Prince to perform at Super Bowl halftime
Pastor Pants
NEW YORK (AP) - McCartney, Jagger and now Prince.
For the third year in a row, a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame act will
headline the Super Bowl halftime entertainment. This time it's Prince.
The Purple One, winner of six Grammy Awards and nominated for five more
this year, will play at the game in Miami on Feb. 4.
The Super Bowl, which will be televised by CBS, is annually television's
highest rated show. An estimated 141 million people watched last year's
game between Pittsburgh and Seattle.
The Rolling Stones headlined the halftime show for that Super Bowl, and
two years ago it was Paul McCartney.
The NFL has tended to take a more cautious approach since Janet Jackson's
widely criticized "wardrobe malfunction" at halftime of the 2004 game.
That game also was televised by CBS.
Last year, Mick Jagger's microphone was silenced as he sang sexually
suggestive lyrics in a couple of songs the Stones performed.
Prince gained attention early his career with raunchy lyrics and racy
performances, but has toned down his act somewhat in recent years.
**
Lest we forget, Michael Jackson's constant dick grabbing incident, while
standing in the midst of thousands of children during the 1993 SB.
Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket?
Pastor Pants wrote:
> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6259272
>
> Prince gained attention early his career with raunchy lyrics and racy
> performances, but has toned down his act somewhat in recent years.
>
> **
> Lest we forget, Michael Jackson's constant dick grabbing incident, while
> standing in the midst of thousands of children during the 1993 SB.
But, but, but everything michael jackson does is inspired by children -
he said so himself - So the children inspire michael jackson to grab
his.... oh.
'Scuse me. I must barf.
FishFood
On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
the motion, its just a dance gesture. Its not as some might imagine
to tease, but a gesture following the rules of misdirection. Dance
without compromise to culture, something to be copied without the
inhibition of culture, seen for itself and nothing else. Ask yourself
what are children thinking when they copy him his dance?
Michael creates from a youthful center, a perspective on the world
which is first and foremost without its learnt inhibitions. I can
see what Michael means, when he says he is inspired by children.
He sees the world as they do, no small task when there is so much
in this world to blight our perspective.
Its quite something to see the world with hope and ambition. And
yet this perspective would come naturally to most children. What
is there not to understand.
If you wanted a philosophy of hope you could do a lot worst than
ask a child what the imagine for the future. I dare say the cynics
out there will take this in only one way.
-------
Of course Jesus said this better..... ;)
"Suffer the little children to come unto me for such is the kingdom
of heaven".
Present culture hearing this for the first time, would balk as such
an idea, having constructed other reasons for its soulless function.
FishFood
[corrections]
On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
the motion, its just a dance gesture. Its not as some might imagine
to tease, but a gesture following the rules of misdirection. Dance
without compromise to culture, something to be copied without the
inhibition of culture, seen for itself and nothing else. Ask yourself
what are children thinking when they copy his dance?
Michael creates from a youthful center, a perspective on the world
which is first and foremost without its learnt inhibitions. I can
see what Michael means, when he says he is inspired by children.
He sees the world as they do, no small task when there is so much
in this world to blight our perspective.
Its quite something to see the world with hope and ambition. And
yet this perspective would come naturally to most children. What
is there not to understand.
If you wanted a philosophy of hope you could do a lot worst than
ask a child what the imagine for the future. I dare say the cynics
out there will take this in only one way.
-------
Of course Jesus said this better..... ;)
"Suffer the little children to come unto me for such is the kingdom
of heaven".
Present culture hearing this for the first time, would balk at such
an idea, having constructed other reasons for its soulless function.
We being so much products of this culture have little choice but to
follow where it dictates.
Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket?
I must barf again as anal comes to the defence of his pedo god. You
comparing a pedophile to the Son of God is an insult to practicing
Christians everywhere.
Jesus said "Suffer the little children to come unto Me..."
In your pedo god's case it would be "Little children will suffer when I
come unto them."
Jesus would be sickened by the likes of wacko... and the shit like you
that defend and condone wacko's evil ways.
And if Jesus were a popstar, he would have relesed his Katrina Benefit
single by now.
Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket?
Posting it twice doesn't make it any less disgusting, you pedo
worshipping fucktard.
FragileWarrior
gui.ntli.net:
> On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
> the motion, its just a dance gesture.
Wait... wait... Placing your hand over your entire genital area with your
middle finger extending deeply toward the area between your balls and
anus like your probing for Klingons and jiggling vigorously is "just a
dance gesture"?? Lordy, Twila must be devasted to have missed out on
THAT one.
F'loons. Can't live with them, can't toss their genitals into the shark
tank at Sea World.
SneakyP
news:Dzcfh.6606$493...@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net:
> Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket? wrote:
>> Pastor Pants wrote:
>>
>>>http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6259272
>>>
>>>Prince gained attention early his career with raunchy lyrics and racy
>>>performances, but has toned down his act somewhat in recent years.
>>>
>>>**
>>>Lest we forget, Michael Jackson's constant dick grabbing incident,
>>>while standing in the midst of thousands of children during the 1993
>>>SB.
>>
>>
>> But, but, but everything michael jackson does is inspired by children
>> - he said so himself - So the children inspire michael jackson to
>> grab his.... oh.
>>
>> 'Scuse me. I must barf.
>
>
> On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
> the motion, its just a dance gesture. Its not as some might imagine
> to tease, but a gesture following the rules of misdirection.
Alien now describes masturbation.
Dance
> without compromise to culture, something to be copied without the
> inhibition of culture, seen for itself and nothing else. Ask yourself
> what are children thinking when they copy him his dance?
>
::"mommy told me that touching it is bad, but it feels good"::
> Michael creates from a youthful center, a perspective on the world
> which is first and foremost without its learnt inhibitions. I can
> see what Michael means, when he says he is inspired by children.
> He sees the world as they do, no small task when there is so much
> in this world to blight our perspective.
Like once wealthy pedos who thought they could get away with it w/o
consequences.
>
> Its quite something to see the world with hope and ambition. And
> yet this perspective would come naturally to most children. What
> is there not to understand.
It's called disciplining them when they play with it in public, ya
demented fuckwit.
>
> If you wanted a philosophy of hope you could do a lot worst than
> ask a child what the imagine for the future. I dare say the cynics
> out there will take this in only one way.
>
> -------
> Of course Jesus said this better..... ;)
>
> "Suffer the little children to come unto me for such is the kingdom
> of heaven".
>
> Present culture hearing this for the first time, would balk as such
> an idea, having constructed other reasons for its soulless function.
>
Jesus was talking about the innocence of children, not the exploitation
of children by pedophile pop stars. Sheesh, you are a fucktarded acid
freak.
--
SneakyP
What's posted in ng stays in ng.
Where's Blanket?
FishFood
This is a story about the extremes of misinformation, its repeated
here as a warning. Something about power and the corruption of truth...
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/04/24/1019441262517.html
Hell Toupee
>
> Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket? wrote:
> > Pastor Pants wrote:
> >
> >>http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6259272
> >>
> >>Prince gained attention early his career with raunchy lyrics and racy
> >>performances, but has toned down his act somewhat in recent years.
> >>
> >>**
> >>Lest we forget, Michael Jackson's constant dick grabbing incident, while
> >>standing in the midst of thousands of children during the 1993 SB.
> >
> >
> > But, but, but everything michael jackson does is inspired by children -
> > he said so himself - So the children inspire michael jackson to grab
> > his.... oh.
> >
> > 'Scuse me. I must barf.
>
> On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
> the motion, its just a dance gesture.
Bollocks. Children universally saw that as one of the gestures their
parents and teachers had been teaching them _not_ to do in public,
which is why it was so controversial. They saw the significance of it,
alan - it was something they're taught that nice people - including
children - don't do in public.
> Its not as some might imagine
> to tease, but a gesture following the rules of misdirection.
MJ was calling attention to his crotch, moron. Which is also why he
took to wearing a gold diaper over his pants.
> Ask yourself
> what are children thinking when they copy him his dance?
They're thinking how they're copying the funny man who had to go to
the bathroom _really_ bad.
> I can
> see what Michael means, when he says he is inspired by children.
You see as artistic a gesture commonly performed by little children
who have a strong urge to urinate. You see MJ as 'inspired' by the
frantic crotch-grabbings of children desperate to pee.
You and MJ *are* pedo pervs, aren't you?
HellT
2nz Lampoons Floon Baboons
<Alan>
I dair say I'd see you pan Nuriyev had he donned a manpon be it simply
just for a programmed costume necessary for the play of life and
truthful intestinal well being at large too.
What I see is the essence of quinity. What you naysay is parbloof
nargham. My historical alarm clock goes to 11.
</Alan>
SneakyP
<Alan>
[corrected]
FragileWarrior
news:1165863619.0...@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
<hee HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE>
Podkayne Fries
>
>On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
>the motion, its just a dance gesture. Its not as some might imagine
>to tease, but a gesture following the rules of misdirection. Dance
>without compromise to culture, something to be copied without the
>inhibition of culture, seen for itself and nothing else. Ask yourself
>what are children thinking when they copy him his dance?
They're thinking that a grown man (so to speak) is playing pocket
pool. Small boys are taught that they should not play with their
penises in public. Perhaps your mother failed to teach you this
important lesson?
--
Regards, Podkayne Fries
"I like people. People are like Happy Meals
with legs." - Spike, BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER
Xclimation
the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
"Pastor Pants" <scruu...@everyturn.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9895F1650...@207.115.17.102...
ernestlsewell
> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not
> interested in the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
Ex-fucking-actly
--
Ernest L Sewell, IV
East Greenbush, NY
Wild Monkshood
Xclimation wrote:
> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not interested in
> the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
Wow! To speak for a whole newsgroup. What an awesome responsibility!
WM
>
Joseph Proctologist
news:2006121123025575249%esewell@xxnycaprrcom:
> On 2006-12-11 22:54:39 -0500, "Xclimation" <Xclim...@tx.rr.com> said:
>
>> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not
>> interested in the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
>
> Ex-fucking-actly
Perhaps Joseph Bartlo's bipolarism treatment by his proctologist would be
of more interest? He's a beastial lover of the cloven hooved species too.
Rooster Cockburn
"FishFood" <do...@home.com> wrote in message
news:Dzcfh.6606$493...@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> Cazzawaw Wondering Where the Hell is Blanket? wrote:
>> Pastor Pants wrote:
>>
>>>http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6259272
>>>
>>>Prince gained attention early his career with raunchy lyrics and racy
>>>performances, but has toned down his act somewhat in recent years.
>>>
>>>**
>>>Lest we forget, Michael Jackson's constant dick grabbing incident, while
>>>standing in the midst of thousands of children during the 1993 SB.
>>
>>
>> But, but, but everything michael jackson does is inspired by children -
>> he said so himself - So the children inspire michael jackson to grab
>> his.... oh.
>>
>> 'Scuse me. I must barf.
>
>
> On the other hand a child would see no particular significance to
> the motion, its just a dance gesture. Its not as some might imagine
<snip alien's pedo crap>
I hope someone chokes the life out of you after beating you for 72 hours
straight.
Pharoah
Wonder if he'll be wearing the assless chaps or have some other wardrobe
malfunction?
FragileWarrior
news:tJGdnVLh5Nb8MuPY...@comcast.com:
> Wonder if he'll be wearing the assless chaps or have some other wardrobe
> malfunction?
I have absolutely no problem with the assless chaps as long as his ass
doesn't droop and have metal stars pinned to it.
No, wait... that would be sorta funny.
I vote for droopy butt chaps and stars.
f5
"Pharoah" <rlj1965_no_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tJGdnVLh5Nb8MuPY...@comcast.com...
>
> "Pastor Pants" <scruu...@everyturn.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9895F1650...@207.115.17.102...
>> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6259272
>>
>> NEW YORK (AP) - McCartney, Jagger and now Prince.
>>
>> For the third year in a row, a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame act will
>> headline the Super Bowl halftime entertainment. This time it's
>> Prince.
>> The Purple One, winner of six Grammy Awards and nominated for five
>> more
>> this year, will play at the game in Miami on Feb. 4.
I saw Prince in concert a few years ago and it was wondrous.
JeePee
--
--
JeePee
There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.
JeePee
saying "I don't want you to cross-post"follwed by dozens of "me neither"
"me neither", would you? That why we appointed a
non-cross-posting-messenger, being the netiquette-friendly and generally
pleasant group that we are.
Pocono Revoked Drivers License Support Group
"JeePee" <jp.pluij...@quicknet.nl> wrote in message
news:29ab6$457eeee3$52d9c267$30...@cache40.multikabel.net...
> Joseph Proctologist wrote:
> > On 11 Dec 2006, Ernest L Sewell, IV <ese...@xxnycap.rr.com> posted some
> > news:2006121123025575249%esewell@xxnycaprrcom:
> >
> >> On 2006-12-11 22:54:39 -0500, "Xclimation" <Xclim...@tx.rr.com> said:
> >>
> >>> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not
> >>> interested in the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
> >> Ex-fucking-actly
> >
> > Perhaps Joseph Bartlo's bipolarism treatment by his proctologist would
be
> > of more interest? He's a beastial lover of the cloven hooved species
too.
> >
> Itwesting. Mowe, mowe
Joseph is very well thought of and accepted by the animal community.
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=395846
FragileWarrior
$52d9c267$8...@cache40.multikabel.net:
> Wild Monkshood wrote:
>>
>>
>> Xclimation wrote:
>>
>>> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not
>>> interested in the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
>>
>> Wow! To speak for a whole newsgroup. What an awesome
responsibility!
>>
>> WM
>>
>>>
> You wouldn't want us to flood an entire other newsgroup with cross-
posts
> saying "I don't want you to cross-post"follwed by dozens of "me
neither"
> "me neither", would you? That why we appointed a
> non-cross-posting-messenger, being the netiquette-friendly and
generally
> pleasant group that we are.
>
Exactly how many voices do you have yammering in your head?
Wild Monkshood
JeePee wrote:
> Wild Monkshood wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Xclimation wrote:
>>
>>> Holy cross-posting thread. We here at the Prince NG, are not
>>> interested in the Michael Jackson fan melodrama.
>>
>>
>> Wow! To speak for a whole newsgroup. What an awesome responsibility!
>>
>> WM
>>
>>>
> You wouldn't want us to flood an entire other newsgroup with cross-posts
> saying "I don't want you to cross-post"follwed by dozens of "me neither"
> "me neither", would you? That why we appointed a
> non-cross-posting-messenger, being the netiquette-friendly and generally
> pleasant group that we are.
Can you say "Anal Retentive"? Still, even if true, how can you claim
this "messenger" represents the wishes of either "Prince" newsgroup? How
about lurkers? What do they say. Oh, yeah. They say nothing. Still, I
can't imagine they are happy with the royal "We" speaking for them.
WM
>
Robert Buchanan
welcome to Pocono Revoked Drivers License Support Group!
Really? I read that most goats think of him as a slut.
--
Robert Buchanan
<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>
Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
JeePee
But hey, who's to say ANY messenger represents the entire community it's
speaking for? Lurkers have their own representative of course. I's a
mute though.