! Hollywood, The slave trade and the modern conscience
Knowledge
published: Sunday | December 10, 2006
Robert Buddan, Contributor
A Jamaican idea introduced by a CARICOM resolution was accepted by the
United Nations in December designating March 25, 2007, as a day to
commemorate the end of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade 200 years ago.
Jamaica's House of Representatives also passed a bill against
modern-day slavery or human trafficking this week after signing the
international protocol in 2002.
The U.N. Resolution was overwhelmingly adopted by 160 countries. The
countries of the formerly enslaved in Africa and the Caribbean, and
the former enslavers in Europe, joined in adopting it.
The countries hope to begin a process of acknowledgement, atonement,
healing and reconciliation. They hope to acknowledge that slavery was
a major cause of the social and economic inequality, bigotry, racism
and prejudice that affect people of African descent today. They hope
remedies, recourse, redress, and compensatory mechanisms will right
the historic wrongs. And, they hope that the slave trade and slavery
will be a part of people's education so that something so terrible
will never happen again.
The Jamaica National Bicentenary Committee will begin its own process
with a cultural rally at Emancipation Park on January 2, 2007.
The resolution and anticipation of it has scored two major successes.
The United Nations has overwhelmingly endorsed it. The Prime Minister
of Britain, Tony Blair, has admitted Britain's shameful role in it.
Before this (February this year) the Church of England had apologised
for its role in the slave trade acknowledging that the Church "was at
the heart of it." For those who think it is a thing of the past, the
Church of England reasoned that, "The body of Christ is not just a
body that exists at one time, it exists across history and we share
the shame and the sinfulness of our predecessors."
Tony Blair, however, has been criticised for stopping short of an
apology. There is clear difficulty in how Britain's powerful estates
.... Church, State, and Parliament ... handle guilt and
responsibility. The Church of England has acknowledged shame and
offered its apology. But it did not propose financial compensation.
Mr. Blair, leader of Parliament, has acknowledged shame but did not
offer an apology or compensation. In 2004, spokespersons for Queen
Elizabeth, Head of State, said that there was nothing to apologise
about since slavery was the law at the time.
Mr. Blair now says, to the embarrassment of royal conscience that, "It
is hard to believe that what would now be a crime against humanity was
legal at the time." The BBC will not shield the aristocracy either. It
reported that, "Today many of the great aristocratic families of
Britain have a hidden past in the slave trade."
LOVE OF MONEY
Why can't Britain's great estates come clean? The problem is, as it
was then, a failure of moral consistency and love of money. The U.K.'s
Guardian informed us in 2001 that 11 countries of the European Union
were willing to issue an apology for the slave trade. However,
Britain, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands had blocked that
decision, preferring the softer word 'regret'. Concerns about money
topped morality. To declare that slavery and the slave trade were
crimes against humanity would expose those countries to claims for
reparations. Even an apology, Blair felt, might have led to calls for
reparations. The last leader of government (Bertrand Aristide) to have
demanded reparations (from France) was overthrown just two years ago
on the 200th anniversary of the revolution that abolished slavery in
Haiti. Overthrow was cheaper.
The 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination,
Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (the Durban Declaration) obligingly
refrained from using the word 'reparations'. It used words like
'remedies', 'redress', 'recourse', and 'compensatory mechanisms',
which could mean debt relief or trade concessions. The declaration
also left a loophole by not explicitly demanding an apology. The
slaver countries had threatened to walk out of the conference
otherwise. But the loophole left them the opportunity to engage these
other compensatory mechanisms.
Europe has not shown the courage to go this route, even though it can
well afford to, and is even morally obliged to provide compensatory
mechanisms. Europe's enrichment from the slave trade is no longer in
dispute. Tony Blair himself acknowledged the correctness of Eric
Williams' thesis that slavery was in part responsible for the wealth
of Europe and its industrial revolution.
MORAL INCONSISTENCY
Britain and Europe suffer from moral inconsistency. Even as Mr. Blair
was expressing shame over the slave trade he was unveiling a decision
to spend 20 billion pounds to update Britain's nuclear arsenal.
Critics in his own party remind him that nuclear deterrence is a relic
of Cold War policy and that the money could be better spent on new
crises like climate change and human trafficking. But the war against
terrorism is Blair's priority.
Indeed, Britain's policies towards Africa seem more interested in
containing terrorism than in investing in economic and human
development. Britain is also complicit in the inhumane secret jails
and detention without rights being pursued by the Bush administration.
Britain, the U.S. and Europe remain unconcerned about apartheid-like
conditions in the Israeli-occupied territories of Palestine, as
African states, and lately Jimmy Carter, have described these
conditions. It is difficult to understand the mindset that can
moralise about the shamefulness of the slave trade while stockpiling
enough nuclear warheads to blow us all to bits many times over, and
supporting apartheid, secret jails and torture.
A Time for Restitution
Which of Britain's estates can jump-start the country's conscience?
Does the Church of England have that influence? The Guardian reported
a Bishop as saying, "The profits from the slave trade were part of the
bedrock of our industrial development. No one who was involved in
running the business, financing it or benefiting from its products can
say they had clean hands." It continued: "We know that Bishops in the
House of Lords with biblical authority voted against the abolition of
the slave trade." We also know that the royal families of Europe
invested heavily in slave trading companies. The real problem these
estates face is moral failure.
So have economists and socio-logists. Adam Smith gave pride of place
to the free market for the industrial revolution. Max Weber said the
Puritan ethic was behind capitalist industrialisation. We had always
suspected that the free market had only succeeded on unfree labour and
that the Puritan ethic thrived on an impure morality.
Britain is consumed with doubts about its national character and finds
it difficult to admit to moral failure. Probably the churches of
Europe - the moral estates - should demand that their governments
apologise and make right for crimes against humanity. It is a grand
hope that the commemoration of the end of the slave trade might open
up a new restitutive moral order in international politics.
States and powerful institutions are being increasingly asked to right
the wrongs of genocide, slavery, dispossession of territory, enforced
prostitution, drug trafficking, theft, persecution, war, illegal
internment, torture, child labour, discriminatory trade, ill-treatment
of immigrants, and failure to help people in disaster. Is an apology
for the slave trade too much to start with?
Robert Buddan lectures in the Department of Government, UWI. Email:
Robert...@uwimona.edu.jm
The Best Energy Builder in the West!!
http://www.tryfrutavida.com/2283012
http://www.frutavida.com/2283012
The QUEEN of night time radio. The most intelligent, charismatic, high-minded, wise woman in human history
holds court from 1800 to 2100 CDT at the link below:
Listen to her and be humanized! Bev Smith!
http://www.waok.com or http://www.what1340i.com
Listen to the King of Talk and the Emperor of talk nightly from 1800 until 2359 on:
www.1230thebuzz.com
http://theblogpicture.blogspot.com/
Listen to them worldiwide absorb their wisdom and become grat people!