Exibition
FJae
Edition...i love that magazine..there is a great story on the house of
Sir Glin and family history in Ireland..there landed in Ireland just
before my family...
there is a work of the Princess Royal on display
Royal Society of Portrait Painters Annual Exhibition
Thur 28-Apr-2005 to Sun 15-May-2005
(Closed on 1st May. Open late until 7pm on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Closes at 1pm on final day). The Royal Society of Portrait Painters
Annual Exhibition is regarded as one of the world's greatest forums
for portrait painting today, with work on show by established members
of the society, alongside that of talented, unknown non-members whose
work is chosen from the open submission. Portraits on show will include
famous sitters alongside less well-known faces
at the v&A Queen MAude's style and splendour
http://www.vam.ac.uk/exhibitions/index.html
Actresses and Aristocrats: English 18 th - Century Portraits in the
Rothschild Collection - SOLD OUT
Special Interest Day
Thursday 12 May.10.30am-4.00pm
The cream of 18th century society presides over the reception and
bedrooms at Waddesdon. Elegant, extravagant and sometimes erotic they
look down on the visitor from their canvasses created by England's most
celebrated painters; Gainsborough, Reynolds and Romney. Matthew Hirst,
Curator at Waddesdon, explores the work of these artists and the lives
of their diverse sitters who included royal mistresses, actresses and
aristocrats.
Includes morning coffee, two course lunch with wine and afternoon tea
£60.00
NT members: £50.00
we missed it today!
Q
"FJae" <f_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115954188.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
I got this information from the latest House and Garden British
Edition...i love that magazine..there is a great story on the house of
Sir Glin and family history in Ireland..there landed in Ireland just
before my family...
*** The Knight of Glin is not called "Sir Glin." His local newspaper
(formerly my local newspaper), the Limerick Leader, calls him Mr. Desmond
Fitzgerald. His wife is known as Madame Fitzgerald. -- Q
Sacha
1115954188.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com, "FJae"
<f_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I got this information from the latest House and Garden British
> Edition...i love that magazine..there is a great story on the house of
> Sir Glin <snip>
That's the Knights of Glin, not Sir Glin.
http://www.celticcastles.com/castles/glin/history.htm
--
Sacha
(remove the weeds for email)
FJae
Anything of substance to add...no I thought not....
Q
It's *of substance* if it clarifies something else that has been posted. --
Q
FJae
YOu see I saw a spell checker you saw someone helping! It is hard to
make out when Sacha is actually trying to help..she is mostly just
getting in the way
Q
Knight of Glin is -- aren't much discussed, and when they are, people often
give wrong information. We used to be slightly acquainted with The O'Grady,
because our children were in school together, and he was known as Col.
O'Grady, and not "sir" or "lord."
If you are interested in this stuff at all, have a look at:
http://www.doyle.com.au/chiefs.html
-- Q
FJae
this is great thank you very much..I am interested in finding out more
about the Norman conquest and Irish nobility, that is those that landed
in Ireland....any websites on this that you know of?
pk4...@yepmail.net
http://www.obrienclan.com/peerage/peerage.htm
http://www.answers.com/topic/irish-nobility
http://www.gaeltacht.info/monivea.html
Happy reading !
FJae
thanks Peeks!
Q
> Sacha..you had already updated everyone with your post....She didn't
> need to add to it...
>
It doesn't matter whom you were responding to. This is an open forum. If
your response to Sacha was supposed to be private, then it belonged in
email. -- Q
Lux
If
your response to Sacha was supposed to be private, then it belonged in
email. -- Q
To whom you were responding. Or is this the sort of pedantry up with
which you will not put?!
Q
"Lux" <luxpe...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1115995720.8...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
deliberately removed the references to it in your quote -- so it was
perfectly clear to even the most clueless moron that I was responding to
Fjae.
If you insist on playing childish games, people will see you for the
malicious asshole that you really are.
--Q
Sacha
1115986497.1...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "FJae"
<f_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Q I wasn't responding to you to be quite Frank I was responding to
> Sacha..you had already updated everyone with your post....She didn't
> need to add to it...
>
Firstly, when I answered you, I hadn't seen Q's post. Secondly, contrary to
the behaviour you exhibit on here, this is not a private discussion board,
it is a public newsgroup and anyone can answer, comment on or amplify any
discussion they wish. Thirdly, "thank you Sacha for the additional
information you posted for our benefit", would have been polite at the very
least.
FJae
he posted three hours before you...if you were truely making an effort
I will say thank you..but i don't beleive it
Sacha
1116001085....@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "FJae"
<f_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
He has told you before she is she. I had not seen Q's posted because I
hadn't opened it. I thought you might be interested in the additional
material. In future, I won't bother and you can remain as ignorant as the
day you were born.
Danny
lol.
Danny
you might want to try that yourself sometime you lunatic.
Lux
report yourself to your ISP as you do others. I quoted only what you
yourself composed. It's only grammar; don't take yourself so
seriously! It's not as if you were caught out ruining a young woman's
life or anything unforgivable like that.
Jean Sue Libkind
Not all posts go to all servers at the same time.
Too many people think email is instantaneous (it can be... or not; some
doesn't show up for several hours) and that all people on a newsgroup
get the messages at the same time (they don't).
js
FJae
Jean Sue Libkind wrote:
> Sacha wrote:
> > On 13/5/05 15:01, in article
> > 1115986497.1...@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "FJae"
> > <f_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>Q I wasn't responding to you to be quite Frank I was responding to
> >>Sacha..you had already updated everyone with your post....She
didn't
> >>need to add to it...
> >>
> >
> > Firstly, when I answered you, I hadn't seen Q's post. Secondly,
contrary to
> > the behaviour you exhibit on here, this is not a private discussion
board,
> > it is a public newsgroup and anyone can answer, comment on or
amplify any
> > discussion they wish. Thirdly, "thank you Sacha for the additional
> > information you posted for our benefit", would have been polite at
the very
> > least.
>
>
> Not all posts go to all servers at the same time.
>
Oh and I suppose the dog ate your homework