oBAMA VIVIDLY REMEMBERS HOW MUCH Cocaine He Did
Edwards@america.gov John Edwards Two Timing Americas
"Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"
<pre...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
Obama's Cocaine Confessional
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
Stutterin' John McKook
"John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer Edw...@America.gov> wrote in
message news:R4SdnVsoqqMxNTDV...@comcast.com...
At least O was honest about it. Not much to say about hoople headed drunken
Bush:
Photos of George W. Bush 'Drunk As A Monkey' At the Olympics
These pictures won't reach the media -- Bush "drunk as a money" at the
Olympics. One picture actually shows a red scraping on his arm. Wonders
how he got that.
http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/fraud/gw_bush_ghw_bush/news.php?q=1218479857
Bush Falling Down Drunk At Olympics:
http://wonkette.com/401833/was-bush-falling-down-drunk-at-olympics
One More Drunken Bush At Olympics Photo!
http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bush-flag.jpg
Kel Varnsen
Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
clouddreamer
Yes. He's name is McBush. A virtual carbon copy of Bush in his thinking
and goals...only slightly more senile.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
Kel
> Kel Varnsen wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
> > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> >> "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> >> Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
[W]hile Obama may not identify as a Muslim, that’s not how the Arab
and Muslim Streets see it. In Arab culture and under Islamic law, if
your father is a Muslim, so are you. And once a Muslim, always a
Muslim. You cannot go back. In Islamic eyes, Obama is certainly a
Muslim. He may think he’s a Christian, but they do not.
tops...@gmail.com
> Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
Either is Bill Clinton, but you conservallons never seem gunshy about
bringing him up.
topset72
"I have agreed with President Bush far more than I have disagreed. And
on the transcendent issues, the most important issues of our day, I’ve
been totally in agreement and support of President Bush
“But,” he quickly added, “I will argue my conservative record voting
with anyone’s, and I will also submit that my support for President
Bush has been active and very impassioned on issues that are important
to the American people. And I’m particularly talking about the war on
terror, the war in Iraq, national security, national defense, support
of men and women in the military, fiscal discipline, a number of other
issues. So I strongly disagree with any assertion that I’ve been more
at odds with the president of the United States than I have been in
agreement with him.”
Hugh Wood
<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote:
> An "oldie" (just barely three months old) but still a real goodie:
>
> http://gawker.com/393627/mcclellan-shocker-bush-too-drunk-to-remember...
> Bush Too Drunk to Remember How Much Cocaine He Did
>
> Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan was the doughy,
> ill-informed punching bag the press needed after a couple years of
> smarmy wise-ass Ari Fleisher. But now he's getting his revenge, as all
> big dumb doughy dudes must after they realize their "friends" just
> pretended to like them. He wrote a book. It's called What Happened,
> and it's about how everyone in the White House was a stupid idiot,
> especially President Bush, who is so stupid that he just convinces
> himself of bullshit so he doesn't technically have to lie. "The media
> won't let go of these ridiculous cocaine rumors," McClellan heard Bush
> say in 1999. "You know, the truth is I honestly don't remember whether
> I tried it or not. We had some pretty wild parties back in the day,
> and I just don't remember." Ha! So maybe he tried cocaine, but if so
> he was already mid-blackout and who can recall between all the
> homosexual encounters, animal sacrifices to pagan gods, and
> stripper-raping that they were doing! After the jump, Karl Rove
> complaining about how Scott McCellan sounds like a raving DailyKos
> liberal. Just because Karl Rove misled him regarding the Plame affair,
> leading McClellan to blatantly lie to the press, destroying his
> credibility and career!
Whew !! Thanks for the info man !! I was all set to vote for Bush
again. You're a lifesaver.
cake_and_...@yahoo.com
His twin brother, and spawn of Satan, John McCain is. And 80% of the
voters say that McCain would carry on the (cough,cough) "high
traditions" (cough, cough) of the Bus administration.
cake_and_...@yahoo.com
Wow, Kel, and all this time we thought you were a "perfect
Christian". You certainly do subscribe to this Muslim "if the daddy
was a Muslim, then the children must be" dogma. Makes us think you
are a closet Muslim or something.
cake_and_...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well, Hugh, if you would get off the alcohol, coke, and other
recreationals, you might realize what is going on.
bval...@aol.com
I'm sorry, you have president Bush confused with Senator Obama, who
openly admits to have being a cocaine "Junkie".
bval...@aol.com
> At least O was honest about it.
He was honest about it to sell copies his sleazy book. When he ran
for president, suddenly, BO doesn't want to talk much about that time
of his life.
Here are some questions that he doesn't want to answer:
Given your past history of using cocaine, which is extremely
addictive, would you be willing to regularly take drug tests during
the campaign and when you're in the White House to insure Americans
that you're not still using?
Have you ever sold drugs?
Have you ever stolen to obtain drugs?
Have you ever received treatment for your drug addiction?
bval...@aol.com
> > [W]hile Obama may not identify as a Muslim, that’s not how the Arab
> > and Muslim Streets see it. In Arab culture and under Islamic law, if
> > your father is a Muslim, so are you. And once a Muslim, always a
> > Muslim. You cannot go back. In Islamic eyes, Obama is certainly a
> > Muslim. He may think he’s a Christian, but they do not.
.
> Wow, Kel, and all this time we thought you were a "perfect
> Christian". You certainly do subscribe to this Muslim "if the daddy
> was a Muslim, then the children must be" dogma. Makes us think you
> are a closet Muslim or something.
Kel never said that Obama wasn't a Christian, only that Muslims
consider him one of their own until he formally denounces the
religion.
Edwards@america.gov John Edwards Two Timing Americas
<tops...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3edfd535-3cfe-4416...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
> Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
Either is Bill Clinton, but you conservallons never seem gunshy about
bringing him up.
================
Since his wife was running until a month ago , and she is speaking at the
Pot Convention next week, any Clinton is fair topic.
felonio...@aol.com
> On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
>
> > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> > > Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
> > Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
>
> His twin brother, and spawn of Satan, John McCain is.
The intolerance and hatred of the left never ceases to amuse :)
Paulie Walnutts
>
> - Show quoted text -
WAIT A GAWD DAMMED MINUTE !!! I AM NOT A DEMOCRAT !!!
Paulie Walnutts
I'd love to see his medical records but I guess that'll never happen.
crook...@gmail.com
> "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer Edwa...@America.gov> wrote in
> messagenews:R4SdnVsoqqMxNTDV...@comcast.com...
>
>
>
> > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"
> >news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> > Obama's Cocaine Confessional
> >http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
> At least O was honest about it. Not much to say about hoople headed drunken
> Bush:
>
> Photos of George W. Bush 'Drunk As A Monkey' At the Olympics
>
> These pictures won't reach the media -- Bush "drunk as a money" at the
> Olympics. One picture actually shows a red scraping on his arm. Wonders
> how he got that.
>
>
> Bush Falling Down Drunk At Olympics:
>
> http://wonkette.com/401833/was-bush-falling-down-drunk-at-olympics
>
> One More Drunken Bush At Olympics Photo!
>
> http://wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bush-flag.jpg
I can't wait for his January 20th farewell speech. I bet he's so drunk
that
he'll actually sound more lucid than usual.
If he's ever brought up for war crimes, will the drunkenness and drug
use excuse be enough to save him from life imprisonment or whatever
it is The Hague courts do these days? Or will Cheney slip him a mickey
before he tries to lay the blame on ol' Dick?
Rob Cypher
robcypher.livejournal.com
www.myspace.com/robcyphercollective
robw
No one (except you right wing Rush idiots) give a rat's ass about those
questions.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:4851d8cd-d112-4498...@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
robw
And you were an editor?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:80d39f8e-485b-4079...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
doomella
Bob
> .
> Kel never said that Obama wasn't a Christian, only that Muslims
> consider him one of their own until he formally denounces the
> religion.
>
then they cut his head off.
dead kennedy haters
> > Kel never said that Obama wasn't a Christian, only that Muslims
> > consider him one of their own until he formally denounces the
> > religion.
.
> then they cut his head off.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo- Islam is the religion of
peace.
doomella
Oh, jeez... Spoken like someone who never did a line of coke at a
party and is completely clueless about it. Tons of people spent the
80's and '90s hoovering Hefty-bagloads of cocaine and ecstasy and
never became "addicts" and never looked back.
robw
"dead kennedy haters" <bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ee207856-4f92-4dbe...@25g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
doomella
His medical records would hardly show drug use, unless he was an
addict enrolled in a treatment program. Is everybody who has a glass
of wine an alcoholic?
robw
a drug addled mess.
bvalley is a hypocrite at all levels.
"doomella" <Doome...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddf880c2-5826-4dae...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
Kel
Thank you!
Kel
Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
addled losers.
clouddreamer
>
> Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> addled losers.
Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
is somehow evil.
BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
rooms...only to be found dead.
Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
felonio...@aol.com
> Kel wrote:
>
> > Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> > idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> > addled losers.
>
> Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
> Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
> is somehow evil.
The entire population is responsible for caring for themselves, you
socialist cunt. When you reach adulthood, maybe you won't be so
clueless.
>
> BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> rooms...only to be found dead.
No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
>
> Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
felonio...@aol.com
> Kel Varnsen wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
> > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> >> "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> >> Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
> > Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
>
He's name is McBush? Please learn English, idiot.
> A virtual carbon copy of Bush in his thinking
> and goals...
Yeah, Anwar, torture, stem cells, he's a real carbon copy all right. I
understand how hysterical you are because you'll never get a say over
who us in the real country to your south elect as our President, but
you should really try thinking these things through next time,
halfwit.
>only slightly more senile.
His decimation of Obama on Saturday must be eating you alive. How's
that American citizenship application going, fifty-first stater? ;)
trotsky
> On Aug 21, 1:02 pm, cake_and_eat_it_...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
>>> Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
>>>> "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>>>> Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>>> Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
>> His twin brother, and spawn of Satan, John McCain is.
>
> The intolerance and hatred of the left never ceases to amuse :)
I guess a shitbag such as yourself would find such stuff amusing. LOL.
Paulie Walnutts
>
> - Show quoted text -
Since I don't do drugs I really could'nt tell you. But I hear pot and
coke stay in your bloodstream for about 30 days. You think it may have
shown up in a blood test somewhere in his past?
trotsky
Wait, are you going to tell us you have some kind of proof that you're
not a loser?
Kel
Ask me if I give a good goddam about a country that is turning into an
islamic one!
Kel
You have a name like trotsky...I think you're the loser!
WBY...@ireland.com
That's renounce, Dork. And it's not necessary except in your very
small mind.
WB Yeats
Paulie Walnutts
>
> - Show quoted text -
Just curious. But, how old are you "doomella"??
Lefty
> On Aug 21, 6:31 pm, clouddreamer <S...@Cllmate.change.net> wrote:
>
> > Kel wrote:
>
> > > Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> > > idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> > > addled losers.
>
> > Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
> > Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
> > is somehow evil.
>
> The entire population is responsible for caring for themselves, you
> socialist cunt. When you reach adulthood, maybe you won't be so
> clueless.
So then, if you become injured or ill and are no longer able to work,
I can assume you'll be willing to starve to death rather than take
social assistance? If America has another great depression (and it
just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
in?
Blow it out your ass, you pathetic fraud. You'd be johnny-on-the-spot
the welfare line, fighting little old ladies to get to the wicket
first.
> > BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> > rooms...only to be found dead.
>
> No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
> approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
Fatuous, ignorant drivel. Government does not approve surgeries. It's
automatically approved by the hospital at the doctor's request. The
government is not involved in such decisions.
> > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
anything that actually helps US citizens. You love supporting ~that~
kind of big government, naturally. You just object to big government
when it actually does people some good.
You're both a hypocrite and a fool.
Lefty
What country is that?
Lefty
Brilliant retort. I'm sure he's completely demoralized by your biting
wit, gasbag.
I bet you don't even know who trotsky was.
felonio...@aol.com
> On Aug 21, 9:37 pm, feloniousmo...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > On Aug 21, 6:31 pm, clouddreamer <S...@Cllmate.change.net> wrote:
>
> > > Kel wrote:
>
> > > > Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> > > > idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> > > > addled losers.
>
> > > Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
> > > Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
> > > is somehow evil.
>
> > The entire population is responsible for caring for themselves, you
> > socialist cunt. When you reach adulthood, maybe you won't be so
> > clueless.
>
> So then, if you become injured or ill and are no longer able to work,
> I can assume you'll be willing to starve to death rather than take
> social assistance?
It depends on whether I'm adequately insured. You've heard of
insurance, I take it?
> If America has another great depression (and it
> just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> in?
I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
> Blow it out your ass, you pathetic fraud. You'd be johnny-on-the-spot
> the welfare line, fighting little old ladies to get to the wicket
> first.
>
> > > BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> > > rooms...only to be found dead.
>
> > No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
> > approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
>
> Fatuous, ignorant drivel. Government does not approve surgeries.
True. Sometimes it takes so long that they never get around to it :)
It's
> automatically approved by the hospital at the doctor's request. The
> government is not involved in such decisions.
Sure they are. The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
government. We're at least that smart.
>
> > > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> > Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> > through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
>
> In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
> The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
> that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
> anything that actually helps US citizens.
True. Canada doesn't actually need a military since you border an
actual country to the south. Without us, you'd be a third world
cesspool like the toilets in Latin America.
You love supporting ~that~
> kind of big government, naturally.
I love being able to defend ourselves from the Muslime animals seeking
to destroy us, yes. But we know how much the left is in love with
those nutbags, so I'm not surprised this concept eludes you.
> You just object to big government
> when it actually does people some good.
Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
> You're both a hypocrite and a fool.
And you're adorable :)
Lefty
> On Aug 22, 1:26 pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 21, 9:37 pm, feloniousmo...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 21, 6:31 pm, clouddreamer <S...@Cllmate.change.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Kel wrote:
>
> > > > > Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> > > > > idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> > > > > addled losers.
>
> > > > Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
> > > > Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
> > > > is somehow evil.
>
> > > The entire population is responsible for caring for themselves, you
> > > socialist cunt. When you reach adulthood, maybe you won't be so
> > > clueless.
>
> > So then, if you become injured or ill and are no longer able to work,
> > I can assume you'll be willing to starve to death rather than take
> > social assistance?
>
> It depends on whether I'm adequately insured. You've heard of
> insurance, I take it?
So, you're saying you have disability insurance? Is it enough to last
you the rest of your life?
You're sidestepping the question, naturally.
> > If America has another great depression (and it
> > just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> > you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> > in?
>
> I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
> capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
In a depression where millions of people are out of work? You're
massively self-deluded or just massively dishonest.
You side-stepped the question again. What would you do if you couldn't
get another job?
> > Blow it out your ass, you pathetic fraud. You'd be johnny-on-the-spot
> > the welfare line, fighting little old ladies to get to the wicket
> > first.
>
> > > > BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> > > > rooms...only to be found dead.
>
> > > No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
> > > approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
>
> > Fatuous, ignorant drivel. Government does not approve surgeries.
>
> True. Sometimes it takes so long that they never get around to it :)
So you say. But I've shown that you are completely ignorant on the
subject and making shit up as you go along.
> It's
>
> > automatically approved by the hospital at the doctor's request. The
> > government is not involved in such decisions.
>
> Sure they are.
You just admitted in your last comment that they don't approve
surgeries, stupid.
You can't even keep your bullshit consistent.
Me: "Government does not approve surgeries"
You; "True."
Sober up, twit.
>The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
> the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
> government. We're at least that smart.
Then why do you keep electing dipshits who can't even be trusted to be
the payer on an insurance plan? I've got a radical idea for you- stop
electing incompetent morons.
>
> > > > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> > > Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> > > through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
>
> > In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
> > The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
> > that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
> > anything that actually helps US citizens.
>
> True. Canada doesn't actually need a military since you border an
> actual country to the south. Without us, you'd be a third world
> cesspool like the toilets in Latin America.
Deflection from your support of big government noted.
> You love supporting ~that~
>
> > kind of big government, naturally.
>
> I love being able to defend ourselves from the Muslime animals seeking
> to destroy us, yes. But we know how much the left is in love with
> those nutbags, so I'm not surprised this concept eludes you.
Defense I can get on board with, but the reason The US a huge military
is not defensive. You'd have to be deeply naive and possibly paranoid
if you believe that much defense is needed, and that attacks on other
nations constitute defense.
I suspect you know it isn't, but are too dishonest to admit it. You
defend government spending on the military like the Marxist you are,
and you use a boogeyman to excuse it. You'd have been happy in the
Soviet Union. They defended their military buildup by using the US as
a boogeyman. The Nazis did the same thing, using Jews and Socialists
as the boogeyman. What good company you're in.
> > You just object to big government
> > when it actually does people some good.
>
> Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
> economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
So you must really hate the Bush regime, then, for the huge increases
in government spending. McCain has indicated he'll continue what Bush
started.
So may I assume you won't be voting for him?
> > You're both a hypocrite and a fool.
>
> And you're adorable :)
So all the sailors tell me.
trotsky
If all the mirrors in his are broken he might be able to claim he
doesn't know what a loser is, either.
Harold Burton
<c9b8f05f-c8ba-4956...@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
Kel Varnsen <KelVarn...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
> Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie"
> > Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
> >
> > Obama's Cocaine
> > Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=277375
> > 4
>
> Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
Snicker. There ya go confusing leftards, not that it's that difficult.
Harold Burton
<d5086326-7984-4cad...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
cake_and_...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
> >
> > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie"
> > > Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
> >
> > > Obama's Cocaine
> > > Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773
> > > 754
> >
> > Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
>
> His twin brother, and spawn of Satan, John McCain is.
Care for some cheese with that whine?
Snicker.
Harold Burton
trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
> Wait, are you going to tell us you have some kind of proof that I'm
> not a loser?
Nope.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
<11243840-e5fd-4027...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Lefty <lefty...@netscape.net> wrote:
Yep.
felonio...@aol.com
> On Aug 22, 8:17 pm, feloniousmo...@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 22, 1:26 pm, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 21, 9:37 pm, feloniousmo...@aol.com wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 21, 6:31 pm, clouddreamer <S...@Cllmate.change.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Kel wrote:
>
> > > > > > Lefties demand welfare, that's it. They're lazy good for nothing
> > > > > > idiots wanting to give my hard earned money away to a bunch of drug
> > > > > > addled losers.
>
> > > > > Wow. You really need to stop drinking the Kool-aid. Seems the
> > > > > Republicans have you all convinced that caring for the entire population
> > > > > is somehow evil.
>
> > > > The entire population is responsible for caring for themselves, you
> > > > socialist cunt. When you reach adulthood, maybe you won't be so
> > > > clueless.
>
> > > So then, if you become injured or ill and are no longer able to work,
> > > I can assume you'll be willing to starve to death rather than take
> > > social assistance?
>
> > It depends on whether I'm adequately insured. You've heard of
> > insurance, I take it?
>
> So, you're saying you have disability insurance? Is it enough to last
> you the rest of your life?
> You're sidestepping the question, naturally.
I've answered the question and devastatingly so. Try not to cry :)
>
> > > If America has another great depression (and it
> > > just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> > > you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> > > in?
>
> > I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
> > capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
>
> In a depression where millions of people are out of work? You're
> massively self-deluded or just massively dishonest.
No, that's quite all right, here in Capitalism LandTM, where people
actually have to earn their livings, there's plenty of work, no matter
how many worthless failures up in the fifty-first state cry themselves
to sleep.
> You side-stepped the question again. What would you do if you couldn't
> get another job?
>
> > > Blow it out your ass, you pathetic fraud. You'd be johnny-on-the-spot
> > > the welfare line, fighting little old ladies to get to the wicket
> > > first.
>
> > > > > BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> > > > > rooms...only to be found dead.
>
> > > > No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
> > > > approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
>
> > > Fatuous, ignorant drivel. Government does not approve surgeries.
>
> > True. Sometimes it takes so long that they never get around to it :)
>
> So you say. But I've shown that you are completely ignorant on the
> subject and making shit up as you go along.
>
> > It's
>
> > > automatically approved by the hospital at the doctor's request. The
> > > government is not involved in such decisions.
>
> > Sure they are.
>
> You just admitted in your last comment that they don't approve
> surgeries, stupid.
No I didn't. Try not to cry, liar ;)
> You can't even keep your bullshit consistent.
>
> Me: "Government does not approve surgeries"
>
> You; "True."
>
> Sober up, twit.
>
> >The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
> > the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
> > government. We're at least that smart.
>
> Then why do you keep electing dipshits who can't even be trusted to be
> the payer on an insurance plan?
Because I don't elect people to be payers on insurance plans, since
I'm able to earn one through work. Again, if you're having trouble
with that scary W word, have an adult explain it to you.
I've got a radical idea for you- stop
> electing incompetent morons.
>
>
>
> > > > > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> > > > Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> > > > through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
>
> > > In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
> > > The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
> > > that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
> > > anything that actually helps US citizens.
>
> > True. Canada doesn't actually need a military since you border an
> > actual country to the south. Without us, you'd be a third world
> > cesspool like the toilets in Latin America.
>
> Deflection from your support of big government noted.
>
> > You love supporting ~that~
>
> > > kind of big government, naturally.
>
> > I love being able to defend ourselves from the Muslime animals seeking
> > to destroy us, yes. But we know how much the left is in love with
> > those nutbags, so I'm not surprised this concept eludes you.
>
> Defense I can get on board with, but the reason The US a huge military
> is not defensive.
Sure it is. Someone has to clean up the messes the rest of the world
is too embarrassingly cowardly to deal with.
You'd have to be deeply naive and possibly paranoid
> if you believe that much defense is needed, and that attacks on other
> nations constitute defense.
Depends on which nations :)
> I suspect you know it isn't, but are too dishonest to admit it. You
> defend government spending on the military like the Marxist you are,
> and you use a boogeyman to excuse it.
You wish your Muslime heroes were boogeyman, but unfortunately for us
evolved humans, they're all too real. Try not to let that destroy you.
You'd have been happy in the
> Soviet Union. They defended their military buildup by using the US as
> a boogeyman. The Nazis did the same thing, using Jews and Socialists
> as the boogeyman. What good company you're in.
Nazi comparison noted.
>
> > > You just object to big government
> > > when it actually does people some good.
>
> > Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
> > economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
>
> So you must really hate the Bush regime, then, for the huge increases
> in government spending. McCain has indicated he'll continue what Bush
> started.
> So may I assume you won't be voting for him?
I won't be voting for the idiot who thinks taxing the "rich" into the
last century will somehow drive the economy anywhere but down.
Sorry ;)
felonio...@aol.com
I see those kneepads are getting a good workout :)
Lefty
Double dodge from a cringing coward. Your non-response tells the tale-
you don`t have enough disability insurance to last, and you ~would~
accept social assistance if it ran out.
Thanks for exposing your massive, unrelenting hypocrisy.
> > > > If America has another great depression (and it
> > > > just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> > > > you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> > > > in?
>
> > > I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
> > > capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
>
> > In a depression where millions of people are out of work? You're
> > massively self-deluded or just massively dishonest.
>
> No, that's quite all right, here in Capitalism LandTM, where people
> actually have to earn their livings, there's plenty of work, no matter
> how many worthless failures up in the fifty-first state cry themselves
> to sleep.
I repeat- in a ~depression~ there would not be enough work. Such is
the nature of a depression, you ignorant ape. So, what would you do?
This is a hypothetical question, and it's simple to answer, yet you
are still dodging. Why not just lie and say you'd die for your
principles? It's not as if you don't lie regularly anyway.
> > You side-stepped the question again. What would you do if you couldn't
> > get another job?
>
> > > > Blow it out your ass, you pathetic fraud. You'd be johnny-on-the-spot
> > > > the welfare line, fighting little old ladies to get to the wicket
> > > > first.
>
> > > > > > BTW...people in Canada don't get ignored in hospital waiting
> > > > > > rooms...only to be found dead.
>
> > > > > No they just die waiting for the idiots in government to get around to
> > > > > approving their surgeries. Try not to cry :)
>
> > > > Fatuous, ignorant drivel. Government does not approve surgeries.
>
> > > True. Sometimes it takes so long that they never get around to it :)
>
> > So you say. But I've shown that you are completely ignorant on the
> > subject and making shit up as you go along.
>
> > > It's
>
> > > > automatically approved by the hospital at the doctor's request. The
> > > > government is not involved in such decisions.
>
> > > Sure they are.
>
> > You just admitted in your last comment that they don't approve
> > surgeries, stupid.
>
> No I didn't. Try not to cry, liar ;)
Proof redux;
Me: "Government does not approve surgeries."
You: "True."
> > You can't even keep your bullshit consistent.
>
> > Me: "Government does not approve surgeries"
>
> > You; "True."
>
> > Sober up, twit.
>
> > >The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
> > > the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
> > > government. We're at least that smart.
>
> > Then why do you keep electing dipshits who can't even be trusted to be
> > the payer on an insurance plan?
>
> Because I don't elect people to be payers on insurance plans, since
> I'm able to earn one through work. Again, if you're having trouble
> with that scary W word, have an adult explain it to you.
More cowardly avoidance. Why do you elect people who are, in your own
words, dipshits?
> I've got a radical idea for you- stop
>
>
>
> > electing incompetent morons.
>
> > > > > > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> > > > > Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> > > > > through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
>
> > > > In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
> > > > The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
> > > > that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
> > > > anything that actually helps US citizens.
>
> > > True. Canada doesn't actually need a military since you border an
> > > actual country to the south. Without us, you'd be a third world
> > > cesspool like the toilets in Latin America.
>
> > Deflection from your support of big government noted.
>
> > > You love supporting ~that~
>
> > > > kind of big government, naturally.
>
> > > I love being able to defend ourselves from the Muslime animals seeking
> > > to destroy us, yes. But we know how much the left is in love with
> > > those nutbags, so I'm not surprised this concept eludes you.
>
> > Defense I can get on board with, but the reason The US a huge military
> > is not defensive.
>
> Sure it is. Someone has to clean up the messes the rest of the world
> is too embarrassingly cowardly to deal with.
That is not defensive. It's only defensive if America is under direct
attack. But you knew that, and you are being hopelessly dishonest, as
usual.
> You'd have to be deeply naive and possibly paranoid
>
> > if you believe that much defense is needed, and that attacks on other
> > nations constitute defense.
>
> Depends on which nations :)
See above.
> > I suspect you know it isn't, but are too dishonest to admit it. You
> > defend government spending on the military like the Marxist you are,
> > and you use a boogeyman to excuse it.
>
> You wish your Muslime heroes were boogeyman, but unfortunately for us
> evolved humans, they're all too real. Try not to let that destroy you.
Indeed they are, and if any Muslim (or other) nation attacks the US,
I'll certainly support defense.
I find it amusing that you associate tribalism with being evolved. As
confused as you are, it's no wonder you think statism is actually free
market capitalism.
> You'd have been happy in the
>
> > Soviet Union. They defended their military buildup by using the US as
> > a boogeyman. The Nazis did the same thing, using Jews and Socialists
> > as the boogeyman. What good company you're in.
>
> Nazi comparison noted.
Racist nationalism = nazism. Corporate statism = fascism. It's not a
comparison. Philosophically, you are indeed a nazi.
Feel free to run to your Uncle Wiki and look up those terms.
> > > > You just object to big government
> > > > when it actually does people some good.
>
> > > Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
> > > economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
>
> > So you must really hate the Bush regime, then, for the huge increases
> > in government spending. McCain has indicated he'll continue what Bush
> > started.
> > So may I assume you won't be voting for him?
>
> I won't be voting for the idiot who thinks taxing the "rich" into the
> last century will somehow drive the economy anywhere but down.
> Sorry ;)
Dodgeball again. I take that to mean you'll vote for the Big
Government GOP. But as I pointed out, the US, under a Republican
regime, already taxes the rich more than Canada does. Maybe you should
move here where we have ~genuine~ capitalism instead of corporate
statism.
Lefty
Oh, he knows. He knows he's a coward, too. I'm sure you've noticed how
he tries to evade questions. He's so stupid that he can't even think
up a good enough lie to respond with, so he hides like the little
bitch he is.
Bleh. He's got so little game that I won't be using him for long. The
pickings are slim lately.
Lefty
> In article
> <d5086326-7984-4cad-aa48-664761f46...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> cake_and_eat_it_...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
>
> > > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > > > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie"
> > > > Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> > > > Obama's Cocaine
> > > > Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773
> > > > 754
>
> > > Well I guess I'm not voting for Bush again. Is he running!
>
> > His twin brother, and spawn of Satan, John McCain is.
>
> Care for some cheese with that whine?
>
> Snicker.
Gee, that was original. Did you think that one up all by yourself?
Lefty
Yap.
This is a fun game. Your turn. Say "yop". Then I'll say "yup", you'll
say "yoop", and so on.
felonio...@aol.com
Sure I do. And so do the rest of the winners who actually have to go
out and earn their livings. Sorry that you've failed yet again :)
and you ~would~
> accept social assistance if it ran out.
> Thanks for exposing your massive, unrelenting hypocrisy.
>
> > > > > If America has another great depression (and it
> > > > > just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> > > > > you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> > > > > in?
>
> > > > I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
> > > > capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
>
> > > In a depression where millions of people are out of work? You're
> > > massively self-deluded or just massively dishonest.
>
> > No, that's quite all right, here in Capitalism LandTM, where people
> > actually have to earn their livings, there's plenty of work, no matter
> > how many worthless failures up in the fifty-first state cry themselves
> > to sleep.
>
> I repeat- in a ~depression~ there would not be enough work.
Sure there would, for us with actual marketable skills, y'know the
ones that keep the dregs in our society sucking on the public tit.
You forgot this part: "Sometimes it takes so long that they never get
around to it :)" I wonder why that is?
>
>
>
> > > You can't even keep your bullshit consistent.
>
> > > Me: "Government does not approve surgeries"
>
> > > You; "True."
>
> > > Sober up, twit.
>
> > > >The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
> > > > the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
> > > > government. We're at least that smart.
>
> > > Then why do you keep electing dipshits who can't even be trusted to be
> > > the payer on an insurance plan?
>
> > Because I don't elect people to be payers on insurance plans, since
> > I'm able to earn one through work. Again, if you're having trouble
> > with that scary W word, have an adult explain it to you.
>
> More cowardly avoidance. Why do you elect people who are, in your own
> words, dipshits?
More deflection because you can't stand the prospect of actually
having to earn a living. These things don't need to scare you :)
>
>
>
> > I've got a radical idea for you- stop
>
> > > electing incompetent morons.
>
> > > > > > > Health care for profit. Hypocrisy at its saddest.
>
> > > > > > Working your ass off so the thieves on the left can steal your money
> > > > > > through taxation. Hypocrisy at its Canadaest.
>
> > > > > In fact, Canada's tax rates favour the wealthy more than US taxes do.
> > > > > The US is actually more socialist in that sense. The difference is
> > > > > that most of your taxes go to support a top-heavy military rather than
> > > > > anything that actually helps US citizens.
>
> > > > True. Canada doesn't actually need a military since you border an
> > > > actual country to the south. Without us, you'd be a third world
> > > > cesspool like the toilets in Latin America.
>
> > > Deflection from your support of big government noted.
>
> > > > You love supporting ~that~
>
> > > > > kind of big government, naturally.
>
> > > > I love being able to defend ourselves from the Muslime animals seeking
> > > > to destroy us, yes. But we know how much the left is in love with
> > > > those nutbags, so I'm not surprised this concept eludes you.
>
> > > Defense I can get on board with, but the reason The US a huge military
> > > is not defensive.
>
> > Sure it is. Someone has to clean up the messes the rest of the world
> > is too embarrassingly cowardly to deal with.
>
> That is not defensive. It's only defensive if America is under direct
> attack.
As it was, and as it never will be again, thanks to preemptive
measures which send the rest of the cowards out there crying to their
cribs.
But you knew that, and you are being hopelessly dishonest, as
> usual.
>
> > You'd have to be deeply naive and possibly paranoid
>
> > > if you believe that much defense is needed, and that attacks on other
> > > nations constitute defense.
>
> > Depends on which nations :)
>
> See above.
>
> > > I suspect you know it isn't, but are too dishonest to admit it. You
> > > defend government spending on the military like the Marxist you are,
> > > and you use a boogeyman to excuse it.
>
> > You wish your Muslime heroes were boogeyman, but unfortunately for us
> > evolved humans, they're all too real. Try not to let that destroy you.
>
> Indeed they are, and if any Muslim (or other) nation attacks the US,
> I'll certainly support defense.
You'd actually welcome any invaders, in a pathetic attempt to curry
favor.
> I find it amusing that you associate tribalism with being evolved. As
> confused as you are, it's no wonder you think statism is actually free
> market capitalism.
>
> > You'd have been happy in the
>
> > > Soviet Union. They defended their military buildup by using the US as
> > > a boogeyman. The Nazis did the same thing, using Jews and Socialists
> > > as the boogeyman. What good company you're in.
>
> > Nazi comparison noted.
>
> Racist nationalism = nazism. Corporate statism = fascism. It's not a
> comparison. Philosophically, you are indeed a nazi.
> Feel free to run to your Uncle Wiki and look up those terms.
It's amazing how quickly the left has to resort to the big bad "nazi"
and "fascist" cards when they lose arguments in record times. Thanks
for keeping the tradition alive.
>
> > > > > You just object to big government
> > > > > when it actually does people some good.
>
> > > > Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
> > > > economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
>
> > > So you must really hate the Bush regime, then, for the huge increases
> > > in government spending. McCain has indicated he'll continue what Bush
> > > started.
> > > So may I assume you won't be voting for him?
>
> > I won't be voting for the idiot who thinks taxing the "rich" into the
> > last century will somehow drive the economy anywhere but down.
> > Sorry ;)
>
> Dodgeball again.
Still sore that I won't be voting for the Messiah, I see. Try not to
have a heart attack.
I take that to mean you'll vote for the Big
> Government GOP. But as I pointed out, the US, under a Republican
> regime, already taxes the rich more than Canada does. Maybe you should
> move here where we have ~genuine~ capitalism instead of corporate
> statism.
Income redistribution isn't capitalism. Sorry :(
felonio...@aol.com
Ooh, looks like Trotsky's got a new boyfriend. Hope you brought a
rubber, she gets around ;)
Suey
> On Aug 21, 3:14 pm, clouddreamer <S...@Cllmate.change.net> wrote:
>
> > Kel Varnsen wrote:
> > > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
> > > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > >> "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> > >>news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> > >> Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
> and Muslim Streets see it. In Arab culture and under Islamic law, if
> your father is a Muslim, so are you. And once a Muslim, always a
> Muslim. You cannot go back. In Islamic eyes, Obama is certainly a
> Muslim. He may think he’s a Christian, but they do not.
Roman Catholic Church thinks the same way, FYI
Suey
> On Aug 21, 3:02 pm, Kel Varnsen <KelVarnsenAu...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 21, 1:39 pm, "John Edwards Two Timing Americas" <TwoTimer
>
> > Edwa...@America.gov> wrote:
> > > "Barbara "My son is a boozing junkie" Bush"<prez...@too.drunk.and.high.to.govern.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:n35ra45tsgd48hun7...@4ax.com...
>
> > > Obama's Cocaine Confessionalhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BothSidesAllSides/story?id=2773754
>
>
> voters say that McCain would carry on the (cough,cough) "high
> traditions" (cough, cough) of the Bus administration.
God help this country and it's citizens,
Suey
>
> Still sore that I won't be voting for the Messiah, I see. Try not to
> have a heart attack.
>
> I take that to mean you'll vote for the Big
>
> > Government GOP. But as I pointed out, the US, under a Republican
> > regime, already taxes the rich more than Canada does. Maybe you should
> > move here where we have ~genuine~ capitalism instead of corporate
> > statism.
>
McBush et at, including all those little mama's boys still living @
home well into their adult years, plonking away on keyboards and
totally removed from the reality of what it's like to actually have to
$upport ones self have given new meaning to the word "capitalism
" ...: " to capitalize on others blood, sweat and tears.." critical
of those who need help, all the while wet-nursing from their own
little private cache called mom & dad; avoiding the military and
demanding others
fight to keep them free and safe to hate. How sad.
felonio...@aol.com
When are you heading out to Iraq? :)
How sad.
trotsky
> In article <tixrk.309020$yE1.151325@attbi_s21>,
> trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
>
>
trotsky
Good one, shitbag!
trotsky
Well, these right wing retards don't have much in the way of
intellectual firepower, but they are fun to screw with from time to time.
Harold Burton
<124a521e-b2a9-4c71...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
Lefty <lefty_t...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
Just as original as the post I responded to.
Snicker.
Lefty
Read the fine print in your policy, you naive twit. Disability
coverage is usually only 60% of your salary and most plans cut you off
after a few years. What company holds your policy? I can easily check
for you.
> and you ~would~
>
>
>
> > accept social assistance if it ran out.
> > Thanks for exposing your massive, unrelenting hypocrisy.
>
> > > > > > If America has another great depression (and it
> > > > > > just might at this rate), you are laid off, and can't find a job,
> > > > > > you'll be content for you and your family to die for what you believe
> > > > > > in?
>
> > > > > I'd be able to get another job. Though I know earning a living in a
> > > > > capitalist country is difficult for complete failures to understand.
>
> > > > In a depression where millions of people are out of work? You're
> > > > massively self-deluded or just massively dishonest.
>
> > > No, that's quite all right, here in Capitalism LandTM, where people
> > > actually have to earn their livings, there's plenty of work, no matter
> > > how many worthless failures up in the fifty-first state cry themselves
> > > to sleep.
>
> > I repeat- in a ~depression~ there would not be enough work.
>
> Sure there would, for us with actual marketable skills, y'know the
> ones that keep the dregs in our society sucking on the public tit.
You need to do some reading up on the Great Depression. Skilled
workers were affected. You must be in a trade, because you're
certainly not well educated.
The trades would be ~devastated~ by a depression. You're in a
precarious position even now, but at least you have your denial to
keep you warm. That's pretty sad, felon.
Repeating a factually unsupported claim is not an argument.
>
> > > > You can't even keep your bullshit consistent.
>
> > > > Me: "Government does not approve surgeries"
>
> > > > You; "True."
>
> > > > Sober up, twit.
>
> > > > >The difference is that unlike in the US, we don't put
> > > > > the healthcare system into the hands of the same dipshits who fuck up
> > > > > government. We're at least that smart.
>
> > > > Then why do you keep electing dipshits who can't even be trusted to be
> > > > the payer on an insurance plan?
>
> > > Because I don't elect people to be payers on insurance plans, since
> > > I'm able to earn one through work. Again, if you're having trouble
> > > with that scary W word, have an adult explain it to you.
>
> > More cowardly avoidance. Why do you elect people who are, in your own
> > words, dipshits?
>
> More deflection because you can't stand the prospect of actually
> having to earn a living. These things don't need to scare you :)
Deflection from what? 'm the one asking the questions. You're the one
repeatedly refusing to answer and changing the subject to avoid it. Do
you even know what the word deflection means?
Bold-faced lie noted.
> But you knew that, and you are being hopelessly dishonest, as
>
>
>
> > usual.
>
> > > You'd have to be deeply naive and possibly paranoid
>
> > > > if you believe that much defense is needed, and that attacks on other
> > > > nations constitute defense.
>
> > > Depends on which nations :)
>
> > See above.
>
> > > > I suspect you know it isn't, but are too dishonest to admit it. You
> > > > defend government spending on the military like the Marxist you are,
> > > > and you use a boogeyman to excuse it.
>
> > > You wish your Muslime heroes were boogeyman, but unfortunately for us
> > > evolved humans, they're all too real. Try not to let that destroy you.
>
> > Indeed they are, and if any Muslim (or other) nation attacks the US,
> > I'll certainly support defense.
>
> You'd actually welcome any invaders, in a pathetic attempt to curry
> favor.
What do you base such a supposition on?
> > I find it amusing that you associate tribalism with being evolved. As
> > confused as you are, it's no wonder you think statism is actually free
> > market capitalism.
>
> > > You'd have been happy in the
>
> > > > Soviet Union. They defended their military buildup by using the US as
> > > > a boogeyman. The Nazis did the same thing, using Jews and Socialists
> > > > as the boogeyman. What good company you're in.
>
> > > Nazi comparison noted.
>
> > Racist nationalism = nazism. Corporate statism = fascism. It's not a
> > comparison. Philosophically, you are indeed a nazi.
> > Feel free to run to your Uncle Wiki and look up those terms.
>
> It's amazing how quickly the left has to resort to the big bad "nazi"
> and "fascist" cards when they lose arguments in record times. Thanks
> for keeping the tradition alive.
Like I said, your own stated philosophy betrays what you are.
Felon, you don't make arguments. You just bluster and evade. You're an
ignorant redneck with a grade 10 diploma from a trade school, zero
verbal reasoning skills, and a deep need to deny your inadequacy.
You know this, so you have to crow about non-existent "victories".
It's all you have.
> > > > > > You just object to big government
> > > > > > when it actually does people some good.
>
> > > > > Big government does nobody any good. Just robs those driving the
> > > > > economy to keep those who can't sucking on the tit.
>
> > > > So you must really hate the Bush regime, then, for the huge increases
> > > > in government spending. McCain has indicated he'll continue what Bush
> > > > started.
> > > > So may I assume you won't be voting for him?
>
> > > I won't be voting for the idiot who thinks taxing the "rich" into the
> > > last century will somehow drive the economy anywhere but down.
> > > Sorry ;)
>
> > Dodgeball again.
>
> Still sore that I won't be voting for the Messiah, I see. Try not to
> have a heart attack.
Why would I give a fuck? I'm not even a US citizen.
> I take that to mean you'll vote for the Big
>
> > Government GOP. But as I pointed out, the US, under a Republican
> > regime, already taxes the rich more than Canada does. Maybe you should
> > move here where we have ~genuine~ capitalism instead of corporate
> > statism.
>
> Income redistribution isn't capitalism. Sorry :(
So you admit the US is not capitalist.
U.S. States Lead the World in High Corporate Taxes;
http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/22917.html
"Summary
Large- and medium-sized businesses: Five percentage points lower
average corporate tax rate in Canada than in the U.S. by 2005.
Small businesses: Significantly lower corporate tax rates in Canada
on income above C$75,000.
Capital gains: Two percentage points lower average top tax rate in
Canada than the typical top capital gains tax rate in the U.S.
A C$500,000 lifetime capital gains exemption for small business
shares that has no equivalent in the U.S.
Research and development: A 20-per-cent research and development
(R&D) tax credit in Canada for all R&D expenditures compared to the
U.S. 20-per-cent credit for incremental R&D.
A 35-per-cent refundable tax credit available to smaller Canadian-
controlled private corporations; no equivalent in the U.S."
http://www.fin.gc.ca/toce/2002/cantaxadv_e.html
Federal income tax for individuals
"Let's consult the web sites of the CRA and the IRS. Income tax rates
are presented for 2005 for Canada and the U.S.
The Canadian table is much simpler:
* 15% on the first $35,595 of taxable income
* 22% on the next $35,595 of taxable income (from $35595 to
$71190)
* 26% on the next $44,549 of taxable income (from $71190 to
$115739)
* 29% of taxable income over $115,739.
In the United States there are four tax tables; the one to use depends
on whether you are filing as single, married filing jointly, married
filing separately, or as "head of household". Probably the most fair
comparison is to use the "single" table:
* 10% on the first $7300 of taxable income
* 15% on the amount between $7300 and $29700
* 25% on the amount between $29700 and $71950
* 28% on the amount between $71950 and $150150
* 33% on the amount between $150150 and $326450
* 35% on the amount over $326450"
http://strickland.ca/taxes.html
Try some alt on that foot, felon.
Lefty
>
> read more »
That should have been "salt" in the last line of my reply.
But on the other hand, tartar sauce might be better.
Lefty
You're losing what little entertainment value you provide with lame
lines like that.
Try harder.