Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
APAPalm
Someone has been using my name on the net, and I am trying to find out more
about what is
behind all this.. I read about this newsgroup, and I thought I might get some
answers here.
From what I have seen, this group is based on enterainment, and I have noticed
some great flames, lots of humorous stuff, and all kinds of neat creative
writing. I don't think there has ever been a newgroup like this one, so I can
see why it has become so popular.
As the real Bill Palmer, though, I have a question or two for regular readers
and posters. Who is Bill Palmer? Is he real, or is all this just a put on? I
read in a magazine article that he was simply a bunch of computers that a some
Russian and American computer experts hooked together for fun.
If so why did they choose my name for their program?
I also read that part of all this was a million-dollar bet to see if they could
create the most popular Usenet newsgroup of 1997 with the right program. Was
anyone paid on this bet, or was the whole thing a put-on that got out of
control?
Are all these "wilhelp" posts by the same person? Where did "wilhelp" come
from anyway, and how does it connect with this newsgroup?
!!!!! ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!!
* Party Favors, Balloons*
Archie Leach
In a previous post, APAPalm the aoloser wrote:
> Someone has been using my name
> on the net, and I am trying to find
> out more about what is behind all
> this.
I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net,
and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously
you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
> From what I have seen, this group
> is based on entertainment
If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours
'entertainment'....
> I don't think there has ever been
> a newsgroup like this one, so
> I can see why it has become
> so popular.
Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp,
alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil,
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk.,
alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa,
alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl,
alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa,
rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda
yadda yadda........
> As the real Bill Palmer, I have
> a question or two for regular
> readers and posters.
Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as
well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the
next post...
> Who is Bill Palmer?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
If you really want to know, here's a good
place to start:
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~tskirvin/home/daemons/
But here's the short of it all:
Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
>Is he real, or is he just a put-on?
Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of
PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of
computers...
But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the
world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
But nothing surprises me anymore, and I have wondered myself if the
racist windbag known as Palmjob isn't just a highly-evolved 'Bot......
Or a 'Bot working with occasional human support, kind of like the humans
that set the various settings before Deep Thought goes into a chess
match.....
ObTournamentPoolDarkhorseAdvisory: Archie Leach thinks that the
#15-ranked Michigan State Spartan men's basketball team can go a long
ways in the NCAA Tournament if Jason Klein gets hot from three-point
range...
APAPalm
>ubject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
>From: stuco...@webtv.net (Archie Leach)
>Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 19:54 EST
>Message-id: <6bo8gb$jvd$1...@newsd-163.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
>
>In a previous post, APAPalm the aoloser wrote:
Just who the hell is this lunatic? I ask a couple of questions and someone
breaks up my lines. Then he makes a bunch of stupid little remarks that don't
make any sense at all.
>
>> Someone has been using my name
>> on the net, and I am trying to find
>> out more about what is behind all
>> this.
What is the joke about making all my lines short? Sorry, but I guess I'm not
with it.
>
>I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net,
>and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously
>you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
I ask a couple of questions and I get THAT? Who is this guy anyway? Just
what is the big joke here? There may be several Bill Palmers on the net, but
I am one of them and think I have the
right to ask what is going on. I'm getting email inteneded for this nut, and
none of it makes a lick of sense..
>
>> From what I have seen, this group
>> is based on entertainment
>
>If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours
>'entertainment'....
I don't really like that name "Palmjob". A kid called me that when I was in
the third grade. I fractured his skull. No real Palmer likes a name like that
Did the otherBill Palmer tell you it was okay for you to call him that name?
>
>> I don't think there has ever been
>> a newsgroup like this one, so
>> I can see why it has become
>> so popular.
>
>Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp,
>alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil,
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk.,
>alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa,
>alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl,
>alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa,
>rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda
>yadda yadda........
Not what I read in the newsgroup announcement in AOL. They said
alt.genius.bill-palmer was a uniqe newsgroup based on creative writing,
flaming, and humor. What kind of a group is this? Why do I get insulted for
asking a couple of questions?
>
>> As the real Bill Palmer, I have
>> a question or two for regular
>> readers and posters.
>
>Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as
>well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the
>next post...
>
>> Who is Bill Palmer?
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>
>Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
Please explain. I don't get the joke. Is everyone "Bill Palmer" or
something?
>
>If you really want to know, here's a good
>place to start:
>
>http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~tskirvin/home/daemons/
What would a website by someone who is not "Bill Palmer" possibly have to tell
me about this famous group? How do I know
the guy at that site isn't an enemy of the other Bill Palmer? Might as well
ask the Man in the Moon about Bill Palmer, I guess, unless
you can direct me to the official Bill Palmer website and I can't seem to find
that.
>
>But here's the short of it all:
>
>Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
Funny, I just read an article called "Racist Drivel Unwelcome In
alt.genius.bill-palmer". Are you saying that article is a forgery? It
said the opposite of what you are saying here.
>
>>Is he real, or is he just a put-on?
>
>Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of
>PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
I DID read "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in alt.genius.bill-palmer.
It was written by someone calling himself wilhelp Bill Palmer and
his anti-racist message seemed very clear. I still don't get your joke at
all. Are you saying all this a big "put on" and there is really no other Bill
Palmer?
>
>>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of
>computers...
>
>But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the
>world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
I don't follow you at all. Why do you make my sentences so short?
>
>But nothing surprises me anymore, and I have wondered myself if the
>racist windbag
No, that's not what I read in "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in
alt.genius.bill-palmer". I ask again if that article was a forgery.
known as Palmjob isn't just a highly-evolved 'Bot......
What I thought was interesting was when the magazine says the whole thing was
part of million dollar bet between the Russian and
American millionaires that the computer team could create a newsgroup that
would become the most popular one of 1997.
Can you refer me to some articles in the group that discuss that angle of Bill
Palmer? Is he a Russian person? I am finding some
interesting things but a lot of gaps. Things that don't add up.
Roads that go no place. That's why I asked the readers for help, and all I
get this one mental problem person who makes my sentences short and says lots
of bad things that make no sense. I've got a right to know whothe other
Bill Palmer is because that is my name too and it's starting to affect my
life..
>
>Or a 'Bot working with occasional human support, kind of like the humans
>that set the various settings before Deep Thought goes into a chess
>match.....
>
>ObTournamentPoolDarkhorseAdvisory: Archie Leach thinks that the
>#15-ranked Michigan State Spartan men's basketball team
Is this other Bill Palmer a Michigan State Spartan computer?
I don't understand the joke.
can go a long
>ways in the NCAA Tournament if Jason Klein gets hot from three-point
>range...
I think something funny is going on here. I've got a right to know
about it. I have emailed the other Bill Palmer but no one ever
responds. Can anyone explain what is going on here?
Bill Palmer
!!! ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!
*Balloons Party Favors*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Archie Leach
Christ in hell, you're even more obnoxious than the "other' Biiil
Palmer......
Asshole....go find out for your fucking self, you somehow magically
summoned your head from your colon to figure out how to put your
horseshit magician's site on the web......scumbag troll....
Archie Leach
stuco...@webtv.com
In article <19980210080...@ladder03.news.aol.com>,
apa...@aol.com (APAPalm) wrote:
>
> >ubject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
> >From: stuco...@webtv.net (Archie Leach)
> >Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 19:54 EST
> >Message-id: <6bo8gb$jvd$1...@newsd-163.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
> >
> >In a previous post, APAPalm the aoloser wrote:
>
> Just who the hell is this lunatic? I ask a couple of questions and someone
> breaks up my lines. Then he makes a bunch of stupid little remarks that don't
> make any sense at all.
They make perfectly good sense, fuckwit. And I broke up your fucking
lines because I was using my WEBTV browser at the time, and WEBTV does
not currently support a "Quote text" feature on its Usenet browser, you
hyperactive, egotistical piece of rhinocerous shit....
> >
> >> Someone has been using my name
> >> on the net, and I am trying to find
> >> out more about what is behind all
> >> this.
>
> What is the joke about making all my lines short? Sorry, but I guess I'm not
> with it.
No, you're not with it, and what's more, you're not sorry, you're
pathetic.
> >
> >I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net,
> >and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously
> >you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
>
> I ask a couple of questions and I get THAT? Who is this guy anyway?
And I make a few smart-ass remarks and I get this poltroon blind-siding
me for flaming the Original Palmjob....
> Just
> what is the big joke here?
That you're a Grubor alias?
> There may be several Bill Palmers on the net, but
> I am one of them and think I have the
> right to ask what is going on. I'm getting email inteneded for this nut, and
> none of it makes a lick of sense..
Well, then change your name. Or learn how to read....
> >
> >> From what I have seen, this group
> >> is based on entertainment
> >
> >If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours
> >'entertainment'....
>
> I don't really like that name "Palmjob". A kid called me that when I was in
> the third grade. I fractured his skull. No real Palmer likes a name like that
> Did the otherBill Palmer tell you it was okay for you to call him that name?
No. Doctoring names is a flaming tradition, Palmjob2. If you don't like
it, then I guess you can come find me and fracture my skull, you
psychotic piece of crystal-meth-whiffing trash. But 10-20 in Jackson
State Prison would kinda put a bummer on your magic career, eh?
As if you won't get busted sooner or later for molesting eight-year-olds
at their birthday parties......oops. Sorry. Didn't mean to steal a
classic Grubor riff there.....
> >
> >> I don't think there has ever been
> >> a newsgroup like this one, so
> >> I can see why it has become
> >> so popular.
> >
> >Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp,
> >alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil,
> >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk.,
> >alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa,
> >alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl,
> >alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa,
> >rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda
> >yadda yadda........
>
> Not what I read in the newsgroup announcement in AOL. They said
> alt.genius.bill-palmer was a uniqe newsgroup based on creative writing,
> flaming, and humor. What kind of a group is this? Why do I get insulted for
> asking a couple of questions?
Because you're almost as much of an idiot, Palmjob2, as the original
Palmjob.
> >
> >> As the real Bill Palmer, I have
> >> a question or two for regular
> >> readers and posters.
> >
> >Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as
> >well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the
> >next post...
> >
> >> Who is Bill Palmer?
> >
> >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
> >
> >Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
>
> Please explain. I don't get the joke. Is everyone "Bill Palmer" or
> something?
I hope not. It's bad enough that you're Bill Palmer.
> >
> >If you really want to know, here's a good
> >place to start:
> >
> >http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~tskirvin/home/daemons/
>
> What would a website by someone who is not "Bill Palmer" possibly have to tell
> me about this famous group?
Listen, you indignant trolling asshole, it's clear that you're either
really, really ignorant, or otherwise you're really, really expert at
trolling, and figuring that you're an aol-er, I'm guessing that you're a
hookwormed old crank.
What I said was that the site listed above was a place to start.
There are many other places to find info on Palmjob.....or the
combination of Russian and American hackers and software and hardware
that masquerades as the world's Most Boring Racist--DumbFucK
> How do I know
> the guy at that site isn't an enemy of the other Bill Palmer? Might as well
> ask the Man in the Moon about Bill Palmer, I guess, unless
> you can direct me to the official Bill Palmer website and I can't seem to find
> that.
Sounds like a personal problem to me...
> >
> >But here's the short of it all:
> >
> >Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
>
> Funny, I just read an article called "Racist Drivel Unwelcome In
> alt.genius.bill-palmer". Are you saying that article is a forgery? It
> said the opposite of what you are saying here.
I would advise you to judge the situation for yourself, but that might
take quite a lot of time for an ignorant fool like yourself to
accomplish--and all that time taken might squeeze out other things on
your schedule, like your weekly volunteering session at the School for
the Blind during which you go find the most disabled of the blind
students and take him into one of the cleaning closets and give him a
good old-fashioned ass-rape...
Usenet doesn't need trash like you around. There's far too many kooks
roaming around the various newsgroups, as it stands right now.
If you want to pollute the 'net with your inconsequential, deranged
rambling, why don't you find an appropriate group, like, for instance,
alt.support.boy-lovers.
In the meantime, make like a magician and disappear.
> >
> >>Is he real, or is he just a put-on?
> >
> >Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of
> >PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
>
> I DID read "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in alt.genius.bill-palmer.
> It was written by someone calling himself wilhelp Bill Palmer and
> his anti-racist message seemed very clear. I still don't get your joke at
> all. Are you saying all this a big "put on" and there is really no other Bill
> Palmer?
> >
> >>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of
> >computers...
> >
> >But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the
> >world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
QED?
Archie Leach
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
Mike MacLennan
wil...@ix.netcom.com(Clueless Moron) wrote:
>
> In <887155286....@dejanews.com> stuco...@webtv.com writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
>
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
>
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
> a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
That's never stopped you before.
>
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
> opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of
> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
> vicious as this character.
"Ouch!"
[...]
> Bill Palmer
> Human Doorknob
> Creator and proprietor of wilhelp
Proof please.
> alt.genius.bill-palmer
> Home of the Cascade
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
mmaclenn[SHIFT+2]ix.netcom.com defame[SHIFT+2]wilhelp.com
Want fame? Say something stupid to reserve your space below.
Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians";
THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the
"Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing
they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up
his arguments in <65acb7$d...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
wil...@ix.netcom.com
In <887155286....@dejanews.com> stuco...@webtv.com writes:
[...]
Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of
them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
vicious as this character.
First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The
Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that
nowadays.
Then, after a fairly mild toasting, "Leach" leaps into
such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself
away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text! Okay, so we know
he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual
alterations). Then came the personal attacks posted
to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which
I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME,
in!
All that was indicitive of a desperate loser who isn't
playing with full deck. NOW we find that "Archie" is
repulsively perverted to boot!
In fact, with the latest aberrant fantasies that
have been spewed forth from the reeking cesspool
that our "Archie Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com>
entity seems to call a brain, we want to call the
folks in the white coats to help scrape him into
some loony bin for deviates. In fact, this
foul entity's drool proves unhappily suggestive of
a "brain" composed of two rotting frontal lobes
faintly sparked by feeble limbic activity.
It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s
perversion. (YOU can backtrack on the thread if you have
a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage
going to be allowed to seep into my little corner of the
Dejanews archive.)
"Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly makes Wormy Wilkes and even
poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal. With Pus Bag and Wormy
Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down
in their gutter and match them perverted secenario
with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag
me down to their level. But with this "Archie Leach"
entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this
pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang,
and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination
for a "comeback" that was anything like what this
pervert "Archie" posted.
Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be
in a staight-jacket. It is very plain to readers what
his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and
frankly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite
preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please
pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
"Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their
own thoughts you shall know them"...
But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology
almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my
theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting
victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a
new fake name.
In the many cases where that happened, the vindictive
sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same
level of "laming", as far as content of their flames--
no better and no worse.
Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out
to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my
roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted
monster! As I have been saying, I can't think
of one of my opponents right off the bat who would
want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing,
pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from
<stuco...@webtv.com>. Of course, some people
do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies
of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not
quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the
repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie
Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look
quite so nasty!)
Frankly, "Leach"'s racist rants suggested Human Leech
David Kendrick, but unless I've missed something about
Kendrick, I've never known him to drool anything quite
as deviated as the reeking mound of diseased tripe that
this "Archie Leach" spewed from his "heart" last time.
The man is very ill--what other explanation could there
be? Plainly, <cope...@webtv.com> wasn't calling names:
He was showing us where he LIVES, and that's scary as hell.
-----------------------------------------
Now, as to this other "Bill Palmer" that has set "Leach"
foaming at the mouth, I suspect this guy is a plant
too. He may even BE our "Leach" entity.
Actually, I had in mind someone like Eskwired. After
all, Eskwired hasn't been around lately. The first
time I recall THAT loser, he was sneaking around in
alt.genius.bill-palmer asking what seemed like
innocent questions. Soon enough, though, he was
polluting the group with his racist defamations.
We'll have to wait and see about this other one.
One thing that strikes me as phony is the way
he closes, "Always Trust a Magician" and
"Balloons and Party Favors". I mean, at a
glance that sounds innocent enough, but what
is he saying, does he SELL "balloons and
party" favors?
Anyway, while my curious new "namesake"
certainly has not proved as vicious, dishonest,
racist, sexually depraved, and generally ugly
and desperate as "Archie Leach" <stucopeland@
webtv.com> the entity bears watching while in
alt.genius.bill-palmer and may well be a plant.
More to follow, no doubt...
Bill Palmer
Creator and proprietor of wilhelp
alt.genius.bill-palmer
wil...@ix.netcom.com
In <6bre4a$a...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> Parasite Mike MacLennan
<defame@wilhelp.*expunge.these.fields*.com> writes:
>wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>
>> In <887155286....@dejanews.com> stuco...@webtv.com writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
>>
>> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
>> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
>> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
>
Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have
seen happen again and again. So is your point I should
avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
>
>>
>> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
>> a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
>
>That's never stopped you before.
Apparently, your whole point is this: Since YOU plainly
feel that the sort of proclivities that entity "Archie
Leach" described to for the readers represent good clean
flame-fun, you want to point our my "squareness" by
taking a taking a couple of cheapshots at ME, thereby
suggesting *I* was off-base for registering my disgust with
this cognitively-diseased, deviated dipshit posting from
<stuco...@webtv.com?
Well, parasite MacLennan, is THAT your point? Or is it
that you are so hog blind-angry from your repeated
humiliations that you will defend anything and anyone
who attacks me--even an entity like the repulsive "Archie
Leach" who drools some of the most repulsive slime into
this group that I (and I suspect most readers) have ever
seen here.
>
>>
>> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
>> opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of
>> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
>> vicious as this character.
>
>"Ouch!"
In other words, MacLennan (whose "brain" overflows like
a dirty toilet with the same kind of sewage that entity
"Archie Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> drools straight from
his foul and perverted "heart") wants everyone to know what
a "big joke" is found in the type of slime that would
literally make a lot of folks toss their cookies. Call
me lacking in humor, by all means...
Ever more slimy as you get ever more desperate, eh,
parasite "MacLennan"?
copyright FLAME GIANT
On Wordscreens of the World
polt...@wilhelp.com
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post
<6br2lt$l...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,wil...@ix.netcom.com ()
wrote:
>Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be
>in a staight-jacket.
That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a
typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
--
Rubbing the Kook Kabal's noses in their
own shit is not only fun, it's a duty.
"All non-hostile reactions are more than welcome and most
especially yours Mr. Palmer. I've long admired your style
and devotion to free speech." - (Speedbump to Palmjob).
All loon-related email to "polt...@wilhelp.com"
Mike MacLennan
wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> In <6bre4a$a...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> Parasite Mike MacLennan
> <defame@wilhelp.*expunge.these.fields*.com> writes:
> >
> >wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> >>
> >> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
> >> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
> >> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
> >
>
> Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have
> seen happen again and again. So is your point I should
> avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
When said past experiences leave you looking like a total moron, yes.
wil...@ix.netcom.com
In <34e4432c...@enews.newsguy.com> para...@wilhelp.com writes:
>
>In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post
><6br2lt$l...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,wil...@ix.netcom.com ()
>wrote:
>
[typo-corrected]
>
>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a
>typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word.
If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you
know more than the editors of the quite-conservative
AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will
bother to look there or in any other excellent English
dictionary, you will learn for the first time that since
the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which
spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best,
both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you
won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your
ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in
it anyway.
Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a
paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing"
in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing
errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial
sentences in the first place, that means your spacing
between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now
and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that
particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing
skill.
Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce
from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a
very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own
KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort
have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention
of your ignorant display, was it not?
Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement
about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary
first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might
not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the
Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a
> paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing"
*Who* requires this, billshit bill palmer the hapless little
dwarf?--your abuse of passive constructions (e.g. "two spaces are
needed") conveniently elides any mention of any authority on this issue.
So, who are you citing?
> in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing
> errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial
> sentences in the first place, that means your spacing
> between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
Fascinating. Billshit bill palmer the depends undergarment wearing dwarf
sinks to a new low: a "spacing" lame. My God. Now *that's* grasping.
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/
polt...@wilhelp.com
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post
<6brn6r$h...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>,wil...@ix.netcom.com
(Palmjob) wrote:
>>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a
>>typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
>
>No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word.
>If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you
>know more than the editors of the quite-conservative
>AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will
>bother to look there or in any other excellent English
>dictionary, you will learn for the first time that since
>the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which
>spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best,
>both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin),
the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in
your head, Bill.
>Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you
>won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your
>ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in
>it anyway.
Pseudonymous? No more than any other email address.
"polt...@wilhelp.com" is as valid an email address as
"wil...@ix.netcom.com". Just click on poltroon and send me some
email. You can even get your own address at wilhelp.com if you ask
nicely; but not "wil...@wilhelp.com"; that's taken. See if you can
get your browser to connect to <www.wilhelp.com>, and join about 45 of
your "fans" who love to pull your tail to see you jump and whine.
>Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a
>paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing"
>in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing
>errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial
>sentences in the first place, that means your spacing
>between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
>
>On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now
>and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that
>particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing
>skill.
I think your data-set is a little small for such a devastating
analysis, Wee Willie.
>Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce
>from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a
>very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own
>KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort
>have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention
>of your ignorant display, was it not?
Not at all; Archie can do just fine on his own, pointing out your
documented history of racial slurs on Usenet.
I just wanted to have some fun with your latest filet of solecism and
English mangling.
>Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement
>about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary
>first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might
>not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
I did, and not some fishwrap 'Merkin dictionary like the A.H.D.
By the way, Willie, you put _three_ spaces between "first." and "Next"
in the above paragraph; 100% error level there, Little Buckaroo.
Now, skitter-off before I toast your little pink backside again,
Palmjob.
>copywrong FLAME GIANT
>
> On Word screeds of the World
Tim Skirvin
In article <6br2lt$l...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,
Thereby insulting everyone named "[..,]"!
>
> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
>
> But as per usual, I shall skip the interesting point and go
>straight to the boring ones.
>
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
> a sore flame war loser sneaKKKing bacKKK for revenge.
Because you're too much of a pathetic shitass to try any other flaming
tactic.
Perhaps you can try to spread the vicious rumor that you wrote the
Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked.
I've written it six or seven times!
I am the true author of the Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked!
And you are the plagarist.
>
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
> a bit hasty in reaching my KKKonKKKlusions.
That's what three weeks' worth of crusted urine and 2-and-1/2 weeks'
worth of skid marks on your Big Boy Pull-Ups Diaper will do,
sometimes.....it'll make you hasty in reaching conclusions!
>
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
> opponents any KKKredit, I cannot think of one of
> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
> vicious as this character.
And I was horrified when Palmjob's foster mother told me about how she
had to put a leather harness on him when he was growing up because when
he was in school, in between classes, Palmjob would run through the
hallways with his little pecker hanging out of his TuffSkins corduroy
pants and he'd try to pee on his classmates...
>
> First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The
> Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that
> nowadays.
MUHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA!!!!!!
>
> Then, after a fairly mild toasting (sic), "Leach" leaps into
> such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself
> away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text!
You're the one inserting triple-K's into the text, Heinrich Palmmler.
Take responsibility for your own actions.
> Okay, so we know
> he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual
> alterations). Then came the personal attacKKKs posted
> to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which
> I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME,
> in!
There are a lot of FLAME groups to which you've never posted a flame,
either.
>
> All that was indicitive
Indicitive? Why don't you spellcheck your lames, for once?
> of a desperate loser who isn't
> playing with full decKKK.
You oughtta know, wanKKKer boy.
> NOW we find that "Archie" is
> repulsively perverted to boot!
>
> In fact, with the latest aberrant fantasies that
> have been spewed forth from the reeKKKing cesspool
> that our "Archie Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com>
> entity seems to call a brain, we want to call the
> folks in the white coats to help scrape him into
> some loony bin for deviates.
Don't you mean deviants? And it looks like you're projecting your own
disturbed (to say the least) childhood onto me.
You're the one who tried to piss on your classmates in middle school.
> In fact, this
> foul entity's drool proves unhappily suggestive of
> a "brain" composed of two rotting frontal lobes
> faintly sparked by feeble limbic activity.
At least I *HAVE* two frontal lobes!
Nyah nyah nyah!
>
> It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s
> perversion. (YOU can bacKKKtracKKK on the thread if you have
> a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage
> going to be allowed to seep into my >little Ku Klux Klan-supportve KKKorner of the
> Dejanews archive.)
I'm awful proud to have it in my corner of it....
>
> "Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly maKKKes Wormy Wilkes and even
> poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal. With Pus Bag and Wormy
> Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down
> in their gutter and match them perverted secenario
> with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag
> me down
Welcome to the Wild and Whacky World of Palmjobese, in which "up" means
"down" and "down" means "up"!
>to their level. But with this "Archie Leach"
> entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this
> pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang,
> and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination
> for a "comebacKKK" that was anything like what this
> pervert "Archie" posted.
YOU CAN E-MAIL ME ANY TIME TO SURRENDER AND ADMIT DEFEAT, AND I'LL
FOREVER CEASE THIS BARRAGE.
Any time, and I promise I will say not a word about it to anyone else.
I think it's time that you surrender with whatever shreds of dignity you
still hold...
>
> Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be
> in a staight-jacket.
That's my name! Don't wear it out!
> It is very plain to readers what
> his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and
> franKKKly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite
> preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please
> pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
No. More like 5,000 variations of tit-for-tat all spammed into the same
post....
>
> "Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their
> own thoughts you shall know them"...
>
> But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology
> almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my
> theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting
> victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a
> new fake name.
There's something new: one of Palmjob's theories about "so and so is
Hausman or whomever" getting shot down.
Again..........and again..........
>
> In the many cases where that happened, the vindiKKKtive
> sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same
> level of "laming", as far as content of their flames--
> no better and no worse.
>
> Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out
> to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my
> roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted
> monster! As I have been saying--
> I can't thinKKK!
You're sure right about that!
> of one of my opponents right off the bat who would
> want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing,
> pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from
> <stuco...@webtv.com>. Of course, some people
> do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
>
> The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies
> of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not
> quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the
> repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie
> Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look
> quite so nasty!)
Quiet, you, or I'll tell your therapists about how you like to jack off
at the local McDonald's Playland...
wil...@ix.netcom.com
In <34e99df7...@enews.newsguy.com> polt...@wilhelp.com writes:
>
>In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post
><6brn6r$h...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>,wil...@ix.netcom.com
>(Palmjob) wrote:
>
>>>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a
>>>typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
>>
>>No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word.
>>If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you
>>know more than the editors of the quite-conservative
>>AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will
>>dictionaries, you will learn for the first time that since
>>the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which
>>spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best,
>>both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
>
>Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin),
>the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in
>your head, Bill.
You're simply an absolute liar caught with your pants down!
You proved stupid enough to criticize someone else's
usage based upon your own uninformed prejudices. Now
you are trying to fib your way our of it. Fact is,
THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY and THE MERRIAM
WEBSTER DICTIONARY each list both forms as correct.
That means, while YOU might prefer otherwise, you have
no business saying people err in giving the editors of
two outstanding dictionaries more credence than they give
your pompous and uninformed blather.
In other words, dear parasite of mine, you deserve a
dunce cap. In effect you are claiming to know more than
the editors of two highly respected dictionaries. There
are many minor instances where THE AMERICAN HERITAGE, THE
MERRIAM WEBSTER, and THE OXFORD disagree on the best
usage. However, only a dunce makes public pronouncements
that someone is "illiterate" for preferring a spelling
choice sanctioned by two top dictionaries.
>
>>Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you
>>won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your
>>ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in
>>it anyway.
>
>Pseudonymous? No more than any other email address.
>"polt...@wilhelp.com" is as valid an email address as
>"wil...@ix.netcom.com". Just click on poltroon and send me some
>email. You can even get your own address at wilhelp.com if you ask
>nicely; but not "wil...@wilhelp.com"; that's taken. See if you can
>get your browser to connect to <www.wilhelp.com>, and join about 45 of
>your "fans" who love to pull your tail to see you jump and whine.
Of course you are a pseduonymous nobody. How do you expect
to blather your way out of that? And of course you are a
parasite, too, since I created wilhelp and made my creation
famous in these newsgroups long before Human Leech Kendrick
registered it as a domain name. It is impossible for you to
use wilhelp without becoming an official "Bill Palmer's
parasite".
>
>
>>Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a
>>paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing"
>>in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing
>>errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial
>>sentences in the first place, that means your spacing
>>between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
>>
>>On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now
>>and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that
>>particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing
>>skill.
>
>I think your data-set is a little small for such a devastating
>analysis, Wee Willie.
I had no need to go beyond the document at hand. After
all, YOU used but one article to proclaim ME "illiterate"--
and your pronouncement proved to be ignorant and incorrect!
>>Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce
>>from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a
>>very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own
>>KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort
>>have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention
>>of your ignorant display, was it not?
>
>Not at all; Archie can do just fine on his own, pointing out your
>documented history of racial slurs on Usenet.
Such "slurs" are fabricated by others, just like YOU
fabricated my supposed "spelling error". But then,
you know that already.
>
>I just wanted to have some fun with your latest filet of solecism and
>English mangling.
In other words, you went fishing for "solecism and English
mangling", but when you couldn't find hide nor hair of any,
you fabricated!
>
>>Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement
>>about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary
>>first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might
>>not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
>
>I did, and not some fishwrap 'Merkin dictionary like the A.H.D.
Despite your own ignorant prejudices, if a spelling is
sanctioned as correct by THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY
(and THE MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY, as a matter of fact!)
a pseudonymous dunce cap wearer such as yourself has no
business pronouncing other people "illiterate" for
preferring the form in question. You certainly DID
put your foot in your mouth.
>
>By the way, Willie, you put _three_ spaces between "first." and "Next"
>in the above paragraph; 100% error level there, Little Buckaroo.
Very dishonest of you! YOUR spacing between sentences was
one-hundred percent wrong. *I* made ONE spacing error in an
article of over 300 words with no other mistakes of any sort.
Since that is far higher than the Usenet average, please
allow me to pat myself on my back for my excellence. Ahhh...
feels so good!
>
>Now, skitter-off before I toast your little pink backside again,
Of course, a pseudonymous dunce WOULD insult everyone
named Palmer and further be brazen enough to insist that
said dunce's exhibition of orthographical ignorance had
somehow "toasted" ME!
>Palmjob.
polt...@wilhelp.com
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post
<6bsu9p$5...@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>,wil...@ix.netcom.com (Hairy
Palmer) wrote:
>Of course you are a pseduonymous nobody. How do you expect
>to blather your way out of that? And of course you are a
>parasite, too, since I created wilhelp and made my creation
>famous in these newsgroups long before Human Leech Kendrick
>registered it as a domain name. It is impossible for you to
>use wilhelp without becoming an official "Bill Palmer's
>parasite".
Biil, this whineing about your parasites is worrying; if you would
observe some basic hygiene, you could get rid of them.
Remember to wash your hands after defecating, and the pin-worms that
make you keep scratching your ass in public will go. Shave your body
hair and wash with kerosene, and the pubic lice that you got from
Boursy will be returned to sender, so to speak. Above all, brush your
dentures and change the primordial soup in the glass where you store
them overnight. The oral-genital warts from Goober are a bit of a
problem, I admit.
You can do it, I know. You too can be free from the itching torment of
psoriasis so evident in your posts.
But my address, "polt...@wilhelp.com", is mine, and it stays. Why,
since I started using it, I've had an offer to do a translation of the
Dead Sea Scrolls into Inuit, a request to pose nude for "Biker Babe
Magazine" and a chance to display my "Etch-A-Sketch" works in the
Royal Ontario Museum Permanent Collection. All because of my domain
name "wilhelp.com". Don't forget to include this in the court
documents when Goober sues Usenet on your behalf.
Too bad you didn't think of registering the domain, but 45 of your
fans thank you. We love rattling your cage, for fun _and_ profit.
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the
Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> >Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin),
> >the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in
> >your head, Bill.
>
> You're simply an absolute liar caught with your pants down!
Uh-oh. Run for cover, everyone. Billshit bill's in estrus again. He's
imagining his correspondents with their pants down AGAIN, attempting to
involve them in his violent and absurd sexual rituals. Ugh.
> You proved stupid enough to criticize someone else's
> usage based upon your own uninformed prejudices. Now
Prejudices?--wrong, bilious billshit billy-boy bill palmer the peurile,
you who stimulates your rectal tissues--now nearly completely
desensitized owing to years and years of ruthless abuse--with
brass-bristled scrubbing brushes and rusty cheese-graters. Your
correspondent cited the OED, which as any linguist, philologist will
tell you is the standard.
> you are trying to fib your way our of it. Fact is,
> THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY and THE MERRIAM
> WEBSTER DICTIONARY each list both forms as correct.
Your children's editions of your american heritage and your little
merriam webster's are of little use to you here, little one. An instance
of incorrect usage, if used often enough, will generally find its way
into a dictionary. Dictionaries, billshit bill palmer, are descriptive,
not prescriptive.
> That means, while YOU might prefer otherwise, you have
> no business saying people err in giving the editors of
> two outstanding dictionaries more credence than they give
> your pompous and uninformed blather.
Yes he does, billshit bill palmer. Why?--because once again you were
wrong--surprise!--and all of your poorly worded and terribly lame
insults cannot reverse that simple fact. You're a loser, loser-boy.
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/
wil...@wilhelp.com
>[typo-corrected]
'Nuff said.
*SLAP*
wil...@wilhelp.com
wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote in message
<6bsu9p$5...@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>...
>I had no need to go beyond the document at hand. After
>all, YOU used but one article to proclaim ME "illiterate"--
>and your pronouncement proved to be ignorant and incorrect!
You don't have to eat the whole egg to know it's rotten, Palmjob.
Goin' Nova
In article <6brhjb$t...@dfw-ixnews2.ix.netcom.com>, wil...@ix.netcom.com ()
wrote:
> In <6bre4a$a...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> Parasite Mike MacLennan
> <defame@wilhelp.*expunge.these.fields*.com> writes:
> >
> >wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In <887155286....@dejanews.com> stuco...@webtv.com writes:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> >>
> >> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
> >> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
> >> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
> >
> >Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
>
> Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have
> seen happen again and again. So is your point I should
> avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
Oh dear. As a Hausmann, MacLennan certainly has the right to use nautical
terms. And, nitwit, how long ago was it "Monica" posted part of your e-mail
where you pointed out that, as a Bay Area resident, you loved to go sailing
on the Bay. <snicker> Clealy, you no sailor. <snicker> But you do like to
use boats to impress the girls, no? <guffaw> I imagine it's still in DejaNews,
lest you start with denial.
Yo, Biily. Blow the man down, dude. <snicker>
Anyone wanna bet Biil's only seen waves on his cruises? It's hard to
see much else with your head over the side....
<snip>
--
Bill has this pile of a lot of crap, some of it neat crap--but it would be
nice if he would do something more with it, rather than park it off on the
side of Usenet. Unprocessed crap smells, and no-one wants to have to sort
through it.
_Stan Kalisch III
<Pine.SUN.3.96L-rev3_1-10....@crl8.crl.com>
balloo
wil...@ix.netcom.com () escribió en artículo:
>In <887155286....@dejanews.com> stuco...@webtv.com writes:
>[...]
>Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
They don't, not really, but I'm bored.
I'll do a Palmjob on a slow day.
>First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
>Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
>a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Palmjob has suggested that of every poster that has publicly
humiliated him (i.e. all of them.)
>Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
>a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
Ooh, ya think? (I know he's not meaning this to be retroactive for
the last two years, but if it weren't for creative inference I would
have killfiled the creepy weasel after reading his first post.)
>As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
>opponents any credit,
...having none to give...
>I cannot think of one of
>them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
>vicious as this character.
With the possible exception of Palmer himself.
>First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The
>Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that
>nowadays.
Most people have to get down on their knees to slap Bill Palmer.
>Then, after a fairly mild toasting, "Leach" leaps into
>such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself
>away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text! Okay, so we know
>he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual
>alterations). Then came the personal attacks posted
>to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which
>I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME,
>in!
Oh, horrors! Do you mean that a Bill Palmer article might have been
cross-posted to a newsgroup that wanted nothing to do with Bill
Palmer?
>All that was indicitive of a desperate loser who isn't
>playing with full deck. NOW we find that "Archie" is
>repulsively perverted to boot!
I Know You Are And So Am I.
*snip* vague meanderings neither interesting or offensive enough to
merit attention of anyone capable of reading for themselves...
>It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s
>perversion.
Only if you spend your life 24/7 grepping your newsfeed for mention of
your name.
>(YOU can backtrack on the thread if you have
>a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage
>going to be allowed to seep into my little corner of the
>Dejanews archive.)
"My little corner of the Dejanews archive" = search "palmjob"
>"Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly makes Wormy Wilkes and even
>poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal.
If he could make Bill look normal he'd be making millions for
Industrial Light and Magic.
>With Pus Bag and Wormy
>Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down
>in their gutter and match them perverted secenario
>with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag
>me down to their level.
Translation: "I get beaten up by John and Gilbert, am unable to
respond in any effective way, and am claiming superiority for failing
to do so."
>But with this "Archie Leach"
>entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this
>pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang,
>and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination
>for a "comeback" that was anything like what this
>pervert "Archie" posted.
That pretty much goes for anyone with access to a keyboard. Palmjob
goes for quantity, not quality.
>Therefore, I won't try.
Won't. Can't. It's all semantics to Bill...
>This "Leach" is sick enough to be
>in a staight-jacket. It is very plain to readers what
>his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and
>frankly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite
>preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please
>pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
Translation: "I'm too narrow minded to understand anything that isn't
displayed on 'Leave it to Beaver' reruns, I'm superior to everyone
with experiences other than my own, my running away from every fight
is a victory."
>"Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their
>own thoughts you shall know them"...
...and no one knows Bill...
...thank god...
>But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology
>almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my
>theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting
>victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a
>new fake name.
Translation: "While I have never gotten the better of anyone in
debate, I will imply that people who have grown bored with spanking me
across Usenet return in other guises, hopefully creating a mythology
in which I am worthy of being the target of persons other than bored
net-junkies."
Yeah, I know what that makes me. Fuck off.
>In the many cases where that happened, the vindictive
>sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same
>level of "laming", as far as content of their flames--
>no better and no worse.
And still always superior to Bill. Which still isn't saying much.
>Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out
>to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my
>roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted
>monster!
Bill's touch can do that. Most people don't know this, but Bill
Palmer produced Michael Jackson's 1979 "Off the Wall" album.
>As I have been saying, I can't think
>of one of my opponents right off the bat who would
>want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing,
>pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from
><stuco...@webtv.com>.
You're saying you don't read other people's posts.
>Of course, some people
>do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
And others, like Bill "Bill" Palmer, become numb to the constant
spankings they receive, and no longer care about the continual
opprobrium they receive from those around them.
>The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies
>of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not
>quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the
>repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie
>Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look
>quite so nasty!)
So Bill likes the sheep. Figures.
>Frankly, "Leach"'s racist rants suggested Human Leech
>David Kendrick,
As opposed to the racist rants Palmjob has himself posted...
>but unless I've missed something about
>Kendrick, I've never known him to drool anything quite
>as deviated as the reeking mound of diseased tripe that
>this "Archie Leach" spewed from his "heart" last time.
Hey, I've been known to mix the occasional metaphor, but who other
than Bill Palmer could imagine "drool" "spewing" from someone's
"heart?"
>The man is very ill--what other explanation could there
>be?
You got spanked, Bill?
>Plainly, <cope...@webtv.com> wasn't calling names:
>He was showing us where he LIVES, and that's scary as hell.
Yeah, I need to do laundry this week myself.
>Now, as to this other "Bill Palmer" that has set "Leach"
>foaming at the mouth, I suspect this guy is a plant
>too. He may even BE our "Leach" entity.
Or maybe it was Bill Palmer and he forgot.
>Actually, I had in mind someone like Eskwired.
I had Uma Thurman in mind, myself.
>After
>all, Eskwired hasn't been around lately.
And Bill went missing for the month of September... hmmm...
>The first
>time I recall THAT loser, he was sneaking around in
>alt.genius.bill-palmer asking what seemed like
>innocent questions. Soon enough, though, he was
>polluting the group with his racist defamations.
That's like charging someone with peeing in a cess pool.
>We'll have to wait and see about this other one.
>
>One thing that strikes me as phony is the way
>he closes, "Always Trust a Magician" and
>"Balloons and Party Favors". I mean, at a
>glance that sounds innocent enough, but what
>is he saying, does he SELL "balloons and
>party" favors?
I will sell you a clue for ten dollars.
>Anyway, while my curious new "namesake"
>certainly has not proved as vicious, dishonest,
>racist, sexually depraved, and generally ugly
>and desperate as "Archie Leach" <stucopeland@
>webtv.com>
..."with whom I have equated him"...
>the entity bears watching while in
>alt.genius.bill-palmer and may well be a plant.
As opposed to Bill himself, who is a vegetable.
>More to follow, no doubt...
Truer words ne'er said...
>Bill Palmer
aka Palmjob. Q: Who is the
>Creator and proprietor of wilhelp
A: Dave Kendrick! (I win a cookie.)
>alt.genius.bill-palmer
Want another oxymoron? Microsoft works.
--
coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com
jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow
http://www.blarg.net/~balloo/flonk/palmjob.html meow
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the
Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie
> Leach" <stuco...@webtv.com> is quite possibly
> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Billshit bill palmer "previously suggested," but no one listened.
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being
> a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
And though now billshit bill palmer the puerile is "given pause to
wonder" ("given pause to ... " ugh!--this subliterate rube just CANNOT
write to save his utterly useless and completely wasted life!), still,
no one listens, no one cares. In sum: billshit bill palmer dialogues
with himself, just like the unwashed madmen one sometimes encounters in
public parks or subway stations, talking, giggling, gibbering and
sometimes even shouting at themselves in non-sensical strings of
incoherent babbling, which no one listens to, and which no one cares
about. Our billshit bill palmer aspires to be one of these. As yet he
lacks the social skills.
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my
> opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of
Yes. Billshit bill palmer the lame hates to give his opponents credit
because they always take it for themselves, even as he shrieks and howls
in protest, helplessly flailing all his many limbs, urinating and
defecating involuntarily, convulsing in a blind panic as one by one they
spank and spank him, chasing him from one newsgroup to another. The
defenseless rube we all know as billshit bill palmer the penile simply
lacks the cognitive sophistication necessary to mount any sort of
defense, so he just goes belly-up, or, more likely, runs away screaming
like a girl.
> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and
> vicious as this character.
And now of course billshit bill palmer describes himself, or how the
bloated capon of a boy would *like* to behave had not his lab-coated
handlers long ago relieved him of his pesky little testicles with a pair
of pruning-snips. Oh but you should have heard the little stump of a boy
shriek and howl. Well, they had to do SOMETHING!--little billshit bill
spent every waking moment ruthlessly abusing his tiny, ill-formed
genitals, an outrage to the other patients and a constant source of
embarrassment to the staff. So, one evening they gelded the bloated
little stump of a boy. And for a time it seemed to work. Now he would
consume his nervous energy on usenet, using usenet as if it were his
chamberpot, but at least he left his tiny little nub of a penis alone,
what little of it still existed.
But then billshit bill palmer discovered his rectum, and his pineapple
sized prostate. Ugh. The cycle begins anew.
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/
APAPalm
>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
>From: Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu>
>Date: Thu, Feb 12, 1998 10:50 EST
>Message-id: <AosldBC00...@andrew.cmu.edu>
><...>
I still have some questions that need answering, and I am not going to go away
without the responses I deserve.
Why is the other Bill Palmer ignoring my emails? I have emailed him at least
two dozen times now and I've heard nothing back.
How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named for him in
the first place? Will he post proof of that for me?
How do we know this newgroup was not named for Bill Palmer, the famous
magician?
Why does the other Bill Palmer seem evasive about his origins? I can trace him
back to the old soc.culture.soviet newsgroup, but the trail stops there. Did
he originate in that newsgroup, or are we talking about two other Bill Palmers
here?
I would also like to know why that mentally disturbed person- Leech attacked me
the last time I posted in alt.genius.bill-palmer. I
thought the other Bill Palmer said _everyone_ was welcome, not just one
little Bill Palmer.
Why did other Bill Palmer say there was something suspicious about my ending,
"Balloons, Party Favors"? What could be more _harmless_ than balloons and
party favors, I would like to know?
Ballons and party favors are a magical state of mind. Would the other Bill
Palmer be more happy if I put "Drugs and Guns" in my closing?
Can _somebody_ please tell me what is going on here?
Bill Palmer
!!!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!!
Balloons, Party Favors
John Davis
APAPalm (apa...@aol.com) wrote:
: >Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
: >From: Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu>
: >Date: Thu, Feb 12, 1998 10:50 EST
: >Message-id: <AosldBC00...@andrew.cmu.edu>
: ><...>
: I still have some questions that need answering, and I am not going to go away
: without the responses I deserve.
Very well, but be advised the regular posters here will be the judge of
the kind of responses you deserve.
: Why is the other Bill Palmer ignoring my emails? I have emailed him at least
: two dozen times now and I've heard nothing back.
Shit, the brainless twit can barely post to use net. I took him over a
yera to learn not to screw up the reference line and he still doesn't
understan the complex workings of the atribution marks. I bet he doesn't
have a clue how to look in his mail box if indeed he knows he has one.
: How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named for him in
: the first place? Will he post proof of that for me?
: How do we know this newgroup was not named for Bill Palmer, the famous
: magician?
As far as Palmjob is concerned, there is no other Bill Palmer. You
better watck it or he is going to start accusing you of stealing his name.
: Why does the other Bill Palmer seem evasive about his origins? I can trace him
: back to the old soc.culture.soviet newsgroup, but the trail stops there. Did
: he originate in that newsgroup, or are we talking about two other Bill Palmers
: here?
As far as we can figure out he is an escapee from the county home for the
criminally stupid. Of course, he may just be the failed experiment of a
rogue biologist who was trying to create an useful line of monkeys to be
helpers for the handicamped. Unfortunitly it turned out to be a nasty
little beast that is able to break out of it's cage and post to usenet.
When they finally catch on to him the decision to put him down will be
finalized.
: I would also like to know why that mentally disturbed person- Leech attacked me
: the last time I posted in alt.genius.bill-palmer. I
: thought the other Bill Palmer said _everyone_ was welcome, not just one
: little Bill Palmer.
This is an alcove of alt.flame you know; attack people is the "sport" we
practice here. Palmjob lies. That one little Bill Palmer has pretty
much sullied the reputations of Bill Palmers everywhere.
: Why did other Bill Palmer say there was something suspicious about my ending,
: "Balloons, Party Favors"?
Everything frightens Palmjob. It comes from being a village idiot. He's
always being jabed with pointy sticks so he thinks everything is a pionty
stick.
: What could be more _harmless_ than balloons and
: party favors, I would like to know?
Well, a wilyelp lame comes to mind.
: Ballons and party favors are a magical state of mind. Would the other Bill
: Palmer be more happy if I put "Drugs and Guns" in my closing?
He would be more happy if that nice person that lives on the other side
of his mirror would post followups to his incoherent drool.
: Can _somebody_ please tell me what is going on here?
I just did. I HTH.
--
A_A
John Davis (o o) Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC) observed:
----------oOO-(^)-OOo----------------------------------------------------
~ Democritus maintains that there can be no great poet
without a spite of madness.
APAPalm
>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
>Date: Wed, Feb 18, 1998 00:52 EST
>Message-id: <jrdavisE...@netcom.com>
>
>
None of this makes any sense. On two separate occasions I have asked some
questions about Bill Palmer, and both times all I have gotten back was a
lunatic tirade from somebody.
I thought this was supposed to be a humor newsgroup. The replies I have
received from that Davis and Leach-persom make it sound to me like a rant and
rave group! What has made these so angry it is almost like they are foaming
at the mouthpeople who are saying nothing at all?
Anway, I am not going anyplace. I am going to continue to challenge the other
Bill Palmer with my questions until I get a straight anwer, and I'll add some
new ones:
What terrible thing has the other Bill Palmer done to get so many
people ranting and raving about him? Further, why is it that these ranters
and ravers don't make any sense, so no can understand what they are so furious
about?
How many Bill Palmers are there on the net?
Did other Bill Palmer originate in soc.culture.soviet, because that is as far
back as I can track him in Dejanews? Did he start inside or outside the net?
Is he a string of computers like the magazine said, or is he a real person?
If he is a string of computers, why did the Russian and American scientists put
my name on entity?
Was there _really_ a bet between some young Russian and American millionaires
to see if they could create the most
popular 1977 newsgroup based on computer entity? Who
are they?
Why won' tthe other Bill Palmer answer his email? I have emailed him two
dozen times now. Does he filter out everyone named Bill Palmer?
Why does the other Bill Palmer say that my "balloons and party favors" ending
is suspicious? What could be more innocent that
balloons and party favors, I would like to know?
How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named in his honor?
Did he just waltz in and take it over? After all, I read in the magazine
where he denied that he started a.g.b-p. Maybe alt.genius.boy-palmer was named
for Bill Palmer the famous magician. Maybe he's just trying to get my glory
for himself. I want Bill Palmer to answer my questions.
Bill Palmer
!!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!
Balloons, Party Favors
wil...@ix.netcom.com
In <19980218194...@ladder02.news.aol.com> apa...@aol.com
(APAPalm) writes:
Listen, you. I'm getting damn sick and tired of this. First
it was "wilhelp" stealing, and now you are starting to steal
Bill Palmer, too!
>
>>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
>>From: jrd...@netcom.com (John Davis)
>>Date: Wed, Feb 18, 1998 00:52 EST
>>Message-id: <jrdavisE...@netcom.com>
>>
>>
>None of this makes any sense. On two separate occasions I have asked
some
>questions about Bill Palmer, and both times all I have gotten back was
a
>lunatic tirade from somebody.
Get a clue, will ya! That is what is SUPPOSED to happen.
This group is named for the World Champion of Flaming. You
seem to have it confused with alt.hug. If I didn't have
ninty percent of the flame world ranting and raving about
The Flame Giant, I would be a damn poor excuse for a world
champion, now wouldn't I?
"Clearly", you are either a fake named phony, or a naif about
the flame universe. Either you are Eskwired or you just happen
to write like Eskwired. That's an old tirck of his. He will
take a phony name and pop up asking innocent sounding questions
until he's got me tangled up wasting my time with him. It
ain't gonna happen again.
>
>I thought this was supposed to be a humor newsgroup. The replies I
have
>received from that Davis and Leach-persom make it sound to me like a
rant and
>rave group! What has made these so angry it is almost like they are
foaming
>at the mouthpeople who are saying nothing at all?
Try to understand that in the case of Davis you are dealing
with a flame world non-entity who has been toast on The
Giant's platter for over two years now. That can do
terrible things to people, as Pus Bag's mindlessly
crude rants bear witness. The other loser you
mentioned is either new toast on The Giant's platter,
or old toast sneaking back under a new name to avoid
being associated with his past humiliations. It happens
to you all the time, when you are the world champion
of flaming. Any more questions, Mr. Nosey?
>
>Anway, I am not going anyplace. I am going to continue to challenge
the other
>Bill Palmer with my questions until I get a straight answer,
I'm giving you straight answers, and you can like 'em
or lump 'em.
and I'll add some
>new ones:
>
>What terrible thing has the other Bill Palmer done to get so many
>people ranting and raving about him?
I've already explained that to you (above).
Further, why is it that these ranters
>and ravers don't make any sense, so no can understand what they are so
furious
>about?
>
>How many Bill Palmers are there on the net?
Well, why don't you just get busy and count 'em,
Mr. Question Mark? There's only one Bill Palmer
who is the World Champion of Flaming. If "Bill
Palmer" REALLY is YOUR name too, so what? That does
not give you any claim on alt.genius.bill-palmer,
which was named for me. After all, how would like
to find ME sitting in YOUR living room, merely on
the strength of my name being "Bill Palmer"? (That
is, assuming for argument's sake that your name IS
Bill Palmer, which I doubt.
>
>Did other Bill Palmer originate in soc.culture.soviet, because that is
as far
>back as I can track him in Dejanews? Did he start inside or outside
the net?
>Is he a string of computers like the magazine said, or is he a real
person?
>If he is a string of computers, why did the Russian and American
scientists put
>my name on entity?
String of cumputers indeed! Never saw such a gale of
horsefeathers; regular blizzard of 'em! Why, as everyone
reading this knows, I'm as solid as a rock. Most readers
would trust me with their life savings. All you are doing
is trying to plant suspicians, ESKWIRED, in order to get my
fans and readers to lose confidence in me. Don't deny it,
Mr. Sneak. I've exposed you before for what you are. I'll
do it again, mark my words.
>
>Was there _really_ a bet between some young Russian and American
millionaires
>to see if they could create the most
>popular 1977 newsgroup based on computer entity? Who
>are they?
Regualar horsefeather factory, aren't you? That magazine
you are babbling about went out of business suddenly, and
I can see why.
>
>Why won' tthe other Bill Palmer answer his email? I have emailed him
two
>dozen times now.
LISTEN YOU! To most people, that would be twenty-three times
too much. To me, that meant twenty-FOUR times too much, since
I don't like to be pestered by email jackanapes.
>Does he filter out everyone named Bill Palmer?
No, but if you don't stop pestering me, it may be
a good idea.
>
>Why does the other Bill Palmer say that my "balloons and party favors"
ending
>is suspicious? What could be more innocent that
>balloons and party favors, I would like to know?
Of course it is suspicious. It is one of the most suspicious
things I've ever seen. It doesn't connect with anything
at all. Is your point that you are SELLING "balloons and
party" favors? I must say, Eskwired, it suggests to me
you are using a cheerful-SOUNDING closing you made up to
try and appear innocent to catch people off guard. True,
"Balloons and Party Favors" SOUNDS innocent, but when you
really think about it, it makes no sense at all, and, frankly,
neither do you, unless, of course, your USUAL pseudo happens
to be "Eskwires".
>
>How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named in
his honor?
I was notifed of that by email from a very distinguished
person, known for his integrity and his many contributions
to Usenet culture. Satisfied?
> Did he just waltz in and take it over? After all, I read in the
magazine
>where he denied that he started a.g.b-p. Maybe alt.genius.boy-palmer
was named
>for Bill Palmer the famous magician.
I don't know anything about any magician named Bill Palmer.
If such a personage exists at all, I somehow suspect he's
no David Copperfield, since I've never heard of him, so
your "famous" proves questionable in and of itself.
>Maybe he's just trying to get my glory
>for himself. I want Bill Palmer to answer my questions.
You got 'em. Now SHUT UP or risk a gigantic boot to the rear!
I've my hands full with fake "wilhelps." Fake "Bill Palmers"
I don't need!
>
>Bill Palmer
>
> !!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!
> Balloons, Party Favors
wilhelp
alt.genius.bill-palmer
>
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 18-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the
Other Bill P.. by billshit bill pal...@ix.netcom.com
[...] palmer spewage snipped for decency's sake
Fascinating. In this particular contribution billshit bill palmer
panicks, executes a hasty about-face, and runs like hell, and insodoing
all but admits to his racism. He also concedes to his many detractors
that in reality, he can neither think nor flame. i for one must agree
with the depends undergarment wearing stump of a boy, the subliterate,
un-toilet trained soiler of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so to
speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems. But
even so, this is at least a start. Right?
P.S. i just thought i'd try the billshit bill palmer technique of
deleting away everything one's opponent writes and then just making
things up as one goes along. That sort of thing.
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/
Goin' Nova
In article <6cfilb$3...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>, wil...@ix.netcom.com ()
wrote:
> In <19980218194...@ladder02.news.aol.com> apa...@aol.com
> (APAPalm) writes:
>
> Listen, you. I'm getting damn sick and tired of this. First
> it was "wilhelp" stealing, and now you are starting to steal
> Bill Palmer, too!
> >
> >>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
> >>From: jrd...@netcom.com (John Davis)
> >>Date: Wed, Feb 18, 1998 00:52 EST
> >>Message-id: <jrdavisE...@netcom.com>
> >>
> >>
> >None of this makes any sense. On two separate occasions I have asked
> some
> >questions about Bill Palmer, and both times all I have gotten back was
> a
> >lunatic tirade from somebody.
>
> Get a clue, will ya! That is what is SUPPOSED to happen.
> This group is named for the World Champion of Flaming. You
When will the real Bill Palmer show up and not this pathetic psudeo
that claims to be him?
<snicker>
> seem to have it confused with alt.hug. If I didn't have
> ninty percent of the flame world ranting and raving about
> The Flame Giant, I would be a damn poor excuse for a world
> champion, now wouldn't I?
Please supply the calculations you used to derive "90% of the flame world"
and, yes, you are a poor excuse. For just about any category anyone can
think of...
Liar. <snicker>
>
> "Clearly", you are either a fake named phony, or a naif about
> the flame universe. Either you are Eskwired or you just happen
> to write like Eskwired. That's an old tirck of his. He will
> take a phony name and pop up asking innocent sounding questions
> until he's got me tangled up wasting my time with him. It
> ain't gonna happen again.
Oh well, that shakes it, then. Palmer has declared you to be someone
else, so it must be so. <snicker> Run out of "Hausmann" name
tags? <guffaw>
> >
> >I thought this was supposed to be a humor newsgroup. The replies I
> have
> >received from that Davis and Leach-persom make it sound to me like a
> rant and
> >rave group! What has made these so angry it is almost like they are
> foaming
> >at the mouthpeople who are saying nothing at all?
>
> Try to understand that in the case of Davis you are dealing
> with a flame world non-entity who has been toast on The
> Giant's platter for over two years now. That can do
> terrible things to people, as Pus Bag's mindlessly
> crude rants bear witness. The other loser you
> mentioned is either new toast on The Giant's platter,
> or old toast sneaking back under a new name to avoid
> being associated with his past humiliations. It happens
> to you all the time, when you are the world champion
> of flaming. Any more questions, Mr. Nosey?
<snicker>
> >
> >Anway, I am not going anyplace. I am going to continue to challenge
> the other
> >Bill Palmer with my questions until I get a straight answer,
>
> I'm giving you straight answers, and you can like 'em
> or lump 'em.
>
Or shove 'em up Biil's ass like everyone else does...
> and I'll add some
> >new ones:
> >
> >What terrible thing has the other Bill Palmer done to get so many
> >people ranting and raving about him?
>
> I've already explained that to you (above).
>
> Further, why is it that these ranters
> >and ravers don't make any sense, so no can understand what they are so
> furious
> >about?
> >
> >How many Bill Palmers are there on the net?
>
> Well, why don't you just get busy and count 'em,
> Mr. Question Mark? There's only one Bill Palmer
> who is the World Champion of Flaming. If "Bill
And you're not him, you nasty, nasty pseudo. <snicker>
> Palmer" REALLY is YOUR name too, so what? That does
> not give you any claim on alt.genius.bill-palmer,
> which was named for me. After all, how would like
> to find ME sitting in YOUR living room, merely on
> the strength of my name being "Bill Palmer"? (That
> is, assuming for argument's sake that your name IS
> Bill Palmer, which I doubt.
Denial. Only one Biil Palmer. Check.
> >
> >Did other Bill Palmer originate in soc.culture.soviet, because that is
> as far
> >back as I can track him in Dejanews? Did he start inside or outside
> the net?
> >Is he a string of computers like the magazine said, or is he a real
> person?
> >If he is a string of computers, why did the Russian and American
> scientists put
> >my name on entity?
>
> String of cumputers indeed! Never saw such a gale of
> horsefeathers; regular blizzard of 'em! Why, as everyone
> reading this knows, I'm as solid as a rock. Most readers
Dumb, not solid.
> would trust me with their life savings. All you are doing
> is trying to plant suspicians, ESKWIRED, in order to get my
> fans and readers to lose confidence in me. Don't deny it,
> Mr. Sneak. I've exposed you before for what you are. I'll
> do it again, mark my words.
The only thing exposed is your incontenance, err, incompetance.
> >
> >Was there _really_ a bet between some young Russian and American
> millionaires
> >to see if they could create the most
> >popular 1977 newsgroup based on computer entity? Who
> >are they?
>
> Regualar horsefeather factory, aren't you? That magazine
> you are babbling about went out of business suddenly, and
> I can see why.
> >
> >Why won' tthe other Bill Palmer answer his email? I have emailed him
> two
> >dozen times now.
>
> LISTEN YOU! To most people, that would be twenty-three times
> too much. To me, that meant twenty-FOUR times too much, since
> I don't like to be pestered by email jackanapes.
At least you've read them. <snicker>
>
> >Does he filter out everyone named Bill Palmer?
>
> No, but if you don't stop pestering me, it may be
> a good idea.
> >
> >Why does the other Bill Palmer say that my "balloons and party favors"
> ending
> >is suspicious? What could be more innocent that
> >balloons and party favors, I would like to know?
>
> Of course it is suspicious. It is one of the most suspicious
> things I've ever seen. It doesn't connect with anything
> at all. Is your point that you are SELLING "balloons and
> party" favors? I must say, Eskwired, it suggests to me
> you are using a cheerful-SOUNDING closing you made up to
> try and appear innocent to catch people off guard. True,
> "Balloons and Party Favors" SOUNDS innocent, but when you
> really think about it, it makes no sense at all, and, frankly,
> neither do you, unless, of course, your USUAL pseudo happens
> to be "Eskwires".
Don't do much web-surfing, do ya?
> >
> >How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named in
> his honor?
>
> I was notifed of that by email from a very distinguished
> person, known for his integrity and his many contributions
> to Usenet culture. Satisfied?
He, as usual, made it up.
>
> > Did he just waltz in and take it over? After all, I read in the
> magazine
> >where he denied that he started a.g.b-p. Maybe alt.genius.boy-palmer
> was named
> >for Bill Palmer the famous magician.
>
> I don't know anything about any magician named Bill Palmer.
> If such a personage exists at all, I somehow suspect he's
> no David Copperfield, since I've never heard of him, so
> your "famous" proves questionable in and of itself.
>
Alt-vista, Yahoo or another favorite web-search may give you a clue, teflon
biil.
> >Maybe he's just trying to get my glory
> >for himself. I want Bill Palmer to answer my questions.
>
> You got 'em. Now SHUT UP or risk a gigantic boot to the rear!
> I've my hands full with fake "wilhelps." Fake "Bill Palmers"
> I don't need!
Psst. wilhelp is his <snicker> word for penis. "Fake Bill Palmers" is his secret
phrase for vagina.
the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience
wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
> <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
[...]
> of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
> >quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so
> to
> >speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
>
> Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
> University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
> others!
Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
- the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience -=-=-=- -- . --- .-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=
a.f.k-m.n "They (people?) have a right to have you removed
alt.flame from their drives. You don't own them."
mhm 15x12 - Stan Kalisch III, UDP Artist
FOA/KoB(h) 13 February 1997
- http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
D. C. & M. V. Sessions
Goin' Nova wrote:
> In article <6cfilb$3...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>, wil...@ix.netcom.com ()
> wrote:
> > In <19980218194...@ladder02.news.aol.com> apa...@aol.com
> > (APAPalm) writes:
> > >None of this makes any sense. On two separate occasions I have asked
> > some
> > >questions about Bill Palmer, and both times all I have gotten back was
> > a
> > >lunatic tirade from somebody.
> >
> > Get a clue, will ya! That is what is SUPPOSED to happen.
Guffaw! Couldn't have been posted by anyone with the
intelligence of a radish. One of the only things Palmoff
has ever written that's worth saving.
> When will the real Bill Palmer show up and not this pathetic psudeo
> that claims to be him?
Well, folks, it looks like idiocy is contagious.
Palmoff *is* a pathetic pseudo.
--
D. C. & M. V. Sessions
sess...@primenet.com
wil...@ix.netcom.com
>
>Fascinating. [...]
Yes, Wormy Wilkes, your addiction to soiled undergarments
IS "fascinating" in a repugnant way, as are MANY morbid
manifestations of subhumanity such as yourself.
It's just as I said, Wormy. Anyone can go back through
your postings and see that you are rarely but a few lines
away from your favorite topics. What I don't understand
is why you are so proud about it. Yes, Wormy, we live
in a liberated day and age, but let us hope that most
folks are never so "liberated" to do other than shake
their heads in dismay at your incredibly shabby and
sordid predilections.
>In this particular contribution billshit bill palmer
>panicks, executes a hasty about-face, and runs like hell, and
insodoing
>all but admits to his racism.
And of couse, a shabby soiled undgergarment fetishist
such as Wormy Wilkes WOULD jump on a racist libel
bandwagon when cornered and prodded a bit with the
proverbial twenty foot pole.
He also concedes to his many detractors
>that in reality, he can neither think nor flame. i for one must agree
>with the depends undergarment wearing
There Wormy goes again, for the 10,000 time!
>stump of a boy, the subliterate,
>un-toilet trained soiler
Now, where have we heard THAT sordid scenario, if not
in every other post by Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes?!!!
of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
>quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so
to
>speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
others! "Whatcha got in the suitcase, Wormy?" (According
to campus legend, the C. M. cops have asked "Wormy" that
question more than once when he was observed hastening
out of a dormitory with some bulging luggage...)
wilhelp
The 2-Belo. Meow.
This just in from the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience
<rao...@revival.bungmunch.edu> by direct wire:
>wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>
>> In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
>> <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>
>[...]
>
>> of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
>> >quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so
>> to
>> >speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
>>
>> Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
>> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
>> University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
>> others!
>
>Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
Hyenas are scavengers, feeding only on the dead.... hmmm....
--
MEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOWMEOW
EOWM The 2-Belo EOWM
OWME the2belo@wilhelp!com OWME
WMEO http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~the2belo/ WMEO
MEOWMEOWALTFLAMEALTFANKARLMALDENNOSEALTLIFESUCKSMEOWMEOW
CASHP #32-97 IDVS MEOVV CAVEAS
"There is a difference between those who steal the
internet resources of others to turn a profit and
those who neurotically seek the attention of large
crowds of strangers. To tar Raoul Xemblinosky in
the same batch as Sanford Wallace is unjust. As
long as this is being done there will be protest."
-balloo, in defense of Usenet Performance Art
December 19, 1997
Gilbert T. Sullivan
The 2-Belo KKK'er wrote:
>
> This just in from the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience
> <rao...@revival.bungmunch.edu> by direct wire:
>
> >wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
> >> <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
> >> >quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so
> >> to
> >> >speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
> >>
> >> Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
> >> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
> >> University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
> >> others!
> >
> >Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
>
> Hyenas are scavengers, feeding only on the dead.... hmmm....
--
the2...@defl.bungmunch.edu (The
2-Belo)<34c189ec...@decaxp.BUNGMUNCH.EDU>
Thu, 15 Jan 1998 wrote:
I cannot see for shit.
--
2-Belo says in:
<34eb9463...@news.bungmunch.edu>
"HELP PREVENT POLICE BRUTALITY: KILL A COP!"
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 19-Feb-98 Re: He's Off!
"Wormy" Wilk.. by blithering billshit billy-boy bill palmer the penile
@ix.netcom.com
[...] palmjob's rambling, incoherent, barely literate attempt at some
form of communication excised.
Poor, poor befuddled bill palmer. i mean, he tries so terribly hard, but
he falls so very short every time. He swells, he jiggles, he turns red
with rage, he breaks into a sweat, he angrily wiggles his limp little
penis, he threateningly puffs his little empty scrotum, he dances about
in frenzi, wriggling obscenely, desperate for even a moment's attention.
But then if you turn and whisper "boo" to him, he loses complete control
of his bowels and cuts loose, much to the chagrin of his long-suffering
handlers, those charged with changing his depends undergarments.
One wonders, what could inspire such absurd responses?
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/
D. C. & M. V. Sessions
the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience wrote:
> wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
> > <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
> > Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
> > Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
> > University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
> > others!
>
> Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
No, it's his favorite subject of old. He's trying
phonics now, and guessed that 'hyiene' was the way
to spell HY-NEE, or as the rest of us write it,
'hiney'.
The 2-Belo. Meow.
This just in from "Gilbert T. Sullivan" <xqpe...@irrelevant.not> by direct
wire:
>The 2-Belo KKK'er wrote:
>>
>> This just in from the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience
>> <rao...@revival.bungmunch.edu> by direct wire:
>>
>> >wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
>> >> <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >> of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
>> >> >quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy comes clean, er, that is, so
>> >> to
>> >> >speak. i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
>> >>
>> >> Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
>> >> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
>> >> University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
>> >> others!
>> >
>> >Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
>>
>> Hyenas are scavengers, feeding only on the dead.... hmmm....
>
>Suck that ass.-BuFFooN
Shag that sheep.-YhbT
john d.
wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
: It ain't gonna happen again.
That's what your mom said after she gave me a 2-for-the-price-of-1
discount, the last time I fucked her.
balloo
"Gilbert T. Sullivan" <xqpe...@irrelevant.not> escribió en artículo:
>The 2-Belo KKK'er wrote:
>> This just in from the Raoul Xemblinosky Experience
>> <rao...@revival.bungmunch.edu> by direct wire:
>> >wil...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> >> In <0outFj200...@andrew.cmu.edu> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes
>> >> <gv...@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
>> >[...]
>> >> > of legitimate newsgroups. Finally, the
>> >> >quivering, jiggly little stump of a boy
>> >> >comes clean, er, that is, so to speak.
>> >> > i mean, he still has yet to address his hygiene problems.
>> >>
>> >> Ironic. A "connoiseur" of soiled undergarments known as
>> >> Gilbert Vanburen "Wormy" Wilkes of Carnegie-Mellon
>> >> University drools about fanciful "hyiene" problems in
>> >> others!
>> >Got hyenas on the brain, Biil?
>> Hyenas are scavengers, feeding only on the dead.... hmmm....
>Suck that ass.-BuFFooN
Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
--
coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com
jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow
Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan
balloo wrote:
> Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
--
Reuben King says in:
<MPG.f4da2e08...@news.alt.net>
"Does anyone have any SMACK? I need SMACK!"
"I need more drugs because I'm an AddicT"
"I don't have a job and I live in a box because I'm an AddicT"
"My crackpipe is beautiful"
"You know what pisses me off? When I buy a 1/4 bag and can't find my
FRIGGIN LIGHTER!!!!"
*************** No Wonder He's a Mess**********************
Raoul J. Xemblinosky III, Th.D.
Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
>
> balloo wrote:
>
> > Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
>
> Be quiet.-MeNtalCasE
Yeah! You don't have to put up with that! Kick him out of the Nose,
just like you did to me!
- Raoul J. Xemblinosky III, Th.D. =-=-=-=- -- . --- .-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=
a.f.k-m.n "So Raoul, get ready to pack your bags and
alt.flame leave the nose." -- BiiLberT, 1 May 1997
mhm 15x12 "Your days as an UseNet performance artist
FOA/KoB(h) are at a close." -- BiiLberT, 5 Dec 1997
- http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Gilbert T. Sullivan
Raoul Joint Xemblinosky the KKK'er wrote:
>
> Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > balloo wrote:
> >
> > > Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
> >
> > Be quiet.-MeNtalCasE
>
> Yeah! You don't have to put up with that! Kick him out of the Nose,
> just like you did to me!
--
In article <34B0C0...@consensus.bungmunch.edu>,
Raoul stated:
I started out on burgundy, but soon hit the harder stuff.
"Raoul F. Xemblinosky III" <rao...@jsltd.bungmunch.edu>
<33E894...@jsltd.bungmunch.edu>
Now cut that out, Dave. It's well known that I'm a lesbian.
--
Raoul says:
<34EBC6...@revival.bungmunch.edu>
A cheap vodka hangover is the absolute worst.
Colonel Editor in chief
Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
> Raoul Joint Xemblinosky the KKK'er wrote:
> >
> > Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
> > >
> > > balloo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
> > >
> > > Be quiet.-MeNtalCasE
> >
> > Yeah! You don't have to put up with that! Kick him out of the Nose,
> > just like you did to me!
>
> The nose needs an enema.-AlcoHoliC
>
> Ain't that what you said last year?-SpunkmonkeY
Raoul J. Xemblinosky III, Th.D.
He said a lot of things last year. None of which came true.-LiaR
Doctor Doom
"Raoul J. Xemblinosky III, Th.D." <rao...@windigo.bungmunch.edu>
wrote:
>Colonel Editor in chief wrote:
>> Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
>> > The nose needs an enema.-AlcoHoliC
>> >
>>Ain't that what you said last year?-SpunkmonkeY
>
>He said a lot of things last year. None of which came true.-LiaR
He said you would hide in the nose for most of the year.
He is right so far....
[Off topic groups snipped]
-
DOCTOR DOOM www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~thorne
Member of HELL FLAME WARS
"We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million
typewriters will eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare.
Now thanks to the residents of the nose, we know this is not true"
APAPalm
Hey!
I want to know just what the hell is going on in this group!
Now.
Everytime I try to ask the other Bill Palmer a few questions, somebody else
pops up and starts raving.
This does not make any sense to me.
This is enough to drive anyone crazy!
I've heard from several different people and I've read several
different answers. None of them seemed to have much to do with
the other Bill Palmer.
People were just venting some things deep inside them.
But I just can't seem to get a clear focus on this other Bill Palmer.
There is something mighty peculiar going on.
People need to be more cheerful. I don't care what color people are. After
all, do people have to be all one color to be famous?
I always say life is like balloons; balloons are all different colors too and
that's what makes them nice.
People should be happy and think about colored balloons when they start to
feel down. Then we wouldn't have so much trouble.
That's my philosophy and I'm glad to share it with you. Won't cost you a
nickel.
Anyway, I still have some questions for the other Bill Palmer.
And I'm not going any place.
Roger Williams
APAPalm <apa...@aol.com> wrote:
> Hey!
> I want to know just what the hell is going on in this group!
> Now.
Uh, have you tried "reading" it?
> Everytime I try to ask the other Bill Palmer a few questions, somebody else
> pops up and starts raving.
Ok. Read the articles from wil...@ix.netcom.com (aka, "Bill Palmer")
and see if you can figure out why the fulltime activity in this newsgroup
is flaming him within an inch of his life. If you need help, just ask.
> This does not make any sense to me.
Is it the multisyllabic words that are confusing you?
> This is enough to drive anyone crazy!
Hmm. Your insanity threshold seems to be lower than mine. That's ok.
> I've heard from several different people and I've read several
> different answers. None of them seemed to have much to do with
> the other Bill Palmer.
What answers did you get that weren't about the "other" Bill Palmer?
If you want the most volume of text about the "other" Bill Palmer, just
try and read the posts from the "other" Bill Palmer. It should be pretty
easy to find, since the "other" Bill Palmer is his own favorite topic.
> People were just venting some things deep inside them.
Actually, it's called 'flaming". Would a primer lesson help?
> But I just can't seem to get a clear focus on this other Bill Palmer.
> There is something mighty peculiar going on.
Oh yeah. Without doubt.
> People need to be more cheerful. I don't care what color people are. After
> all, do people have to be all one color to be famous?
Who's famous? Bill Palmer? Maybe the Bill Palmer at www.billpalmer.com,
but not the one that hangs out here.
> I always say life is like balloons; balloons are all different colors too and
> that's what makes them nice.
> People should be happy and think about colored balloons when they start to
> feel down. Then we wouldn't have so much trouble.
Aw. That was nice.
> That's my philosophy and I'm glad to share it with you. Won't cost you a
> nickel.
A nickel saved is a nickel earned, you know.
> Anyway, I still have some questions for the other Bill Palmer.
Just ask them here then. However, I would caution you to make sure you
have about 45 megabytes of free space available on your hard drive before
you download his response.
> And I'm not going any place.
Neither is the "other" Bill Palmer <snicker>.
> Bill Palmer
I think I'll call you "the ORIGINAL Bill Palmer". I think that has a
nice ring to it...
> !!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!
Indeed!
> Balloons, Party Favors
Can you make a parrot out of balloons? I'd like to see that...
--
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{} \|/
{} RogerW rog...@newsguy.com {} 0< -- Ljutefisk!
{} http://www.parrot.net ad...@parrot.net {} ^^^^(*)^^^^
{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{} ^^ / \ ^^
balloo
>Colonel Editor in chief wrote:
>>
>> Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> > Raoul Joint Xemblinosky the KKK'er wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > balloo wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
>> > > >
>> > > > Be quiet.-MeNtalCasE
>> > >
>> > > Yeah! You don't have to put up with that! Kick him out of the Nose,
>> > > just like you did to me!
>> >
>> > The nose needs an enema.-AlcoHoliC
>> >
>>Ain't that what you said last year?-SpunkmonkeY
>
>He said a lot of things last year. None of which came true.-LiaR
Yes, but Giblet said them with love.
APAPalm
>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer?
>Date: Mon, Feb 23, 1998 05:45 EST
>Message-id: <6crk0e$6...@enews1.newsguy.com>
>
>
HEY LOOK!
This whole thing gets as crazy a circus bozo who's been inhaling something
that was supposed to go into the balloons!
All I've done is ask a few simple questions about the other guy named Bill
Palmer. I've heard about five answers and each one sounded nuttier than the
one before it!.
The magazine said alt.genius.bill-palmer was a rollicking newsgroup, but it
seems to me that _rollicking_ is not the word for it! Nutty as a tin roof
sundae would be better description!
Pus Bag! Louse-monkey! Cockroach Roger Williams! Human Leech this and
parasite that! Where the hell do these characters
come from?
Is this all a big put on?
Is the other Bill Palmer writing all those wacky _anti-Palmer_
posts?!!! That's what _I'd_ like to know because none of it makes a lick of
sense. _Unless_ some folks are trying to make some of kind of great big freak
show of the mind, or sort of what we used to call a Hall of Mirrors with some
guy wearing a different clown
mask peering back out of every mirror, laughing at everydody
all the time?
I'll ask again, and I wan't the other Bill Palmer to anwer since it is getting
more and more clear to me that _he's_ likely the only one with a clue about
what is going on in alt.genius.bill-palmer.
_If_, I mean, he's a real person and not just a string of computers
witing all this stuff from people who are _supposedly_ trying
to tell me about the other Bill Palmer but don't make no sense.
Sometimes I feel like I'm trying to guess what is under the walnut
shell, but everytime I look under the walnut shell nothing is there!
Then I look under another walnut shell and nothing is there either.
If you have not guessed my meaning, the walnut shells are these
nutty posts that keep showing up from people who tell me they
are going to about the other Bill Palmer and then they just squawk
like a flock of chickens I've just pulled out of my hat!
Somebody's pulling a few strings. I want to know who it is!
This could be affecting my business, and as Bill Palmer I have a right to ask a
few questions.
The other Bill Palmer won't answer my e-mail.
An all I geti this newsgroup are crazy chicken-squawks from people who plainly
don't know any more about the other Bill Palmer than they know about what was
in the old Barnum Museum before it burned down! <I know.but it is my business
to know.>
HEY! I would like a few anwers, please---from the other Bill Palmer or from
any _sane_ party.
Bill Palmer
!!!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!
Balloons, Party FAvors
Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 24-Feb-98 Re: He's
Branching Out... .. by bal...@lloo.at.wilhelp.d
>
> >Colonel Editor in chief wrote:
> >>
> >> Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
> >>
> >> > Raoul Joint Xemblinosky the KKK'er wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Dr. Gilbert T. Sullivan wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > balloo wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Block that kick! Jump that sheep! GoooooooOOOOOO GIBLET!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Be quiet.-MeNtalCasE
> >> > >
> >> > > Yeah! You don't have to put up with that! Kick him out of the Nose,
> >> > > just like you did to me!
> >> >
> >> > The nose needs an enema.-AlcoHoliC
> >> >
> >>Ain't that what you said last year?-SpunkmonkeY
> >
> >He said a lot of things last year. None of which came true.-LiaR
>
> Yes, but Giblet said them with love.
He's a very loving little boy. i should take him to the vet and have him
fixed.
> --> coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
> ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com
> jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow
> http://www.blarg.net/~balloo/flonk/index.html meow
http://english-server.hss.cmu.edu/home/wilkes/