I think you will find that the real world doesn't give a shit what she
engages in. She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
Incorrect. She's very popular in the real world. If ever you visit
us here, you'll see that.
> She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
DeGeneres displays no sign of any kind of mental illness.
We always expect mutants to engage in circus-like activity....
It will be entertaining....
Until November when the joke is on them.
Looking forward to the first high profile lesbian divorce.
Divorce amuses you? You must be in HEAVEN!
I'm so pleased that Ellen Degenerate's getting hitched.
Not necessarily but when the wedding looks like a publicity stunt tied into
the court decision I don't hold out much hope for the marriage. Pretty soon
we will probably find out who gets to keep the Subaru.
Is it because she's famous that you're calling this a "publicity
stunt"? She and de Rossi have been together for four years. In her
announcement, she said they'd wanted to make it legal. Now that it IS
legal, and they're getting married, how does that equate to their
wedding being merely a "publicity stunt"?
Funny! She said herself that "DeGenerate" is what her fourth-grade
classmates called her!
So, was this childish insight, or, is she their fault?
What it means is that calling her "Ellen DeGenerate" is so hilarious
that even a fourth-grader could think it up.
>In article <2jdr249m8itakplht...@4ax.com>, Pat...@America.Com says...
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 06:04:09 -0700, Hothead McCain <n...@spamm.com>
>> wrote:
>> >In article <s50r24lmmf2gouh501e5j95jau399htpn0@news>, gonn...@thatportia.hard says...
>> >> Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>> >The Republicans must be furious to see DeGeneres engage in her
>> >pursuit of happiness.
>>
>> We always expect mutants to engage in circus-like activity....
>>
>> It will be entertaining....
>>
>> Until November when the joke is on them.
>>
>>
>Try to overcome your homophobia, PG.
Belief in the Word of God is not homophobia, moron.
Always remember: Christ love's you, and so do I! Each and every one of you!
On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:54 +0000, The Ghost of Anne Heche
<gonn...@thatportia.hard> wrote:
>Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>
>http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/TV/05/16/ellen.degeneres.marriage.ap/index.html
> Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry...
Good, one less ugly woman roaming free.
You think Portia de Rossi is ugly?
http://l.yimg.com/img.tv.yahoo.com/tv/us/img/site/09/91/0000000991_20060919140946.jpg
Heh heh...
I keep saying that the only guys who give a damn about gays are other
gays.
Thanks for making my point, gay boy.
Rightards...
>Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
Ellen DeGeneres:Ric Ocasek::Portia DiRossi:Paulina Poriskova
-- Rob
--
LORELAI: I am so done with plans. I am never, ever making one again.
It never works. I spend the day obsessing over why it didn't work
and what I could've done differently. I'm analyzing all my shortcomings
when all I really need to be doing is vowing to never, ever make a plan
ever again, which I'm doing now, having once again been the innocent
victim of my own stupid plans. God, I need some coffee.
>LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
>California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into action
>-- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres announced during a
>taping of her talk show.
Just when I was begining to forget why I disliked her so much...
(Psst! Did you know that Ellen's gay?)
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
>> > The Republicans must be furious to see DeGeneres engage in her
>> > pursuit of happiness.
>>
>> I think you will find that the real world doesn't give a shit what
>> she engages in.
>
>Incorrect. She's very popular in the real world. If ever you visit
>us here, you'll see that.
He said the "real world", not "you and your Ellen fan club".
>> She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
>
>DeGeneres displays no sign of any kind of mental illness.
Selective memory on your part, obviously,
>Looking forward to the first high profile lesbian divorce.
Oh gawd! Think she'll stage another crying jag on her show that day?
>> > > Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>>
>> > > LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
>> > > California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into
>> > > action -- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres
>> > > announced during a taping of her talk show.
>>
>> >> Looking forward to the first high profile lesbian divorce.
>> >Divorce amuses you? You must be in HEAVEN!
>>
>> Not necessarily but when the wedding looks like a publicity stunt
>> tied into the court decision I don't hold out much hope for the
>> marriage.
>
>Is it because she's famous that you're calling this a "publicity
>stunt"? She and de Rossi have been together for four years. In her
>announcement, she said they'd wanted to make it legal. Now that it IS
>legal, and they're getting married, how does that equate to their
>wedding being merely a "publicity stunt"?
I was not aware that Ellen had been dating her for four years (thank
GAWD we were spared THAT!), but the fact that she "spontaneously"
decided to make a huge announcement on her show now instead of quietly
getting hitched in Vermont (or is it Massachusetts?) speaks volumes.
(Psst! Did you know Ellen's gay?)
It is just a mild mental illness.
>
> Always remember: Christ love's you, and so do I! Each and every one of you
What did Christ say about gays?
Isn't that when your favorite rump-ranger Larry Craig is going
to be defeated?
>>Always remember: Christ love's you, and so do I! Each and every one of you
>
> What did Christ say about gays?
The way I heard it, at the so-called "Last Supper" he tells them to
"Eat me".
Haw! The Jeebus, what a joker. Hey, gays....EAT ME! HAW HAW HAW!!
Gays are so funny. But you have to be careful around them. They're always
trying to get "more rights", like legalized marriage and the right to
follow me into a public restroom and stare at my buttocks and fondle my
private parts while I'm urinating. They want to kidnap young boys and
perform unnatural and unholy acts upon their innocent bodies. They want to
sidle up to straight people at bars, with their gaudy scarves and paisley
bell-bottoms and their Flock Of Seagulls hair, and intercede in our
conversations with beautiful straight women and try to convince us that
it's not only their right but their gosh-darned *mission* to come back to
my apartment and toss me rear-end-up over the hassock and pump me up the
ass until I scream "MICKEY MOUSE! MICKEY MOUSE!!" Then they want to slap
me across the face and spit on me and leave me there in a disheveled mess,
crying and bleeding and totally humiliated. That's what gay people--wait a
minute. Did I say gay people? I meant Mormons.
Excuse me, I'm sorry, wrong newsgroup.
**
Captain Infinity
There's no such thing as 'homophobia.'
I'm not afraid of fags. I just don't like 'em.
But that doesn't mean they get a free pass on the faggotry.....
He referred all questions to what His Dad said about fags...
Prove he's a fag.
>is going to be defeated?
If you spend less time sucking dicks you would have more time to pay
attention.
He said he was retiring after his term expired.
> I was not aware that Ellen had been dating her for four years (thank
> GAWD we were spared THAT!), but the fact that she "spontaneously"
> decided to make a huge announcement on her show now instead of quietly
> getting hitched in Vermont (or is it Massachusetts?) speaks volumes.
You do know that for a same-sex couple to be married in Massachusetts,
state residency is required, don't you? :-)
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:05:35 -0700, Hothead McCain <n...@spamm.com>
> wrote:
> >In article <2jdr249m8itakplht...@4ax.com>, Pat...@America.Com says...
> >Try to overcome your homophobia, PG.
>
> There's no such thing as 'homophobia.'
>
> I'm not afraid of fags. I just don't like 'em.
> that even a fourth-grader could think it up.- Hide quoted text -
>
Suitable though, isn't it?
> On May 16, 9:51 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <s50r24lmmf2gouh501e5j95jau399htpn0@news>,
> > The Ghost of Anne Heche <gonnar...@thatportia.hard> wrote:
> >
> > > Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry...
> > Good, one less ugly woman roaming free.
> You think Portia de Rossi is ugly?
What part of "ONE less ugly woman" didn't you understand?
lux et veritas wrote:
> > The Republicans must be furious to see DeGeneres engage in her
> > pursuit of happiness.
>
> I think you will find that the real world doesn't give a shit what she
> engages in. She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
what mental illness?
The DSM dropped homosexuality decades ago.
You fundies do not read very much, do you?
--
C. Marietta de Medici
Villa Medici Gallese
Lesbian: Tribade, Sapphist, Dyke, Practitioner of That Love Which Dare Not
Speak It's Name, Member of the Heterodoxy Club,
"The Medicis: Banking, Metaphysics and Art"
Will wrote:
> "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@gmx.com> wrote in message
> news:970a8cb1-cf5a-494b...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> On May 16, 12:31 pm, "Will" <w...@will.not> wrote:
> > "The Ghost of Anne Heche" <gonnar...@thatportia.hard> wrote in
> > messagenews:s50r24lmmf2gouh501e5j95jau399htpn0@news...
> >
> > > Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
> >
> > > LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
> > > California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into action
> > > -- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres announced during a
> > > taping of her talk show.
> >
> >> Looking forward to the first high profile lesbian divorce.
>
> >Divorce amuses you? You must be in HEAVEN!
>
> Not necessarily but when the wedding looks like a publicity stunt tied into
> the court decision I don't hold out much hope for the marriage. Pretty soon
> we will probably find out who gets to keep the Subaru.
Most well off Lesbians do not drive Subarus...
At a recent gathering of Lesbians for dinner, Jaguars and sports cars
predominated in the parking lot...
Harold Burton wrote:
She is certainly not my taste, but she is cute....
Ubiquitous wrote:
You clearly did not see last month's casualty figures.
Ubiquitous wrote:
> emersonw...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >On May 16, 11:27 am, lux et veritas <l...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > The Republicans must be furious to see DeGeneres engage in her
> >> > pursuit of happiness.
> >>
> >> I think you will find that the real world doesn't give a shit what
> >> she engages in.
> >
> >Incorrect. She's very popular in the real world. If ever you visit
> >us here, you'll see that.
>
> He said the "real world", not "you and your Ellen fan club".
>
> >> She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
> >
> >DeGeneres displays no sign of any kind of mental illness.
>
> Selective memory on your part, obviously,
>
She has no known history of mental illness....
As opposed to the substance dependent individual that the Republicans
elected twice to the white house or the republican with Impulse Control
Disorder that they want to foist upon America next....
Ubiquitous wrote:
You have to be a resident of Massachusetts to marry there.....because of an
old law used to prevent interracial marriages....
Patriot Games wrote:
Lesbians get a free pass...you straight fundie pervs think that we are hot...
>
>
>Will wrote:
>
>> "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@gmx.com> wrote in message
>> news:970a8cb1-cf5a-494b...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 16, 12:31 pm, "Will" <w...@will.not> wrote:
>> > "The Ghost of Anne Heche" <gonnar...@thatportia.hard> wrote in
>> > messagenews:s50r24lmmf2gouh501e5j95jau399htpn0@news...
>> >
>> > > Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>> >
>> > > LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
>> > > California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into action
>> > > -- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres announced during a
>> > > taping of her talk show.
>> >
>> >> Looking forward to the first high profile lesbian divorce.
>>
>> >Divorce amuses you? You must be in HEAVEN!
>>
>> Not necessarily but when the wedding looks like a publicity stunt tied into
>> the court decision I don't hold out much hope for the marriage. Pretty soon
>> we will probably find out who gets to keep the Subaru.
>
>Most well off Lesbians do not drive Subarus...
>At a recent gathering of Lesbians for dinner, Jaguars and sports cars
>predominated in the parking lot...
No dykes on bikes? <vbg>
WB Yeats
Well recently i got into Arrested development, never watched it for a
moment when it was on and then started watching it free on hulu.com
What a great show and I have to say I love Portia's acting. she
captured that role so perfectly. As for ellen, compared to Rosy,
Ellen is a gentleman and I like her. She doesn't smack you with her
lesboism like rosy does. For that even though I'm very much against
gays co-opting a sacred institution I wish both of them well.
Portia de Rossi isn't "ONE" woman, gay boy?
Heh heh...
Rightards...
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:ocGdnf9i0rvVmrLV...@comcast.com...
Well my love, if you were just a tad more in touch with reality you
would know that Massachusetts, the only other state which allows same
sex marriage, has restrictions on who may marry. Massachusetts does
not have a residency requirement for marriage, BUT one old, local law
– dating from 1913 – says that non-residents may not marry in
Massachusetts if their marriage would be expressly prohibited if
contracted in their home state. On March 30, 2006, the Supreme
Judicial Court (SJC) of Massachusetts issued a decision in this case
clarifying the criteria that must be met for determining which non-
residents can marry in Massachusetts.
Subsequently, a Massachusetts trial court judge, interpreting the
SJC’s decision, determined that Rhode Island same-sex couples are able
to marry in Massachusetts, without having to express an intent to
reside in Massachusetts. In July 2007, the Massachusetts Department of
Public Health determined that New Mexico same-sex couples are also
entitled to marry in Massachusetts. I seem to recall someone recently
got the court in New York to agree that a marriage ceremony in
Massachusetts would be valid for a New York resident.
If you reside in a state other than Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New
Mexico or possibly New York, the only way you may marry in
Massachusetts is if you express an intent to relocate to Massachusetts
after the marriage. So it speaks volumes that you condemn a person for
not doing something she is prohibited from doing by the law.
And why should she not make a public announcement that she intends to
marry? Most people do although most may not be as well known as she
is.
> --
> It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
> the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
> our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
> for them, it's failing.
If this is true then why does McCain say it may take 100 years to
resolve the war?
charley wrote:
Marriage per se is not sacred. Civil marriages existed for centuries and the
Pagans had marriage as well and I am sure that you would not recognize Pagan
Nuptials as sacred to Christians...
>
>I fixed the subject line for you.
>
>
>On Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:54 +0000, The Ghost of Anne Heche
><gonn...@thatportia.hard> wrote:
>
>>Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>>
>>LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
>>California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into action
>>-- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres announced during a
>>taping of her talk show.
>>
>>DeGeneres was taping the episode of "The Ellen DeGeneres Show" on
>>Thursday, the day the state's high court struck down California laws
>>against gay marriage, and it was to air Friday, a person close to the
>>production said.
>>
>>The person, who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly,
>>spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity.
>>
>>Citing the court's ruling, DeGeneres said she and girlfriend de Rossi
>>("Ally McBeal," "Nip/Tuck") would be getting married.
>>
>>De Rossi, 35, who was in the studio, and DeGeneres, 50, were applauded
>>by audience members, the person close to the production said.
>>
>>Calls and e-mails late Thursday to DeGeneres' publicist were not
>>immediately returned.
>>
>>The court ruling means same-sex couples could tie the knot in as
>>little as a month. However, religious and social conservatives are
>>seeking to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot in November
>>that would undo the Supreme Court ruling and ban gay marriage. Watch
>>why California Supreme Court overturned ban on same-sex marriage »
>>
>>DeGeneres has boldly used TV before to make a stand for gay rights.
>>
>>In 1997, she brought her character on the ABC sitcom "Ellen" out of
>>the closet, making the show the first on prime-time network TV to have
>>an openly gay lead. The move drew cheers from gay civil rights
>>organizations but was condemned by some religious groups.
>>
>>A month before, DeGeneres had proclaimed from the cover of Time
>>magazine that she was a lesbian.
>>
>>DeGeneres and the glamorous de Rossi have been a familiar couple at
>>Hollywood events, including the Academy Awards. Previously, DeGeneres
>>had a high-profile relationship with actress Anne Heche.
>>
>>In a 2005 interview with Allure magazine, the comedian said she hoped
>>she and de Rossi are "together the rest of our lives."
>>
>>"I never would have thought my life would have turned out this way,"
>>DeGeneres told the magazine. "To have money. Or to have a gorgeous
>>girlfriend. I just feel so lucky with everything in my life right
>>now."
>>
>>http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/TV/05/16/ellen.degeneres.marriage.ap/index.html
>
> Portia de Rossi isn't "ONE" woman, gay boy? (sic)
Neither is ugly Ellen, but she was the one referred to.
Snicker.
In the Real World, most people couldn't give a damn about Ellens'
affectional preference.
When you join this Real World with the rest of us, you will see that.
>
> >> She'll never be happy because of her mental illness.
>
> >DeGeneres displays no sign of any kind of mental illness.
>
> Selective memory on your part, obviously,
No. Absence of mental illness.
If you see signs of mental illness, kindly report it here:
Why are you so fixated on ugly women? Are they the only ones who
will even talk to you?
I still think you're agent smith.
annie is certifiably nuts. ellen isn't.
Not really - don't you know that Dykes on Bikes are a treasured
institution out here in the Bay Area?
WB Yeats
Who gives a shit what a snaggletoothed Limey POOF thinks?
Nobody.
Go suck some Limey dicks and shut the fuck up.
Jesus didn't have anything to say about fags (that I know of).
His Dad took care of that for Him.
You should READ your cites....
"Singh was the only one without a date, and was hugging and dancing
with other men.
"In the hours preceding the attack, a group described as
Russian-speaking hurled explicit gay slurs and racial remarks at Singh
and his party, according to witnesses and sheriff's officials. When
Singh and his friends tried to leave around 8 p.m., they were
confronted by the Slavic group and a fight ensued, the witnesses said.
"Singh was punched -- once -- in the face. He fell backward and
cracked his head, rupturing a part of the brain stem that controls
most of life's functions. He died four days later."
Sounds like a basic fist-fight that had an unfortunate accidental
ending...
Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
a good idea?
> On 17 May 2008 13:03:07 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote:
> >Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> writes:
> >> On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:05:35 -0700, Hothead McCain <n...@spamm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >In article <2jdr249m8itakplht...@4ax.com>, Pat...@America.Com says...
> >> >Try to overcome your homophobia, PG.
> >> There's no such thing as 'homophobia.'
> >> I'm not afraid of fags. I just don't like 'em.
> ><http://www.sacbee.com/101/story/270787.html>.
>
> You should READ your cites....
>
> "Singh was the only one without a date, and was hugging and dancing
> with other men.
So? Nothing he was doing was illegal and he wasn't trying to hug or
dance with the creeps who killed him.
> "In the hours preceding the attack, a group described as
> Russian-speaking hurled explicit gay slurs and racial remarks at Singh
> and his party, according to witnesses and sheriff's officials. When
> Singh and his friends tried to leave around 8 p.m., they were
> confronted by the Slavic group and a fight ensued, the witnesses said.
> "Singh was punched -- once -- in the face. He fell backward and
> cracked his head, rupturing a part of the brain stem that controls
> most of life's functions. He died four days later."
>
> Sounds like a basic fist-fight that had an unfortunate accidental
> ending...
Your "basic fist-fight" sounds more like a vicious and unprovoked
assault.
> Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
> a good idea?
Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
> Hothead McCain <n...@spamm.com> wrote:
>
>> Try to overcome your homophobia, PG.
>
> Belief in the Word of God is not homophobia, moron.
If you don't want gay people to have equal rights simply because
your god told you to think that way, perhaps it's time for you to
find a new god. Because the one you've got right now is a big jerk.
--
William December Starr <wds...@panix.com>
> There's no such thing as 'homophobia.'
>
> I'm not afraid of fags. I just don't like 'em.
Which is one of the two primary meanings of the word. The more
common one, in fact.
Words are not required to have meanings which are equal to, or
limited to, the sum of the meanings of their components. (If they
were, pineapples would grow on evergreen trees.)
> Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> What it means is that calling her "Ellen DeGenerate" is so
>> hilarious that even a fourth-grader could think it up.
>
> Suitable though, isn't it?
Let's see: "Degenerate, adj. having fallen below a normal or
desirable level, esp. in physical or moral qualities."
Seems to better describe people like you than her.
William December Starr wrote:
What's wrong with a deity who claims to be all-loving until you cross
him at which time he sends plagues, earthquakes, and Conservatives?
Words of someone exercising their first amendment rights just like
your side constantly reminds us about.
Words of someone exercising their first amendment rights just like
So why are Christians so worked over the issue?
> His Dad took care of that for Him.
The same Dad who said eating pork and shrimp was as bad as
being gay?
Boy are you dumb.
Fags don't have the right to Marriage.
Marriage belongs to heterosexual men & women.
They DO have the right to the same rights and privileges provided by
"Marriage" so long as they call it something other than Marriage.
Pay attention. "Creeps" did not kill him. One person hit him one
time. He fell and hit his head on a rock. Hitting his head on a rock
killed him. It was an accident.
>> "In the hours preceding the attack, a group described as
>> Russian-speaking hurled explicit gay slurs and racial remarks at Singh
>> and his party, according to witnesses and sheriff's officials. When
>> Singh and his friends tried to leave around 8 p.m., they were
>> confronted by the Slavic group and a fight ensued, the witnesses said.
>> "Singh was punched -- once -- in the face. He fell backward and
>> cracked his head, rupturing a part of the brain stem that controls
>> most of life's functions. He died four days later."
>> Sounds like a basic fist-fight that had an unfortunate accidental
>> ending...
>Your "basic fist-fight" sounds more like a vicious and unprovoked
>assault.
Pay attention: "Singh was... hugging and dancing with other men" in
public.
That's a provocation.
>> Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
>> a good idea?
>Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
Freedom isn't free. All freedom comes with responsibility.
You wanna frolic around "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC
then accept responsibility for what your actions may provoke.
I'm not PERMITTED to exercise my freedom of speech because the Nazi
fag Democrats disagree with it.....
But they can be "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC with
total impunity.....
This is the totalitarian Nazism that the Democrats want to impose on
America.
We'll remember that when we vote in November.
Wrong. Pay attention when I lecture you:
Definition of 'homophobia' (hom?-fobe-?) - The American Heritage®
Dictionary
homophobia (n.) Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
No it isn't. He wasn't trying to dance or hug the people who attacked
him. In fact, they attacked him when he was trying to leave the
area.
> >> Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
> >> a good idea?
> >Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
>
> Freedom isn't free. All freedom comes with responsibility.
The responsibility is to obey the laws we have, which includes not
assaulting people just because you don't like them.
No, your opinion is taht of a fascist who claims that any criticism of
his views is some sort of repression but that it is OK to assault
people he doesn't like. It's as simple as that.
Because of the use of the word "Marriage." A lot of Americans, a
majority, and especially more evangelical Christians completely object
to fags using the 'M' word.
>> His Dad took care of that for Him.
> The same Dad who said eating pork and shrimp was as bad as
>being gay?
Try double-checking that. Lots of things in the Bible are some guy
telling people what he thinks God wants them to do (or not to do)
which is (obviously) NOT that same as some guy (allegedly) quoting
God.
> Boy are you dumb.
The obvious problem is that if I'm dumb that makes you a drooling
retard....
Sorry, never said anything of the kind.
>but that it is OK to assault people he doesn't like.
I think one of the things America BADLY needs is a return to a good
old LEGAL fist fight in public.
> It's as simple as that.
A fag died. It was an accident. Get over it.
If a person was provoked by it then IT was a provocation... Duh.
Your argument is that his actions SHOULD NOT have provoked anyone.
Your argument is a FANTASY. Welcome to the REAL WORLD where MOST
people DO NOT LIKE fags.
It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong, good or bad, what matters
is that that's THE REAL WORLD.
>> >> Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
>> >> a good idea?
>> >Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
>> Freedom isn't free. All freedom comes with responsibility.
>The responsibility is to obey the laws we have, which includes not
>assaulting people just because you don't like them.
The responsibility ALSO include being responsible for YOUR OWN
ACTIONS.
The dead fag FAILED to perform real-world responsibility for his own
actions. That doesn't let the other guy off the hook. He's still
gonna get a legal spanking for assault.
But the bottom line is the dead fag would NOT be dead if he'd done his
"hugging and dancing with other men" elsewhere.
> Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry
>
> LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Ellen DeGeneres is putting the
> California Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage into action
> -- she and Portia de Rossi plan to wed, DeGeneres announced during a
> taping of her talk show.
Good for them!
--
Roofshadow.
> On 19 May 2008 11:52:20 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote:
> >Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> writes:
> >> On Mon, 19 May 2008 04:50:26 -0700 (PDT), charley <varr...@aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Perhaps the "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC isn't such
> >> >> > a good idea?
> >> >> Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
> >> >Words of someone exercising their first amendment rights just like
> >> >your side constantly reminds us about.
> >> I'm not PERMITTED to exercise my freedom of speech because the Nazi
> >> fag Democrats disagree with it.....
> >> But they can be "hugging and dancing with other men" IN PUBLIC with
> >> total impunity.....
> >> This is the totalitarian Nazism that the Democrats want to impose on
> >> America.
> >No, your opinion is taht of a fascist who claims that any criticism of
> >his views is some sort of repression
>
> Sorry, never said anything of the kind.
Actually you did - you said you were not permitted to exercise your freedom
of speach merely because your bigotry was called bigotry. Nobody stopped
you from doing anything, least of all Democrats.
>
> >but that it is OK to assault people he doesn't like.
>
> I think one of the things America BADLY needs is a return to a good
> old LEGAL fist fight in public.
Nope.
> > It's as simple as that.
>
> A fag died. It was an accident. Get over it.
Actually, it wasn't an accident - it was an assualt, a criminal act.
> On 19 May 2008 11:48:59 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote:
>
> If a person was provoked by it then IT was a provocation... Duh.
An attempt at a tautology is not an argument. If someone wore a green
shirt and some nut attacked him for, you can't exactly call wearing
the green shirt a provocation, no matter what someone tries to claim
to avoid going to jail.
> Your argument is a FANTASY. Welcome to the REAL WORLD where MOST
> people DO NOT LIKE fags.
While your "most people do not like [gays]" is probably a lie (most
people don't care), your claim is irrelevant - at one time in the U.S.,
"most people" did not like Blacks. That was not a valid reason to
deny them civil rights.
> It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong, good or bad, what matters
> is that that's THE REAL WORLD.
A minority of bigots do not get to define the real world.
> >> >Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
> >> Freedom isn't free. All freedom comes with responsibility.
> >The responsibility is to obey the laws we have, which includes not
> >assaulting people just because you don't like them.
>
> The responsibility ALSO include being responsible for YOUR OWN
> ACTIONS.
ROTFLMAO - if they catch and prosecute these people, they will be
held responsible for their "own actions".
> The dead fag FAILED to perform real-world responsibility for his own
> actions. That doesn't let the other guy off the hook. He's still
> gonna get a legal spanking for assault.
>
> But the bottom line is the dead fag would NOT be dead if he'd done his
> "hugging and dancing with other men" elsewhere.
Bigoted idiot - this guy would not be dead if some criminals had obeyed
the law.
not the same democratic party it once was.
From the same dictionary:
contempt (n.)
1. The feeling or attitude of regarding someone or something as
inferior, base, or worthless; scorn.
[Middle English, from Latin contemptus, past participle of contemnere,
to despise. See contemn.]
And from Roget's II:
contempt
1. The feeling of despising: despisal, despite, disdain, scorn. See
respect/contempt/standing.
http://www.answers.com/contempt&r=67
Whoops, looks like you *are* a homophobe after all!
Nobody is afraid of homos, just repulsed, but we pray for all of you.
> On May 17, 2:28 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <ed077877-0485-4810-8531-3c9986b41...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > SilentOtto <silento...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 16, 9:51 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <s50r24lmmf2gouh501e5j95jau399htpn0@news>,
> > > > The Ghost of Anne Heche <gonnar...@thatportia.hard> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Ellen DeGeneres, girlfriend plan to marry...
> > > > Good, one less ugly woman roaming free.
> > > You think Portia de Rossi is ugly?
> >
> > What part of "ONE less ugly woman" didn't you understand?
>
>
> Why are you so fixated on ugly women?
Why are you so fixated on people you "think" are fixated on ugly women?
Snicker.
people like you should stop using a word you have no idea what it
means or it's about.
hahahahahha!!!
>> > It's as simple as that.
>> A fag died. It was an accident. Get over it.
>Actually, it wasn't an accident - it was an assualt, a criminal act.
The assault was not an accident. And an assault is a criminal act.
The death of the fag was an accident.
Its just a fact, if a person was provoked by it then IT was a
provocation.
That doesn't make it legal. But it is a fact.
The court will ALWAYS consider ANY provocation even if that
consideration is limited to politely listening to something utterly
stupid.
>> Your argument is a FANTASY. Welcome to the REAL WORLD where MOST
>> people DO NOT LIKE fags.
>While your "most people do not like [gays]" is probably a lie (most
>people don't care), your claim is irrelevant - at one time in the U.S.,
>"most people" did not like Blacks. That was not a valid reason to
>deny them civil rights.
Gallup Poll. May 8-11, 2008. "Do you think marriages between same-sex
couples should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with
the same rights as traditional marriages?"
Should: 40%
Should Not: 56%
I'm Stupid: 4%
As of TWO WEEKS AGO most (56%) certainly DO CARE.
But this case isn't about civil rights.
>> It doesn't matter if that's right or wrong, good or bad, what matters
>> is that that's THE REAL WORLD.
>A minority of bigots do not get to define the real world.
Sometimes they do. More often a majority does.
But both of those facts are irrelevant.
The "real world" is ALWAYS pre-defined the moment you walk out of your
door. You walk INTO that "real world" and the degree to which it is
fair or unfair is irrelevant.
>> >> >Words of a freedom-hating bigot.
>> >> Freedom isn't free. All freedom comes with responsibility.
>> >The responsibility is to obey the laws we have, which includes not
>> >assaulting people just because you don't like them.
>> The responsibility ALSO include being responsible for YOUR OWN
>> ACTIONS.
>ROTFLMAO - if they catch and prosecute these people, they will be
>held responsible for their "own actions".
Based on the article which references the multiple eyewitness
testimony if they catch the fag-puncher he's positively going to be
charged with something like involuntary manslaughter, 3rd-degree
murder maybe.
>> The dead fag FAILED to perform real-world responsibility for his own
>> actions. That doesn't let the other guy off the hook. He's still
>> gonna get a legal spanking for assault.
>> But the bottom line is the dead fag would NOT be dead if he'd done his
>> "hugging and dancing with other men" elsewhere.
>Bigoted idiot - this guy would not be dead if some criminals had obeyed
>the law.
Obviously that's true. But the fag punchout occurred AFTER the fag
"hugging and dancing with other men" in public...
I don't like lima beans either. Does that nake me a Limabeanophobe?
Its not my fault this is to hard for you.
Its not my fault to you have to invent the most ridiculous claims to
try to force people to like.
> On 19 May 2008 16:03:25 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote:
> >Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> writes:
> >> I think one of the things America BADLY needs is a return to a good
> >> old LEGAL fist fight in public.
> >Nope.
>
> hahahahahha!!!
Idiot.
> >> > It's as simple as that.
> >> A fag died. It was an accident. Get over it.
> >Actually, it wasn't an accident - it was an assualt, a criminal act.
>
> The assault was not an accident. And an assault is a criminal act.
>
> The death of the fag was an accident.
Nope - the death was the direct consequence of a crime. You do know,
don't you, that you can be charged with murder if someone is killed
while you are comitting a felony, even if you had no intention of
killing anyone?
The only question in this case is whether it is a case of murder
or involuntary manslaughter.
> On 19 May 2008 16:10:53 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote:
> >Patriot Games <Pat...@America.Com> writes:
> >> On 19 May 2008 11:48:59 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> If a person was provoked by it then IT was a provocation... Duh.
> >An attempt at a tautology is not an argument. If someone wore a green
> >shirt and some nut attacked him for, you can't exactly call wearing
> >the green shirt a provocation, no matter what someone tries to claim
> >to avoid going to jail.
>
> Its just a fact, if a person was provoked by it then IT was a
> provocation.
>
> That doesn't make it legal. But it is a fact.
Wrong. You have to use the legal definition, which is:
4. (Law) Such prior insult or injury as may be supposed,
under the circumstances, to create hot blood, and to
excuse an assault made in retort or redress.
[1913 Webster]
> The court will ALWAYS consider ANY provocation even if that
> consideration is limited to politely listening to something utterly
> stupid.
Idiot.
>
> >> Your argument is a FANTASY. Welcome to the REAL WORLD where MOST
> >> people DO NOT LIKE fags.
> >While your "most people do not like [gays]" is probably a lie (most
> >people don't care), your claim is irrelevant - at one time in the U.S.,
> >"most people" did not like Blacks. That was not a valid reason to
> >deny them civil rights.
>
> Gallup Poll. May 8-11, 2008. "Do you think marriages between same-sex
> couples should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with
> the same rights as traditional marriages?"
> Should: 40%
> Should Not: 56%
> I'm Stupid: 4%
You made up the numbers (Gallop does not use your "Stupid" category)
and those numbers are irrelevant. You are trying to confuse views
on marriage with views on gays. Some people think civil unions are
adequate, for example.
>
> As of TWO WEEKS AGO most (56%) certainly DO CARE.
You took data about marriage and tried to turn that into an
opinion about gays. Total BS on your part.
> The "real world" is ALWAYS pre-defined the moment you walk out of your
> door. You walk INTO that "real world" and the degree to which it is
> fair or unfair is irrelevant.
In the "real world", if you go around killing people you don't like,
you end up in prison.
> >> But the bottom line is the dead fag would NOT be dead if he'd done his
> >> "hugging and dancing with other men" elsewhere.
> >Bigoted idiot - this guy would not be dead if some criminals had obeyed
> >the law.
>
> Obviously that's true. But the fag punchout occurred AFTER the fag
> "hugging and dancing with other men" in public...
So what?
>> If you don't want gay people to have equal rights...
>
> Fags don't have the right to Marriage.
Wrong.
> Marriage belongs to heterosexual men & women.
"Belongs to?" Have they got a receipt for it?
--
William December Starr <wds...@panix.com>
> I'm not PERMITTED to exercise my freedom of speech because the
> Nazi fag Democrats disagree with it.....
Hey look everybody: Patriot Games' lying!
>>> There's no such thing as 'homophobia.'
>>> I'm not afraid of fags. I just don't like 'em.
>>
>> Which is one of the two primary meanings of the word. The more
>> common one, in fact.
>
> Wrong. Pay attention when I lecture you:
>
> Definition of 'homophobia' (hom?-fobe-?) - The American Heritage®
> Dictionary
>
> homophobia (n.) Fear of or contempt for lesbians and gay men.
What part of "or" don't you understand?
> Nobody is afraid of homos,
That's probably not true. There's a _lot_ of people out there.
> just repulsed,
Which, if you were a good person, you would acknowledge is _your_
problem, and you would not attempt to make it theirs.
> but we pray for all of you.
And that mental illness is your problem too.
About 38 States disagree with you.
>> Marriage belongs to heterosexual men & women.
>"Belongs to?" Have they got a receipt for it?
Yes.
Wimp.
>> >> > It's as simple as that.
>> >> A fag died. It was an accident. Get over it.
>> >Actually, it wasn't an accident - it was an assualt, a criminal act.
>> The assault was not an accident. And an assault is a criminal act.
>> The death of the fag was an accident.
>Nope - the death was the direct consequence of a crime. You do know,
>don't you, that you can be charged with murder if someone is killed
>while you are comitting a felony, even if you had no intention of
>killing anyone?
What you've learned from TV Crime Drama shows IS NOT the real world.
>The only question in this case is whether it is a case of murder
>or involuntary manslaughter.
If you haven't figured out a way for them to put an unidentified
person on trial then I rather think there are MORE questions than
that.
There is even THIS (remote) possibility:
Fag-Puncher: Sir, please refrain from dancing with and hugging other
men in the presence of children.
Fag: I have a gun in my pocket and you have one second to disappear.
As I said, what you've learned from TV Crime Drama shows IS NOT the
real world.
Besides, why should they get to be happy while we suffer. Let 'em get
married.
--
The All-New, All-Different Howling Curmudgeons!
http://www.whiterose.org/howlingcurmudgeons
You said: "You have to use the legal definition" THEN you quoted a
DICTIONARY instead of a LAW SOURCE.
>> The court will ALWAYS consider ANY provocation even if that
>> consideration is limited to politely listening to something utterly
>> stupid.
>Idiot.
Yes, you are.
>> >> Your argument is a FANTASY. Welcome to the REAL WORLD where MOST
>> >> people DO NOT LIKE fags.
>> >While your "most people do not like [gays]" is probably a lie (most
>> >people don't care), your claim is irrelevant - at one time in the U.S.,
>> >"most people" did not like Blacks. That was not a valid reason to
>> >deny them civil rights.
>> Gallup Poll. May 8-11, 2008. "Do you think marriages between same-sex
>> couples should or should not be recognized by the law as valid, with
>> the same rights as traditional marriages?"
>> Should: 40%
>> Should Not: 56%
>> I'm Stupid: 4%
>You made up the numbers (Gallop does not use your "Stupid" category)
No. I made up a Category Name, the 4% is accurate.
You could have verified that by using the URL I provided (that you
deleted).
>and those numbers are irrelevant. You are trying to confuse views
>on marriage with views on gays. Some people think civil unions are
>adequate, for example.
You said: "most people don't care."
I proved that you're WRONG because most people DO CARE enough to take
a Survey and express a SPECIFIC opinion OTHER THAN the 4%.
>> As of TWO WEEKS AGO most (56%) certainly DO CARE.
>You took data about marriage and tried to turn that into an
>opinion about gays. Total BS on your part.
Pay attention when I lecture you.
You said: "most people don't care."
I proved that you're WRONG because most people DO CARE enough to take
a Survey and express a SPECIFIC opinion OTHER THAN the 4%.
>> The "real world" is ALWAYS pre-defined the moment you walk out of your
>> door. You walk INTO that "real world" and the degree to which it is
>> fair or unfair is irrelevant.
>In the "real world", if you go around killing people you don't like,
>you end up in prison.
In the "real world", if you go around insulting people your chances of
getting killed increase significantly.
In the "real world", if you go around unwilling or unable to defend
yourself your chances of getting killed increase significantly.
In the "real world", if you go around unwilling or unable to take
responsibility for your actions your chances of getting killed
increase significantly.
>> >> But the bottom line is the dead fag would NOT be dead if he'd done his
>> >> "hugging and dancing with other men" elsewhere.
>> >Bigoted idiot - this guy would not be dead if some criminals had obeyed
>> >the law.
>> Obviously that's true. But the fag punchout occurred AFTER the fag
>> "hugging and dancing with other men" in public...
>So what?
So if you can't identify who the alleged criminal would have punched
out had the fag NOT BEEN THERE you are forced to conclude that the fag
being was the precursor to the event.