9/11 toasted cars -- bremsstrahlung and trillions of electron-volts?
u2...@gmx.net
Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
Yes, Uri Geller..if you wish. Or Никола Тесла*** (discovered
the Bremsstrahlung).
Remote Control demolition by privatiers
from
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
Back To the Future with Nikola Tesla -- 9-11 (1998) Joe Vialls. 16
August 2003
"Omega might direct a standing wave at the exact resonant frequency of
copper, "
===== of steel? and demolish WTC ======
VIII. Toasted Cars Introduction
A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. These vehicles had
peculiar
patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7
blocks
from the WTC, along the East River). For example, vehicles had missing
door handles, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine
blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle
front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the
vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of
cars burned while paper nearby did not.
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html
Speculate what source of this gigantic energy is? Develpoed at Oak
Ridge? By Martin Marietta?
Haarp / Omega / Space based / earth-magnetic-field or other fantasies?
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
Which military satellites were exactly above New York at the exact
times of
WTC1 and WTC2 collapse?
Eugene Griessel
>Which military satellites were exactly above New York at the exact
>times of
Vostokloon1 and Vostokloon7. Need a nice aluminium hat?
Eugene L Griessel
A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular.
Agent Smith
Have you got the faintest idea how many tons hardware it takes to generate
bremsstrahlung or a TeV e-beam? Did they pick up the Stony Brook
synchrotron and carry it out to Ground Zero in Suzie's Japanese pick-up
truck? Or did they used that secret, CIA, exploding, nuclear powered, ray
gun sattellite that nobody's ever told us about yet, because it doesn't
exist, Flash Gordon?
You've been watching too much sci-fi on tv. Don't watch anything more
recent than the original Star Trek, which has been proven not to cause
schizophrenia in laboratory rats. Sorry, no more "Heroes" for you, because
you might climb up onto the roof and try to fly. But then again, maybe
that's not such a bad idea.
Yeah, when I was a teenager, I believed all that stuff. But then I grew up
and went to college.
T Wake
<u2...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:1165224543.9...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>"Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
Wow. You really are more than a few sandwiches short of a tea party.
Peter Twydell
u2...@gmx.net writes
>
<snip ravings>
>
>VIII. Toasted Cars Introduction
>
How many of them were Rolls?
--
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
John Griffin
> [ crazy shit ]
You need to work HAARP into your act. According to some (of your
kind), it can project a tight beam of energy over the horizon and
wreck a space shuttle, just to name one example. Making HUGE POOLS
OF MOLTEN STEEL (q.v.) in New York is something it could do on
idle. I'm sorry I can't help you look it up; I have to go
underground now that I've mentioned it.
Orval Fairbairn
u2...@gmx.net wrote:
It's those pesky Klingons and Romulans with their cloaked ships and disrupterr weapons again!
Dan
> In article <1165224543.9...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> u2...@gmx.net wrote:
>
>> "Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
>>
>> Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
>>
>> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
>>
Geeze, not that one again. It was the Borg, get it right.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
Dan
Don't forget it was HAARP that directed Katrina into New Orleans as
part of a racist plot.
Tankfixer
usenet...@gishpuppy.com mumbled
That ans all his tea is floating in the harbor
Tankfixer
> Orval Fairbairn wrote:
> > In article <1165224543.9...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > u2...@gmx.net wrote:
> >
> >> "Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
> >>
> >> Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
> >>
> >> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
> >>
Ferngi
u2...@gmx.net
beneficiary of the biggest welfare programme, member of a club that is
desperate to attract members, oh, what merit!
=====
I note that your blanket dismissals are less triumphant now. I can
detect some wavering.
Looks like some of the know-betters here have actually been reading up
on the event of 911.
Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in the
woods.
Please look at the "janedoe" toasted-car photos and use physics to
explain the observed physical phenomena.
If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses, go away and
enjoy your hair.
Open up your own thread:
"911 conspiracy theorists are all crazy" -- or a similar stupid
statement -- will attract the ignoramusses you can debate.
For the silent and concerned responsible citizens:
Toasted Cars = Exploding Cars ...
... that Patricia Ondrovic described?
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-rescuer-saw-explosions-inside-wtc.html
(heating metal fits well with the exploding door-locks from the Judy
Wood pictures)
KT: Let's recap real quickly; your ambulance was parked backed up
against the WTC 6, near the 6's corner by the alleyway between the WTC
5 and 6. When you were trying to put your stretcher back in, you were
knocked down to the ground by an explosion that you thought came from
the lobby of WTC 5. When you got back up, you started running west up
the sidewalk on Vesey St towards West Side Hwy and then these cars
parked along the street started blowing up as you ran by and that's
when you tried to duck into the WTC 6 lobby for cover, but these
policemen inside where preventing you from coming in and that's when
you saw the explosions inside the lobby of WTC 6?
PO: Yes.
- What can cause these phenomena? Nuclear-pumped xray lasers?
can someone point to some better literature?
http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/pdf/1_3-4Fenstermacher.pdfgζ z ?t
type=hidden name=lang value=
Tankfixer
u2...@gmx.net mumbled
> > Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
> Dan, who always knows better and is proud of having been the
> beneficiary of the biggest welfare programme, member of a club that is
> desperate to attract members, oh, what merit!
>
> =====
>
> I note that your blanket dismissals are less triumphant now. I can
> detect some wavering.
> Looks like some of the know-betters here have actually been reading up
> on the event of 911.
>
> Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
So did your explinations of what happened.
>
> Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in the
> woods.
PKB
>
> Please look at the "janedoe" toasted-car photos and use physics to
> explain the observed physical phenomena.
>
> If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses, go away and
> enjoy your hair.
Why don't you educate us in the laws of physics that would allow what
you claim to have happened actually occur.
Use small word please since we obviously lack your spurious intelect.
hhc...@yahoo.com
being a crackpot I suspect that until you search using Google, you have
absolutely no idea about what bremsstrahlung is, or how it applies in
this situation.
Right now, I'll bet you $10 that you don't know what bremsstrahlung is,
or how it is produced.
You're simply still another crackpot with access to a computer, with no
knowledge at all except how to run your computer.
When you learn what bremsstrahlung means and is, I'll be happy to send
you my $10, and while this will be just a bit in your education, it's a
start. I really don't thinks that I will have to pay you, because I
believe that you lack the drive to go to Google and research what the
term actually means in physics, so there is only a small risk that I
will have to pay you.
If I loose, my email address is hhc...@yahoo.com and my telephone
number is (in the Boston Area) 978-256-6972). If I'm not here, just
leave a message on my machine and I will get back to you to determine
to who and where I should make payment.)
I'm quite serious, as I am very affended by kooks like you cluttering
up the newsgroups with your maniacle nonsense!
Harry C.
p.s. Researching what "bremsstrahlung" is will likely keep him buisy
and off the net for the next few days. Something worth the risk of
losing $10 to me.
hhc...@yahoo.com
Arcane, whose goal is to project a columnated beam of anti-meson
particles though the interspace gap. Hell, doesn't everyone know this
-- on the downside it toasts cars!
On the other hand, what better place to hide a top secret science
research experiment other than the financial district in lower
Manhattan. Who would expect it there? :-)
On the other hand, the World Trade Center was directly situated at what
was the electronics center of the east coast, Radio Row on Cortlant
Street. Here's just a theory, if this research activity began in or
close to Cortlant Street back around 1950 when it was cheap real
estate, it makes sense that it could have still existed on
9/11/2001...and when the planes hit the research was disrupted with
catastrophic results. Something for the crackpots to think about! :-)
Harry C.
Dan wrote:
> Orval Fairbairn wrote:
> > In article <1165224543.9...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > u2...@gmx.net wrote:
> >
> >> "Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
> >>
> >> Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
> >>
> >> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
> >>
> >> Yes, Uri Geller..if you wish. Or Никола Тесла*** (discovered
John Griffin
> If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses....
I see there an implication that you're capable of discerning
whether or not laws of physics are properly invoked.
Curiously, I also saw a lot of bimbolike yapping, but no evidence
to support that implication. What's up with that?
I'm sure as hell not trying to discourage your parroting of that
foolishness. It's fun to see new manifestations of conspiracy
lunatic syndrome, because the old ones have been dismissed and
re-dismissed so often and so thoroughly that most of you
passionately credulous turkeys have shifted your attention to
Planet X or some of the other mindfart.
T Wake
<u2...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:1165293970.9...@16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>
><snips>
>Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
Neither does your post.
>Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in the
>woods.
Hahahahaha. Priceless.
Stuart Grey
> In article <Bf%ch.3338$a14...@newsfe24.lga>, B2...@aol.com mumbled
>
>>Orval Fairbairn wrote:
>>
>>>In article <1165224543.9...@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>> u2...@gmx.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
>>>>
>>>>Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
>>>>
>>>>http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
>>>>
Dominion. We Ferngi would have made deals first, or salvaged what we
could after the attack.. Wanton destruction is not our way - too wasteful.
Tankfixer
stuar...@mapson.comcast.net mumbled
> >>
> >>Geeze, not that one again. It was the Borg, get it right.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ferngi
>
> Dominion. We Ferngi would have made deals first, or salvaged what we
> could after the attack.. Wanton destruction is not our way - too wasteful.
>
Hmm Good point
Also rules out the Borg
Henry
> I note that your blanket dismissals are less triumphant now. I can
> detect some wavering.
> Looks like some of the know-betters here have actually been reading up
> on the event of 911.
>
> Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
>
> Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in the
> woods.
>
> Please look at the "janedoe" toasted-car photos and use physics to
> explain the observed physical phenomena.
>
> If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses, go away and
> enjoy your hair.
Thermite explains it very well, and has been proved by
research and analysis by Dr. Steven Jones who obtained
and analyzed samples of the molten metal from ground zero.
Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds are either kooks or they
are deliberately providing disinformation in an attempt to
discredit people who question the Bush regime's impossible
magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy theory.
--
http://100777.com/node/963
http://911research.wtc7.net
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
John Griffin
> u2...@gmx.net wrote:
>
>> I note that your blanket dismissals are less triumphant now.
>> I can detect some wavering.
>> Looks like some of the know-betters here have actually been
>> reading up on the event of 911.
>>
>> Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
>>
>> Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in
>> the woods.
>>
>> Please look at the "janedoe" toasted-car photos and use
>> physics to explain the observed physical phenomena.
>>
>> If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses, go
>> away and enjoy your hair.
>
> Thermite explains it very well, and has been proved by
> research and analysis by Dr. Steven Jones who obtained
> and analyzed samples of the molten metal from ground zero.
> Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds are either kooks or they
> are deliberately providing disinformation in an attempt to
> discredit people who question the Bush regime's impossible
> magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy theory.
No further dismissal of that lunatic nonsense is necessary, but I
just wanted to let you know that someone appreciates your
willingness to humiliate yourself by recycling it. Every time it
resurfaces, it's funny stuff.
Art Deco
>u2...@gmx.net wrote:
>
>> I note that your blanket dismissals are less triumphant now. I can
>> detect some wavering.
>> Looks like some of the know-betters here have actually been reading up
>> on the event of 911.
>>
>> Your responses had nothing to do with physics!
>>
>> Stop abusing this usenet group for your infantile shouting in the
>> woods.
>>
>> Please look at the "janedoe" toasted-car photos and use physics to
>> explain the observed physical phenomena.
>>
>> If you cannot employ laws of physics in your reponses, go away and
>> enjoy your hair.
>
> Thermite explains it very well, and has been proved by
>research and analysis by Dr. Steven Jones who obtained
>and analyzed samples of the molten metal from ground zero.
> Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds are either kooks or they
>are deliberately providing disinformation in an attempt to
>discredit people who question the Bush regime's impossible
>magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy theory.
All other conspiracies pale in comparison with the HUGE POOLS OF MOLTEN
STEEL!!
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@netcabal.com> wrote:
> > Thermite explains it very well, and has been proved by
> >research and analysis by Dr. Steven Jones who obtained
> >and analyzed samples of the molten metal from ground zero.
> > Judy Woods and Morgan Reynolds are either kooks or they
> >are deliberately providing disinformation in an attempt to
> >discredit people who question the Bush regime's impossible
> >magic fire/Super Arab conspiracy theory.
>
> All other conspiracies pale in comparison with the HUGE POOLS OF MOLTEN
> STEEL!!
Are they FILLED WITH THE LEMON MERINGUES of the LATE EMPEROR OF DENMARK
who once sat down to dinner WITH A CHICKEN?
--
Just \int_0^\infty du it!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
T Wake
"Art Deco" <er...@netcabal.com> wrote in message
news:091220061435253464%er...@netcabal.com...
I have heard they were so big you could see them from space but then the
USGOVT sent a crack team from AREA 51 to DISABLE THE OVERHEAD SATELLITES
WHICH IS WHY THERE IS NO RECORD ON GOOGLE EARTH
its true. you cant see them on Google earth.
Art Deco
Sounds like another case of MI6/CIA/NSA/AAA blocking the TRVTH.
Autymn D. C.
> "Toasted Cars" (with intact plastic!) phenomenon ...
>
> Which frequency/particle "ray" will "tune" into steel and heat it?
Microwave or far infrared, but you don't need a tune.
> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
>
> Yes, Uri Geller..if you wish. Or Никола Тесла*** (discovered
> the Bremsstrahlung).
>
> Remote Control demolition by privatiers
> from
> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
no
> VIII. Toasted Cars Introduction
> A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. These vehicles had
> peculiar
> patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7
> blocks
> from the WTC, along the East River). For example, vehicles had missing
> door handles, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine
> blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle
> front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the
> vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of
>
> cars burned while paper nearby did not.
> http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html
>
> Speculate what source of this gigantic energy is? Develpoed at Oak
> Ridge? By Martin Marietta?
> Haarp / Omega / Space based / earth-magnetic-field or other fantasies?
> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/2006/12/remote-control-demolition-by.html
Okay, I will explain the stuff on that StarWarsBeam page, writted by
the retarded shitheads Judy Wood and Morgan Reynold.
stone and steel avalanche -> cars smashed -> oil and rubber sprays and
fires -> paint unpeels
Masonry falls a great heiht under a great weiht, smashes stiff objects
and crumbels into the fine mullock you see a'lining the streets. The
damage on the paint looks like a contact fire did it, not a "beam". As
heat rises, it wouldn't scorch the bottom, nor the paper. Where the
big carfire and the paperyard are, the mullock smothers the paper so it
wouldn't liht. The paper in the cars are not èndèmic to the cars!
Why would it matter if it were torn inside yet the car not? It's from
the tower. Engine blocks are where the fuel comes out, fro the fuel
lines; the fuel needs to boil to burn, and can't stay in the tank to do
that.
There are thousands of steels, and ovens do not need to support tons!
"These fires do not melt or significantly weaken steel. (stove courtesy
of Century wood stoves)" is sheer mindles bullshit.
"How could alleged jet-fuel and trash-can fires melt or significantly
weaken steel in the WTC towers?
In 1975 Fires burned 6 floors of WTC1 for 180 minutes (floors 9-14)
with no fire sprinklers. (source)
In 2001 Fires burned 5-6 floors of WTC1 for 102 minutes (floors 94-98)
with fire sprinklers.
In 2001 Fires burned 6-7 floors of WTC1 for 56 minutes (floors 78-84)
with fire sprinklers."
So all that fire damage can't add up? You should know that many
engineers are full of shit, and hav nothing better to do than come up
with fake and flake thèories about their poor grasp of cause and
effect (aitiolòjy). I'll email Wood about your post.
> Which military satellites were exactly above New York at the exact
> times of
> WTC1 and WTC2 collapse?
shut up
-Aut
AW: Even if radiant heat were the firestarter, paper is awfully hard to
burn that way. It's bleached to over .91 reflectance, and is quite
hard to burn with small magnifying glasses and|or weak sunliht--I try.
Meanwhile, paint is supposed to bend and stretch and giv to heat in its
medium, which will melt off if you try.