Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Sam Wormley

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:00:06 AM5/26/12
to
http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf

> The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme
Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28
March. Please click here for an IPCC press release on the report, and
here for the report itself.

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 26, 2012, 1:34:21 PM5/26/12
to
In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:

Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?



AGWFacts

unread,
May 26, 2012, 10:04:25 PM5/26/12
to
This is from Group Three, yes?

I'll look for the report when it is published.


--
"A 'crank' is defined as a man who cannot be turned." --- _Nature_, 8 Nov 1906

AGWFacts

unread,
May 26, 2012, 10:05:11 PM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:34:21 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:00:06 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?

Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
newsgroups?

Paul Cardinale

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:27:19 PM5/26/12
to
On May 26, 10:34 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?

Like most imbecile crackpots, the members of the sam wormley cult are
incapable if realizing that they're not geniuses.

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:09:22 PM5/26/12
to
In sci.physics AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:34:21 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:00:06 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:

<pasted in crap snipped back out>

>> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
>
> Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
> newsgroups?


Why do you paste hundreds of lines of crap into posts in a childish and
idiotic attempt to make it look like the previous poster posted it?


AGWFacts

unread,
May 27, 2012, 1:24:39 PM5/27/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 03:09:22 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:

> On Sat, 26 May 2012 20:05:11 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:34:21 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:00:06 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
> > > > http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf
> > > >
> > > > The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme
> > > > Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28
> > > > March. Please click here for an IPCC press release on the report, and
> > > > here for the report itself.
> >
> > > Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
> >
> > Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
> > newsgroups?

> Why do you paste hundreds of lines of crap into posts in a childish and
> idiotic attempt to make it look like the previous poster posted it?

No.

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 27, 2012, 2:31:01 PM5/27/12
to
In sci.physics AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 03:09:22 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> wrote:

<snip crap pasted in from other posts>


>> > Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
>> > newsgroups?
>
>> Why do you paste hundreds of lines of crap into posts in a childish and
>> idiotic attempt to make it look like the previous poster posted it?
>
> No.

You are really quite insane as well as illiterate.



Sam Wormley

unread,
May 27, 2012, 11:01:13 PM5/27/12
to
On 5/26/12 12:34 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?


jimp, in case you had some doubt, here are some video bytes
you can learn from.

Today's CO2 is nothing Special
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4BJDwI8zSk

It's Us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXgDrr6qiUk

Peak wood, Peak Whale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNwRQ8Avzvo

We don't Know enough
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a69_owv4jEE

Peter Webb

unread,
May 27, 2012, 11:21:26 PM5/27/12
to

"Sam Wormley" <swor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:YaqdnbPAaPjkd1_S...@mchsi.com...
> On 5/26/12 12:34 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
>
>
> jimp, in case you had some doubt, here are some video bytes
> you can learn from.
>
> Today's CO2 is nothing Special
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4BJDwI8zSk
>
> It's Us
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXgDrr6qiUk
>
> Peak wood, Peak Whale
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNwRQ8Avzvo
>

I haven't watched this video, but the title sugests an excellent reason why
we shouldn't worry too much about running out of resources.

At various times in history, both whales (for indoor lighting) and wood (for
building ships) were critical resources, and their depletion was a cause for
great concern.

As it turned out in this and hundreds of other cases - starting with the
shortage of rocks in the correct shape to be stone axe heads - this turned
out to not be a problem at all, as technology provided substitutes. These
substitutes turned out to be better than the original materials -
electricity is better for lighting than whale oil, and steel is better for
building ships than is wood.

Technology creates useful resources much faster than people consume them.
That is why we have sufficient resources to provide good indoor lighting for
billions of people, but in the mid 19th century we only had the resources to
provide mediocre indoor lighting for tens of millions.

If the experiences of the last 200 years tells us anything, it is that
Malthus was dead wrong. You should learn from history (which is another way
of saying you should test theories against experiment).

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 28, 2012, 1:20:33 AM5/28/12
to
In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/12 12:34 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
>
>
> jimp, in case you had some doubt,

I have no doubt you are a self rightous, arrogant, misanthropic, ass hat
with delusions of competence.

It is no surprise you get your pseudo science from youtube.

And as usual, you attempt to change the subject.

Fuck off and die.




AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 12:31:46 PM5/28/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 18:31:01 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:24:39 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 27 May 2012 03:09:22 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 20:05:11 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:34:21 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:00:06 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
> > > > > > http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme
> > > > > > Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28
> > > > > > March. Please click here for an IPCC press release on the report, and
> > > > > > here for the report itself.
> > > >
> > > > > Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
> > > >
> > > > Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
> > > > newsgroups?
> >
> > > Why do you paste hundreds of lines of crap into posts in a childish and
> > > idiotic attempt to make it look like the previous poster posted it?
> >
> > No.

> You are really quite insane as well as illiterate.

Huh? No.

AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 12:33:55 PM5/28/12
to
Dr. Alley is awesome, and I wish I had his jobs.

AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 12:36:37 PM5/28/12
to
On Mon, 28 May 2012 05:20:33 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:

> In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/26/12 12:34 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:01:13 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 5/26/12 12:34 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > > In sci.physics Sam Wormley<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
> >
> >
> > jimp, in case you had some doubt, here are some video bytes
> > you can learn from.
> >
> > Today's CO2 is nothing Special
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4BJDwI8zSk
> >
> > It's Us
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXgDrr6qiUk
> >
> > Peak wood, Peak Whale
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNwRQ8Avzvo
> >
> > We don't Know enough
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a69_owv4jEE

> I have no doubt you are a self rightous, arrogant, misanthropic, ass hat
> with delusions of competence.

Science is too hard for you, eh? Well, you still have your Crayons
I'm sure.

Tunderbar

unread,
May 28, 2012, 12:56:58 PM5/28/12
to
On May 26, 10:00 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdfhttp://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf
>
>  > The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme
> Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28
> March. Please click here for an IPCC press release on the report, and
> here for the report itself.

Let me guess.... we're all gonna die unless we give the a trillions
dollars.

Am I right?.... or am I right?

Falcon

unread,
May 28, 2012, 1:08:57 PM5/28/12
to

On Mon, 28 May 2012 09:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Tunderbar wrote...
This was discussed two months ago.
Must be a slow news day for the group troll.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 28, 2012, 1:05:36 PM5/28/12
to
In sci.physics AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> pasted in from other posts:

21 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.


ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 28, 2012, 1:07:58 PM5/28/12
to
In sci.physics AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> pasted in from other posts:

16 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.


Sam Wormley

unread,
May 28, 2012, 5:54:38 PM5/28/12
to
On 5/28/12 12:05 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> In sci.physics AGWFacts<AGWF...@1800reality.com> pasted in from other posts:
>
> 21 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.
>

jimp continues to count lines as his favorite pass time. May
I remind the jimp that the IPCC released its Special Report on
Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance
Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28 March. Please click here
for an IPCC press release on the report, and here for the report
itself.
> http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
> http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf

Wally W.

unread,
May 28, 2012, 6:01:04 PM5/28/12
to
Do you have a page number and quote that you found to be particularly
interesting?

You *have* read both documents completely, haven't you?


Falcon

unread,
May 28, 2012, 6:07:15 PM5/28/12
to

On Mon, 28 May 2012 18:01:04 -0400
Wally W. wrote...
Ooh. I have one or two really juicy quotes. Pick me, pick me. ;-)

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 28, 2012, 6:15:11 PM5/28/12
to
In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/28/12 12:05 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> In sci.physics AGWFacts<AGWF...@1800reality.com> pasted in from other posts:
>>
>> 21 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.
>>
>
> jimp continues to count

swormle1 continues to be unable to understand the difference between
counting and reading a displayed number.

Given his delusions of compentency and general illiteracy, this is fully
understandable.


Sam Wormley

unread,
May 28, 2012, 6:35:03 PM5/28/12
to
Yes, did you find anything scientifically troubling in either
document, Wally?

Wally W.

unread,
May 28, 2012, 6:57:58 PM5/28/12
to
I haven't read them.

You say you have.

You recommend reading them because you found what in them?

Sam Wormley

unread,
May 28, 2012, 7:10:55 PM5/28/12
to
Once we *both have read* the documents, we can have a discussion.


ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
May 28, 2012, 7:05:03 PM5/28/12
to
In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
swormley1 continues to believe that press releases are peer reviewed
scientific papers.



Wally W.

unread,
May 28, 2012, 7:32:50 PM5/28/12
to
That will give you time to actually read them. Will you?

So far, I see no demonstration that you have read the full report
yourself. Why won't you say what your favorite part is? If you don't
have *one* favorite part, what is one in the top 10 of your favorites
in the full report?

AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 9:50:52 PM5/28/12
to
On Mon, 28 May 2012 17:05:36 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:
> 21 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.


AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 9:57:41 PM5/28/12
to
On Mon, 28 May 2012 16:54:38 -0500, Sam Wormley
<swor...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/28/12 12:05 PM, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 May 2012 10:31:46 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 27 May 2012 18:31:01 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 27 May 2012 11:24:39 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 27 May 2012 03:09:22 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 20:05:11 -0600, AGWFacts <AGWF...@1800reality.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:34:21 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 26 May 2012 10:00:06 -0500, Sam Wormley <swor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
> > > > > > > > > http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The IPCC released its Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme
> > > > > > > > > Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28
> > > > > > > > > March. Please click here for an IPCC press release on the report, and
> > > > > > > > > here for the report itself.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your 'bots are duplicating; lack of coordination?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since you hate science so much, why are you posting in two science
> > > > > > > newsgroups?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Why do you paste hundreds of lines of crap into posts in a childish and
> > > > > > idiotic attempt to make it look like the previous poster posted it?
> > > > >
> > > > > No.
> > >
> > > > You are really quite insane as well as illiterate.
> > >
> > > Huh? No.

> > 21 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.

> jimp continues to count lines as his favorite pass time. May

I wrote a front-end to Free Agent so that it automatically fills
in the previous article that "jimp" hates and fears seeing. It
magically restores the article back to its hateful, ugly, factal
original. This is helping me with my abnormal psychology class
project.

> I remind the jimp that the IPCC released its Special Report on
> Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance
> Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) on 28 March. Please click here
> for an IPCC press release on the report, and here for the report
> itself.
> http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf
> http://www.ipcc.ch/news_and_events/docs/srex/srex_press_release.pdf

And an unhappy report it is, too. I see that the predictions
market has increased the confidence that year 2012 will be warmer
than year 2011. I'll earn $98 on the contracts at the start of
year 2013. Wee hee!

AGWFacts

unread,
May 28, 2012, 9:58:52 PM5/28/12
to
On Mon, 28 May 2012 17:07:58 -0000, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com
wrote:
> 16 lines of crap in the delusional belief he is being clever.



0 new messages