Someone has been using my name on the net, and I am trying to find out more about what is behind all this.. I read about this newsgroup, and I thought I might get some answers here.
From what I have seen, this group is based on enterainment, and I have noticed some great flames, lots of humorous stuff, and all kinds of neat creative writing. I don't think there has ever been a newgroup like this one, so I can see why it has become so popular.
As the real Bill Palmer, though, I have a question or two for regular readers and posters. Who is Bill Palmer? Is he real, or is all this just a put on? I read in a magazine article that he was simply a bunch of computers that a some Russian and American computer experts hooked together for fun. If so why did they choose my name for their program?
I also read that part of all this was a million-dollar bet to see if they could create the most popular Usenet newsgroup of 1997 with the right program. Was anyone paid on this bet, or was the whole thing a put-on that got out of control?
Are all these "wilhelp" posts by the same person? Where did "wilhelp" come from anyway, and how does it connect with this newsgroup?
!!!!! ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!! * Party Favors, Balloons*
> Someone has been using my name > on the net, and I am trying to find > out more about what is behind all > this.
I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net, and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
> From what I have seen, this group > is based on entertainment
If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours 'entertainment'....
> I don't think there has ever been > a newsgroup like this one, so > I can see why it has become > so popular.
Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk., alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa, alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl, alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa, rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda yadda yadda........
> As the real Bill Palmer, I have > a question or two for regular > readers and posters.
Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the next post...
> Who is Bill Palmer?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
If you really want to know, here's a good place to start:
Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
>Is he real, or is he just a put-on?
Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of
computers...
But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
But nothing surprises me anymore, and I have wondered myself if the racist windbag known as Palmjob isn't just a highly-evolved 'Bot......
Or a 'Bot working with occasional human support, kind of like the humans that set the various settings before Deep Thought goes into a chess match.....
ObTournamentPoolDarkhorseAdvisory: Archie Leach thinks that the #15-ranked Michigan State Spartan men's basketball team can go a long ways in the NCAA Tournament if Jason Klein gets hot from three-point range...
>ubject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer? >From: stucopel...@webtv.net (Archie Leach) >Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 19:54 EST >Message-id: <6bo8gb$jv...@newsd-163.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
>In a previous post, APAPalm the aoloser wrote:
Just who the hell is this lunatic? I ask a couple of questions and someone breaks up my lines. Then he makes a bunch of stupid little remarks that don't make any sense at all.
>> Someone has been using my name >> on the net, and I am trying to find >> out more about what is behind all >> this.
What is the joke about making all my lines short? Sorry, but I guess I'm not with it.
>I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net, >and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously >you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
I ask a couple of questions and I get THAT? Who is this guy anyway? Just what is the big joke here? There may be several Bill Palmers on the net, but I am one of them and think I have the right to ask what is going on. I'm getting email inteneded for this nut, and none of it makes a lick of sense..
>> From what I have seen, this group >> is based on entertainment
>If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours >'entertainment'....
I don't really like that name "Palmjob". A kid called me that when I was in the third grade. I fractured his skull. No real Palmer likes a name like that Did the otherBill Palmer tell you it was okay for you to call him that name?
>> I don't think there has ever been >> a newsgroup like this one, so >> I can see why it has become >> so popular.
>Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp, >alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil, >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk., >alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa, >alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl, >alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa, >rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda >yadda yadda........
Not what I read in the newsgroup announcement in AOL. They said alt.genius.bill-palmer was a uniqe newsgroup based on creative writing, flaming, and humor. What kind of a group is this? Why do I get insulted for asking a couple of questions?
>> As the real Bill Palmer, I have >> a question or two for regular >> readers and posters.
>Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as >well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the >next post...
>> Who is Bill Palmer?
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
Please explain. I don't get the joke. Is everyone "Bill Palmer" or something?
>If you really want to know, here's a good >place to start:
What would a website by someone who is not "Bill Palmer" possibly have to tell me about this famous group? How do I know the guy at that site isn't an enemy of the other Bill Palmer? Might as well ask the Man in the Moon about Bill Palmer, I guess, unless you can direct me to the official Bill Palmer website and I can't seem to find that.
>But here's the short of it all:
>Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
Funny, I just read an article called "Racist Drivel Unwelcome In alt.genius.bill-palmer". Are you saying that article is a forgery? It said the opposite of what you are saying here.
>>Is he real, or is he just a put-on?
>Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of >PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
I DID read "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in alt.genius.bill-palmer. It was written by someone calling himself wilhelp Bill Palmer and his anti-racist message seemed very clear. I still don't get your joke at all. Are you saying all this a big "put on" and there is really no other Bill Palmer?
>>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of >computers...
>But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the >world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
I don't follow you at all. Why do you make my sentences so short?
>But nothing surprises me anymore, and I have wondered myself if the >racist windbag
No, that's not what I read in "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in alt.genius.bill-palmer". I ask again if that article was a forgery.
known as Palmjob isn't just a highly-evolved 'Bot......
What I thought was interesting was when the magazine says the whole thing was part of million dollar bet between the Russian and American millionaires that the computer team could create a newsgroup that would become the most popular one of 1997.
Can you refer me to some articles in the group that discuss that angle of Bill Palmer? Is he a Russian person? I am finding some interesting things but a lot of gaps. Things that don't add up. Roads that go no place. That's why I asked the readers for help, and all I get this one mental problem person who makes my sentences short and says lots of bad things that make no sense. I've got a right to know whothe other Bill Palmer is because that is my name too and it's starting to affect my life..
>Or a 'Bot working with occasional human support, kind of like the humans >that set the various settings before Deep Thought goes into a chess >match.....
>ObTournamentPoolDarkhorseAdvisory: Archie Leach thinks that the >#15-ranked Michigan State Spartan men's basketball team
Is this other Bill Palmer a Michigan State Spartan computer? I don't understand the joke.
can go a long
>ways in the NCAA Tournament if Jason Klein gets hot from three-point >range...
I think something funny is going on here. I've got a right to know about it. I have emailed the other Bill Palmer but no one ever responds. Can anyone explain what is going on here?
Bill Palmer
!!! ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!! *Balloons Party Favors*
Christ in hell, you're even more obnoxious than the "other' Biiil Palmer......
Asshole....go find out for your fucking self, you somehow magically summoned your head from your colon to figure out how to put your horseshit magician's site on the web......scumbag troll....
In article <19980210080201.DAA13...@ladder03.news.aol.com>, apap...@aol.com (APAPalm) wrote:
> >ubject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer? > >From: stucopel...@webtv.net (Archie Leach) > >Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 19:54 EST > >Message-id: <6bo8gb$jv...@newsd-163.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
> >In a previous post, APAPalm the aoloser wrote:
> Just who the hell is this lunatic? I ask a couple of questions and someone > breaks up my lines. Then he makes a bunch of stupid little remarks that don't > make any sense at all.
They make perfectly good sense, fuckwit. And I broke up your fucking lines because I was using my WEBTV browser at the time, and WEBTV does not currently support a "Quote text" feature on its Usenet browser, you hyperactive, egotistical piece of rhinocerous shit....
> >> Someone has been using my name > >> on the net, and I am trying to find > >> out more about what is behind all > >> this.
> What is the joke about making all my lines short? Sorry, but I guess I'm not > with it.
No, you're not with it, and what's more, you're not sorry, you're pathetic.
> >I would remark that there are probably several Bill Palmers on the 'net, > >and I would rub your nose in your own fecal stupidity, but obviously > >you're trolling for dullards, so....um.....anyway.
> I ask a couple of questions and I get THAT? Who is this guy anyway?
And I make a few smart-ass remarks and I get this poltroon blind-siding me for flaming the Original Palmjob....
> Just > what is the big joke here?
That you're a Grubor alias?
> There may be several Bill Palmers on the net, but > I am one of them and think I have the > right to ask what is going on. I'm getting email inteneded for this nut, and > none of it makes a lick of sense..
Well, then change your name. Or learn how to read....
> >> From what I have seen, this group > >> is based on entertainment
> >If you call spanking Palmjob off the 'net once every 102.6 hours > >'entertainment'....
> I don't really like that name "Palmjob". A kid called me that when I was in > the third grade. I fractured his skull. No real Palmer likes a name like that > Did the otherBill Palmer tell you it was okay for you to call him that name?
No. Doctoring names is a flaming tradition, Palmjob2. If you don't like it, then I guess you can come find me and fracture my skull, you psychotic piece of crystal-meth-whiffing trash. But 10-20 in Jackson State Prison would kinda put a bummer on your magic career, eh?
As if you won't get busted sooner or later for molesting eight-year-olds at their birthday parties......oops. Sorry. Didn't mean to steal a classic Grubor riff there.....
> >> I don't think there has ever been > >> a newsgroup like this one, so > >> I can see why it has become > >> so popular.
> >Except for alt.flame, alt.flame.niggers, alt.butt.harp, > >alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.stupid-ass.bill-palmer, alt.evil, > >alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk., > >alt.nuke.the.USA, aus.flame, aus.flame.usa, > >alt.life.sucks, alt.college.college-bowl, > >alt.college.college-meow, rec.org.mensa, > >rec.arts.prose, talk.abortion, alt.flame.abortion, yadda yadda yadda > >yadda yadda........
> Not what I read in the newsgroup announcement in AOL. They said > alt.genius.bill-palmer was a uniqe newsgroup based on creative writing, > flaming, and humor. What kind of a group is this? Why do I get insulted for > asking a couple of questions?
Because you're almost as much of an idiot, Palmjob2, as the original Palmjob.
> >> As the real Bill Palmer, I have > >> a question or two for regular > >> readers and posters.
> >Does this question apply for our constipated readers and posters as > >well? If not, then I guess Big Daddy Zeus might as well click for the > >next post...
> >> Who is Bill Palmer?
> >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
> >Funny you should ask. Biiiiil Palmer?
> Please explain. I don't get the joke. Is everyone "Bill Palmer" or > something?
I hope not. It's bad enough that you're Bill Palmer.
> >If you really want to know, here's a good > >place to start:
> What would a website by someone who is not "Bill Palmer" possibly have to tell > me about this famous group?
Listen, you indignant trolling asshole, it's clear that you're either really, really ignorant, or otherwise you're really, really expert at trolling, and figuring that you're an aol-er, I'm guessing that you're a hookwormed old crank.
What I said was that the site listed above was a place to start.
There are many other places to find info on Palmjob.....or the combination of Russian and American hackers and software and hardware that masquerades as the world's Most Boring Racist--DumbFucK
> How do I know > the guy at that site isn't an enemy of the other Bill Palmer? Might as well > ask the Man in the Moon about Bill Palmer, I guess, unless > you can direct me to the official Bill Palmer website and I can't seem to find > that.
Sounds like a personal problem to me...
> >But here's the short of it all:
> >Bill Palmer is a racist windbag and a cowardly piece of chickenshit.
> Funny, I just read an article called "Racist Drivel Unwelcome In > alt.genius.bill-palmer". Are you saying that article is a forgery? It > said the opposite of what you are saying here.
I would advise you to judge the situation for yourself, but that might take quite a lot of time for an ignorant fool like yourself to accomplish--and all that time taken might squeeze out other things on your schedule, like your weekly volunteering session at the School for the Blind during which you go find the most disabled of the blind students and take him into one of the cleaning closets and give him a good old-fashioned ass-rape...
Usenet doesn't need trash like you around. There's far too many kooks roaming around the various newsgroups, as it stands right now.
If you want to pollute the 'net with your inconsequential, deranged rambling, why don't you find an appropriate group, like, for instance, alt.support.boy-lovers.
In the meantime, make like a magician and disappear.
> >Were you hallucinating when you browsed through those dozens of > >PalmKKKrap (tm) messages?
> I DID read "Racist Drivel Unwelcome in alt.genius.bill-palmer. > It was written by someone calling himself wilhelp Bill Palmer and > his anti-racist message seemed very clear. I still don't get your joke at > all. Are you saying all this a big "put on" and there is really no other Bill > Palmer?
> >>I read a magazine article that said he was simply a bunch of > >computers...
> >But how could you get even the most powerful set of computers in the > >world to come up with The Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked?
QED?
Archie Leach
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
> In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
> [...]
> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie > Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly > a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being > a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
That's never stopped you before.
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my > opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of > them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and > vicious as this character.
"Ouch!"
[...]
> Bill Palmer > Human Doorknob > Creator and proprietor of wilhelp
Proof please.
> alt.genius.bill-palmer > Home of the Cascade
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Want fame? Say something stupid to reserve your space below.
Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up his arguments in <65acb7$...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
[...]
Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
First, I have previously suggested that "Archie Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and vicious as this character.
First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that nowadays.
Then, after a fairly mild toasting, "Leach" leaps into such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text! Okay, so we know he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual alterations). Then came the personal attacks posted to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME, in!
All that was indicitive of a desperate loser who isn't playing with full deck. NOW we find that "Archie" is repulsively perverted to boot!
In fact, with the latest aberrant fantasies that have been spewed forth from the reeking cesspool that our "Archie Leach" <stucopl...@webtv.com> entity seems to call a brain, we want to call the folks in the white coats to help scrape him into some loony bin for deviates. In fact, this foul entity's drool proves unhappily suggestive of a "brain" composed of two rotting frontal lobes faintly sparked by feeble limbic activity.
It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s perversion. (YOU can backtrack on the thread if you have a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage going to be allowed to seep into my little corner of the Dejanews archive.)
"Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly makes Wormy Wilkes and even poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal. With Pus Bag and Wormy Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down in their gutter and match them perverted secenario with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag me down to their level. But with this "Archie Leach" entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang, and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination for a "comeback" that was anything like what this pervert "Archie" posted.
Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be in a staight-jacket. It is very plain to readers what his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and frankly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
"Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their own thoughts you shall know them"...
But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a new fake name.
In the many cases where that happened, the vindictive sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same level of "laming", as far as content of their flames-- no better and no worse.
Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted monster! As I have been saying, I can't think of one of my opponents right off the bat who would want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing, pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from <stucopel...@webtv.com>. Of course, some people do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look quite so nasty!)
Frankly, "Leach"'s racist rants suggested Human Leech David Kendrick, but unless I've missed something about Kendrick, I've never known him to drool anything quite as deviated as the reeking mound of diseased tripe that this "Archie Leach" spewed from his "heart" last time.
The man is very ill--what other explanation could there be? Plainly, <copel...@webtv.com> wasn't calling names: He was showing us where he LIVES, and that's scary as hell.
-----------------------------------------
Now, as to this other "Bill Palmer" that has set "Leach" foaming at the mouth, I suspect this guy is a plant too. He may even BE our "Leach" entity.
Actually, I had in mind someone like Eskwired. After all, Eskwired hasn't been around lately. The first time I recall THAT loser, he was sneaking around in alt.genius.bill-palmer asking what seemed like innocent questions. Soon enough, though, he was polluting the group with his racist defamations.
We'll have to wait and see about this other one.
One thing that strikes me as phony is the way he closes, "Always Trust a Magician" and "Balloons and Party Favors". I mean, at a glance that sounds innocent enough, but what is he saying, does he SELL "balloons and party" favors?
Anyway, while my curious new "namesake" certainly has not proved as vicious, dishonest, racist, sexually depraved, and generally ugly and desperate as "Archie Leach" <stucopeland@ webtv.com> the entity bears watching while in alt.genius.bill-palmer and may well be a plant.
More to follow, no doubt...
Bill Palmer Creator and proprietor of wilhelp alt.genius.bill-palmer
>> In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
>> [...]
>> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
>> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie >> Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly >> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
>Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have seen happen again and again. So is your point I should avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
>> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being >> a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
>That's never stopped you before.
Apparently, your whole point is this: Since YOU plainly feel that the sort of proclivities that entity "Archie Leach" described to for the readers represent good clean flame-fun, you want to point our my "squareness" by taking a taking a couple of cheapshots at ME, thereby suggesting *I* was off-base for registering my disgust with this cognitively-diseased, deviated dipshit posting from <stucopel...@webtv.com?
Well, parasite MacLennan, is THAT your point? Or is it that you are so hog blind-angry from your repeated humiliations that you will defend anything and anyone who attacks me--even an entity like the repulsive "Archie Leach" who drools some of the most repulsive slime into this group that I (and I suspect most readers) have ever seen here.
>> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my >> opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of >> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and >> vicious as this character.
>"Ouch!"
In other words, MacLennan (whose "brain" overflows like a dirty toilet with the same kind of sewage that entity "Archie Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> drools straight from his foul and perverted "heart") wants everyone to know what a "big joke" is found in the type of slime that would literally make a lot of folks toss their cookies. Call me lacking in humor, by all means...
Ever more slimy as you get ever more desperate, eh, parasite "MacLennan"?
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post <6br2lt$...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,wilh...@ix.netcom.com () wrote:
>Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be >in a staight-jacket.
That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word. -- Rubbing the Kook Kabal's noses in their own shit is not only fun, it's a duty. "All non-hostile reactions are more than welcome and most especially yours Mr. Palmer. I've long admired your style and devotion to free speech." - (Speedbump to Palmjob). All loon-related email to "poltr...@wilhelp.com"
> >> In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
> >> [...]
> >> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> >> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie > >> Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly > >> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
> >Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
> Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have > seen happen again and again. So is your point I should > avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
When said past experiences leave you looking like a total moron, yes.
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-M i k e M a c L e n n a n -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Want fame? Say something stupid to reserve your space below.
Don't bother asking me to "post proof" for my "suspicians"; THAT is the sort of unreasonable request favored by the "Louse-monkeys" and the "Lousy MacLemons" (providing they are indeed different crude entities) of the net.
Biil Palmer chiding others for daring to ask him to back up his arguments in <65acb7$...@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
In <34e4432c.70801...@enews.newsguy.com> paras...@wilhelp.com writes:
>In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post ><6br2lt$...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>,wilh...@ix.netcom.com () >wrote:
>>Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be >>in a straightjacket.
[typo-corrected]
>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a >typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word. If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you know more than the editors of the quite-conservative AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will bother to look there or in any other excellent English dictionary, you will learn for the first time that since the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best, both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in it anyway.
Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing" in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial sentences in the first place, that means your spacing between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing skill.
Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention of your ignorant display, was it not?
Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a > paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing"
*Who* requires this, billshit bill palmer the hapless little dwarf?--your abuse of passive constructions (e.g. "two spaces are needed") conveniently elides any mention of any authority on this issue. So, who are you citing?
> in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing > errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial > sentences in the first place, that means your spacing > between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
Fascinating. Billshit bill palmer the depends undergarment wearing dwarf sinks to a new low: a "spacing" lame. My God. Now *that's* grasping.
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post <6brn6r$...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>,wilh...@ix.netcom.com
(Palmjob) wrote: >>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a >>typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
>No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word. >If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you >know more than the editors of the quite-conservative >AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will >bother to look there or in any other excellent English >dictionary, you will learn for the first time that since >the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which >spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best, >both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin), the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in your head, Bill.
>Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you >won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your >ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in >it anyway.
Pseudonymous? No more than any other email address. "poltr...@wilhelp.com" is as valid an email address as "wilh...@ix.netcom.com". Just click on poltroon and send me some email. You can even get your own address at wilhelp.com if you ask nicely; but not "wilh...@wilhelp.com"; that's taken. See if you can get your browser to connect to <www.wilhelp.com>, and join about 45 of your "fans" who love to pull your tail to see you jump and whine.
>Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a >paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing" >in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing >errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial >sentences in the first place, that means your spacing >between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
>On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now >and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that >particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing >skill.
I think your data-set is a little small for such a devastating analysis, Wee Willie.
>Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce >from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a >very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own >KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort >have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention >of your ignorant display, was it not?
Not at all; Archie can do just fine on his own, pointing out your documented history of racial slurs on Usenet.
I just wanted to have some fun with your latest filet of solecism and English mangling.
>Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement >about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary >first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might >not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
I did, and not some fishwrap 'Merkin dictionary like the A.H.D.
By the way, Willie, you put _three_ spaces between "first." and "Next" in the above paragraph; 100% error level there, Little Buckaroo.
Now, skitter-off before I toast your little pink backside again, Palmjob.
>copywrong FLAME GIANT
> On Word screeds of the World
-- Rubbing the Kook Kabal's noses in their own shit is not only fun, it's a duty. "All non-hostile reactions are more than welcome and most especially yours Mr. Palmer. I've long admired your style and devotion to free speech." - (Speedbump to Palmjob). All loon-related email to "poltr...@wilhelp.com"
In article <6br2lt$...@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com>, wilh...@ix.netcom.com () wrote:
> In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
> [...]
Thereby insulting everyone named "[..,]"!
> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> But as per usual, I shall skip the interesting point and go >straight to the boring ones.
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie > Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly > a sore flame war loser sneaKKKing bacKKK for revenge.
Because you're too much of a pathetic shitass to try any other flaming tactic.
Perhaps you can try to spread the vicious rumor that you wrote the Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked.
I've written it six or seven times!
I am the true author of the Spankiest Spank Ever Spanked!
And you are the plagarist.
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being > a bit hasty in reaching my KKKonKKKlusions.
That's what three weeks' worth of crusted urine and 2-and-1/2 weeks' worth of skid marks on your Big Boy Pull-Ups Diaper will do, sometimes.....it'll make you hasty in reaching conclusions!
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my > opponents any KKKredit, I cannot think of one of > them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and > vicious as this character.
And I was horrified when Palmjob's foster mother told me about how she had to put a leather harness on him when he was growing up because when he was in school, in between classes, Palmjob would run through the hallways with his little pecker hanging out of his TuffSkins corduroy pants and he'd try to pee on his classmates...
> First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The > Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that > nowadays.
MUHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA!!!!!!
> Then, after a fairly mild toasting (sic), "Leach" leaps into > such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself > away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text!
You're the one inserting triple-K's into the text, Heinrich Palmmler. Take responsibility for your own actions.
> Okay, so we know > he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual > alterations). Then came the personal attacKKKs posted > to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which > I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME, > in!
There are a lot of FLAME groups to which you've never posted a flame, either.
> All that was indicitive
Indicitive? Why don't you spellcheck your lames, for once?
> of a desperate loser who isn't > playing with full decKKK.
You oughtta know, wanKKKer boy.
> NOW we find that "Archie" is > repulsively perverted to boot!
> In fact, with the latest aberrant fantasies that > have been spewed forth from the reeKKKing cesspool > that our "Archie Leach" <stucopl...@webtv.com> > entity seems to call a brain, we want to call the > folks in the white coats to help scrape him into > some loony bin for deviates.
Don't you mean deviants? And it looks like you're projecting your own disturbed (to say the least) childhood onto me.
You're the one who tried to piss on your classmates in middle school.
> In fact, this > foul entity's drool proves unhappily suggestive of > a "brain" composed of two rotting frontal lobes > faintly sparked by feeble limbic activity.
At least I *HAVE* two frontal lobes! Nyah nyah nyah!
> It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s > perversion. (YOU can bacKKKtracKKK on the thread if you have > a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage > going to be allowed to seep into my >little Ku Klux Klan-supportve KKKorner of the > Dejanews archive.)
I'm awful proud to have it in my corner of it....
> "Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly maKKKes Wormy Wilkes and even > poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal. With Pus Bag and Wormy > Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down > in their gutter and match them perverted secenario > with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag > me down
Welcome to the Wild and Whacky World of Palmjobese, in which "up" means "down" and "down" means "up"!
>to their level. But with this "Archie Leach" > entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this > pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang, > and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination > for a "comebacKKK" that was anything like what this > pervert "Archie" posted.
YOU CAN E-MAIL ME ANY TIME TO SURRENDER AND ADMIT DEFEAT, AND I'LL FOREVER CEASE THIS BARRAGE.
Any time, and I promise I will say not a word about it to anyone else.
I think it's time that you surrender with whatever shreds of dignity you still hold...
> Therefore, I won't try. This "Leach" is sick enough to be > in a staight-jacket.
That's my name! Don't wear it out!
> It is very plain to readers what > his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and > franKKKly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite > preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please > pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
No. More like 5,000 variations of tit-for-tat all spammed into the same post....
> "Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their > own thoughts you shall know them"...
> But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology > almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my > theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting > victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a > new fake name.
There's something new: one of Palmjob's theories about "so and so is Hausman or whomever" getting shot down.
Again..........and again..........
> In the many cases where that happened, the vindiKKKtive > sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same > level of "laming", as far as content of their flames-- > no better and no worse.
> Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out > to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my > roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted > monster! As I have been saying-- > I can't thinKKK!
You're sure right about that!
> of one of my opponents right off the bat who would > want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing, > pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from > <stucopel...@webtv.com>. Of course, some people > do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
> The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies > of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not > quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the > repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie > Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look > quite so nasty!)
Quiet, you, or I'll tell your therapists about how you like to jack off at the local McDonald's Playland...
Archie Leach
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
In <34e99df7.94058...@enews.newsguy.com> poltr...@wilhelp.com writes:
>In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post ><6brn6r$...@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>,wilh...@ix.netcom.com >(Palmjob) wrote:
>>>That's "strait-jacket", you illiterate clown. And don't say it's a >>>typo; you don't have a clue about the etymology of the word.
>>No, YOU don't have a CLUE about the etymology of the word. >>If you did, you would never be stupid enough to fancy you >>know more than the editors of the quite-conservative >>AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY. After all, if you will >>bother to look there or in most other excellent English >>dictionaries, you will learn for the first time that since >>the foremost language authorities cannot agree on which >>spelling, "straightjacket" or "straitjacket", is best, >>both forms are considered acceptable in standard English.
>Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin), >the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in >your head, Bill.
You're simply an absolute liar caught with your pants down! You proved stupid enough to criticize someone else's usage based upon your own uninformed prejudices. Now you are trying to fib your way our of it. Fact is, THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY and THE MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY each list both forms as correct.
That means, while YOU might prefer otherwise, you have no business saying people err in giving the editors of two outstanding dictionaries more credence than they give your pompous and uninformed blather.
In other words, dear parasite of mine, you deserve a dunce cap. In effect you are claiming to know more than the editors of two highly respected dictionaries. There are many minor instances where THE AMERICAN HERITAGE, THE MERRIAM WEBSTER, and THE OXFORD disagree on the best usage. However, only a dunce makes public pronouncements that someone is "illiterate" for preferring a spelling choice sanctioned by two top dictionaries.
>>Now, of course, since you are a pseudonymous nobody, you >>won't have to worry about being embarrassed by your >>ignorant display, but I am delighted to rub your nose in >>it anyway.
>Pseudonymous? No more than any other email address. >"poltr...@wilhelp.com" is as valid an email address as >"wilh...@ix.netcom.com". Just click on poltroon and send me some >email. You can even get your own address at wilhelp.com if you ask >nicely; but not "wilh...@wilhelp.com"; that's taken. See if you can >get your browser to connect to <www.wilhelp.com>, and join about 45 of >your "fans" who love to pull your tail to see you jump and whine.
Of course you are a pseduonymous nobody. How do you expect to blather your way out of that? And of course you are a parasite, too, since I created wilhelp and made my creation famous in these newsgroups long before Human Leech Kendrick registered it as a domain name. It is impossible for you to use wilhelp without becoming an official "Bill Palmer's parasite".
>>Further, two spaces are needed between sentences in a >>paragraph, so you need to review the chapter on "spacing" >>in your remedial writing text. Now, we all make spacing >>errors on occasion, but since you only drooled TWO trivial >>sentences in the first place, that means your spacing >>between sentences is ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT WRONG!
>>On top of that, while we all begin sentences with "and" now >>and then, beginning FIFTY-PERCENT of your sentences with that >>particular conjunction reveals your egregious lack of writing >>skill.
>I think your data-set is a little small for such a devastating >analysis, Wee Willie.
I had no need to go beyond the document at hand. After all, YOU used but one article to proclaim ME "illiterate"-- and your pronouncement proved to be ignorant and incorrect!
>>Most important, it'll take a whole lot more than a typo-pounce >>from a pseudonymous wilhelp parasite such as yourself to get a >>very sick bastard like this "Archie Leach" off the hook his own >>KKK racism and announced sexual perversion of the grossest sort >>have got him wriggling on. After all, that WAS the intention >>of your ignorant display, was it not?
>Not at all; Archie can do just fine on his own, pointing out your >documented history of racial slurs on Usenet.
Such "slurs" are fabricated by others, just like YOU fabricated my supposed "spelling error". But then, you know that already.
>I just wanted to have some fun with your latest filet of solecism and >English mangling.
In other words, you went fishing for "solecism and English mangling", but when you couldn't find hide nor hair of any, you fabricated!
>>Above all, whenever you feel inclined to make a pronouncement >>about someone else's usage, be sure to check a good dictionary >>first. Next time you put your foot in your mouth, you might >>not be safely cowering behind a fake name.
>I did, and not some fishwrap 'Merkin dictionary like the A.H.D.
Despite your own ignorant prejudices, if a spelling is sanctioned as correct by THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY (and THE MERRIAM WEBSTER DICTIONARY, as a matter of fact!) a pseudonymous dunce cap wearer such as yourself has no business pronouncing other people "illiterate" for preferring the form in question. You certainly DID put your foot in your mouth.
>By the way, Willie, you put _three_ spaces between "first." and "Next" >in the above paragraph; 100% error level there, Little Buckaroo.
Very dishonest of you! YOUR spacing between sentences was one-hundred percent wrong. *I* made ONE spacing error in an article of over 300 words with no other mistakes of any sort. Since that is far higher than the Usenet average, please allow me to pat myself on my back for my excellence. Ahhh... feels so good!
>Now, skitter-off before I toast your little pink backside again,
Of course, a pseudonymous dunce WOULD insult everyone named Palmer and further be brazen enough to insist that said dunce's exhibition of orthographical ignorance had somehow "toasted" ME!
In newsgroup alt.genius.bill-palmer, post <6bsu9p$...@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>,wilh...@ix.netcom.com (Hairy
Palmer) wrote: >Of course you are a pseduonymous nobody. How do you expect >to blather your way out of that? And of course you are a >parasite, too, since I created wilhelp and made my creation >famous in these newsgroups long before Human Leech Kendrick >registered it as a domain name. It is impossible for you to >use wilhelp without becoming an official "Bill Palmer's >parasite".
Biil, this whineing about your parasites is worrying; if you would observe some basic hygiene, you could get rid of them.
Remember to wash your hands after defecating, and the pin-worms that make you keep scratching your ass in public will go. Shave your body hair and wash with kerosene, and the pubic lice that you got from Boursy will be returned to sender, so to speak. Above all, brush your dentures and change the primordial soup in the glass where you store them overnight. The oral-genital warts from Goober are a bit of a problem, I admit.
You can do it, I know. You too can be free from the itching torment of psoriasis so evident in your posts.
But my address, "poltr...@wilhelp.com", is mine, and it stays. Why, since I started using it, I've had an offer to do a translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls into Inuit, a request to pose nude for "Biker Babe Magazine" and a chance to display my "Etch-A-Sketch" works in the Royal Ontario Museum Permanent Collection. All because of my domain name "wilhelp.com". Don't forget to include this in the court documents when Goober sues Usenet on your behalf.
Too bad you didn't think of registering the domain, but 45 of your fans thank you. We love rattling your cage, for fun _and_ profit. -- Rubbing the Kook Kabal's noses in their own shit is not only fun, it's a duty. "All non-hostile reactions are more than welcome and most especially yours Mr. Palmer. I've long admired your style and devotion to free speech." - (Speedbump to Palmjob). All loon-related email to "poltr...@wilhelp.com"
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> >Nonsense; the only _English_ dictionary (as distinct from 'Merkin), > >the O.E.D., says no such thing. Any "debate" is between the voices in > >your head, Bill.
> You're simply an absolute liar caught with your pants down!
Uh-oh. Run for cover, everyone. Billshit bill's in estrus again. He's imagining his correspondents with their pants down AGAIN, attempting to involve them in his violent and absurd sexual rituals. Ugh.
> You proved stupid enough to criticize someone else's > usage based upon your own uninformed prejudices. Now
Prejudices?--wrong, bilious billshit billy-boy bill palmer the peurile, you who stimulates your rectal tissues--now nearly completely desensitized owing to years and years of ruthless abuse--with brass-bristled scrubbing brushes and rusty cheese-graters. Your correspondent cited the OED, which as any linguist, philologist will tell you is the standard.
> you are trying to fib your way our of it. Fact is, > THE AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY and THE MERRIAM > WEBSTER DICTIONARY each list both forms as correct.
Your children's editions of your american heritage and your little merriam webster's are of little use to you here, little one. An instance of incorrect usage, if used often enough, will generally find its way into a dictionary. Dictionaries, billshit bill palmer, are descriptive, not prescriptive.
> That means, while YOU might prefer otherwise, you have > no business saying people err in giving the editors of > two outstanding dictionaries more credence than they give > your pompous and uninformed blather.
Yes he does, billshit bill palmer. Why?--because once again you were wrong--surprise!--and all of your poorly worded and terribly lame insults cannot reverse that simple fact. You're a loser, loser-boy.
>I had no need to go beyond the document at hand. After >all, YOU used but one article to proclaim ME "illiterate"-- >and your pronouncement proved to be ignorant and incorrect!
You don't have to eat the whole egg to know it's rotten, Palmjob.
> >> In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes:
> >> [...]
> >> Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
> >> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie > >> Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly > >> a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
> >Wow. I've never seen you take this tack before. <snicker>
> Nothing to do with a "tack". It is a situation I have > seen happen again and again. So is your point I should > avoid drawing upon past experiences, parasite MacLennan?
Oh dear. As a Hausmann, MacLennan certainly has the right to use nautical terms. And, nitwit, how long ago was it "Monica" posted part of your e-mail where you pointed out that, as a Bay Area resident, you loved to go sailing on the Bay. <snicker> Clealy, you no sailor. <snicker> But you do like to use boats to impress the girls, no? <guffaw> I imagine it's still in DejaNews, lest you start with denial.
Yo, Biily. Blow the man down, dude. <snicker>
Anyone wanna bet Biil's only seen waves on his cruises? It's hard to see much else with your head over the side....
<snip>
-- Bill has this pile of a lot of crap, some of it neat crap--but it would be nice if he would do something more with it, rather than park it off on the side of Usenet. Unprocessed crap smells, and no-one wants to have to sort through it.
_Stan Kalisch III <Pine.SUN.3.96L-rev3_1-10.971217152541.13338B-100...@crl8.crl.com>
>In <887155286.2047606...@dejanews.com> stucopel...@webtv.com writes: >[...] >Some interesting points merit being brought out here.
They don't, not really, but I'm bored.
I'll do a Palmjob on a slow day.
>First, I have previously suggested that "Archie >Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly >a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Palmjob has suggested that of every poster that has publicly humiliated him (i.e. all of them.)
>Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being >a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
Ooh, ya think? (I know he's not meaning this to be retroactive for the last two years, but if it weren't for creative inference I would have killfiled the creepy weasel after reading his first post.)
>As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my >opponents any credit,
...having none to give...
>I cannot think of one of >them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and >vicious as this character.
With the possible exception of Palmer himself.
>First, he practically gets on his knees to beg for The >Flame Giant's attention. Lots of people do that >nowadays.
Most people have to get down on their knees to slap Bill Palmer.
>Then, after a fairly mild toasting, "Leach" leaps into >such ugly racist sewage that he actually gives himself >away by inserting "KKK"'s in my text! Okay, so we know >he's very racist, and very dirty (with all the textual >alterations). Then came the personal attacks posted >to all sorts of non-flame groups, some of them which >I have never even posted ANTHING, let alone a FLAME, >in!
Oh, horrors! Do you mean that a Bill Palmer article might have been cross-posted to a newsgroup that wanted nothing to do with Bill Palmer?
>All that was indicitive of a desperate loser who isn't >playing with full deck. NOW we find that "Archie" is >repulsively perverted to boot!
I Know You Are And So Am I.
*snip* vague meanderings neither interesting or offensive enough to merit attention of anyone capable of reading for themselves...
>It's amazing, actually, to witness the depths of "Leach"'s >perversion.
Only if you spend your life 24/7 grepping your newsfeed for mention of your name.
>(YOU can backtrack on the thread if you have >a very strong stomach, dear reader; in no way is that sewage >going to be allowed to seep into my little corner of the >Dejanews archive.)
"My little corner of the Dejanews archive" = search "palmjob"
>"Archie Leach"?, in fact, nearly makes Wormy Wilkes and even >poor ol' Pus Bag look almost normal.
If he could make Bill look normal he'd be making millions for Industrial Light and Magic.
>With Pus Bag and Wormy >Wilkes, I always point out I am refusing to jump down >in their gutter and match them perverted secenario >with perverted scenario, since that would merely drag >me down to their level.
Translation: "I get beaten up by John and Gilbert, am unable to respond in any effective way, and am claiming superiority for failing to do so."
>But with this "Archie Leach" >entity, I've got to admit, I could IN NO WAY match this >pervert's disgusting drivel even if I let decency hang, >and tried to plumb the depths of my own imagination >for a "comeback" that was anything like what this >pervert "Archie" posted.
That pretty much goes for anyone with access to a keyboard. Palmjob goes for quantity, not quality.
>Therefore, I won't try.
Won't. Can't. It's all semantics to Bill...
>This "Leach" is sick enough to be >in a staight-jacket. It is very plain to readers what >his proclivities are (be they latent or overt) and >frankly I wouldn't touch this guy and his favorite >preoccupations with a one-hundred foot pole, so please >pardon me if I don't reply tit-for-tat!
Translation: "I'm too narrow minded to understand anything that isn't displayed on 'Leave it to Beaver' reruns, I'm superior to everyone with experiences other than my own, my running away from every fight is a victory."
>"Archie Leach": What a sickie! To paraphrase, "By their >own thoughts you shall know them"...
...and no one knows Bill...
...thank god...
>But as I say, this "leach" entity's disgusting pathology >almost (I do have to qualify with "almost") shoots down my >theory that he is simply another Flame Giant toasting >victim sneaking back for a coward's revenge under a >new fake name.
Translation: "While I have never gotten the better of anyone in debate, I will imply that people who have grown bored with spanking me across Usenet return in other guises, hopefully creating a mythology in which I am worthy of being the target of persons other than bored net-junkies."
Yeah, I know what that makes me. Fuck off.
>In the many cases where that happened, the vindictive >sneaks usually have stayed at the about the same >level of "laming", as far as content of their flames-- >no better and no worse.
And still always superior to Bill. Which still isn't saying much.
>Hey, I've got to admit it; if this guy DOES turn out >to be one of my toasting victims creeping back, my >roasting of him must have turned him into a perverted >monster!
Bill's touch can do that. Most people don't know this, but Bill Palmer produced Michael Jackson's 1979 "Off the Wall" album.
>As I have been saying, I can't think >of one of my opponents right off the bat who would >want to post such ugly, deviated, self-revealing, >pestilential swill as "Achie Leach" posting from ><stucopel...@webtv.com>.
You're saying you don't read other people's posts.
>Of course, some people >do get very "brave" hiding behind a fake name.
And others, like Bill "Bill" Palmer, become numb to the constant spankings they receive, and no longer care about the continual opprobrium they receive from those around them.
>The guy almost makes the little "sheep" fantasies >of Cockroach Rog Wemyss seem cute. (Almost, not >quite; those "roach-dreams" WERE a bit on the >repugnant side too, but compared with "Archie >Leach"'s posted proclivities, they don't look >quite so nasty!)
So Bill likes the sheep. Figures.
>Frankly, "Leach"'s racist rants suggested Human Leech >David Kendrick,
As opposed to the racist rants Palmjob has himself posted...
>but unless I've missed something about >Kendrick, I've never known him to drool anything quite >as deviated as the reeking mound of diseased tripe that >this "Archie Leach" spewed from his "heart" last time.
Hey, I've been known to mix the occasional metaphor, but who other than Bill Palmer could imagine "drool" "spewing" from someone's "heart?"
>The man is very ill--what other explanation could there >be?
You got spanked, Bill?
>Plainly, <copel...@webtv.com> wasn't calling names: >He was showing us where he LIVES, and that's scary as hell.
Yeah, I need to do laundry this week myself.
>Now, as to this other "Bill Palmer" that has set "Leach" >foaming at the mouth, I suspect this guy is a plant >too. He may even BE our "Leach" entity.
Or maybe it was Bill Palmer and he forgot.
>Actually, I had in mind someone like Eskwired.
I had Uma Thurman in mind, myself.
>After >all, Eskwired hasn't been around lately.
And Bill went missing for the month of September... hmmm...
>The first >time I recall THAT loser, he was sneaking around in >alt.genius.bill-palmer asking what seemed like >innocent questions. Soon enough, though, he was >polluting the group with his racist defamations.
That's like charging someone with peeing in a cess pool.
>We'll have to wait and see about this other one.
>One thing that strikes me as phony is the way >he closes, "Always Trust a Magician" and >"Balloons and Party Favors". I mean, at a >glance that sounds innocent enough, but what >is he saying, does he SELL "balloons and >party" favors?
I will sell you a clue for ten dollars.
>Anyway, while my curious new "namesake" >certainly has not proved as vicious, dishonest, >racist, sexually depraved, and generally ugly >and desperate as "Archie Leach" <stucopeland@ >webtv.com>
..."with whom I have equated him"...
>the entity bears watching while in >alt.genius.bill-palmer and may well be a plant.
As opposed to Bill himself, who is a vegetable.
>More to follow, no doubt...
Truer words ne'er said...
>Bill Palmer
aka Palmjob. Q: Who is the
>Creator and proprietor of wilhelp
A: Dave Kendrick! (I win a cookie.)
>alt.genius.bill-palmer
Want another oxymoron? Microsoft works.
-- coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow http://www.blarg.net/~balloo/flonk/palmjob.html meow
Excerpts from netnews.alt.genius.bill-palmer: 11-Feb-98 Re: Who Is the Other Bill P.. by @ix.netcom.com
> First, I have previously suggested that "Archie > Leach" <stucopel...@webtv.com> is quite possibly > a sore flame war loser sneaking back for revenge.
Billshit bill palmer "previously suggested," but no one listened.
> Now, I am given pause to wonder if I was not being > a bit hasty in reaching my conclusions.
And though now billshit bill palmer the puerile is "given pause to wonder" ("given pause to ... " ugh!--this subliterate rube just CANNOT write to save his utterly useless and completely wasted life!), still, no one listens, no one cares. In sum: billshit bill palmer dialogues with himself, just like the unwashed madmen one sometimes encounters in public parks or subway stations, talking, giggling, gibbering and sometimes even shouting at themselves in non-sensical strings of incoherent babbling, which no one listens to, and which no one cares about. Our billshit bill palmer aspires to be one of these. As yet he lacks the social skills.
> As a matter of fact, while I hate to give my > opponents any credit, I cannot think of one of
Yes. Billshit bill palmer the lame hates to give his opponents credit because they always take it for themselves, even as he shrieks and howls in protest, helplessly flailing all his many limbs, urinating and defecating involuntarily, convulsing in a blind panic as one by one they spank and spank him, chasing him from one newsgroup to another. The defenseless rube we all know as billshit bill palmer the penile simply lacks the cognitive sophistication necessary to mount any sort of defense, so he just goes belly-up, or, more likely, runs away screaming like a girl.
> them who has come off quite as low, aberrant, and > vicious as this character.
And now of course billshit bill palmer describes himself, or how the bloated capon of a boy would *like* to behave had not his lab-coated handlers long ago relieved him of his pesky little testicles with a pair of pruning-snips. Oh but you should have heard the little stump of a boy shriek and howl. Well, they had to do SOMETHING!--little billshit bill spent every waking moment ruthlessly abusing his tiny, ill-formed genitals, an outrage to the other patients and a constant source of embarrassment to the staff. So, one evening they gelded the bloated little stump of a boy. And for a time it seemed to work. Now he would consume his nervous energy on usenet, using usenet as if it were his chamberpot, but at least he left his tiny little nub of a penis alone, what little of it still existed.
But then billshit bill palmer discovered his rectum, and his pineapple sized prostate. Ugh. The cycle begins anew.
>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer? >From: Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes <g...@andrew.cmu.edu> >Date: Thu, Feb 12, 1998 10:50 EST >Message-id: <AosldBC00iWl04c...@andrew.cmu.edu> ><...>
I still have some questions that need answering, and I am not going to go away without the responses I deserve.
Why is the other Bill Palmer ignoring my emails? I have emailed him at least two dozen times now and I've heard nothing back.
How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named for him in the first place? Will he post proof of that for me? How do we know this newgroup was not named for Bill Palmer, the famous magician?
Why does the other Bill Palmer seem evasive about his origins? I can trace him back to the old soc.culture.soviet newsgroup, but the trail stops there. Did he originate in that newsgroup, or are we talking about two other Bill Palmers here?
I would also like to know why that mentally disturbed person- Leech attacked me the last time I posted in alt.genius.bill-palmer. I thought the other Bill Palmer said _everyone_ was welcome, not just one little Bill Palmer.
Why did other Bill Palmer say there was something suspicious about my ending, "Balloons, Party Favors"? What could be more _harmless_ than balloons and party favors, I would like to know?
Ballons and party favors are a magical state of mind. Would the other Bill Palmer be more happy if I put "Drugs and Guns" in my closing?
Can _somebody_ please tell me what is going on here?
Bill Palmer
!!!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!!! Balloons, Party Favors
: >Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer? : >From: Gilbert Vanburen Wilkes <g...@andrew.cmu.edu> : >Date: Thu, Feb 12, 1998 10:50 EST : >Message-id: <AosldBC00iWl04c...@andrew.cmu.edu> : ><...>
: I still have some questions that need answering, and I am not going to go away : without the responses I deserve.
Very well, but be advised the regular posters here will be the judge of the kind of responses you deserve.
: Why is the other Bill Palmer ignoring my emails? I have emailed him at least : two dozen times now and I've heard nothing back.
Shit, the brainless twit can barely post to use net. I took him over a yera to learn not to screw up the reference line and he still doesn't understan the complex workings of the atribution marks. I bet he doesn't have a clue how to look in his mail box if indeed he knows he has one.
: How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named for him in : the first place? Will he post proof of that for me? : How do we know this newgroup was not named for Bill Palmer, the famous : magician?
As far as Palmjob is concerned, there is no other Bill Palmer. You better watck it or he is going to start accusing you of stealing his name.
: Why does the other Bill Palmer seem evasive about his origins? I can trace him : back to the old soc.culture.soviet newsgroup, but the trail stops there. Did : he originate in that newsgroup, or are we talking about two other Bill Palmers : here?
As far as we can figure out he is an escapee from the county home for the criminally stupid. Of course, he may just be the failed experiment of a rogue biologist who was trying to create an useful line of monkeys to be helpers for the handicamped. Unfortunitly it turned out to be a nasty little beast that is able to break out of it's cage and post to usenet. When they finally catch on to him the decision to put him down will be finalized.
: I would also like to know why that mentally disturbed person- Leech attacked me : the last time I posted in alt.genius.bill-palmer. I : thought the other Bill Palmer said _everyone_ was welcome, not just one : little Bill Palmer.
This is an alcove of alt.flame you know; attack people is the "sport" we practice here. Palmjob lies. That one little Bill Palmer has pretty much sullied the reputations of Bill Palmers everywhere.
: Why did other Bill Palmer say there was something suspicious about my ending, : "Balloons, Party Favors"?
Everything frightens Palmjob. It comes from being a village idiot. He's always being jabed with pointy sticks so he thinks everything is a pionty stick.
: What could be more _harmless_ than balloons and : party favors, I would like to know?
Well, a wilyelp lame comes to mind.
: Ballons and party favors are a magical state of mind. Would the other Bill : Palmer be more happy if I put "Drugs and Guns" in my closing?
He would be more happy if that nice person that lives on the other side of his mirror would post followups to his incoherent drool.
: Can _somebody_ please tell me what is going on here?
I just did. I HTH.
-- A_A John Davis (o o) Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC) observed: ----------oOO-(^)-OOo---------------------------------------------------- ~ Democritus maintains that there can be no great poet without a spite of madness.
>Subject: Re: Who Is the Other Bill Palmer? >From: jrda...@netcom.com (John Davis) >Date: Wed, Feb 18, 1998 00:52 EST >Message-id: <jrdavisEoK8B6....@netcom.com>
None of this makes any sense. On two separate occasions I have asked some questions about Bill Palmer, and both times all I have gotten back was a lunatic tirade from somebody.
I thought this was supposed to be a humor newsgroup. The replies I have received from that Davis and Leach-persom make it sound to me like a rant and rave group! What has made these so angry it is almost like they are foaming at the mouthpeople who are saying nothing at all?
Anway, I am not going anyplace. I am going to continue to challenge the other Bill Palmer with my questions until I get a straight anwer, and I'll add some new ones:
What terrible thing has the other Bill Palmer done to get so many people ranting and raving about him? Further, why is it that these ranters and ravers don't make any sense, so no can understand what they are so furious about?
How many Bill Palmers are there on the net?
Did other Bill Palmer originate in soc.culture.soviet, because that is as far back as I can track him in Dejanews? Did he start inside or outside the net? Is he a string of computers like the magazine said, or is he a real person? If he is a string of computers, why did the Russian and American scientists put my name on entity?
Was there _really_ a bet between some young Russian and American millionaires to see if they could create the most popular 1977 newsgroup based on computer entity? Who are they?
Why won' tthe other Bill Palmer answer his email? I have emailed him two dozen times now. Does he filter out everyone named Bill Palmer?
Why does the other Bill Palmer say that my "balloons and party favors" ending is suspicious? What could be more innocent that balloons and party favors, I would like to know?
How does the other Bill Palmer know that this newsgroup was named in his honor? Did he just waltz in and take it over? After all, I read in the magazine where he denied that he started a.g.b-p. Maybe alt.genius.boy-palmer was named for Bill Palmer the famous magician. Maybe he's just trying to get my glory for himself. I want Bill Palmer to answer my questions.
Bill Palmer
!!!ALWAYS TRUST A MAGICIAN!!! Balloons, Party Favors