Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.global-warming
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Al Gore is a disgrace
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
PeterBP  
View profile  
 More options Apr 9 2008, 9:34 pm
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming, sci.environment, sci.physics
From: a...@me.com (PeterBP)
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:34:57 +0200
Local: Wed, Apr 9 2008 9:34 pm
Subject: Re: Al Gore is a disgrace
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Bawana <mrbawan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 3:25 pm, a...@me.com (PeterBP) wrote:
> > Bawana <mrbawan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 29, 11:00 pm, a...@me.com (PeterBP) wrote:
> > > > Bawana <mrbawan...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > >    Science is not particularly about debate, no.  Science is about
> > > > > > hypotheses and proofs.  If something is being "debated" instead of v
erif
> > ied,
> > > > > > usually someone is trying to avoid running their own experiments to
chec
> > k
> > > > > > someone else's work.

> > > > > >    AGW is a case in point - experiments continually verify it,

> > > > > What successful experiments- altering the global climate- have there
> > > > > been, liar?
> > > > > None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

> > > > Not experiments per se,

> > > None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

> > > > but the paleoclimatic records gives some good
> > > > hints in that regard.

> > > For the short attention spam tard:
> > > What successful experiments- altering the global climate- have there
> > > been, liar?

> > Read what I wrote again.

> I did. Same conclusion;
> You got nothing.

Mirror time, pal.

> > > > (The same way stars show us nuclear fusion in
> > > > action before we have any sustained-running fusion reactors working on
> > > > this planet).

> > > Blithering idiocy.

> > What, you're a fusion-skeptic, as well?

> More blithering idiocy...

I'll take it as a 'yes'.

> > > > regards , Peter B. P.http://macplanet.dk
> > > > Washington D.C.: District of Criminals

> > > Got nothing.

> > For brains?

> You got shit for brains.

Woohoo, I'm sure that took at least an IQ of about 45 to come up with
that retort!

> Care to try again?
> What successful experiments- altering the global climate- have there
> been, liar?
> So far you have got-  None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

Running the same groove. No brain, no arguments - bawana in a nutshell.

--
regards , Peter B. P. http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals

"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google