Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

If homosexuality is natural why isn't the anus made for sex...?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Friar Feinstein

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:13:25 PM11/18/09
to mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@m2n.gabrix.ath.cx
Fair question.

Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

clouddreamer

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:15:53 PM11/18/09
to
Friar Feinstein wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>


The mouth isn't made for sex either. Are you telling me you've never
performed oral sex???

..

IAAH

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:22:09 PM11/18/09
to
On 11/18/09 7:13 PM, * Friar Feinstein wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>

Why isn't the mouth? Fellatio occurs in the animal
world. You asked a stupid question.

--
"I do not pretend to be able to prove that there
is no God. I equally cannot
prove that Satan is a fiction. The Christian god
may exist; so may the gods of
Olympus, or of ancient Egypt, or of Babylon. But
no one of these hypotheses is
more probable than any other: they lie outside the
region of even probable
knowledge, and therefore there is no reason to
consider any of them."
Bertrand Russell

Lars Eighner

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:23:52 PM11/18/09
to
In our last episode,
<5eef5502a585c4b4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>, the lovely
and talented Friar Feinstein broadcast on alt.gossip.celebrities:

> Fair question.

> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

If heterosexuality is natural, howcome the penis is used for pissing?


--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5923, 1993
302 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.

Twitchell

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:37:39 PM11/18/09
to
In article <5eef5502a585c4b4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>, Friar
Feinstein says...

>
>Fair question.
>
>Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>
Any reason you're using an anonymous remailer for your simple, straightforward
question? What do you have to hide?

twitch

mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 7:50:42 PM11/18/09
to
On Nov 18, 7:13 pm, "Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

All queers take a stab at the anus.

mr dude (scientists have discovered a gay gene, it's called "Jordache")

Uncle Vic

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 11:06:46 PM11/18/09
to
One fine day in alt.atheism, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
wrote:

> In our last episode,
> <5eef5502a585c4b4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>, the
> lovely and talented Friar Feinstein broadcast on
> alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
>> Fair question.
>
>> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>
> If heterosexuality is natural, howcome the penis is used for pissing?
>
>

Now *there's* an example of a fucked-up design, eh?

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs.

Dysperdis

unread,
Nov 18, 2009, 11:41:33 PM11/18/09
to
Friar Feinstein wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>

If homosexuality isn't natural, why is the prostate located where it is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostate#Male_sexual_response

--
Society, like water, needs to move and change to remain fresh. To keep
it from doing so is to allow it to become stagnant and malodorous. The
religious right would have us all living in a swamp to assuage their own
fears.

�The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye. The more light you
shine on it, the more it will contract.� �Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

"Never trust a man who puts his words in the mouth of god and says it's
absolute truth" -Voltaire, "/God Thinks/"

How to argue like a bigot: http://www.derailingfordummies.com/

http://dysperdis.wordpress.com/

anonymous

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 7:10:15 AM11/19/09
to
Friar Feinstein wrote:
>
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

Well, since the beginning of time men have been shoving their penises in
the mouths of men and women and the anuses of men and women for a sexual
purpose.

clouddreamer

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 7:39:51 AM11/19/09
to


<crickets>

..

--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us.

Pat Magroyne

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 4:05:01 PM11/19/09
to

And in watermelons and sheep.

RamRod Sword of Baal

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 4:27:42 PM11/19/09
to

"Pat Magroyne" <patma...@null.net> wrote in message
news:900894fc-8a27-47b9...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

>> Well, since the beginning of time men have been shoving their penises in
>> the mouths of men and women and the anuses of men and women for a sexual
>> purpose.

> And in watermelons and sheep.

Don't for get pumpkins.

OMG is it midnight already :-)

FreeThink

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:00:56 PM11/19/09
to
On Nov 18, 4:13 pm, "Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

Because the anus was not "made" it evolved.

JTEM

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:30:45 PM11/19/09
to

"Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:

> Fair question.

Not really. It's entirely circular -- predicated on it's
own conclusion.

After all, who says the anus hasn't evolved for sex,
and why do they make this claim?

Bill Taylor

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 10:17:37 PM11/19/09
to mail...@reece.net.au, mail...@dizum.com, mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@mixmin.net
In article <9qmag5d0b0446sa1j...@4ax.com>
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.Legfwtrgwery.com> " <x...@m.com>
wrote:
>
>
> [[[ TOTALLY-IRRELEVANT-to-this-topic groups:
> alt.gossip.celebrities and alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
> ... removed from the crosspostings. (What was the NUTTY
> point of including those in the first place?) (The Alaska one
> was iffy, but then I remembered fruitcake Sarah Palin. So
> I left it in.) ]]]

How do you know they didn't originate it? Hollywood is loaded
with queers, so is Mass.

Groups restored.

>
> On 18 Nov 2009 16:37:39 -0800,
> Twitchell <Twitchel...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > Friar Feinstein wrote:
>
>
> >> If homosexuality is natural why isn't the anus made for sex...?


> >>
> >> Fair question.
> >>
> >> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>
> > Any reason you're using an anonymous remailer for your simple,
> > straightforward question? What do you have to hide?
> >
> >twitch
>

> Indeed! How MANY ignorant bigots have the GUTS to post their
> swill under their REAL names -- vis-a-vis the number of egalitarians
> who, having NOTHING to be ASHAMED of -- don't hesitate to?
>
> Bigots are almost *always* are craven COWARDS.
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> ��� Rest in Peace ���
> ��� George Richard Tiller, MD ���
> ��� A True American HERO! ���
> ��� August 8, 1941 � May 31, 2009 ���
> ��� Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com ���
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> -- Craig Chilton <xana...@mchsi.com>
>
> www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
> www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
> http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
> http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
> www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
> www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!


Lefty

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 10:31:46 PM11/19/09
to

If he has, he certainly hasn't done it well.

Lefty

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 10:33:27 PM11/19/09
to
On Nov 18, 7:22 pm, IAAH <n...@email.exist> wrote:
> On 11/18/09 7:13 PM, * Friar Feinstein wrote:
>
> > Fair question.
>
> > Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>
> Why isn't the mouth? Fellatio occurs in the animal
> world. You asked a stupid question.

So does anal sex.


Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 12:16:10 AM11/20/09
to

I think the real question is, if the anus isn't made for sex, then how the
hell did Friar Feinstein get born? I think he's living proof that it is, and
so is his brother, Mr. Hanky.


Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 12:21:37 AM11/20/09
to
Uncle Vic said:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In our last episode,
>> <5eef5502a585c4b4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>, the
>> lovely and talented Friar Feinstein broadcast on
>> alt.gossip.celebrities:
>>
>>> Fair question.
>>
>>> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>>
>> If heterosexuality is natural, howcome the penis is used for pissing?
>>
>>
>
> Now *there's* an example of a fucked-up design, eh?

Three engineers are debating the existence of god, an electrical engineer, a
mechanical engineer, and a civil engineer.

The electrical engineer says "look at the marvel of the human brain with
it's complexity to perform complex functions and completely control the
operation of the human body through electrical impulses. Surely god is an
electrical engineer."

The mechanical engineer says, "no, just look at the human body, and the
incredible physical complexity of all that exists in nature, and it's
amazing diversity and endless unique specialized structures. Surely god is a
mechanical engineer.

The civil engineer says, "no, god is certainly a civil engineer. Who else
would put a waste disposal system in the middle of a major recreational
area?"


Uncle Vic

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 12:40:30 AM11/20/09
to
One fine day in alt.atheism, "Nunya Bidnits"
<nunyab...@eternal-september.invalid> wrote:

> Three engineers are debating the existence of god, an electrical
> engineer, a mechanical engineer, and a civil engineer.
>
> The electrical engineer says "look at the marvel of the human brain
> with it's complexity to perform complex functions and completely
> control the operation of the human body through electrical impulses.
> Surely god is an electrical engineer."
>
> The mechanical engineer says, "no, just look at the human body, and
> the incredible physical complexity of all that exists in nature, and
> it's amazing diversity and endless unique specialized structures.
> Surely god is a mechanical engineer.
>
> The civil engineer says, "no, god is certainly a civil engineer. Who
> else would put a waste disposal system in the middle of a major
> recreational area?"

ROFL

Bill Taylor

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 2:21:54 PM11/20/09
to mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@m2n.gabrix.ath.cx, mail...@reece.net.au, mail...@mixmin.net
In article <rqidg5pjvd8hdpcfu...@4ax.com>
"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.Lauilyghuiohouicom> " <x...@m.com>
wrote:
>
>
> [[[ TOTALLY-IRRELEVANT-to-this-topic groups:
> alt.gossip.celebrities and alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
> ... removed from the crosspostings. (What was the NUTTY
> point of including those in the first place?) (The Alaska one
> was iffy, but then I remembered fruitcake Sarah Palin. So
> I left it in.) ]]]
>

Sarah Palin owns you queers. All one has to do is mention her
name, and you pathetic little bigots start whining and yapping.

>
> On 18 Nov 2009 16:37:39 -0800,
> Twitchell <Twitchel...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> > Friar Feinstein wrote:
>
>
> >> If homosexuality is natural why isn't the anus made for sex...?
> >>
> >> Fair question.
> >>
> >> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
>
> > Any reason you're using an anonymous remailer for your simple,
> > straightforward question? What do you have to hide?
> >
> >twitch
>
>>
>
>

> ________________
> /| /| | |
> ||__|| | CRAIG CHILTON |
> / O O\ | HOMO |
> / \ | QUEERUS! |
> / \ \|_______________ |
> / _ \ \ ||
> / |\___\ \ ||
> / | | | |\__/ ||
> / \|_|_|/ | _ ||
> / / \ |____| ||
> / | | | --|
> | | | |__ _ --|
> * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
> *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
> / _ \\ | / `
> * / \_ /- | | |
> * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c______FAG______
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

JTEM

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:14:36 PM11/20/09
to

"No One" aka Bill Taylor <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:

> Sarah Palin owns you queers.  All one has to do is mention her
> name, and you pathetic little bigots start whining and yapping.

You misspelled "Obamabot."

It's one of the reasons I hate Obama. That is, before Obama,
sexism was a distinctly GOP trait, but now it's 100% associated
with the Democrats.

I'll give you a prime example....

Fight for a decent healthcare system rages in Washington, and
the greatest obstacle reform is the President:

: Rep. John Conyers took a broad swipe at President Obama
: and his chief of staff on Thursday, accusing them of
: "bowing down" to "nutty right-wing" health care proposals
: in a principle-less effort to get legislation passed.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/19/conyers-rips-obama-emanue_n_363702.html

Now this wasn't the first time that Obama had opposed
true reform. Nope. The first time he created real opposition
to healthcare legislation was when he talked about stripping
the elderly of their medicare advantage plans:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/02/26/obama-budget-cuts-medicare-advantage-helps-generic-biotech/

So what do you do if you overcame bigotry to become
the first black President in America's history, but you're
really a Republican pretending to be a Democrat?

Why, you play the sexism card for all it's worth...

: Obama fundraising group using out-of-office Palin to
: drum up support
:
: [...]
:
: Individuals on Obama's mailing list received an email
: Thursday from Organizing for America director Mitch
: Stewart, stating: "Right now, Sarah Palin is on a
: highly publicized, nationwide book tour, attacking
: President Obama and his plan for health reform at
: every turn. It's dangerous.
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/obama-palin-drum-support/

Note to idiots: Sarah Palin isn't in office. Supposedly,
the only opposition to genuine healthcare reform are
the Republican members of congress, and Sarah Palin
isn't one of them.

One. More. Time.

Sarah Palin is not in office. She has no vote on healthcare
reform. Yet, the Obama camp made the conscious
decision to ignore their alleged opposition in congress and
to blame Sarah Palin for their own failures.

It's sexism. They have consciously decided to "Run against
the woman," even though the woman was never their
opponent.

Okay, sure, John McCain did run against Obama, but Sarah
Palin didn't. She never once ran for President...

Budikka666

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 4:47:48 PM11/20/09
to

And apple pies! What could be more American than that?!

Budikka

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,
Nov 20, 2009, 11:52:57 PM11/20/09
to

[[[ TOTALLY-IRRELEVANT-to-this-topic groups:
alt.gossip.celebrities and alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots
... removed from the crosspostings. (What was the NUTTY
point of including those in the first place?) (The Alaska one
was iffy, but then I remembered fruitcake Sarah Palin. So
I left it in.) ]]]

On 18 Nov 2009 16:37:39 -0800,
Twitchell <Twitchel...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> Friar Feinstein wrote:


>> If homosexuality is natural why isn't the anus made for sex...?
>>
>> Fair question.
>>
>> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

> Any reason you're using an anonymous remailer for your simple,
> straightforward question? What do you have to hide?
>
>twitch

Indeed! How MANY ignorant bigots have the GUTS to post their

bob young

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:20:01 AM11/21/09
to

Friar Feinstein wrote:

> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

Easy - men do not have a Vulva

bob young

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:20:02 AM11/21/09
to

clouddreamer wrote:

. . .or used his hands !

bob young

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:23:01 AM11/21/09
to

IAAH wrote:

The whole conception of God is a conception derived from
the ancient Oriental despotisms. It is a conception quite
unworthy of free men. When you hear people in church
debasing themselves and saying that they are miserable
sinners, and all the rest of it, it seems contemptible and
not worthy of self-respecting human beings. We ought to
stand up and look the world frankly in the face. We ought to
make the best we can of the world, and if it is not so good
as we wish, after all it will still be better than what
these others have made of it in all these ages. A good world
needs knowledge, kindliness, and courage; it does not need a
regretful hankering after the past, or a fettering of the
free intelligence by the words uttered long ago by ignorant
men. [Bertrand Russell]

bob young

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 12:27:01 AM11/21/09
to

Uncle Vic wrote:

> One fine day in alt.atheism, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com>
> wrote:
>
> > In our last episode,
> > <5eef5502a585c4b4...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>, the
> > lovely and talented Friar Feinstein broadcast on
> > alt.gossip.celebrities:
> >
> >> Fair question.
> >
> >> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
> >
> > If heterosexuality is natural, howcome the penis is used for pissing?
> >
> >
>
> Now *there's* an example of a fucked-up design, eh?

Reminds me of the giraffe and the sloth, plus a few others

Nunya Bidnits

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:54:40 PM11/21/09
to
(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> said:

> Bigots are almost *always* are craven COWARDS.

Where did you come up with the "almost" part?

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:14:10 PM11/21/09
to

I was being honest. Allowing for the very FEW of them
who HAVE apparently posted under their own names.

That said though, *ALL* bigot are hateful dolts.

Intelligence and bigotry are mutually-exclusive.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:27:47 AM11/22/09
to
On Nov 20, 4:14 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "No One" aka  Bill Taylor <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
>
> > Sarah Palin owns you queers.  All one has to do is mention her
> > name, and you pathetic little bigots start whining and yapping.
>
> You misspelled "Obamabot."
>
> It's one of the reasons I hate Obama. That is, before Obama,
> sexism was a distinctly GOP trait, but now it's 100% associated
> with the Democrats.
>
> I'll give you a prime example....
>
> Fight for a decent healthcare system rages in Washington, and
> the greatest obstacle reform is the President:
>
> : Rep. John Conyers took a broad swipe at President Obama
> : and his chief of staff on Thursday, accusing them of
> : "bowing down" to "nutty right-wing" health care proposals
> : in a principle-less effort to get legislation passed.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/19/conyers-rips-obama-emanue_n_...

>
> Now this wasn't the first time that Obama had opposed
> true reform. Nope. The first time he created real opposition
> to healthcare legislation was when he talked about stripping
> the elderly of their medicare advantage plans:
>
> http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/02/26/obama-budget-cuts-medicare-adv...

>
> So what do you do if you overcame bigotry to become
> the first black President in America's history, but you're
> really a Republican pretending to be a Democrat?
>
> Why, you play the sexism card for all it's worth...
>
> : Obama fundraising group using out-of-office Palin to
> : drum up support
> :
> : [...]
> :
> : Individuals on Obama's mailing list received an email
> : Thursday from Organizing for America director Mitch
> : Stewart, stating: "Right now, Sarah Palin is on a
> : highly publicized, nationwide book tour, attacking
> : President Obama and his plan for health reform at
> : every turn. It's dangerous.http://rawstory.com/2009/11/obama-palin-drum-support/

>
> Note to idiots:  Sarah Palin isn't in office. Supposedly,
> the only opposition to genuine healthcare reform are
> the Republican members of congress, and Sarah Palin
> isn't one of them.
>
> One. More. Time.
>
> Sarah Palin is not in office. She has no vote on healthcare
> reform. Yet, the Obama camp made the conscious
> decision to ignore their alleged opposition in congress and
> to blame Sarah Palin for their own failures.
>
> It's sexism. They have consciously decided to "Run against
> the woman," even though the woman was never their
> opponent.
>
> Okay, sure, John McCain did run against Obama, but Sarah
> Palin didn't. She never once ran for President...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/going-rogue-goes-rogue-sa_n_361803.html

JTEM

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 5:43:26 AM11/22/09
to

"hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:

> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/going-rogue-goes-rogue-sa_n_...


OO! A Blog! So cool! And not just *Any* blog, but one
that took the news that Obama was running around the
country lying his ass off about NAFTA and said this:

: Allegations of double talk on NAFTA from the Obama and
: Clinton campaigns dominated the U.S. political landscape
: on Thursday.

It wasn't allegations of double talk from Obama AND
Clinton, it was Obama who ran around the country saying
he was against NAFTA, even as his campaign secretly
contacted the Canadian government and told them that
they were just spewing campaign rhetoric.

Here's another one on the same scandal:

: Curiously, Senator Clinton is alleged to have engaged in
: the same conversation with Canadian officials for which
: she casts dispersions on the character of Senator Obama.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lecia-shorter/clintons-nafta-attack-aga_b_89973.html

Ironically, a Canadian government memo was leaked
confirming beyond any doubt that the Obama campaign
really had been lying all along, that they did contact the
Canadian government and admitted that their NAFTA
position was nothing more than bullshitting the voters.

....and the Huffington Post knew this...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/politics/04nafta.html

The memo doesn't mention Hillary at all.

TranslucentAmoebae

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 2:29:48 PM11/25/09
to
On Nov 18, 4:13 pm, "Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:
> Fair question.
>
> Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?

In birds and most non-mammals; It is.

anonymous

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 11:22:21 PM11/26/09
to

Type at a google prompt "free porn videos" you will see thousands of
sites - 99.99 percent of all sites where women have a man's penis shoved
in her anus. And mouth and vagina.

George Orwell

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 12:35:10 AM11/27/09
to mail...@reece.net.au, mail...@dizum.com, mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@mixmin.net
In article <4B0F5319...@anonymous.com>

Proving what? That some women will do anything for money? It's
been my experience that most women hate and refuse to take a
cock up their ass.


Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

anonymous

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 8:13:59 PM11/28/09
to
George Orwell wrote:
>
> In article <4B0F5319...@anonymous.com>
> anonymous <anon...@anonymous.com> wrote:
> >
> > TranslucentAmoebae wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 18, 4:13 pm, "Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:
> > > > Fair question.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
> > >
> > > In birds and most non-mammals; It is.
> >
> > Type at a google prompt "free porn videos" you will see thousands of
> > sites - 99.99 percent of all sites where women have a man's penis shoved
> > in her anus. And mouth and vagina.
>
> Proving what? That some women will do anything for money? It's
> been my experience that most women hate and refuse to take a
> cock up their ass.
>
We agree. But there are reasons. Firstly, they worry their
man/husband/boyfriend might be homosexual or have homosexual interest or
worse, experience. Secondly, women want vaginal sex, and a man who
wants them for their vaginas. Thirdly, women have to watch carefully
because if a man goes from the anus to the vagina infection is almost
guaranteed.

Oh, and it is not that women will do anything for money. It is that men
will pay women anything they can to get anal sex and blowjobs which is
something heterosexual women get nothing out of - except tire and sore.

RamRod Sword of Baal

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 12:33:59 AM11/29/09
to

"anonymous" <anon...@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:4B11C9F5...@anonymous.com...


What no references, so that is just what you think then.


However....


http://www.the-clitoris.com/f_html/anal_sex.htm
In the current and archived surveys that ask female visitors about their
experiences with masturbation, this is what they say in regard to anal sex.

What percentage of girls and women have "explored" their anus?

62 % 55 %

What percentage of girls and women have "stimulated" their anus for
pleasure?

50 % 44 %

-----------------

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anal_sex

A 2005 survey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found a
rising incidence of anal relations in the American heterosexual population.
The survey showed that 40% of men and 35% of women between 25 and 44 had
engaged in heterosexual anal sex; in 1992 a similar survey found that only
26% of men 18 to 59 and 20% of women 18 to 59 had.[10] By way of comparison,
seven times as many women as gay men engage in anal intercourse.

-----------------

http://womenshealth.about.com/b/2003/10/03/men-say-women-want-anal-sex.htm

=================

WangoTango

unread,
Nov 30, 2009, 12:02:25 PM11/30/09
to
In article <2e8b4f6ba898f6d1...@mixmaster.it>,
nob...@mixmaster.it says...

> In article <4B0F5319...@anonymous.com>
> anonymous <anon...@anonymous.com> wrote:
> >
> > TranslucentAmoebae wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 18, 4:13 pm, "Friar Feinstein" <a...@anon.org> wrote:
> > > > Fair question.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any queers willing to take a stab at it?
> > >
> > > In birds and most non-mammals; It is.
> >
> > Type at a google prompt "free porn videos" you will see thousands of
> > sites - 99.99 percent of all sites where women have a man's penis shoved
> > in her anus. And mouth and vagina.
>
> Proving what? That some women will do anything for money? It's
> been my experience that most women hate and refuse to take a
> cock up their ass.

Most != all
So, that kind of blows (ha ha) your argument away.

While the statement of "most" just means 50% + 1, the fact is that anal
sex is pretty common among hetros. I guess you are just jealous.


=3FKinsey data collected between 1938-1963 found that 9 percent of non-
married males and 28 percent of non-married females had engaged in anal
sex at least once. Among married subjects, the numbers were much lower--
around 11 percent for both men and women.

=3FIn 1974, Playboy magazine published a huge survey of over 2000 people.
Depending on the age of the respondent, between 14 and 25 percent of
people said they had tried anal sex at least once.

=3FA more recent study, conducted in 1990 at the Kinsey Institute, found
that 27 percent of male and 24 percent of female college students had
anal sex at least once.

=3FOne researcher, who surveyed one group of people in the 1970s then
another in the late 1980s, offers a good point of comparison. In the
first survey, 25 percent of women had anal sex and 8 percent reported
engaging in it regularly. In the second, 72 percent had anal sex, and 23
percent reported engaging in it regularly.

=3FA 1991 survey of 3200 men (in a nationally representative sample) found
that 20 percent of men age 20 to 39 had engaged in anal sex at least
once. Fifty percent of the men who had tried it had only tried it once.
Interestingly, in this more contemporary study, more older men reported
having had anal sex than younger men (27 percent of men age 35 to 39
versus 13 percent of men age 20 to 24).

=3FThe most recent U.S. data from a national representative sample comes
from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), which was
conducted on over 12,000 men and women aged 15 to 44. Results show that
34 percent of men and 30 percent of women reported engaging in anal sex
at least once.

=3FIn a 1996 survey of Swedish women aged 18 to 74, about 20 percent of
women overall reported having engaged in anal sex--specifically, 28
percent of 25 to 34 year-olds and 2 percent of 66 to 74 year-olds.

0 new messages