Re: Whatever Happened to Mirelle?
Gary Renzetti
> On 23-Jul-2009, Groucho <justm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 23, 8:16 pm, Gary Renzetti <lizg...@connection.com> wrote:
>
Ahhh! I see that "me too" Sowsan sees fit to join the discussion. I
admit to being confused at not seeing the thick Irish liar before now.
Interestingly, she managed to get through this entire post without once
using the word "projection". Sowsie, are you off your feed?
>>> She sure as hemorrhoids
>
> What an appropriate mental imagery - on both their parts.
>
>>> didn't publish it *several* *hundred* *times*!
>
> Yeah, it was only DOZENS!
A lie.
> Good grief.
> I betif she stole hundreds instead of thousands he'd defend that as well...
Stole? What did Mirelle "steal" form anyone?
>
>>> She was attacked by a pair of scumbags.
>
> I love the reality these liars concoct.
No lies there, Sowsan. The archive is there for all to see.
> This certainly explains their anti-Israeli lies...
What "lies" might these be, Sowsan?
Ersatz "isr-el"� is a parasitic rogue entity founded on terrorism by
terrorists. It has elected terrorists Prime Minister on more than one
occasion. It practices torture, collective punishments, illegal
deportations, extra-judicial murders, detentions without charge or
trial, racist land policies, colonial expansion and uses US-supplied
military hardware against civilians.
Lies are not necessary when discussing the zionist state. There are
numerous factual examples to illustrate why this renegade entity needs
to be reined in.
>
>>> Normally, I'd stay out of
>>> someone else's flame war,
>
> And the delusions grow apace...
What "delusions" are you prattling about? As a "for instance", how much
do you see of me in the current ganging up of the usual suspects on
Duwaynea on sci? I do seem to see lots of posts from your thick lying
self in those threads, though.
>
>>> but what was being done here by two despicable
>>> individuals was disgusting.
> Yeah - Vera & anyone who joine dup with her.
Nobody "joined up" with Mirelle. We were merely disgusted with the way
the Rosen rectum and the shoveari cannibal were abusing her.
>
>> If she was so horrified about her address being posted by others, she
>> never should have posted it... not even once!
True, but have you never done anything foolish that you came to regret
later, Groucho? Even Mirelle admitted at the time that she should never
have posted her personal info. Isn't 20-20 hindsight wonderful?
>>
> It was theonly way anyone could have gotten it.
> But it was her posting other people's information thast started it.
A lie. Ok, it *may* have been true in the dog n/g, but it certainly
wasn't known in the groups above.
>
>> Lord knows, there have been enough warnings in the media about
>> divulging any information on any nonsecure website, and the fact that
>> she did it on a place like Usenet was just plain foolhardy.
Can't (and don't) argue that, but how does this somehow make it kosher
for these sleazes to use it to abuse her? As far as I'm concerned, all
it does is confirm their lack of ethics and common decency.
>
> Oh, good Lord - the other stuff she revealed there was far worse!!!
>
>> And just as a FYI, it was someone named "Iamhere" who began with
>> reposting Mirelle's address after she had initially done so, not Mr.
>> Rosen or Ms. Sharavi.
Didn't know this, but it comes as no great surprise.
>>
> Of course; the truth is anathema to these morons.
And just *when* did you become acquainted with "the truth", Sowsie?
I'm still waiting for you to document the vicious slur where you accused
me of "Shoah denial"�.
>>>> And no matter what "euphemisms" you have for those who went after
>>>> Mirelle,
>>> They aren't euphemisms, they are rather accurate descriptions of the
>>> scum that initiated this attack. ie: the rectum and the cannibal.
>> I suppose you are entitled to your opinions here.
> But, as either Twain or Mencken said "no one is entitled to his own facts."
True, Sowsie. But when did you *ever* post facts?
>
>>>> and no matter how you rationalize her actions,
>>> I don't, in fact. Mirelle's reactions became more bizarre during the
>>> months that this attack continued.
>
> Hers, of course.
Crap. Mirelle was attacked and she retaliated.
>
>>> My complaint is with the pair of
>>> slimeballs who drove Mirelle to such extremes.
> And the justifications are as stupid as the lies.
Again, Sowsie. What lies are you alluding to?
>
>> Perhaps if Mirelle were a stronger person she wouldn't have felt the
>> need to "go to such extremes."
>
> maybe if she hadn;t started aything, nothing would have happened toher.
> Strike the "maybe".
She didn't.
>
>> Many other people were victimized by
>> this, and if anything, the worst that happened to them, using your
>> example above, is that they no longer post in the newsgroup. I'm sure
>> to them, not posting on usenet anymore is no great loss.
I wouldn't dispute anything in that paragraph.
>>
> But it was enjoyable to Vera, Renzetti & the other slimebags.
Sowsan, you are one sick, sad-sack piece of work. I took no pleasure in
that exchange, but I was damned if I was just going to sit back and let
a pack of hyenas savage the woman. The slimebags in this instance were
the tag-team that ganged up on Mirelle.
> That was their entire intention all along.
Hardly, Sowsan. You're (dare I say it?) projecting, and lying of course.
>
>> As I said, the consequences of what Mirelle did are far more dire than
>> anything that happened to Ms. Sharavi, Mr. Rosen, or anyone else that
>> Mirelle victimized.
>>
>>> the bottom> line is that it is Mirelle who is in very serious legal
>>> problems. If
>>>> you think that Mirelle's actions in "getting a troll" to stop posting
>>>> is a victory, well, it's a pretty hollow victory if you ask me, given
>>>> the hot water she's in as a result of her activities.
>>> Actually, we're in nearly virgin legal territory here. A Canadian
>>> citizen posted confidential information about US nationals (and a
>>> citizen of New Zealand). I doubt that such things are extraditable and
>>> there might be a little problem finding a Canadian law that she's
>>> violated. I would suspect that the RCMP would have cautioned her about
>>> hate speech laws and told her to tone down her rhetoric. But criminal
>>> violations? I doubt it somehow.
>
> Translation: he hopes he's in any way right - as he always does.
Care to place a wager, you lying, thick Irish "c-word"?
>
>>> Time will tell.
>> According to US law, if the information is viewable in the USA, it can
>> be extraditable, especially if, for example, any of Mirelle's targets
>> become victims of ID theft or any other misfortune befalls them as a
>> result of their info being exposed on line. That does apply in this
>> case. So Mirelle had better hope that nothing like that ever happens
>> to any of her targets. Of course, I would also hope that her victims
>> have taken steps to prevent that from happening.
I'm sure that identity theft is indeed extraditable, but in the absence
of such a crime having committed, I very much doubt that Mirelle has
violated Canadian criminal laws. Just because something is criminal in
the US, doesn't make it extraditable. You can only be extradited if the
same activity would be considered a crime if it were committed in Canada.
>>
>>>> You can rationalize Mirelle's behavior from here to eternity, the
>>>> truth is that Mirelle, by "virtue" of her pathological need to one-up
>>>> everyone, ended up one-upping herself in the end.
>> And I still stand by that statement.
Well, to quote Robert Heinlein,
"Never frighten a little man; he'll kill you".
>
> Me, too.
And *that* little snippet, confirms what I previously posted about
Sowsan and her part in the whole sad affair.
>
> Sowsan