 |
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming
From: Tunderbar <tdcom...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 2:26 pm
Subject: Re: "We don't know what it is, but it can't be CO2"
On Nov 13, 12:09 pm, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:47:13 PM UTC, James wrote:
First where is your science that shows how trace amounts of CO2 can
> > "Dawlish" <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > >news:3b7f0399-2f89-4b97-9695-41d580688789@googlegroups.com
> > > So catchy! But I'd like to give the opportunity to deniers to say
> > > what is probably causing the warming from 1860, 1880, 1900 but no
> > > cheating deniers; it has to be backed by a body of research and
> > > peer-reviewed publications*.
> > > Off you go round the Internet then........
> > > *No asking questions in return either, or quoting the "burden of
> > > proof is on you" as this is science and you've been told clearly
> > > there is no proof and never will be, or deflecting to talk about
> > > cooling from 1998 (because you weren't able to explain Spencer's
> > > graph from 1979; you've had plenty of chance to explain that one, but
> > > you failed quite miserably), or avoiding this, or it just means you
> > > have no idea and the mantra sticks like tar and feathers to you.
> > Nobody cares about your convoluted mind wanderings dawlish. Just say El
> > Ninos and satisfy your stupid, irrelevant questions and go bother
> > another ng.
> Not doing well deniers are we? 5 replies from 5 deniers and not one even tries to suggest a reason for the current warming. All have repeated the mantra in one way or another though.
> Come on. You *know* it *cannot* be CO2, so you must have evidence it is something else, or you really are basing your ideas on your own belief and opinion.
> Really, come on deniers. You should be able to do better. Remember, an avoid is a perfect acceptance that you simply have no idea what is causing the warming. The Internet is out there. Go on; search.
catastrophically alter the globes climate? You forget that the basis of your statement, that you want us to disprove, hasn't been proved. So quit wasting band width and show us the "settled science".
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||