Anderson Cooper Wears Underwear in the Shower
edonline
Anderson Cooper Wears Underwear in the Shower
CNN anchor-reporter Anderson Cooper does his daily workouts at the busy
Equinox gym in the Time Warner Center in New York, and so he's had to come
up with a brief solution to curious, cell-phone toting fellow gymrats -
wearing underwear in the showers. Janet Charlton reports that Cooper, who
attracts a great deal of attention from men and women gawkers on the
ellipticals and benches, is concerned about having himself exposed, so he
"takes precautions," wearing boxer briefs throughout the locker rooms to
scuttle anyone who might try to take a surreptitious snap.
JFlexer
news:vemdncheZPN1zbLb...@giganews.com...
My suspicion is that a pic of Anderson in wet, clingy briefs would "do it"
for most of his fans as much as a full frontal... maybe even moreso,
because of the titillation factor?
do you agree, ed? (I wish LCM was here to comment...)
--
-J
** Keeper of Betty Buckley and Bette Midler **
edonline
"JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f0o6c...@news5.newsguy.com...
I see nothing wrong with Anderson wanting to wear wet briefs! :)
DonnaB shallotpeel
<vemdncheZPN1zbLb...@giganews.com>, "edonline"
<edonlineSPAMOUT!@comcast.net> wrote:
He's a NeverNude! [Arrested Development reference]
--
DonnaB
"The day hums sweetly when you have enough bees working for you." - Baron
Vladimir Harkonnen, the original, HUNTERS OF DUNE, Brian Herbert & Kevin J.
Anderson
Roofshadow
"edonline" <edonlineSPAMOUT!@comcast.net> wrote:
Ditto.
I happily support his right to wear wet clingy underwear especially if
someone posts pics online!
;)
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
Terry Lomax
Roofshadow says...
Booker
"Terry Lomax" <Terry_...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f0ong...@drn.newsguy.com...
I don't care what he is....he's gorgeous...
Booker
Gregory Morrow
> "edonline" <edonlineSPAMO...@comcast.net> wrote innews:vemdncheZPN1zbLb...@giganews.com:
> And then what? Does he get into his business suit with soaking wet
> underwear, or does he change them and risk a photo? And if he changes
> them, why not wear a bathing suit instead of underwear? I'm sorry, but
> this story doesn't sound plausible.
I know, and I'll also go on record (as a gay guy) to say that I find
him just slightly dweeby...
And besides which with his bux couldn't he have a personal trainer
come into his home for workouts? Or wouldn't a place like CNN have
their own on - premises gym? One of the GREAT things about being rich
is that you don't have to soil yourself in public by doing things like
going to health clubs, taking public transport, etc...money DOES buy
privacy.
--
Best
Greg
Breaking News
>>
>> CNN anchor-reporter Anderson Cooper does his daily workouts at the busy
>> Equinox gym in the Time Warner Center in New York, and so he's had to
>> come up with a brief solution to curious, cell-phone toting fellow
>> gymrats - wearing underwear in the showers. Janet Charlton reports that
>> Cooper, who attracts a great deal of attention from men and women gawkers
>> on the ellipticals and benches, is concerned about having himself
>> exposed, so he "takes precautions," wearing boxer briefs throughout the
>> locker rooms to scuttle anyone who might try to take a surreptitious
>> snap.
Last year, I think, AC inferred, rather unsubtily, on AC 360, that his fav
pet is a hamster, not a horse. Could not believe what he'd just said!
With his 10m contract, he could conceivably get his own gym.
katorzejames
> And then what? Does he get into his business suit with soaking wet
> underwear, or does he change them and risk a photo? And if he changes
> them, why not wear a bathing suit instead of underwear? I'm sorry, but
> this story doesn't sound plausible.
actually, it sounds like you have never been to the gym.
your instincts are wildly off, as always.
kswymford@.com
frequented by Muslims. According to their religion their genitals aren't
to be displayed in public. So, they would shower in their underwear, dry
off and then put their towel around them and replace their wet underwear
with dry under the towel. That problem solved! ;)
mooseb...@hotmail.com
Anderson Cooper's a Never-Nude!
The Original Lisa Pease
haciendadevi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Or maybe he is just a "Princess Tiny Meat" and does not want anyone to
> see what he does not have. I think that is more like it!
>
> Hacienda de Ville
Nobody can prove that the size of a penis affects the sexual response
of every single heterosexual woman who ever lived.
Gregory Morrow
> That's another good argument. Why don't they have a private gym, right
> in the building where he works?
Exactly...or even a gym in the building where he lives...
This thing is one of those "suspension of reality" things. Reminds me
of in _The Devil Wears Prada_ where Meryl Streep's imperious fashion
editor character is always barking at her hapless assistant "Go get my
STARBUCK's...!!!". A big - cheeze company like that (modelled on
Conde Nast or whatever) would in all probability have an in - house
Starbuck's as some companies do, they'd have staff to deliver coffee
and such...busy assistants in real life wouldn't waste time going
outside of HQ to buy something mundane like coffee, you contract that
out.
--
Best
Greg
Gregory Morrow
The only time moozlims show their genitals is when they are screwing
dopey politically - correct liberals (like "nimue" here on agc or the
infamous "Chas Nemo" on the Dr. Laura group [to which this is x -
posted]) up the butt...
;-P
--
Best
Greg
Gregory Morrow
But you CAN prove that the size of a penis affects the sexual response
of every single homo male who's ever lived...!!!
;-D
--
Best
Greg
Terry Lomax
mooseb...@hotmail.com says...
He's a power bottom who like men of color fuck him in his shitpipe.
JFlexer
news:Xns991EC2AA1E24Cag...@207.115.17.102...
> la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote in
> news:cjb233dcsoqteb025...@4ax.com:
>
>> Agent Smith <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
>>
>>>la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote in
>>>news:3ra233t1rs8otb615...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> Agent Smith <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"edonline" <edonlineSPAMOUT!@comcast.net> wrote in
>>>>>news:vemdncheZPN1zbLb...@giganews.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://w2ww.tmz.com/2007/04/24/jessica-to-britney-take-my-dad-
>>>please/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anderson Cooper Wears Underwear in the Shower
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CNN anchor-reporter Anderson Cooper does his daily workouts at the
>>>>>> busy Equinox gym in the Time Warner Center in New York, and so
>>>>>> he's had to come up with a brief solution to curious, cell-phone
>>>>>> toting fellow gymrats - wearing underwear in the showers. Janet
>>>>>> Charlton reports that Cooper, who attracts a great deal of
>>>>>> attention from men and women gawkers on the ellipticals and
>>>>>> benches, is concerned about having himself exposed, so he "takes
>>>>>> precautions," wearing boxer briefs throughout the locker rooms to
>>>>>> scuttle anyone who might try to take a surreptitious snap.
>>>>>
>>>>>underwear, or does he change them and risk a photo? And if he
>>>>>changes them, why not wear a bathing suit instead of underwear? I'm
>>>>>sorry, but this story doesn't sound plausible.
>>>>
>>>> there's always a few guys at the gym who change under a towel. Or
>>>> go in the toilet stalls.
>>>>
>>>> Besides, it's not that unusual to cover up in the shower. People
>>>> did it for centuries in some places. Nuns still do it today. They
>>>> are never naked. Not even in the shower.
>>>
>>>Drenched underwear is gross, and it will make you wash that important
>>>area less.
>>
>> I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that if you're already
>> showering in your underwear (or in one of those long garments for that
>> purpose that some people use - like nuns) then chances are that "that
>> important area" isn't very important to you. Think about it. ;)
>
> Cleanliness is also next to godliness. I wonder if psychiatrists have
> ever used the phrase "genital self-hatred." Some people do have that
> problem, and you're probably right that it's worse among religious
> weirdos. We should start another vicious rumor that Cooper has that
> problem, too. :[
>
> Have you been to the Seminary? You seem to know an awful lot about the
> intimate garments of nuns. Got any other spicy secrets about nuns, that
> you'd care to recount? :)~
Psst, nuns generally live in a convent, priory, abbey, or motherhouse...
men studying to be priests live in a seminary.
JFlexer
Such a vivid and descriptive comment, Terry - as if you considered this
activity in great detail... longing for it... lusting, even...
hmmm...
katorzejames
> Someone should tell the Muslims about the bathing suit, too. We should
> start a vicious rumor that Cooper is a Muslim Traitor. Not for any
> particular political reason, but just for the joke.
>
> Besides Muslims, who majke themselves look crazy half the time anyhow, who
> showers in their friggin' underwear? Ewww...
boxer briefs literally are swimsuits - especially the microfiber
ones.
ps
guys shower at the gym in the above all the time.
sometimes you don't want all the closeted "straight" guys staring at
your junk!
katorzejames
wrote:
> But you CAN prove that the size of a penis affects the sexual response
> of every single homo male who's ever lived...!!!
oh my gosh, speak for yourself!
for grownups of all persuasions (including the greeks) beauty is
about proportion, not about exaggeration.
katorzejames
> I see nothing wrong with Anderson wanting to wear wet briefs! :)
anderson cooper seems like a regular guy, and it's not weird that he
should want to work out at a normal gym with normal people.
if he doesn't parade nude in the locker room, that's not weird,
either.
gay guys don't need to parade nude at the gym, because we have other
outlets for that shit - at least the cute ones do!
you see it all the time.
it's like this:
you work out in a t-shirt, boxer briefs and nylon shorts.
you go in the locker room, remove the shirt and shorts, enter the
shower, soap and rinse, briefly pull down your shorts and flip around
with a handful of liquid soap, rinse, pull the shorts back up and
enter the hot tub and/or sauna *in your shorts, so the old closeted
"straight" guys don't perv on you* - then re-enter the shower, repeat
and return to your locker.
then you remove your shorts and dry off and stow your wrung out, damp
shorts with your dirty towel in a plastic bag inside your gymbag.
you then put on new shorts or freeball in your god damn slacks.
it's not that deep - i do it all the time.
ps
most gay guys are not wearing stained, baggy white jockeys like agent
smith!
their shorts are generally black or colored microfiber squarecuts
which look great in the water and don't get "soggy".
i apologize to get so clinical, but stop the madness - i'm so sure!
The Original Lisa Pease
> In article <1177605410.395006.278...@n35g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> mooseboys...@hotmail.com says...
Please name one man of color who has inserted his penis into Anderson
Cooper's rectum. If you don't, then I don't believe you. You could
say the same thing about about Lou Dobbs.
>
> - Show quoted text -
Roofshadow
"JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Gosh wouldn't that be a shocker?
(NOT!)
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
Roofshadow
la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote:
> Agent Smith <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
>
> >la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote in
> >news:cjb233dcsoqteb025...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> Agent Smith <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote in
> >>>news:3ra233t1rs8otb615...@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>>> Agent Smith <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>"edonline" <edonlineSPAMOUT!@comcast.net> wrote in
> >>>>>news:vemdncheZPN1zbLb...@giganews.com:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> http://w2ww.tmz.com/2007/04/24/jessica-to-britney-take-my-dad-
> >>>please/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anderson Cooper Wears Underwear in the Shower
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> CNN anchor-reporter Anderson Cooper does his daily workouts at the
> >>>>>> busy Equinox gym in the Time Warner Center in New York, and so
> >>>>>> he's had to come up with a brief solution to curious, cell-phone
> >>>>>> toting fellow gymrats - wearing underwear in the showers. Janet
> >>>>>> Charlton reports that Cooper, who attracts a great deal of
> >>>>>> attention from men and women gawkers on the ellipticals and
> >>>>>> benches, is concerned about having himself exposed, so he "takes
> >>>>>> precautions," wearing boxer briefs throughout the locker rooms to
> >>>>>> scuttle anyone who might try to take a surreptitious snap.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>And then what? Does he get into his business suit with soaking wet
> >>>>>underwear, or does he change them and risk a photo? And if he
> >>>>>changes them, why not wear a bathing suit instead of underwear? I'm
> >>>>>sorry, but this story doesn't sound plausible.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe you're thinking too much about this. My brother told me
> >>>> there's always a few guys at the gym who change under a towel. Or
> >>>> go in the toilet stalls.
> >>>>
> >>>> Besides, it's not that unusual to cover up in the shower. People
> >>>> did it for centuries in some places. Nuns still do it today. They
> >>>> are never naked. Not even in the shower.
> >>>
> >>>Drenched underwear is gross, and it will make you wash that important
> >>>area less.
> >>
> >> I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that if you're already
> >> showering in your underwear (or in one of those long garments for that
> >> purpose that some people use - like nuns) then chances are that "that
> >> important area" isn't very important to you. Think about it. ;)
> >
> >Cleanliness is also next to godliness. I wonder if psychiatrists have
> >ever used the phrase "genital self-hatred." Some people do have that
> >problem, and you're probably right that it's worse among religious
> >weirdos. We should start another vicious rumor that Cooper has that
> >problem, too. :[
>
> I think Cooper has a lot of problems, probably. He comes from a
> messed up family. Considering how twisted his mom is, and his
> brother's suicide, he might just be the most normal member of that
> family.
What makes you say his mom is twisted?
I really don't know much about her.
> >Have you been to the Seminary? You seem to know an awful lot about the
> >intimate garments of nuns. Got any other spicy secrets about nuns, that
> >you'd care to recount? :)~
>
> What I know about the secret lives of nuns could probably fill up a
> few books. Unfortunately I can't reveal it. I don't want to burn in
> hell. :-P
I'll grant you an absolution - now tell!
;)
> >What do you suppose is the the Church of SciFiendology's position on sex
> >outside of mariage? They're certainly a pretty extreme collection of
> >"religious" crazies. ?:(
>
> Yep, they're truly insane. I was in Co$ for a short while years ago.
> I'm lucky I escaped with my life.
Good grief... what a scary cult.
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
JFlexer
> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:f0rfj...@news4.newsguy.com:
> also betting that men studying to be priests can likewise live in an
> Abbey.
A seminary can be on the grounds of an abbey, most certainly.
Men in Catholic orders can live in Abbeys, Rectories, Priories, Chaplain's
Quarters, Vicarages, etc...
(heck, nuns, priests, and brothers can live in plain old ordinary houses
too...)
The trick about a seminary is that it is a place for men to study to become
priests. When I was in the seminary, we had a convent (about the size of a
two-story, 4 bedroom house) out back where 2 rather old nuns lived. One
taught at a school in town, the other was our cherished Chef. To my
knowledge never was a seminarian invited inside. We would usually wait,
politely, on the porch.
Sr. Stanisia, of course, was welcome in the Seminary, but never on the
private floors where our living quarters were located.
Our seminary was adjacent to the college campus where we took classes, and
to most people, it appeared to be just another building on campus. Most
freshman had no idea it was not owned by the school.
JFlexer
--
-J
** Keeper of Betty Buckley and Bette Midler **
"Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns991F91C5CDF2Dag...@207.115.33.102...
<snippety-doo-dah>
> The sexual issue I'm curious about is that I've heard rumors about
> priests sometimes seducing nuns, and I was wondering if you heard any
> stories to that effect.
I have heard lots of stories of that nature over my life, but in my years in
the seminary and prior, I never saw such a thing occur, and never heard a
real "insiders" rumor. I am sure, from time to time a priest and a nun
might have a sexual affair, but I suspect it to be far less common than any
other type of sexual relationships a priest might covertly engage, including
homosexual, pedophilic, or adulterous...
I think most of the priest/nun stories are more likely the inventions of
Penthouse Forum (and such) than real events.
> Come to think of it, as a niña you may have had
> to fend off some advances from priests, yourself. I don't mean that in
> a pedophile sense, but because I repeatedly forget the difference
> between niña and chica. Soy torpon Americano.
>
> I'd love to know if the priests advances were clumsy or smooth. People
> look up to young priests as handsome young leaders of society, which I
> think would make then hot property for a sexual lady. but sometimes
> young guys don't have a clue about the fine art of seduction, and they
> can be about as ham-handed as a cowboy wrangling a steer.
>
> One of the women in here once told me that the slogan "lights out at
> nine, candles out at ten" means that the priest can be expected to visit
> his concubine during those hours. Since he holds the power of
> absolution, he is allowed to pronounce that she hasn't sinned. That
> sounds like a good way to assemble a harem. If he can convince his
> father confessor to give absolution, he's got it made in the shade. But
> I don't know if this is all rumor, or if there's truth in it. Can you
> verify or contradict any of that?
All the rest here seems to be conjecture and fantasy.... and maybe some
hold-over truth from the middle ages...
It is far less difficult for a priest to engage in an affair in the same way
any other person would... put on non-descript clothing and head out to the
rendevous place...
JFlexer
"Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns991FBD080AF5Fag...@207.115.33.102...
> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:f0trj...@news4.newsguy.com:
>
> There's something funny about your post. It looks like you're making
> the entire thing through your sig file. Are you aware that something
> unny might be happening in that regard?
you're right... Outlook wants you to top post, and I forgot to move my
sig-line to the bottom...
>> ** Keeper of Betty Buckley and Bette Midler **
>> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
>> message news:Xns991F91C5CDF2Dag...@207.115.33.102...
>> <snippety-doo-dah>
>>
>>> The sexual issue I'm curious about is that I've heard rumors about
>>> priests sometimes seducing nuns, and I was wondering if you heard any
>>> stories to that effect.
>>
>> I have heard lots of stories of that nature over my life, but in my
>> years in the seminary and prior, I never saw such a thing occur, and
>> never heard a real "insiders" rumor. I am sure, from time to time a
>> priest and a nun might have a sexual affair, but I suspect it to be
>> far less common than any other type of sexual relationships a priest
>> might covertly engage, including homosexual, pedophilic, or
>> adulterous...
>
> Sadly that may be true, but then we might simply hear more about the
> homosexual pedophilia, because it's highly illegal, and child sex crimes
> didn't get much press, before the internet caused their occurrence to
> explode.
>
> Remember, back in the seventies we similarly heard rumors about such
> things happening, but never knew anybody that they happened to.
<snip>
> Do the collars just pop on and off of a black dress shirt? All the
> black in the rest of the uniform might still arouse suspicion. If he
> were smart, he'd try to find a way to add a little color to his
> wardrobe. Short of changing clothes in the car, I can't see any way to
> do that.
There are different types of collars... I have one that is a plastic strip
that wraps all around my neck and has a snap on the front to attach to the
shirt/cassock.
I have another that is a little white plastic tab that slides into the black
collar, attached to a shirt... (think a really tailored button down shirt.)
I think there are black collars with the white showing that attach to the
neck of a shirt, but didn't own that type.
I never owned a shirt/slack set... just two cassocks. I wasn't required to
wear them in Seminary - they were for use at home... when I was in the
diocese, we always wore cassocks for high ceremonies and sometimes in the
parish.
I preferred a cassock to the black slacks/shirt... more comfortable,
actually, because I could wear "whatever" underneath. (and we had plenty
of jokes about going commando...)
Most priests have "street clothes" in their wardrobe. It would not be
considered a notable thing to see a priest leaving the rectory in "normal
clothes" Even priests and brothers in an abbey or monastary have some
ordinary clothing. (btw - priests and nuns can live in monastaries, too, but
never together...)
Terry Lomax
Lisa Pease says...
In a group with the name 'gossip' in it, proof is not required. If you want to
know rumors of the men of color he apparenly sees, search his name at
http://gawker.com
You'll come up with something.
Terry Lomax
wrote:
> Gosh wouldn't that be a shocker?
>
> (NOT!)
Roofshadow is a stupid cunt. The filthy bitch is so stupid, she
doesn't realize the post was by an impostor. I traumatized Roofshadow
into killfiling me. If she used the killfile properly, she'd see the
impostor. She probably killfiled by screen name. JFlexer was
irresponsible, enabling the impostor.
Roofshadow has posted elsewhere in this thread, saying she hopes the
celebrity is the victim of the illegal activity of faggot voyeurs
taking photos of him in the shower so she can jill off to them. Proof
Roofshadow is a sex offender, as she favors illegal voyeurism not
consented by the victim.
I agree with the people who say the celeb should shower in swimming
trunks, as they're designed to get wet. Underwear is often made of
materials that aren't supposed to get wet, and the material is often
thinner which defeats any strategy of modesty.
katorzejames
> Please name one man of color who has inserted his penis into Anderson
> Cooper's rectum. If you don't, then I don't believe you. You could
> say the same thing about about Lou Dobbs.
well i was ready for anderson to start f*cking with mayor nagin right
there amongst the rubble of new orleans, i'll tell you that much.
don't tell me there wasn't chemistry.
Roofshadow
la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote:
> Just some of the stuff I read about her years ago. And the few times
> I've seen her on tv. I don't know much about her either. It's just
> the way she struck me. Eccentric old money folks with lots of family
> drama.
Could be.
Didn't Anderson have a brother who killed himself?
> >> >Have you been to the Seminary? You seem to know an awful lot about the
> >> >intimate garments of nuns. Got any other spicy secrets about nuns, that
> >> >you'd care to recount? :)~
> >>
> >> What I know about the secret lives of nuns could probably fill up a
> >> few books. Unfortunately I can't reveal it. I don't want to burn in
> >> hell. :-P
> >
> >I'll grant you an absolution - now tell!
> >
> >;)
>
> Ha ha...a nun never kisses and tells. She's married to Jesus. :)
Darn it.
> >> >What do you suppose is the the Church of SciFiendology's position on sex
> >> >outside of mariage? They're certainly a pretty extreme collection of
> >> >"religious" crazies. ?:(
> >>
> >> Yep, they're truly insane. I was in Co$ for a short while years ago.
> >> I'm lucky I escaped with my life.
> >
> >Good grief... what a scary cult.
>
> At least now they've been exposed and people know more about them. My
> encounter with them was back in the 80s, before Al Gore invented the
> Internet, so I couldn't just go online and read up on them. I had
> never even heard of them until a friend recommended them. That was
> the beginning of a nightmare that ended with several of them camped
> out at my door for three days when I left. Truly a nightmare.
That's truly bizarre... I can't believe people nowadays still get sucked
in.
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
Ahti Eric Rovainen
says...
universities, many given free rides at taxpayer expense. The foreign
students enjoy most of the benefits of living in the USA without most
of the responsibilities.
Foreign schools cannot be trusted, as they're full of corruption.
Schools in India allow cheating and favoritism, so a moron can get
good grades and recommendations. Good grades from an India high
school should not be used to rationalize admission to US colleges.
I once was the victim of a foreign student pulling a high-powered
assault gun on me in his apartment (the apartment was shared by a
student from India, one from Pakistan, and one from Bangladesh).
Those students made duplicate keys of their dorm keys in a previous
school year in which they lived in the dorms.
JFlexer
> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:f0tvp...@news4.newsguy.com:
>
>> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
>> message news:Xns991FBD080AF5Fag...@207.115.33.102...
>>> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>> news:f0trj...@news4.newsguy.com:
>>>
>>> There's something funny about your post. It looks like you're making
>>> the entire thing through your sig file. Are you aware that something
>>> unny might be happening in that regard?
>>
>> you're right... Outlook wants you to top post, and I forgot to move
>> my sig-line to the bottom...
>
> Outlook 2000, or is it some new widget that they added?
I still use Outlook Express for Usenet.
<snip>
> I would feel extraordinarily out of place in the world if I had to wear
> a cassock when I was out running personal errands, like shopping. But I
> always found the shirt/slack set to be erally cool. Sort of the hip,
> friendly priest that's one of the regular folks, as well as one of the
> ministry. They're much easier to relate to, and mush less intimidating.
Well, some wear them for errands and such, but most do not... it depends on
the errand and if you want to change. Many priests wear a collared shirt
and black slacks all day, like a uniform, and some only during "working"
hours...
>> I preferred a cassock to the black slacks/shirt... more comfortable,
>> actually, because I could wear "whatever" underneath. (and we had
>> plenty of jokes about going commando...)
>
> Ah, a gay priest. It figures that the only priest that I know would be
> a gay guy. I thought you only existed on tv. It's really true what
> they say about the Seminary being a manget for men who like men, isn't
> it?
Dearheart, I am most definitely NOT a priest. I was gay even in the Sem,
but had I pursued a calling, I would have been a celibate gay priest...
Most priests take their vow of celibacy very seriously. Many priests
struggle with celibacy. Ocassionally a priest will "slip." But most live
their life as a priest without ever breaking that vow.
<snipping a bunch of rambling that doesn't apply>
>> Most priests have "street clothes" in their wardrobe. It would not
>> be considered a notable thing to see a priest leaving the rectory in
>> "normal clothes" Even priests and brothers in an abbey or monastary
>> have some ordinary clothing. (btw - priests and nuns can live in
>> monastaries, too, but never together...)
>
> "Together" is relative. If they're in separate buildings on the same
> grounds, they have access to each other.
It would be a rare thing for a monastary to be co-ed. A monastary is a
property owned and occupied by either a men's or women's religious order. A
Beneditine monastary would not be co-ed. The cloister, where the priests
and brother's live in a male monastary, would never be accessed by a female,
nun or otherwise.
It simply doesn't work that way.
> It's not a co-ed dorm, but
> they can find a way to get laid, if they're determined.
And they will... by heading to the local no-tell motel, like the rest of
us...
> All you gotta
> do is walk across the grounds and sneak in the back stairwell door,
> which she conveeeeniently leaves ajar for you. Or you can meet off-
> campus, in the apartment of a non-Catholic confederate, if the heat is
> on.
This is priest/nun thing only happens in a novel or a movie
JFlexer
<snip>
> Can Mothers and higher ranking Sisters hear the confessions of regular
> sisters, or is it that just a priviledge of the male priests?
Administering the Sacrament of Penance, often referred to as confession, is
a priestly function only. I'm sure that Mother Superior often listens in
confidence to problems and a certian level of confession, but never in
replacement of a priest and the sacrament.
> Either way,
> the devious mind can exploit the situation to their sexual disavantage. A
> benign Mother, who will forgive a sister for her transgressions, because
> she understands what it's like to be a girl, could come in vey handy in
> such a situation.
>
> But so could a priest, because to a horny guy, a confession box revelation
> could become an invitation to try a seduction. And if he doesn't accept
> your invitation, what the hell, he's just gay, and he's an even worse
> sinner than you. Given that, his word is effectively worthless, and even
> if he tells you to do the most unpleasant penance in the universe. You
> don't have to do it, because he's infinitely more dishonorable than you.
> You may have had a fling, but at least it wasn't gay.
>
> Besides, how could making babies ever be dishonorable, because it's god's
> most precious gift?
More Penthouse Forum fiction, Smith! LOL!
> It depends on whether you wear the pantaloons and the shirt. JFlexer was
> just telling me about his days of "going commando," at the seminary.
I said there were RUMORS about going commando - not that *I* went commando.
It was mostly a joke around the Sem, but if a priest did go commando, you'd
never know it...
JFlexer
--
-J
** Keeper of Betty Buckley and Bette Midler **
"Roofshadow" <Roofsha...@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Roofshadow2004-1D2...@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <vn85335hj1cmudfek...@4ax.com>,
> la niña <afterelniño...@comesla.niña> wrote:
<snip>
>> Ha ha...a nun never kisses and tells. She's married to Jesus. :)
>
> Darn it.
And, we know that Jesus only tells the details of his trysts to Betty
Bowers...
JFlexer
> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:f0tr1...@news4.newsguy.com:
> the twenty-something women that are the most libidinous.
>
>> One taught at a school in town, the other was our
>> cherished Chef. To my knowledge never was a seminarian invited
>> inside. We would usually wait, politely, on the porch.
>
> but unlike men, they have no interest in ever getting them back. My
> friend, you need to invest some of your extraordinary brain power into
> examining the sexual physiology of the human female. Their mysteries
> are as intricate, fascinating and enchanting as unravelling any of the
> most complex riddles of either religion or science.
>
> Hanging around with all those gay dudes has both cramped your style and
> suppressed your education. I don't believe that you can call yourself a
> deep thinker until you've tried to plumb the depths of humanity's
> deepest and most beautiful mystery, the female sexual experience.
<snip>
> Hey cool. So there's even regular girls' college dorms around, too.
> Son, you just don't know what you're missing. Vaginas are the coolest
> things in all of God's creation, and you gay guys are so naive to allow
> yourselves to miss out on that. I just don't know how you can do it.
What makes you so sure I haven't "plumbed the depths of the female
experience" so-to-speak?!
I guess, we'll have to agree to disagree on the whole "vagina thing"
JFlexer
news:1177724068....@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 27, 10:38 am, Roofshadow <Roofshadow2...@nospam.yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Gosh wouldn't that be a shocker?
>>
>> (NOT!)
>
> Roofshadow is a stupid cunt. The filthy bitch is so stupid, she
> doesn't realize the post was by an impostor. I traumatized Roofshadow
> into killfiling me. If she used the killfile properly, she'd see the
> impostor. She probably killfiled by screen name. JFlexer was
> irresponsible, enabling the impostor.
*I* am irresponsible?!
Honey, own what you write or don't write it. If Roof reads my posts, and
one is in response to some drivel that was extruded from your keyboard, that
is not MY problem....
Roofshadow
"JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You really should KF this nitwit... he's not even an entertaining kook.
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
Terry Lomax
> *I* am irresponsible?!
>
> Honey, own what you write or don't write it. If Roof reads my posts, and
> one is in response to some drivel that was extruded from your keyboard, that
> is not MY problem....
It IS your problem. I didn't write the drivel which you quoted. You
quoted the crap and used my screen name and referred to me by my first
name as if I wrote it. Only an idiot would believe I wrote that crap
(Roofshadow is obviously an idiot). The impostor posts from
"newsguy". Ignore the impostor. Don't reply to its posts. Feel free
to netcop the newsguy idiot for its attempts to impersonate other
posters. In addition, don't patronize me with your terms of
endearment. I don't know/remember who you are, but you're making a
horrible impression.
Agent Smith
news:f15t...@news4.newsguy.com:
> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
> message news:Xns99201BACC85Dag...@207.115.17.102...
>> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:f0tvp...@news4.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
>>> message news:Xns991FBD080AF5Fag...@207.115.33.102...
>>>> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>> news:f0trj...@news4.newsguy.com:
>>>>
>>>> There's something funny about your post. It looks like you're
>>>> making the entire thing through your sig file. Are you aware that
>>>> something unny might be happening in that regard?
>>>
>>> you're right... Outlook wants you to top post, and I forgot to
>>> move my sig-line to the bottom...
>>
>> I wasn't aware that Outlook let you post to Usenet. Is that feature
>> in Outlook 2000, or is it some new widget that they added?
>
> I still use Outlook Express for Usenet.
Which version?
>>> I preferred a cassock to the black slacks/shirt... more comfortable,
>>> actually, because I could wear "whatever" underneath. (and we
>>> had plenty of jokes about going commando...)
>>
>> Ah, a gay priest. It figures that the only priest that I know would
>> be a gay guy. I thought you only existed on tv. It's really true
>> what they say about the Seminary being a manget for men who like men,
>> isn't it?
>
> Dearheart,
Don't call me dearhart. I'm not gay, and I won't put up with your
unwanted gay advances on me. If you persist in coming on to me, I'll
suddenly become very unpleasant toward you.
> I am most definitely NOT a priest.
What are you?
>>> Most priests have "street clothes" in their wardrobe. It would not
>>> be considered a notable thing to see a priest leaving the rectory in
>>> "normal clothes" Even priests and brothers in an abbey or
>>> monastary have some ordinary clothing. (btw - priests and nuns can
>>> live in monastaries, too, but never together...)
>>
>> "Together" is relative. If they're in separate buildings on the same
>> grounds, they have access to each other.
>
> It would be a rare thing for a monastary to be co-ed. A monastary is
> a property owned and occupied by either a men's or women's religious
> order. A Beneditine monastary would not be co-ed. The cloister,
> where the priests and brother's live in a male monastary, would never
> be accessed by a female, nun or otherwise.
>
> It simply doesn't work that way.
I never said anything about a monastery. I'm talking about seminaries
and convents. Face it, churches just own property and they're
constrained to put their buildings on property they own. If they've got
a big estate set aside for training preists and nuns, the schools can be
on the same grounds. It's America Jenkins, where we're a little more
practical that they were in the 13th century.
>> It's not a co-ed dorm, but
>> they can find a way to get laid, if they're determined.
>
> And they will... by heading to the local no-tell motel, like the rest
> of us...
Pretty much, but I don't know about the rest of us, becaue I own a
house, where I can do as I please. Admittedly chicks don't really dig
messy bachelor pads, but if she can't do it at her place, she's stuck
with mine.
>> All you gotta
>> do is walk across the grounds and sneak in the back stairwell door,
>> which she conveeeeniently leaves ajar for you. Or you can meet off-
>> campus, in the apartment of a non-Catholic confederate, if the heat
>> is on.
>
> This is priest/nun thing only happens in a novel or a movie
Being gay means that you have no clue about how heteros behave.
Agent Smith
news:f15u...@news4.newsguy.com:
I don't read that.
>> It depends on whether you wear the pantaloons and the shirt. JFlexer
>> was just telling me about his days of "going commando," at the
>> seminary.
>
> I said there were RUMORS about going commando - not that *I* went
> commando. It was mostly a joke around the Sem, but if a priest did go
> commando, you'd never know it...
No, but it tipped your hand to your gayhood, which makes it a codeword
between gays, to see who is into it. It's becoming pretty clear that
the priesthood is a gay sex club. I don't know how you think that the
heteros don't do it, too.
Face it slim, everybody everywhere does it. Nature set it up so that we
have an irresistable compulsion to do it. It's a biological machine
that is completely out of anybody's control. Your protestations that it
doesn't happen are just more Cathlic lies, like the ones you were
puching in the last posts.
That's quite a sophisticated thought control machine you people have
built over the centuries. Too bad that the first rule of thought
control is "Do as I say, not as I do." You can't fool me, because
science trumps religion.
Agent Smith
news:f15uh...@news4.newsguy.com:
>
> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
> message news:Xns9920461D1335ag...@207.115.17.102...
>> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:f0tr1...@news4.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> "Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in
>>> message news:Xns991ED4C173384ag...@207.115.17.102...
>>>> "JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>> news:f0rfj...@news4.newsguy.com:
>>>>
>>> One taught at a school in town, the other was our
>>> cherished Chef. To my knowledge never was a seminarian invited
>>> inside. We would usually wait, politely, on the porch.
>>
>> Of course not. Older women frequently lose their libidos completely,
>> but unlike men, they have no interest in ever getting them back. My
>> friend, you need to invest some of your extraordinary brain power
>> into examining the sexual physiology of the human female. Their
>> mysteries are as intricate, fascinating and enchanting as unravelling
>> any of the most complex riddles of either religion or science.
>>
>> Hanging around with all those gay dudes has both cramped your style
>> and suppressed your education. I don't believe that you can call
>> yourself a deep thinker until you've tried to plumb the depths of
>> humanity's deepest and most beautiful mystery, the female sexual
>> experience.
>
>> Hey cool. So there's even regular girls' college dorms around, too.
>> Son, you just don't know what you're missing. Vaginas are the
>> coolest things in all of God's creation, and you gay guys are so
>> naive to allow yourselves to miss out on that. I just don't know how
>> you can do it.
>
> What makes you so sure I haven't "plumbed the depths of the female
> experience" so-to-speak?!
> I guess, we'll have to agree to disagree on the whole "vagina thing"
How interesting. In one post you say that priests and nuns don't do it,
and then in the next you say that you swing both ways. You're really
something.
JFlexer
How about this:
<plonk>
There... much better.
JFlexer
Wow... you really haven't been following along, have you?
Well, good luck with your further investigations.
Cripple
> <plonk>
>
> There... much better.
That's dumb. Terry Lomax is very entertaining. Or are you here to
find people who think like you?
Roofshadow
"JFlexer" <jf09...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Isn't it though?
--
Roofshadow
AUK FNG