Al Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Erik J. Helgesen

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 6:08:53 AM2/2/07

to

http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1623952.ece

The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say MPs Børge
Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US
Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.

The two green-thinking MPs suggest that Gore share the prize with
Inuit Sheila Watt-Cloutier, in recognition for their efforts to put
the danger posed by climate change on the global political agenda.

--
Erik

Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.
Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Let a man overcome anger by love, evil by good,
the greedy by liberality, the liar by truth.
-- Buddha

Hysterical leftwing global warmers must DIE

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 6:48:28 AM2/2/07

to

No one deserves that silly prize more than Gore.

Bill Habr

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 12:19:03 PM2/2/07

to

So was Rush Limbaugh

"Erik J. Helgesen" <gamle...@hell.no> wrote in message
news:9j66s2p85mdt0j3vn...@4ax.com...

kdt...@yahoo.com

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 12:45:51 PM2/2/07

to

On Feb 2, 11:19 am, "Bill Habr" <billh...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> So was Rush Limbaugh

If they think that highly of old Corncob Al, why the hell doesn't he
stay there when he goes to sit in the crowd and see if he won,(again?
HAHAHAH)

The EU and Britain and all that seem to be lovin the hell out of the
anti-carbon religion they've adopted as their national religion. They
could probably enjoy a high priest like Corncob AL Gore. Old Corncob
Al could even go have some tete a tete parlays with old Putin on the
advantages of the anti-carbon religion since even old Putin and the
Ruskies have joined Kyoto,,(I'll bet they're just controlling the hell
out of those CO2 emissions)

Corncob Al must be something like a superhero in Europe. Twirlin his
Golden Al Gore corncob (the one he shoves up his ass), that he had
made up so he doesn't feel so dissapointed if he comes up the LOSER
again, and doesn't get the medal..

I still think he should go to a surgeon and see if he can get that
grench look removed from his face.

Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies

Saddam's Noose, Exxon's Neck

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 3:06:05 PM2/2/07

to

.... it's about wealth-shifting: Exxon shifts YOUR Wealth to Exxon,
Yes, we got it!

http://ScienceCop.info/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=TheSunBetrayed
http://sciencecop.info/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=TheCarbonWar
http://sciencecop.info/wiki/tiki-index.php?page=Cartel+Solar+Patents

http://www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/ExxonMobil-GlobalWarming-tobacco.html
Scientists' Report Documents ExxonMobil's Tobacco-like Disinformation
Campaign on Global Warming Science -- Oil Company Spent Nearly $16
Million to Fund Skeptic Groups, Create Confusion

> Dr. R. Timothy Patterson, professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences
> (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, Ottawa

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1163
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=112
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1164

> Dr. Fred Michel, director, Institute of Environmental Science and
> associate professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University,
> Ottawa

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://ScienceCop.info/adti/AdTI_Contents/AdTI_Contents.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html

> Dr. Madhav Khandekar, former research scientist, Environment Canada.
> Member of editorial board of Climate Research and Natural Hazards

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1115
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=93

> Dr. Ross McKitrick, associate professor, Dept. of Economics, University
> of Guelph, Ont.

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/McKitrick_Fraud.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://ScienceCop.info/adti/AdTI_Contents/AdTI_Contents.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/em.php?mapid=173 Liars Lineup
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1008
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=36
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=107
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=142

> Dr. Tim Ball, former professor of climatology, University of Winnipeg;
> environmental consultant

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1164
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=112
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1163
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1165

> Dr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., energy consultant, Star Tannery, Va., and
> Sioux Lookout, Ont.

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Idsos.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Sallie_Baliunas.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1174
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=88
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41

> Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept.
> of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute
> of Technology

> Mr. George Taylor, Dept. of Meteorology, Oregon State University;
> Oregon State climatologist; past president, American Association of
> State Climatologists

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=912
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=112
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1164
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=24
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=9

> Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences,
> University of Virginia

> Dr. Roy W. Spencer, principal research scientist, Earth System Science
> Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville

> Dr. Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics, University of
> Connecticut

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=241
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=25

> Dr. S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences,
> University of Virginia; former director, U.S. Weather Satellite Service

> Dr. Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist and climate researcher, Boston,
> Mass.

> Dr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, physicist/meteorologist, previously with the
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Calif.; atmospheric consultant.

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Hazeltine-Singer.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/em.php?mapid=176 Singer Circle
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=31
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=25
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=82

> Dr. Art Robinson, founder, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine,
> Cave Junction, Ore.

http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Sallie_Baliunas.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_Fred_Michel.html
http://www.ScienceCop.info/adti/Corrupt_CFACT.html
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=6

Message has been deleted

hank minifield

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 6:24:38 PM2/2/07

to

Skeptic skep...@autonet.com said:

> Erik J. Helgesen wrote:
>
> > http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1623952.ece
> >
> > The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say MPs Børge
> > Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US
> > Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.
>

> What a coincidence... Talk show host Rush Limbaugh got a Nobel Peace
> Prize nomination this year too.
>
>
> http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-01-2007/0004518421&EDATE=
>
> Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize
>
And they're the ones who should be deciding who gets nominated too, not those
fags in Norway. They nominated Bush last year, but the Commies took his name
off the list.

kdt...@yahoo.com

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 6:45:35 PM2/2/07

to

On Feb 2, 5:24 pm, hank minifield <hankmi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Skeptic skept...@autonet.com said:
>
>
>
> > Erik J. Helgesen wrote:
>
> > >http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1623952.ece
>
> > > The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say MPs Børge
> > > Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US
> > > Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.
>
> > What a coincidence... Talk show host Rush Limbaugh got a Nobel Peace
> > Prize nomination this year too.
>

> > Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize
>
> And they're the ones who should be deciding who gets nominated too, not those
> fags in Norway. They nominated Bush last year, but the Commies took his name

> off the list.- -

I think they should give them some boxing gloves and let's see who
wins the Peace Prize. I'm betting on Rush. At least he's not on the
campaign to stuff a corncob up everybodies ass, like the ole CORNCOB
GORE.

Hey Al, you can walk the walk of an idiot with a corncob up your
butt,,,,can you talk the talk?????

Al Gore is a raving lunatic. Did you see him ranting at Bush??? He is
surely exhibiting the symptoms of advanced CO2Phobia, which is a lot
like rabies. You just can't turn your back on a such a diseased
animal.

Obviously this psychological disease is in danger of completly
destroying the acreditation of the Nobel Awards. Either this or the
money floating around to push their propaganda. Notice the high
council of the superstition priest had their meetings with their
'smoking guns' that don't quite smoke, reports, just as hearings are
scheduled in the US.

Deatherage

Brent Cobb

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 7:28:44 PM2/2/07

to

kdt...@yahoo.com said:
> I think they should give them some boxing gloves and let's see who
> wins the Peace Prize. I'm betting on Rush. At least he's not on the
> campaign to stuff a corncob up everybodies ass, like the ole CORNCOB
> GORE.
>

I've seen pictures of Limbaugh, he's a magnificent specimen, a man of muscle,
tall and strong. He'd kick anyone's ass. Including that socialist Sylvester
Stallone.

Captain Morgan

unread,

Feb 2, 2007, 7:37:14 PM2/2/07

to

Bill Habr bill...@sbcglobal.net said:
> So was Rush Limbaugh
>
Yes, indeed. And by the people who are actually responsible for nominating
recipients as well!

His fan club!

Word is that right wing neo-Nazi pedophile Kevin Alfred Strom has been nominated
by the contributors to National Vanguard for 2008!

Several members of the right have nominated Timothy McVeigh for a posthumous
award, but it looks like Shawn Hannity will probably get it instead.

Erik J. Helgesen

unread,

Feb 3, 2007, 5:41:59 AM2/3/07

to

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:08:01 -0600, Skeptic <skep...@autonet.com>
wrote:

>> http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1623952.ece
>>
>> The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say MPs Børge
>> Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US
>> Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.
>
>
>

>What a coincidence... Talk show host Rush Limbaugh got a Nobel Peace
>Prize nomination this year too.
>
>

>http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/02-01-2007/0004518421&EDATE=

>
>Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/eng_com_nom.html

Nominators

New nomination rules, effective from 2003. Compared to the old rules
the list of nominators has been slightly expanded.

Any one of the following persons is entitled to submit proposals:

- members of national assemblies and governments;

- members of international courts of law;

- university chancellors; university professors of social science,
history, philosophy, law and theology;

- leaders of peace research institutes and institutes of foreign
affairs;

- former Nobel Peace Prize laureates;

- board members of organisations that have received the Nobel Peace
Prize;

- present and past members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee;
(committee members must present their nomination at the latest at the
first committee meeting after February 1);

- former advisers at the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
- - - - - -

Sorry, but the Landmark Legal Foundation doesn't qualify as a
nominator.

T. M.

unread,

Feb 3, 2007, 8:55:16 AM2/3/07

to

"Erik J. Helgesen" <gamle...@hell.no> wrote >

http://nobelpeaceprize.org/eng_com_nom.html
>
> Nominators
>
> New nomination rules, effective from 2003. Compared to the old rules
> the list of nominators has been slightly expanded.
>
> Any one of the following persons is entitled to submit proposals:
>
> - members of national assemblies and governments;
>
> - members of international courts of law;
>
> - university chancellors; university professors of social science,
> history, philosophy, law and theology;
>
> - leaders of peace research institutes and institutes of foreign
> affairs;
>
> - former Nobel Peace Prize laureates;
>
> - board members of organisations that have received the Nobel Peace
> Prize;
>
> - present and past members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee;
> (committee members must present their nomination at the latest at the
> first committee meeting after February 1);
>
> - former advisers at the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
> - - - - - -
>
>
>
> Sorry, but the Landmark Legal Foundation doesn't qualify as a
> nominator.

It does so. First of all, the Landmark Legal Foundation is certified by Fox
News Network to be "Fair and Balanced". Secondly, it's American and Americans
are never wrong. Thirdly, Rush Limbaugh is a war hero. He chose to stay away
from the armed forces and futile battle in times of war in order to serve his
country in other ways. Just like George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, Dick Cheney,
Paul Wolfowitz, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Karl Rove.

Like Rush, these are men of greatness, prosperity and balance. They're not
Godless America hating communists like the selection committee in Norway.

kdt...@yahoo.com

unread,

Feb 3, 2007, 1:37:56 PM2/3/07

to

On Feb 3, 4:41 am, Erik J. Helgesen <gamle_e...@hell.no> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:08:01 -0600, Skeptic <skept...@autonet.com>

> wrote:
>
> >>http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article1623952.ece
>
> >> The fight for the global climate is a fight for peace, say MPs Børge
> >> Brende and Heidi Sørensen, and they have nominated former US
> >> Vice-president Al Gore for a share of the Nobel Peace Prize.
>
> >What a coincidence... Talk show host Rush Limbaugh got a Nobel Peace
> >Prize nomination this year too.
>

> >http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/stor...

>
> >Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize
>
> http://nobelpeaceprize.org/eng_com_nom.html
>
> Nominators
>
> New nomination rules, effective from 2003. Compared to the old rules
> the list of nominators has been slightly expanded.
>
> Any one of the following persons is entitled to submit proposals:
>
> - members of national assemblies and governments;
>
> - members of international courts of law;
>
> - university chancellors; university professors of social science,
> history, philosophy, law and theology;
>
> - leaders of peace research institutes and institutes of foreign
> affairs;
>
> - former Nobel Peace Prize laureates;
>
> - board members of organisations that have received the Nobel Peace
> Prize;
>
> - present and past members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee;
> (committee members must present their nomination at the latest at the
> first committee meeting after February 1);
>
> - former advisers at the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
> - - - - - -
>
> Sorry, but the Landmark Legal Foundation doesn't qualify as a
> nominator.

However Corncob Gore got nominated it means that the process has no
credibility. Al Gore is absolutely hated by a significant number of
Americans. This is rightfully so. In his movie and his personal
appearances, he only puts forth a line of carefully considered
propaganda designed to condition peoples minds falsely to the idea of
global warming. His statements are predominately false and can be
proved to be so. The IPCC report predicts maybe 2 and half feet of
ocean rise. The main component of his power point production is to
show the effect of 20 foot sea level rise and how bad that will be.

The US civil war began with the election of Abraham Lincoln. Between
the time he was elected and the time he was inagurated, the southern
states had succedded and the war was on. Although it is due to
different reasons, If AL Gore were elected president, he would divide
the US in the same way and WOULD cause another civil war and great
divide among Americans.

The nobel peace prize is subject to bribery or mere political
favoratism. The Nobel Peace Prize has absolutely no meaning at this
point and is only become part of the propaganda of the AGW movement to
impose the criminal application of controls on CO2 emissions. These
committiess have foregone any respectable consideration from the rest
of the world by nominating this person who in no way has benifited
world peace and if he does not stop his continued actions and the
promotion of his FRAUDULENT science and attempts to destroy the
American economy and implement the form of socialism or communism upon
our free society, will cause the most widespead conflict and strife of
our age. Besides the genocide that would occur with this modifing our
society that these planners condone in their plans.

Deatherage

Hohoho Hanson Loves Brown Turds, not Green Ones

unread,

Feb 3, 2007, 8:04:32 PM2/3/07

to

On Feb 3, 10:37 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:

> ... no
> credibility. ... hated ...
> propaganda ... falsely
> ... false
>
> ... propaganda
> ... FRAUDULENT ... destroy the
> American economy ...
> genocide
> Deatherage

FREEDOM DAY in July, 2039 -- 100% FREEDOM from Fossil Fuels Occurs

Based on three assumptions, the Carbon Energy Economy is over in 41
years, and the New Era of Clean Renewable Photovoltaics will power
everything, either directly, or indirectly by powering the
complementary Hydrogen Economy.

The three assumptions are these:
(1) We start now in 2007 with a base of 1700 MW of PV already built
and installed.
(2) Each doubling of the base reduces the price 19%.
(3) The rate of growth has been a steady 25% per year since 1979 and
is expected to continue unchanged. It currently takes 3 years to
double the installed capacity.

Based on these three well-supported and credibly researched facts, the
date that the entire consumption of electricity from PV occurs can be
projected to nearly the exact month in the future.

A spreadsheet is available for downloading:
http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls

The text results of the spreadsheet in non-interactive form is
available as:
http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.html

Thirty-two years and six months, July 2039, the US will own
1,851,556,663 kilowatts of PV generation capacity. The cost of new PV
will then be $1.01 per watt fully installed and operational. This
amount will generate the full quantity of electricity used by America
right now.

Because PV only produces power during the daytime there will need to
be additional PV for storing night power. Because of losses in putting
energy in storage and taking it out again, a double capacity is
figured, which is accomplished in thirty-five years, and the cost will
be 85 cents per watt.

Allowing for transition to electric vehicles and Hydrogen Economy a
fourfold increase in PV, that will be accomplished in 41 years, in
2058, and the cost of PV will be 60 cents per watt installed.

Three years later the production will have increased to double all the
energy of every form currently used, and three years later it will
have doubled again. The costs will be 50 cents and 42 cents a watt for
these two doublings.

This is autopilot. This will happen inevitably. However, as prices
decrease more people feel the price is in their reach. The doubling is
fixed by the perceived competition offering low-priced dirty polluting
energy. If the polluter paid the actual costs of business their prices
would rise and the PV alternative would be on a level playing field.
The increases in doubling and the attraction of more swiftly falling
prices would shorten the time between doublings, and each doubling
brings the price closer to the buying point of new sets of customers.

With a little pushing along this, 41 years to FREEDOM DAY, freedom
from pollution, freedom from monopolist power cartels can be shortened
to ten years. TEN YEARS TO FREEDOM DAY! It means increasing the
doublings to 4 times as fast. Instead of every three years, it means
doing it every 9 months.

At utility rates, at one dime per kilowatthour on your bill, you will
pay the average American amount of $35,916 between now and FREEDOM
DAY. If instead the pace was increased, you wouldn't pay more then ten
years of bills, $8,760 up until FREEDOM DAY. By the time your FREEDOM
DAY PV wears out, replacements will only cost 2 cents per watt. The
electricity for a house will cost $1 per day for 21 months every 25
years and you will never see a utility bill for decades. That's why
FREEDOM DAY will become a national holiday!

http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls
http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.html

FREEDOM DAY!

3.7170 Trillion kWh/yr = 3,717,000,000,000 = 1,851,556,663 kW PV daily
(/ 365 days/yr / 5.5 average peak hours sunshine).

https://cia.gov/cia//publications/factbook/geos/us.html
Electricity - consumption: 3.717 trillion kWh (2004)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power
Total peak power of installed PV is around 1700 MW as of the end of
2005.

http://www.crest.org/repp_pubs/articles/pv/2/2.html
Technological learning and renewable energy costs: implications ...
"This means that the price of PV declines 18% for every cumulative
doubling of production."

http://www.mretreview.gov.au/pubs/mret-submission165.pdf
BCSE MRET Submission May 03
"As an example, the international experience for solar PV shows that
installed costs fall by 18 per cent real for every doubling of
installed capacity."

http://www.crest.org/repp_pubs/articles/resRpt09/01Role.htm
"Figure 2 demonstrates the tight empirical relationship between
cumulative industry-wide production and the unit price for
photovoltaics. This series from 1976 to 1992 indicates that inflation-
adjusted prices drop by 18% with every doubling of cumulative
production. Other analyses using different data sets and periods have
indicated price declines as high as 32%, but most studies indicate
that prices have historically fallen by about 20% with every doubling
of cumulative PV output.36 " ... "If all current segments of the PV
market grow by 20% annually and prices decline by 20% for every
doubling of cumulative PV sales, module costs would fall from a 1998
wholesale price of $3.65 per Wp to about $1.20 by 2018."

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/green-paper-energy-supply/doc/contributions/11/2001-11-30-ewea.pdf
"...Cost remains the main handicap for a large-scale development of
PV. On the other hand, the 45% reduction in PV system prices during
the period 1995-1999 constitutes a guarantee that the high growth
rates will continue. ..."

http://www.sunpowercorp.com/techpapers/swanson.pdf
"Module prices have followed a classic experience curve in cost versus
cumulative volume. (Straight line on a log-log plot of price versus
cumulative volume.) The experience factor is 81%, meaning that module
prices reduce 19% for every doubling of cumulative volume. The well-
known historical trend showing this behavior for the period 1979 to
2002 is plotted in Figure 1."

Corporate Shill Catcher

unread,

Feb 26, 2007, 2:20:48 AM2/26/07

to

On Feb 3, 10:37 am, kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:

> the time he was elected and the time he was inagurated, the southern
> states had succedded and the war was on. Although it is due to

> The nobel peace prize is subject to bribery or mere political

> favoratism. The Nobel Peace Prize has absolutely no meaning at this

> committiess have foregone any respectable consideration from the rest

> of the world by nominating this person who in no way has benifited

> our free society, will cause the most widespead conflict and strife of

> our age. Besides the genocide that would occur with this modifing our

> Deatherage

Death-Rag said: inagurated succedded nobel favoratism committiess
benifited widespead modifing.