Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!acb4df96.ipt.aol.COM!not-for-mail
From: "Hugh Watkins" <hugh_watk...@net.dialog.dk>
Newsgroups: alt.genealogy
Subject: Re: Oldest Genealogy?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:31:46 -0000
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <b4nju6$1qhgqo$1@ID-71976.news.dfncis.de>
References: <Y5zba.34756$5l.10441798@twister.midsouth.rr.com> <XmAba.55709$6b3.215409@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acb4df96.ipt.aol.com (172.180.223.150)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1047483143 61391704 172.180.223.150 (16 [71976])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


"FREE Genealogy Resources" <newsgr...@insightbb.com> wrote in message news:XmAba.55709$6b3.215409@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net...
> When you as the genealogist have no proof (records, documents) to backup
> your claims.

and it takes three independant documents to be 100% certain

eg census showingthe family together

BDM certificates and a parish register


Hugh W