Roger Coppock alarmist suckker!
matt sykes
Warming!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) -7.658841 0.504840 -15.2 <2e-16
Year 0.003878 0.000262 14.8 <2e-16
Residual standard error: 0.151 on 157 degrees of freedom
R-Squared: 0.58
F-statistic: 220 on 1 and 157 DF, p-value: <2e-16
This analysis shows a 0.88K per century per century
acceleration in the sea surface temperature rise
between 1850 and 2008.
"
You got suckkered Roger, all this data you so alarmistly based your
stats on is fraudulently corrupt.
RayLopez99
> Roger wrote: "Latest Hadley Sea Temperature Data Show Accelerated
>
> Warming!
>
> Coefficients:
> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
> (Intercept) -7.658841 0.504840 -15.2 <2e-16
> Year 0.003878 0.000262 14.8 <2e-16
>
> Residual standard error: 0.151 on 157 degrees of freedom
> R-Squared: 0.58
> F-statistic: 220 on 1 and 157 DF, p-value: <2e-16
>
> This analysis shows a 0.88K per century per century
> acceleration in the sea surface temperature rise
> between 1850 and 2008.
> "
>
>
> You got suckkered Roger, all this data you so alarmistly based your
> stats on is fraudulently corrupt.
Roger is harmless. He's a junior high school science fair judge in
his full time job. He retired decades ago after writing a program in
BASIC for NASA that went nowhere (his greatest accomplishment).
Ignore him or tweak his chain for some fun.
The real battle over GW is right here on Capital Hill where I'm
posting from. And none of the real players even have time for email
or PCs (their aides do). And their aides are not reading this NG.
RL
matt sykes
>
> - Show quoted text -
IMO the real battle is in Europe. The US never bought into it that
much, while Europe has a hostory of greenness.
Its the EU thats the big global supporter of this crap, lke the UN, it
sees this as a way of raising tax and providing jobs for the boys.
erschro...@gmail.com
>
> Warming!
>
> Coefficients:
> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
> (Intercept) -7.658841 0.504840 -15.2 <2e-16
> Year 0.003878 0.000262 14.8 <2e-16
>
> Residual standard error: 0.151 on 157 degrees of freedom
> R-Squared: 0.58
> F-statistic: 220 on 1 and 157 DF, p-value: <2e-16
>
> This analysis shows a 0.88K per century per century
> acceleration in the sea surface temperature rise
> between 1850 and 2008.
> "
>
>
> You got suckkered Roger, all this data you so alarmistly based your
> stats on is fraudulently corrupt.
You got reamed out, Matt. All your thoughts were implanted by aliens
via rectal probe.
Man_of_Mind
> Roger is harmless. He's a junior high school science fair judge
Still with your immature epithets, "Ray"?
> The real battle over GW is right here on Capital Hill where
> I'm posting from. And none of the real players even have
> time for email or PCs (their aides do)
So, you're somehow involved with the lobbying, eh?
--You're certainly no 'scientist', are you?