Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
99% of scientists prefer the "AGW Lite" brand of global warming. "AGW Lite", the brand for the modern sophisticated warmer.
13 views
Skip to first unread message
1/3 of land cooling
May 26, 2012, 5:37:44 PM5/26/12
to
99% of scientists prefer the "AGW Lite" brand of global warming. "AGW Lite", the brand for the modern sophisticated warmer.
You may have heard that 97% of scientists believe in AGW.
That is true, in a way.
But what the survey people don't want you to know, is which "brand" of AGW scientists prefer.
"AGW Lite", the brand of global warming that gave you a little bit of harmless temperature increase in the past. The brand that delivers the promise of a little bit of harmless temperature increase in the future.
No inconvenient shifting home because of rising sea levels, with "AGW Lite". You can enjoy the healthy marine environment, as you always have.
Tests show that marine life, and plants all over the world, actually prefer living in the richer CO2 environment.
So don't join the ranks of the stupid Alarmists, with their private "Heavy" brand of AGW. It just isn't right.
You may have heard that 97% of scientists believe in AGW.
That is true, in a way.
But what the survey people don't want you to know, is which "brand" of AGW scientists prefer.
"AGW Lite", the brand of global warming that gave you a little bit of harmless temperature increase in the past. The brand that delivers the promise of a little bit of harmless temperature increase in the future.
No inconvenient shifting home because of rising sea levels, with "AGW Lite". You can enjoy the healthy marine environment, as you always have.
Tests show that marine life, and plants all over the world, actually prefer living in the richer CO2 environment.
So don't join the ranks of the stupid Alarmists, with their private "Heavy" brand of AGW. It just isn't right.
kym horsell
May 26, 2012, 5:55:27 PM5/26/12
to
On Sunday, May 27, 2012 7:37:44 AM UTC+10, 1/3 of land cooling wrote:
> 99% of scientists prefer the "AGW Lite" brand of global warming. "AGW Lite", the brand for the modern sophisticated warmer.
Sophistry, amateur sophistry. :)
> 99% of scientists prefer the "AGW Lite" brand of global warming. "AGW Lite", the brand for the modern sophisticated warmer.
--
[If X attenuates one water level variation -- maybe it amplifies another?]
If Hobart harbour has a very low tidal variation, surely that makes
it one of the best places in the world to detect a sea level rise,
because the signal is not hidden by a large amount of tidal noise?
-- 2/3 of land not cooling@Auckland, 7 May 2012 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
1/3 of land cooling
May 26, 2012, 7:39:21 PM5/26/12
to
The "Doom and gloom" brand of global warming, is exactly the same product as "Heavy".
gordo
May 26, 2012, 9:42:46 PM5/26/12
to
governments of the world. Read the bloody reports and government
responses . Change your stupid name it is embarrassing everyone.
1/3 of land cooling
May 27, 2012, 1:25:57 AM5/27/12
to
This comment shows just how naive you are.
The IPCC (and all of the other Alarmist organisations), are marketing AGW/global warming pseudo-science.
Marketing is the science of selling an idea.
And "AGW/global warming" is an idea.
It needs to be "sold", just like any other idea.
-----------------------------------------
My nickname is not an embarrassment to me.
It is only an embarrassment to you, because you can't disprove it.
Here is a challenge for you. If you can prove that my nickname is NOT true, then I will change it. Because I do not want to have a nickname that is not true.
kym horsell
May 27, 2012, 1:38:30 AM5/27/12
to
On Sunday, May 27, 2012 3:25:57 PM UTC+10, 1/3 of land cooling wrote:
...
the data and distribution of land of various elevations.
But enough of facts.
This embarrassment thing.
Everyone over 21 has things from their childhood that still tug at them in one way or the other. Perhaps they got very low marks in arithmetic in school, no
now compensate for that counting lines and posting it to USENET.
Perhaps they remember some smart-alecky remark they made to a teacher that
they learned years later was silly, and when they see another smart aleck
making similar remarks they live that moment over again and it may make them
a little unconfortable.
I remember... I had to think a moment or 2 because I am so near perfect as makes
no difference... something from my childhood I still remember and tugs a little.
I used to catch a bus from my highschool -- must have been year 9 or so -- over
to Mossman, Sydney (its a big bird that lives near Ayers Rock in central Australia; I'm sure your grandpa will know) and pay with the funny pennies and farthings we had at the time. They were nice green double deckers that could take a collision with a car like it wasn't there.
Anyway.
One day the conductor (sort of like a mobile ATM with a beard and bad eyesight)
told me I had over-paid my fare, meaning I had over-paid my fare for the previous 2 years or so.
Boy, was I embarrassed as it was money my mummy gave me and I could have been saving up for my own porn channel.
Now, whenever I see someone fondling a farthing I get goosebumps and I think "silly goose".
>...
--
Is Hobart harbour still significantly higher than sea level, or
have massive sea level rises elsewhere reduced the difference?
...
> My nickname is not an embarrassment to me.
>
> It is only an embarrassment to you, because you can't disprove it.
Ahh. Who wants to disprove it? We all pretty much expect it, given
>
> It is only an embarrassment to you, because you can't disprove it.
the data and distribution of land of various elevations.
But enough of facts.
This embarrassment thing.
Everyone over 21 has things from their childhood that still tug at them in one way or the other. Perhaps they got very low marks in arithmetic in school, no
now compensate for that counting lines and posting it to USENET.
Perhaps they remember some smart-alecky remark they made to a teacher that
they learned years later was silly, and when they see another smart aleck
making similar remarks they live that moment over again and it may make them
a little unconfortable.
I remember... I had to think a moment or 2 because I am so near perfect as makes
no difference... something from my childhood I still remember and tugs a little.
I used to catch a bus from my highschool -- must have been year 9 or so -- over
to Mossman, Sydney (its a big bird that lives near Ayers Rock in central Australia; I'm sure your grandpa will know) and pay with the funny pennies and farthings we had at the time. They were nice green double deckers that could take a collision with a car like it wasn't there.
Anyway.
One day the conductor (sort of like a mobile ATM with a beard and bad eyesight)
told me I had over-paid my fare, meaning I had over-paid my fare for the previous 2 years or so.
Boy, was I embarrassed as it was money my mummy gave me and I could have been saving up for my own porn channel.
Now, whenever I see someone fondling a farthing I get goosebumps and I think "silly goose".
>...
--
Is Hobart harbour still significantly higher than sea level, or
have massive sea level rises elsewhere reduced the difference?
Fredric L. Rice
May 28, 2012, 3:38:50 PM5/28/12
to
>You may have heard that 97% of scientists believe in AGW.
Only if you listen to right wing corporate cocksuck radio. :) Out in the
real world, not a single scientist believes in anything. They *do* accept
directly observed phenomena, however.
---
http://www.skeptictank.org/
Save us, Obe Won Paul! You're our only hope!
0 new messages