Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC wrong? « The Science of Doom
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Sam Wormley
May 26, 2012, 11:06:50 AM5/26/12
to
CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC
wrong?
http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-core-record-doesnt-that-prove-the-ipcc-wrong/
> “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
>
> CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
>
> CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature changes. That’s what makes climate science so fascinating.
wrong?
http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-core-record-doesnt-that-prove-the-ipcc-wrong/
> “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
>
> CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
>
> CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature changes. That’s what makes climate science so fascinating.
kdt...@earthlink.net
May 26, 2012, 10:10:23 PM5/26/12
to
On May 26, 10:06 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC
> wrong?
>
> http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-c...
> CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC
> wrong?
>
>
>
>
> > “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
>
> > CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
>
> > CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature changes. That’s what makes climate science so fascinating.- Hide quoted text -
>
>
> > “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
>
> > CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
''''''''''''''''CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature
changes. That’s what makes climate science so
fascinating''''''''''''''
What the hell does this mean. There still being no empirical data that
the CO2 is affecting the temperature.
If this were true, it would be evident in the temperature gradient
still, which it is not. But it can be seen that the temperature
gradient is not affected as CO2 begins to rise about 1000 years after
significant warming cycles.
Womley. Refer us the study which shows correlation of temperature
affect from the changing CO2. Or perhaps just stick with your mentor,
Algore, and put your graphs in small enough scale so you can state
your lie that the ice cores present any scientific evidence whatsoever
for AGW.
Not only that, you must ignore this evidience which shows
scientifically that the CO2 is not affecting temperature.
THE WARMING FLUCTUATIONS ARE FROM ANOTHER CAUSE AND WHICH
DEMONSTRATES THAT ANY PRESENT WARMING IS FROM ANOTHER CAUSE OTHER THAN
MAN MADE CO2, REGARDLESS OF HOW FASCINATING IT MAY BE FOR THE RINKY
DINK SCIENTISTS OF OUR DAY TO FANTASIZE ABOUT CLIMATE AND THEIR MONEY
COW.
KD
Sam Wormley
May 26, 2012, 10:27:11 PM5/26/12
to
On 5/26/12 9:10 PM, kdt...@earthlink.net wrote:
> There still being no empirical data that
> the CO2 is affecting the temperature.
Actually, let me steer you to some good information about
> There still being no empirical data that
> the CO2 is affecting the temperature.
CO2 and how it and other greenhouse gasses work.
> The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
> http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm
>
> The History of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Earth
> http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html
> Infrared Radiation and Planetary Temperature
> http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/PhysTodayRT2011.pdf
> http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/publist.html
>
> Attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect
> http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2010/2010_Schmidt_etal_1.pdf
>
> Introduction to Infrared Radiative Transfer
> http://www.jcsda.noaa.gov/documents/meetings/2009summercoll/Barnet2_InfraRadTran.pdf
>
AGWFacts
May 28, 2012, 4:05:07 PM5/28/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 19:10:23 -0700 (PDT), "kdt...@earthlink.net"
<kdt...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On May 26, 10:06 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC
> > wrong?
> >
> > http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-c...
> >
> >
> >
> > > “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
> >
> > > CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
> >
> > > CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature changes. That’s what makes climate science so fascinating.- Hide quoted text -
<kdt...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On May 26, 10:06 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > CO2 Lags Temperature in the Ice-Core Record. Doesn’t that prove the IPCC
> > wrong?
> >
> > http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/01/15/co2-lags-temperature-in-the-ice-c...
> >
> >
> >
> > > “Skeptics” now arrive and claim to “debunk” the science of the IPCC by debunking Al Gore’s movie. They rely on the ignorance of their audience. Or demonstrate their own.
> >
> > > CO2 is certainly very important in our atmosphere despite being a “trace gas”. Physics and the properties of “trace gases” cannot be deduced from our life experiences. Have a read of CO2 – An Insignificant Trace Gas? Part One to understand more about this subject.
> >
> > > CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature changes. That’s what makes climate science so fascinating.- Hide quoted text -
> CO2 is both a cause and a consequence of temperature
> changes. That’s what makes climate science so
> fascinating
>
> What the hell does this mean. There still being no empirical data that
> the CO2 is affecting the temperature.
You mean other than the nearly 200 years of empiricle data that
> changes. That’s what makes climate science so
> fascinating
>
> What the hell does this mean. There still being no empirical data that
> the CO2 is affecting the temperature.
does that it does? Nutter.
--
"A 'crank' is defined as a man who cannot be turned." --- _Nature_, 8 Nov 1906
0 new messages