Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Aguilera's hubby won't let her pose nude (photo)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer

unread,
Jun 5, 2006, 7:30:06 PM6/5/06
to
photo - http://i5.tinypic.com/11t7olc.jpg

Christina Aguilera has decided not to pose topless for
a magazine - because her hunky husband has told her not to.
According to reports, the singer had been considering a
lucrative offer to bare her breasts for a photo shoot
to prove she has not had an enlargement. However,
Christina's husband, music executive extraordinaire,
and one of the most sexually satisfied men in the world,
Jordan Bratman, has now stopped her from going through
with her plans because he doesn't want the world to see
the assets he plays with every day and night.
A source said: "Christina was thinking of doing
something radical to end all the speculation but
Jordan was horrified when she mentioned she wanted
to pose topless." The source added: "He wants Christina
to move away from her old image and posing naked,
or semi-naked, would go against that. He's also very
much against her doing any sort of hot making out scenes
in future film projects, for obvious reasons."

mayvenne

unread,
Jun 5, 2006, 8:12:36 PM6/5/06
to
Well I definitely would not call her husband her hunky husband, but all
the same he is showing some BIG signs of normalcy.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

mooseb...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jun 5, 2006, 8:57:36 PM6/5/06
to

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:

What bullshit. She's as plastic as a tinkertoy.

Message has been deleted

8MilesHigh

unread,
Jun 6, 2006, 5:03:37 AM6/6/06
to

mayvenne wrote:
> Well I definitely would not call her husband her hunky husband, but all
> the same he is showing some BIG signs of normalcy.


I like him for the effect he's having on CA. Bratman's lack of movie
star good looks only makes him more interesting in a way - what's he
got that CA adores? Some "secret therein lies". His Valentines gift
to her was very romantic - a album filled with the pictures of their
honeymoon. That took real consideration and some love.

They probably won't last. Hollywood couples just don't. I find them
one of the most interesting celeb couplings, nonetheless.

bel

Gooserider

unread,
Jun 6, 2006, 5:17:48 AM6/6/06
to

"8MilesHigh" <avian...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1149584617.6...@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>
> mayvenne wrote:
>> Well I definitely would not call her husband her hunky husband, but all
>> the same he is showing some BIG signs of normalcy.
>
>
> I like him for the effect he's having on CA. Bratman's lack of movie
> star good looks only makes him more interesting in a way - what's he
> got that CA adores? Some "secret therein lies". His Valentines gift
> to her was very romantic - a album filled with the pictures of their
> honeymoon. That took real consideration and some love.
>
> They probably won't last. Hollywood couples just don't. I find them
> one of the most interesting celeb couplings, nonetheless.
>
> bel
>

It's a bit funny that she made a big statement about only dating black guys,
because white boys didn't have "that flava:", but she marries a nebbishy
bucktoothed Jewish nerd, about as far from a black guy as possible.


0 new messages