Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
2nd Opinions, please 1900 WV census
20 views
Skip to first unread message
singhals
Aug 1, 2008, 5:21:00 PM8/1/08
to
BOSLEY WILLIAM W 48 M W WV
1900 > WEST VIRGINIA > MINERAL > NEW CREEK DIST
Series: T623 Roll: 1766 Page: 87
1900 > WEST VIRGINIA > MINERAL > NEW CREEK DIST
Series: T623 Roll: 1766 Page: 87
The last entry in his household seems to be his father; can
anyone read Dad's name?? I'd like it to be a certain word
so I don't want to trust myself. (g)
Thanks.
Cheryl
saki
Aug 1, 2008, 6:02:14 PM8/1/08
to
singhals
Aug 2, 2008, 11:45:02 AM8/2/08
to
saki wrote:
Thank you. (g)
Cheryl
Huntersglenn
Aug 2, 2008, 3:41:40 PM8/2/08
to
I also read that as John. Also, the West Virginia Vital Records has a
John Boseley, aged 76, 3 months, 28 days, dying on 22 July 1901 in the
New Creek District of Mineral County. Spouse/information name was given
as W. W. Boseley, mother as Harriet Boseley and father as Wm. Boseley.
John Boseley, aged 76, 3 months, 28 days, dying on 22 July 1901 in the
New Creek District of Mineral County. Spouse/information name was given
as W. W. Boseley, mother as Harriet Boseley and father as Wm. Boseley.
Hope that helps,
Cathy
singhals
Aug 2, 2008, 7:02:19 PM8/2/08
to
Thanks. There are waaaay too many William
Boseley/Bosely/Bosley wandering around that part of WV. :(
Boseley/Bosely/Bosley wandering around that part of WV. :(
Cheryl
Huntersglenn
Aug 3, 2008, 6:52:03 PM8/3/08
to
I noticed that! The wife seems to be the key player in keeping those
families separate - that is, if you're lucky enough to have a William
who managed to keep the same wife throughout his life <grin>.
families separate - that is, if you're lucky enough to have a William
who managed to keep the same wife throughout his life <grin>.
Don't know if it makes a difference or not, but if I remember correctly,
this particular William left Mineral County and went to Barbour County.
Cathy
singhals
Aug 4, 2008, 11:26:07 AM8/4/08
to
I found (after the OQ) an on-line database that, if true,
explains a lot. (g) Seems the wife I had for a man was the
2nd (which I had supposed). What I hadn't known was -- he
had a dozen kids with his first wife! IF I assume it's
true, then almost all my stand-alones come into line. As a
working hypothesis, it's good for me, until I get around to
checking out whether he left a will...the living family
doubt he had a tuppence to bless himself with, so we hadn't
looked. Then again, 18 kids would do that to a man, I guess?
explains a lot. (g) Seems the wife I had for a man was the
2nd (which I had supposed). What I hadn't known was -- he
had a dozen kids with his first wife! IF I assume it's
true, then almost all my stand-alones come into line. As a
working hypothesis, it's good for me, until I get around to
checking out whether he left a will...the living family
doubt he had a tuppence to bless himself with, so we hadn't
looked. Then again, 18 kids would do that to a man, I guess?
Cheryl
0 new messages