PHOTOS OF ("SIX") TRICIA HELFER'S ASS AND VAGINA!
The Herlihy Boy
The Central Scrutinizer
> http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
She's really not all that attractive...
Felicity
Oddly, none of these feature her vagina or ass, though apparently her
boobs make an appearance.
Bob
<bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
>She's really not all that attractive...
Your gay.
--
"It's impossible to obtain a conviction for sodomy from
an English jury. Half of them don't believe that it can
physically be done, and the other half are doing it."
--Winston Churchill
Bob
wrote:
>Oddly, none of these feature her vagina or ass, though apparently her
>boobs make an appearance.
Half an ass is better than none at all.
P No Gree G O
> On 24 Jun 2006 19:43:58 -0700, "The Central Scrutinizer"
> <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
>
>
>>She's really not all that attractive...
>
>
> Your gay.
>
>
His gay what?
I Know
sp...@uce.gov (Bob) wrote:
> On 24 Jun 2006 19:43:58 -0700, "The Central Scrutinizer"
> <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
>
> >She's really not all that attractive...
>
> Your gay.
It's "you're," not "your."
It's a contraction for "you are."
"Your" means something that you have or own.
NOW--
Go back to 5th grade, and learn something instead of watching Dane Cook,
who truly is gay.
I mean - -that guy has ass-muncher / cock-sucker written all over his
fagot face....
Tim McGaughy
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:48:46 GMT, in alt.gossip.celebrities, sp...@uce.gov (Bob) arranged
> some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... On 24 Jun 2006 19:43:58 -0700, "The Central Scrutinizer"
> ... <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> ... >> http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
> ...
> ... >She's really not all that attractive...
> ...
> ... Your gay.
>
> What, his gay? He has a gay?
I thought that was illegal.
hunt...@earthlink.net
>She's really not all that attractive...
You're high on animal tranquilizers, aren't you?
PurplePenny
Do you know what a vagina is? if you can see a woman's vagina from the
outside she needs to be taken to the ER.
zcar...@yahoo.com
zcar...@yahoo.com
The Central Scrutinizer
> ... Your gay.
>
> What, his gay? He has a gay?
At least he used a capital Y.
The Cheshire Cody
news:1151288110.3...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> PHOTOCHOPPED STUFF. ALL FAKE
>
Actually, no. The nude is from a photoshoot she did a few years back, the
other is from Maxim last year (or the year before?). She was a lingerie
model, don't cha know, and most of them, having no problem with exposed
flesh, have posed topless or nude in artistic form at one time or another.
Try these on for size. They're from Arena magazine.
http://img125.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc29&image=80915_arena01.jpg
http://img155.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc143&image=80923_arena07.jpg
http://img137.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc171&image=80929_arena08.jpg
Cody k
--
There is no responsibility or blame so great that it cannot be passed off
onto someone else.
-me
Preacher
> <zcar...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1151288110.3...@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > PHOTOCHOPPED STUFF. ALL FAKE
> >
>
> Actually, no. The nude is from a photoshoot she did a few years back, the
> other is from Maxim last year (or the year before?). She was a lingerie
> model, don't cha know, and most of them, having no problem with exposed
> flesh, have posed topless or nude in artistic form at one time or another.
>
> Try these on for size. They're from Arena magazine.
>
> http://img125.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc29&image=80915_arena01.jpg
> http://img155.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc143&image=80923_arena07.jpg
> http://img137.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc171&image=80929_arena08.jpg
She's very pretty, but damn, her legs are spindly.
Bob
<bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> ... Your gay.
You're gay.
>> What, his gay? He has a gay?
>At least he used a capital Y.
I thought typo flames were for children.
Bob
>> Your gay.
>It's "you're," not "your."
Yes, I know.
Do you know what a typo is?
Bob
wrote:
>Do you know what a vagina is? if you can see a woman's vagina from the
>outside she needs to be taken to the ER.
That's not as bad as a fellow I know said once:
"Hey, did you know Marvin is driving a new Vulva."
Bob
<cod...@ver-ticalhor-izon.net> wrote:
>Try these on for size. They're from Arena magazine.
>http://img125.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc29&image=80915_arena01.jpg
>http://img155.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc143&image=80923_arena07.jpg
>http://img137.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc171&image=80929_arena08.jpg
She's added a few more inches since that shoot.
David B
Different strokes. I think she's gorgeous.
CatPanDaddy
"~* Magda ~*" <ma...@chrisecc.dk> wrote in message
news:a660a2dkhtpfq4fs1...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:15:25 GMT, in alt.gossip.celebrities, sp...@uce.gov
> some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ... <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> ... >> ... Your gay.
> ...
> ... You're gay.
> ...
> ... >> What, his gay? He has a gay?
> ...
> ... >At least he used a capital Y.
> ...
> ... I thought typo flames were for children.
>
> It is - for those children who left school before they could learn anything.
>
Typos are accidents caused by haste or tiredness. Nobody is completely immune
to one striking now and then.
Exhibitionist
that on Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:15:25 GMT, sp...@uce.gov (Bob) wrote:
>On 25 Jun 2006 19:29:43 -0700, "The Central Scrutinizer"
><bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> ... Your gay.
>
>You're gay.
>
>>> What, his gay? He has a gay?
>
>>At least he used a capital Y.
>
>I thought typo flames were for children.
Not when dealing with insipidly stupid children. (not you)
Exhibitionist
>On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:02:26 GMT, I Know <nob...@nowhere.za> wrote:
>
>>> Your gay.
>
>>It's "you're," not "your."
>
>Yes, I know.
>
>Do you know what a typo is?
That is NOT a typo. It has neither the correct puncutuation, nor the
correct spelling. It is ignorance.
I won't comment on defending ignorance.
CatPanDaddy
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 18:19:37 -0500, in alt.gossip.celebrities, "CatPanDaddy"
> <c...@cat.pan.net> arranged some electrons, so they looked like this:
>
> ...
> ... Typos are accidents caused by haste or tiredness. Nobody is completely
> immune
> ... to one striking now and then.
>
> It was NOT a typo. A misplaced letter is/may be a typo. "Seperate",
> "definately", "tounge"
> and other... marvels... are NOT typos. Taking "your" for "you are" is sheer
> stupidity.
>
> For *once* in your life, call a spade a spade...!
>
Okay then, I will drop the use of the term "typo" for the sake of discussion.
Also please notice that I have my own disgreements with the person we are
discussing, so this isn't a defense of him, simply a defense of the truth of the
matter.
"Your/You're" mistakes are indeed among the most cringe-worthy ones to make.
However, sitting at a computer keyboard makes it surprisingly easy to make many
kinds of tired mental transposition mistakes that one would not ordinarily make,
since typing can take place at speeds of 50-100 words per minute and beyond.
However, the person in question does /not/ make that mistake consistently... a
casual search of messages will bear this out. By failing to take that into
account, you yourself have failed to... "call a spade a spade." Further, if you
knew his mistake was a once-in-a-blue-moon error and represented it as
otherwise, then it is likely you were looking to score cheap points, as you did
before with the pointedly blunt comment to me where you wrote, "For *once* in
your life, call a spade a spade...!"
So I'm going to call a spade a spade once more in this message: "Your" bluff
has been called, and "you're" not going to get any more traction on this issue.
HTH.
Bob
wrote:
> ... >> Your gay.
> ... >It's "you're," not "your."
> ... Yes, I know.
> ... Do you know what a typo is?
>Yes - a bad excuse.
A bad excuse for what?
I was in a hurry and wrote the wrong thing. That's a typo. Nothing
more can be read into it.
CatPanDaddy
"CatPanDaddy" <c...@cat.pan.net> wrote in message
news:aaGdnbHN76g2rDzZ...@comcast.com...
> However, the person in question does /not/ make that mistake consistently... a
> casual search of messages will bear this out. By failing to take that into
> account
<snip>
I want to extend one apology to you and the newsgroup you are reading from... I
realized after my previous reply to you was posted, that the header information
shows you were viewing this thread from "alt.gossip.celebrities", and therefore
you had no way of knowing Bob's past posting history. I'm reading this
horrendously cross-posted thread from another group and it's easy to miss which
messages are coming in from which groups.
It was a clumsy, amateurish mistake that I will take extra care to avoid in the
future.
Bob
wrote:
> ... >> ... Your gay.
> ... You're gay.
> ... >> What, his gay? He has a gay?
> ... >At least he used a capital Y.
> ... I thought typo flames were for children.
>It is - for those children who left school before they could learn anything.
Then you claim that the person who issued the typo flame is a child
who left school before they could learn anything.
--
Bob
wrote:
>Typos are accidents caused by haste or tiredness. Nobody is completely immune
>to one striking now and then.
Haste is my biggest enemy - and the fact that I cannot type.
Bob
wrote:
>It was NOT a typo. A misplaced letter is/may be a typo. "Seperate", "definately", "tounge"
>and other... marvels... are NOT typos. Taking "your" for "you are" is sheer stupidity.
It is a typo, plain and simple. It's like the very common typo "it's"
when someone means "its".
>For *once* in your life, call a spade a spade...!
Your a shithead.<g>
Hey, BSG - we got a pedant here.
CatPanDaddy
"Bob" <sp...@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:44a136a1...@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:10:58 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <ma...@chrisecc.dk>
> wrote:
>
>> ... >> Your gay.
>
>> ... >It's "you're," not "your."
>
>> ... Yes, I know.
>
>> ... Do you know what a typo is?
>
>>Yes - a bad excuse.
>
> A bad excuse for what?
>
> I was in a hurry and wrote the wrong thing. That's a typo. Nothing
> more can be read into it.
>
Well to be fair, he's using a strict definition of the word "typo"... but even
failing such a strict definition, it can still be seen as a mistake of mental
transposition of terms. Still, terminology aside, "in a hurry and wrote the
wrong thing" is the best and clearest way to put it.
Bob
wrote:
>> For *once* in your life, call a spade a spade...!
>Also please notice that I have my own disgreements with the person we are
>discussing,
I would have it no other way. If you and I were in agreement about
everything, then there would be no purpose to our posting in Usenet.
The more you disagree with me the more you fulfill my role as a
Jesuitical Heathen Troll. Keep up the good work.
>However, the person in question does /not/ make that mistake consistently... a
>casual search of messages will bear this out. By failing to take that into
>account, you yourself have failed to... "call a spade a spade."
That's because he is a leftist queer shithead.
CatPanDaddy
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:04:26 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <ma...@chrisecc.dk>
> wrote:
>
>>It was NOT a typo. A misplaced letter is/may be a typo. "Seperate",
>>"definately", "tounge"
>>and other... marvels... are NOT typos. Taking "your" for "you are" is sheer
>>stupidity.
>
> It is a typo, plain and simple. It's like the very common typo "it's"
> when someone means "its".
>
>>For *once* in your life, call a spade a spade...!
>
> Your a shithead.<g>
>
> Hey, BSG - we got a pedant here.
>
<grin> ... Intentional substitution of "your" for "you're" in the name of pithy
humorous comeback noted!
It's funny though -- being pendantic has been a big downfall for me personally
as well, and I'm not referring to Usenet here. One of those things I have to
work on little by little, as I best can.
Bob
wrote:
>> > http://www.paris-hilton-sex.com/t/Tricia-Helfer/e63_TriciaHelfer_Nude.jpg
>> She's really not all that attractive...
>Different strokes. I think she's gorgeous.
She is also a talented actress. She has had the most difficult role to
play - Caprica Six, Baltar Six, Gina, etc. In each instance she pulled
off the role well.
Contrast that with Park who comes off like Boomer no matter who she
is. Maybe that is written into the script because Sharon is the same
Cylon, but you would think there would be some variation from role to
role.
Every once in a while I see a spark of acting ability in Park's
performances, but it is rare. By contrast, every time Helfer shows up
on the screen you know it is going to be good.
Bob
wrote:
>>>> Your gay.
>>>It's "you're," not "your."
>>Yes, I know.
>>Do you know what a typo is?
>That is NOT a typo. It has neither the correct puncutuation, nor the
>correct spelling. It is ignorance.
>I won't comment on defending ignorance.
Blow it out your ass, leftist queer.
CatPanDaddy
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:24:57 -0500, "CatPanDaddy" <c...@cat.pan.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> For *once* in your life, call a spade a spade...!
>
>>Also please notice that I have my own disgreements with the person we are
>>discussing,
>
> I would have it no other way. If you and I were in agreement about
> everything, then there would be no purpose to our posting in Usenet.
I agree. Yipe! cancel that, I mean... *FWOOM* <vanish>
Too late!
--
Bob
wrote:
> ... Well to be fair, he's using a strict definition of the word "typo"... but even
> ... failing such a strict definition, it can still be seen as a mistake of mental
> ... transposition of terms. Still, terminology aside, "in a hurry and wrote the
> ... wrong thing" is the best and clearest way to put it.
>Maybe next time he can say "my bad, I'm sorry" and avoid posting 1,514 messages trying to
>"explain" the mistake... Not convincing anyone.
Maybe next time you won't post anything on alt.battlestar-galactica.
We have better things to do than waste time in typo flames.
Bob
wrote:
>I would have forgiven one "omlette", but three (four?) in a row... Sorry, no can do.
Nobody gives a rat's ass what the fuck you do.
Now go crawl back up your boyfriend's ass where you belong.
Fucking leftist queers.
The Cheshire Cody
The difference between "your" and "you're" is *not* a typo. It's the
difference between being literate and being illiterate.
Cody k
--
There is no responsibility or blame so great that it cannot be passed off
onto someone else.
-me
Exhibitionist
>On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:10:58 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <ma...@chrisecc.dk>
>wrote:
>
>> ... >> Your gay.
>
>> ... >It's "you're," not "your."
>
>> ... Yes, I know.
>
>> ... Do you know what a typo is?
>
>>Yes - a bad excuse.
>
>A bad excuse for what?
>
>I was in a hurry and wrote the wrong thing. That's a typo. Nothing
>more can be read into it.
Except a pathological need to call people leftist queers. Been
looking in the mirror?
Exhibitionist
<cod...@ver-ticalhor-izon.net> wrote:
>
>The difference between "your" and "you're" is *not* a typo. It's the
>difference between being literate and being illiterate.
>
>Cody k
Uh-oh. Now Bob will have to call you a "leftist queer." But don't
feel alone, he calls everyone a leftist queer. He's kind of limited,
you know.
CatPanDaddy
"The Cheshire Cody" <cod...@ver-ticalhor-izon.net> wrote in message
news:_Lfog.436401$3N6.2...@fe06.news.easynews.com...
> "CatPanDaddy" <c...@cat.pan.net> wrote in message
> news:5-WdnZwohuQR9j3Z...@comcast.com...
>>
>> "~* Magda ~*" <ma...@chrisecc.dk> wrote in message
>> news:a660a2dkhtpfq4fs1...@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:15:25 GMT, in alt.gossip.celebrities, sp...@uce.gov
>>> (Bob) arranged
>>> some electrons, so they looked like this:
>>>
>>> ... On 25 Jun 2006 19:29:43 -0700, "The Central Scrutinizer"
>>> ... <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>> ... >> ... Your gay.
>>> ...
>>> ... You're gay.
>>> ...
>>> ... >> What, his gay? He has a gay?
>>> ...
>>> ... >At least he used a capital Y.
>>> ...
>>> ... I thought typo flames were for children.
>>>
>>> It is - for those children who left school before they could learn anything.
>>>
>>
>> Typos are accidents caused by haste or tiredness. Nobody is completely
>> immune to one striking now and then.
>
> The difference between "your" and "you're" is *not* a typo. It's the
> difference between being literate and being illiterate.
>
My bad in using the word typo. In the strictest sense, transposing two words
out of haste isn't a typographical error. But if he's made that particular
mistake before, I've rarely seen it, and that's after doing a google search to
verify it. At any rate, I get your point.
PurplePenny
Bob wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2006 13:11:16 -0700, "PurplePenny" <Apple...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Do you know what a vagina is? if you can see a woman's vagina from the
> >outside she needs to be taken to the ER.
>
> That's not as bad as a fellow I know said once:
>
> "Hey, did you know Marvin is driving a new Vulva."
LMFAO...I wouldn't want to be her!
Tim McGaughy
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:09:03 +0200, ~* Magda ~* <ma...@chrisecc.dk>
> wrote:
>
>
>>... Well to be fair, he's using a strict definition of the word "typo"... but even
>>... failing such a strict definition, it can still be seen as a mistake of mental
>>... transposition of terms. Still, terminology aside, "in a hurry and wrote the
>>... wrong thing" is the best and clearest way to put it.
>
>
>>Maybe next time he can say "my bad, I'm sorry" and avoid posting 1,514 messages trying to
>>"explain" the mistake... Not convincing anyone.
>
>
> Maybe next time you won't post anything on alt.battlestar-galactica.
>
> We have better things to do than waste time in typo flames.
Can we get back to Tricia Helfer's ass, please?
Bob
wrote:
> ... Maybe next time you won't post anything on alt.battlestar-galactica.
>I've never gone there - never watched it, either.
Then quit posting you're nonsense. (g)
Bob
<cod...@ver-ticalhor-izon.net> wrote:
>The difference between "your" and "you're" is *not* a typo. It's the
>difference between being literate and being illiterate.
Yet another leftist queer checks in.
Bob
wrote:
>Uh-oh. Now Bob will have to call you a "leftist queer." But don't
>feel alone, he calls everyone a leftist queer.
Not everyone - only leftist queers.
>He's kind of limited, you know.
You know? What do you know?
I know you are a leftist queer.
Bob
wrote:
>My bad in using the word typo. In the strictest sense, transposing two words
>out of haste isn't a typographical error. But if he's made that particular
>mistake before, I've rarely seen it, and that's after doing a google search to
>verify it. At any rate, I get your point.
It is a typo.
From Websters Online:
typo: an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
Both of you are wrong.
Bob
wrote:
>Except a pathological need to call people leftist queers.
Nothing pathelogical about calling a leftist queer what he is, namely
a leftist queer.
>Been looking in the mirror?
No leftist queer there.
Joseph D. Korman
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:53:52 -0500, "CatPanDaddy" <c...@cat.pan.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>My bad in using the word typo. In the strictest sense, transposing two words
>>out of haste isn't a typographical error. But if he's made that particular
>>mistake before, I've rarely seen it, and that's after doing a google search to
>>verify it. At any rate, I get your point.
>
>
> It is a typo.
>
> From Websters Online:
>
> typo: an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
>
> Both of you are wrong.
>
>
Not having anything better to do now, I'll add that "your" vs. "you're"
is not a typo, but more of a malaprop.
http://www.bartleby.com/61/53/M0055300.html
A typo is 'yuor', a misspelling of the correct usage of the word 'your'.
Interchanging the two homonyms is a mis-use of the words.
PS, I almost had a typo with 'homonyms', but my spell checker caught it ;-)
--
-------------------------------------------------
| Joseph D. Korman |
| mailto:re...@thejoekorner.com |
| Visit The JoeKorNer at |
| http://www.thejoekorner.com |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| AOL-IM user name joekoreln |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| The light at the end of the tunnel ... |
| may be a train going the other way! |
| Don't take any wooden Metrocards |
| Happily retired since May 2005! |
| Battlestar Galactica is better than... |
| the last two Star Treks - WAY better! !
| Brooklyn Tech Grads build things that work! |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| All outgoing E-mail is scanned by NAV |
-------------------------------------------------
Bob
<joe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> It is a typo.
>> From Websters Online:
>> typo: an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
>> Both of you are wrong.
>"your" vs. "you're" is not a typo
You know better than Websters Dictionary?! That's really rich.
I made an "error of spelling in typed material". That's a typo
according to Webster's Dictionary.
Joseph D. Korman
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:45:22 GMT, "Joseph D. Korman"
> <joe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>It is a typo.
>
>
>
>>>From Websters Online:
>
>
>
>>>typo: an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
>
>
>
>>>Both of you are wrong.
>
>
>>"your" vs. "you're" is not a typo
>
>
> You know better than Websters Dictionary?! That's really rich.
>
> I made an "error of spelling in typed material". That's a typo
> according to Webster's Dictionary.
>
Of course you deleted my original reference.
http://www.bartleby.com/61/53/M0055300.html
No, the definition I referenced from The American Heritage® Dictionary
is a malaprop, a mis-use of a word. Here's the reference in Webster:
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/malapropisms this from Webster.
A typo is an error of spelling, not using the wrong word. So if you
used "yuor" that's a typo. If you meant "you're" and used "yuor" it's
both a typo and a malaprop.
CatPanDaddy
"Joseph D. Korman" <joe...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:44A2BD0B...@earthlink.net...
> Bob wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:45:22 GMT, "Joseph D. Korman"
>> <joe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>It is a typo.
>>
>>
>>>>From Websters Online:
>>
>>
>>>>typo: an error (as of spelling) in typed or typeset material
>>
>>
>>>>Both of you are wrong.
>>
>>
>>>"your" vs. "you're" is not a typo
>>
>>
>> You know better than Websters Dictionary?! That's really rich.
>>
>> I made an "error of spelling in typed material". That's a typo
>> according to Webster's Dictionary.
>>
>
> Of course you deleted my original reference.
>
> http://www.bartleby.com/61/53/M0055300.html
>
> No, the definition I referenced from The American Heritage® Dictionary is a
> malaprop, a mis-use of a word. Here's the reference in Webster:
>
> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/malapropisms this from Webster.
>
> A typo is an error of spelling, not using the wrong word. So if you used
> "yuor" that's a typo. If you meant "you're" and used "yuor" it's both a typo
> and a malaprop.
>
> --
Proposed compromise... it's a malaprop of a different color. One that came
uniquely from the process of typing in a hurry. If the word had been spoken, no
malaprop would have been noticed.
Bob
<joe...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>A typo is an error of spelling, not using the wrong word.
I did not use the wrong word. I intended to type you're but in haste I
mistyped it your. That makes it a typo.
If I had actually intended to use your, then it would have been a
malaprop. But that is not what I intended.
I usually take the time to proof my posts because I am not a good
typist, but in that instance I hastily sent it off. If I had proofed
the post I would have caught the error.
--
Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
The Cheshire Cody
news:ho63a25q1j19jroah...@4ax.com...
Like I give a rat's ass what he calls me.
Bob
wrote:
> ... Then quit posting you're nonsense. (g)
>Nonsense is your middle name, right?
<yawn>