not sure. I'm going to have more milk. See the link
above for a more reasoned argument.
oonhz
moonglow minnow
> On Sep 20, 9:57 am, Fnord Prefect Fnord <fnordik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:04:42 +0100, Jennie Kermode wrote:
>>> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
>>> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
>>> of an insult.
>>> Jennie
>> I'll be glad to stalk you if you like.
>
> Then I'll stalk ikins at the same time. Who will stalk me then?
Ooh! Me! Me!
*stares at Tenshi, not moving except for the flicking of her tail tip*
Maeve >^..^<
--
http://moonglowminnow.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/minnow/
TenshiKurai9
> TenshiKurai9 wrote:
>> On Sep 20, 9:57 am, Fnord Prefect Fnord <fnordik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:04:42 +0100, Jennie Kermode wrote:
>>>> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
>>>> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
>>>> of an insult.
>>>> Jennie
>>> I'll be glad to stalk you if you like.
>>
>> Then I'll stalk ikins at the same time. Who will stalk me then?
>
> Ooh! Me! Me!
Who will stalk you?
-TK9
Axel
<ten...@abyss.ninehells.com> wrote:
>On 2008-09-22, moonglow minnow <moonglo...@charter.net.invalid> wrote:
>> TenshiKurai9 wrote:
>>> On Sep 20, 9:57 am, Fnord Prefect Fnord <fnordik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:04:42 +0100, Jennie Kermode wrote:
>>>>> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
>>>>> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
>>>>> of an insult.
>>>> I'll be glad to stalk you if you like.
>>>
>>> Then I'll stalk ikins at the same time. Who will stalk me then?
>>
>> Ooh! Me! Me!
>
>Who will stalk you?
Me. There's experimental cheescake to be had.
--
Axel... ...Kallisti
"Everything is true, even false things" -Malaclypse the Younger
"How can that be?" "Don't ask me, man, I didn't do it."
<ax...@eol.ca>
Fnord Prefect Fnord
*thump* *thump* *clap*
oonh
>
>
> let's see...
>
> (any stalkers can (with little trouble) figure out where on
> the Kinsey spectrum I lie, so, with further ado):
let's see, so I really go for somewhat tall, somewhat well
coordinated masochists. if they're ambidextrous or left
handed, even the better. I go for good listeners rather
than bad listeners. I have a spanking fetish***. I play
the didge and I juggle, and I do both seriously*. I am
more than a little alienated at the moment, and the amount
of effort required to be social is immense because I don't
really like the poly/kinky/bi/pagan trainwreck; I haven't
been to any play parties and I don't get out much. I think
I'd prefer a life partner than to date around randomly, but
it takes too much effort. (and I'm kind of tired of low ROI
things, and I don't want to initiate much these days because
most often I get scraps in return).
But as things go, there's only one of you in the metro boston
area** (no pit fiends on a.g.? sad), so I'm pretty much
writing to the great matchmaker in the sky.
* I am working on the reverse cascade at the moment. I am
also looking for ethnomusicological information concerning
the native cultural significance of playing the didgeridoo
(technically 'Yirdaki') and throat singing (Tuva) while
dreaming.
** who we have already established is not in my target market
*** and along the crops, straps, and belts line, less in the paddles
and canes direction
TenshiKurai9
> We will, we will stalk you!
>
>
> *thump* *thump* *clap*
Everyone stalks each other?
-TK9
Fnord Prefect Fnord
Yes, we all need stalkings to go with our Nice Boots!
`una
> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
> of an insult.
I know I'm insulted by mine!
16.5 years of it and he's still using an ancient corded phone
so he can click the button that hangs up the phone at me.
Obviously, if you tap it fast enough, it doesn't hang up,
it just makes a clicking noise. He has a little pattern of
clicks he likes to use so I'll know it's him and not just
a telemarketer switching over from the autodialer.
`una - so bored with that shit I just hang up if the person
on the other end of the line doesn't respond within to seconds
of my only "hello."
Joseph Brenner
>> Indeed. The thing which has most disappointed me about my
>> stalkers has been their apallingly low quality. Frankly, it's something
>> of an insult.
>
> I know I'm insulted by mine!
>
> 16.5 years of it and he's still using an ancient corded phone
> so he can click the button that hangs up the phone at me.
Hey! I've got a ma bell rotary tank on my desk, myself. [1]
At least I don't need to repeat myself five times to be understood
on the other end... presuming the other end is another land-line,
which unfortunately is increasingly rare.
> Obviously, if you tap it fast enough, it doesn't hang up,
> it just makes a clicking noise. He has a little pattern of
> clicks he likes to use so I'll know it's him and not just
> a telemarketer switching over from the autodialer.
Somehow I suspect you're talking to cosmic rays.
> `una - so bored with that shit I just hang up if the person
> on the other end of the line doesn't respond within to seconds
> of my only "hello."
I do that any way. The telemarketers apparently dial multiple
numbers at once, and it takes them a few seconds to figure out
that a human being has actually picked up one of them.
[1] I do need to run the line through the computer one of these
days, so I can use software to generate touch-tones when I need
them to get through voicemail trees -- or at least the primitive
forms of "voicemail" that aren't actually voice operated.
`una
> `una writes:
>
> > Obviously, if you tap it fast enough, it doesn't hang up,
> > it just makes a clicking noise. He has a little pattern of
> > clicks he likes to use so I'll know it's him and not just
> > a telemarketer switching over from the autodialer.
>
> Somehow I suspect you're talking to cosmic rays.
Cosmic rays don't breathe. They also don't ask for you
if someone else answers the phone.
`una - but he certainly has made it impossible for anybody
to take me seriously.
TenshiKurai9
> But as things go, there's only one of you in the metro boston
> area** (no pit fiends on a.g.? sad)
Which reminds me, I should get back to distributing your various
materials.
-TK9
TenshiKurai9
> I do that any way. The telemarketers apparently dial multiple
> numbers at once, and it takes them a few seconds to figure out
> that a human being has actually picked up one of them.
I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at once.
More like talk about how insane the whole telemarketing community can be
to work. Or insane stories of the customers on the other end.
-TK9, sheets he's been given for Obama fundraising are too empty for me
to even read.
`una
> Joseph Brenner wrote:
> > The telemarketers apparently dial multiple
> > numbers at once...
>
> I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at once.
It depends on the call center. Some call centers can be as small
as three people in a back room hand-dialing local numbers or as
large as a fully automated office space with computers auto-dialing
every number in the system and operators being connected to a line
that gets an answer. Most are somewhere in between.
Call volume depends on what's being offered and who it's being
offered to. The local firefighters aren't going to raise money
by selling tickets to people in Timbuktu. Major credit card companies
aren't going to limit their potential customer base to one state.
`una - worked in a three person call center and did so well that
it was doubled to 6 people based on my numbers and I was made manager.
Siobhan
<ten...@abyss.ninehells.com> wrote:
>On 2008-10-12, Joseph Brenner <do...@kzsu.stanford.edu> wrote:
>> I do that any way. The telemarketers apparently dial multiple
>> numbers at once, and it takes them a few seconds to figure out
>> that a human being has actually picked up one of them.
>
>I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at once.
>More like talk about how insane the whole telemarketing community can be
>to work. Or insane stories of the customers on the other end.
Ask him if he works on an automated dialer. The call centre I work for
has a computer system that calls the numbers for us and can be set to
only connect the agent to the phone line once somebody actually picks
up.
It's a good system for getting through large piles of numbers really
fast. Once the list of numbers is brought down to a managable level
the agents can dial them manually.
Siobhan
TenshiKurai9
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:29:30 -0500, TenshiKurai9
> has a computer system that calls the numbers for us and can be set to
> only connect the agent to the phone line once somebody actually picks
> up.
Turns-out he has talked about it before. It's just that he's only
talked about the keys he's had to hit to categorize how the call went
and never mentioned the automatic dialing part.
He's then started to tell me about how it can make you feel like you're
being turned into a machine from how you don't get a chance to breathe
in between calls.
-TenshiKurai9
kest
> TenshiKurai9 wrote:
>> I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at
>> once.
>
> It depends on the call center.
This is not a sex thread. I want my money back.
k
Peter H. Coffin
If working in a call center is a sex thread, the employees have very
little to complain about.
--
The trouble with things that extend your lifespan is that they happen at
wrong end. I'd hate to be wearing Depends at 85 and thinking "I gave up
booze and cigarettes for three more years of this."
Satori
And how much did you pay for a sex thread?
NightMist
wrote:
Maybe we should try sex rope instead of thread?
Thread either breaks or cuts skin.
I am a traditionalist and prefer hemp or silk.
More expensive, but worth the money IMHO.
Silk does have a tendancy to overtighten the knots when pulled though.
I do not buy that having to cut the rope gives me an excuse to punish.
Because I want to is adequete reason so far as I am concerned.
NightMist
--
Nothing has been the same since that house fell on my sister.
Fnord Prefect Fnord
>> This is not a sex thread. I want my money back.
>
I want your money back too.
Edvamp
> `una <u...@nettrip.org> scrawled:
>
> > TenshiKurai9 wrote:
> >> I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at
> >> once.
>
> > It depends on the call center.
>
> This is not a sex thread.
That also depends on the call center.
Ever and Always
Edvamp
www.suffocation.us
Edvamp
> >> This is not a sex thread. I want my money back.
>
> I want your money back too.
Free Market Capitalism. Everyone is entitled to your money and my
opinion.
Potatojunkie
> This is not a sex thread. I want my money back.
>
> k
*chucks 50p down the table*
TenshiKurai9
Whoah! That's like, a dollar US!
-TK9
TenshiKurai9
But what if the call center is selling pornography?
-TK9
TenshiKurai9
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:14:55 -0500, kest wrote:
>> `una <u...@nettrip.org> scrawled:
>>> TenshiKurai9 wrote:
>>>> I've never heard my boyfriend reference dialing several numbers at
>>>> once.
>>>
>>> It depends on the call center.
>>
>> This is not a sex thread. I want my money back.
>
> If working in a call center is a sex thread, the employees have very
> little to complain about.
What if it's all bad phone sex?
-TK9
Peter H. Coffin
$0.80 as of this morning. Not as much as it used to be.
--
88. If a group of henchmen fail miserably at a task, I will not berate them
for incompetence then send the same group out to try the task again.
--Peter Anspach's list of things to do as an Evil Overlord