THE Christie Brinkley-Peter Cook saga continues
PUSSS...@aol.com
THE Christie Brinkley-Peter Cook saga. She's handled this brilliantly.
Publicly, she just smiled, always looking in control, never taking one
opportunity to knock him in the press. Never speaking out once. But
behind the scenes, this beautiful blond confection, who looks like
whipped cream wouldn't melt in her mouth, was a killer. She quickly
hustled the kids away. Didn't let him know where. Did not allow him
access. Did not permit him to speak to them. And when she did finally
grant him one minute on the phone, she'd, for instance, instruct their
son Jack: "Tell him to call one of his whores."
When, finally, she let him see his children, she called all the shots.
Strictly at the time she chose, strictly at her own compound. He kept
trying to win her back. He sent love letters. Flowers. Forget it. We
big brains who knew he'd been married to this terrific woman but like a
jerk got himself involved with another jerk but was a great father - we
all figured she'd take him back as other today women do. Not a shot.
Supposedly, they were poised to open a furniture business. Smarter,
tougher than all of us, she walked away from it all. And let him
dangle. When he wanted to talk publicly, she told him don't you dare.
She frightened him into submission. He stayed quiet. He cried. Lost
weight. Got scared. She stayed beautiful. She posed for photographers
at events.
Christie Brinkley. Professor Emeritus in How To Handle El Piggo.
NY POST/PAGE SIX..
PETER Cook, the forlorn soon-to-be-ex-husband of Christie Brinkley,
leaving the King Kullen supermarket in Bridgehampton with four bags of
bachelor groceries.
Agent Smith
news:1169827991.3...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
> NY POST/CINDY ADAMS...
> THE Christie Brinkley-Peter Cook saga. She's handled this brilliantly.
> Publicly, she just smiled, always looking in control, never taking one
> opportunity to knock him in the press. Never speaking out once. But
> behind the scenes, this beautiful blond confection, who looks like
> whipped cream wouldn't melt in her mouth, was a killer. She quickly
> hustled the kids away. Didn't let him know where. Did not allow him
> access. Did not permit him to speak to them. And when she did finally
> grant him one minute on the phone, she'd, for instance, instruct their
> son Jack: "Tell him to call one of his whores."
>
> When, finally, she let him see his children, she called all the shots.
> Strictly at the time she chose, strictly at her own compound. He kept
> trying to win her back. He sent love letters. Flowers. Forget it. We
> big brains who knew he'd been married to this terrific woman but like a
> jerk got himself involved with another jerk but was a great father - we
> all figured she'd take him back as other today women do. Not a shot.
> Supposedly, they were poised to open a furniture business. Smarter,
> tougher than all of us, she walked away from it all. And let him
> dangle. When he wanted to talk publicly, she told him don't you dare.
> She frightened him into submission. He stayed quiet. He cried. Lost
> weight. Got scared. She stayed beautiful. She posed for photographers
> at events.
>
> Christie Brinkley. Professor Emeritus in How To Handle El Piggo.
The cruel poetry of villainous intent - Professor Emerita.
b
On Jan 26, 11:42 am, "It's the Principle!"
<brandy...@kittylitternewsguy.com> wrote:
> pusssyk...@aol.com <PUSSSYK...@aol.com> wrote in
> alt.gossip.celebrities:
> > with four bags of bachelor groceries.The only think I absolutely do not agree with doing is making the
> children say and do nasty things. It's YOUR relationship that is
> broken with the man, not theirs. Let them have their father.
>
I was bothered by the same thing..... What was the point of that? Why
should it be applauded? She's angry with him and taking it out on the
children. Really low. Makes me wonder if they would be better off
living with him.....
Coop
Get the feeling a nasty custody battle is ahead with the divorce lawyers
cleaning up.
Coop
Going for Broke
Probably happens in 90% of ALL divorce cases.
Kevin
"Agent Smith" <agent...@two-blocks-on-your-left.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98C4731AFE24Dag...@207.115.17.102...
Ilene Bilenky
"pusss...@aol.com" <PUSSS...@aol.com> wrote:
> And when she did finally
> grant him one minute on the phone, she'd, for instance, instruct their
> son Jack: "Tell him to call one of his whores."
Bad. Bad. All the rest sounds quite elegant. You do *not* include your
children in sending nasty messages, etc. Why bother shielding kids from
these kinds of things in the media if you're going to shove it at them
yourself?
If this is true, it's very poor form.
Ilene B
Smoot
<PUSSS...@aol.com> wrote:
How would anyone know that she instructed the kids to say nasty things
to him unless she, the kids or he told others that. Which one of those
parties would have a motive for spreading such a story to someone in
the press? Which one of those parties has come off poorly in the press
so far and stands to gain by planting something, anything, that might
knock Christie down a peg? Hmmmm.
Rebecca
parula
I don't think it necessarily follows that he'd be the better custodial
parent. ITA with what Brandy said, though. Shitty husband does not
equal shitty father, and I say this having been through a similar
infidelity divorce scenario -- minus, of course, the money, the looks,
the publicity, etc. It's hard enough on the kids to endure a splitup.
To suddenly deny them contact with their father and act like he's evil
is selfish and cruel of her.
parula
parula
wrote:
Excellent point, and one I hadn't considered when posting elsewhere in
the thread. And, come to think of it, my cheatin' ex went around after
I gave him the boot being all victimized and sad, too. For some
people, though, infidelity is a deal-breaker. Me 'n' Christie, we're
like that. :)
parula