Happy hunting,
Jan
Anna
The records of intestate estates (where there is no will) can be even more
helpful. In those cases the law generally required a full accounting of heirs.
Those who made wills could name heirs selectively; those who did not, could not.
There is also likely to be an inventory and orders for distribution of the
estate. If the decedent had owned land, the distribution will include legal
descriptions of lots which you may then find in the land records. Intestate
estates and wills are generally recorded in the same set of record books and
files.
> Land Records - You can usually look at the grantor and grantee indexes to
> see if your ancestor owned land. The actual deeds will tell you
> specifically where they lived, who they bought the property from and who
> they sold it to which could both be clues. If your ancestor received some
> sort of land grant you might be able to find something at
> http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
Bear in mind that BLM has records of *federal* land grants -- useful if you know
(or believe) that your ancestor bought from the government. Know also that its
database covers interior regions better than coastal ones.
>
> Happy hunting,
> Jan
>
Seconded,
Austin W. Spencer
> > If your ancestor received some sort of land grant you might
> > be able to find something at
> > http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/
> Bear in mind that BLM has records of *federal* land grants
> -- useful if you know (or believe) that your ancestor bought
> from the government. Know also that its database covers
> interior regions better than coastal ones.
To add to what Austin said, the key word here is "bought." The
Government Land Office database included primarily PATENTS (not
"grants") of two types: "Cash Entry Sales" (land sold for cash
after 1820) and Homestead lands (160 acres given to those who met
certain conditions concerning the land). Sales prior to the Act
of 1820, before which land was sold with installment payments)
are not in the database.
NOTE: It is a common misconception that if a land patent was
signed by the U.S. President it represented a grant of land for
some service performed for the government, military or otherwise.
The fact is that the patents (the first deed issued for a tract
of land) for the disposition of all federal lands bear the
President's signature. Not only that, but until about 1830, the
law required that the President himself sign each one! IOW,
attach no special significance to a patent with the President's
signature. All of them had it.
Richard
Remind us (me!) where to look for the land-grants that predate
Federal involvement? F'instance, 1836 a man transfers land in
souhern Illinois; I don't find this man's name on the GLO or the
ILPDLG lists. So where'd he get the land he was giving away?
Cheryl
ILlinois Public Domain Land Grants -- gopherspace reference; much
like the GLO but different. (and no more intelligible.)
Cheryl
> Remind us (me!) where to look for the land-grants that predate
> Federal involvement? F'instance, 1836 a man transfers land in
> souhern Illinois; I don't find this man's name on the GLO or
the
> ILPDLG lists. So where'd he get the land he was giving away?
I'm not familiar with the ILPDLG lists and their origins.
I tried to explain this in my previous message and didn't make my
point clearly. With respect to the GLO on-line land records, the
database includes only "cash entry" sales for the period you are
interest in.
From 1785 to 1820 land was sold at various prices, in various
amounts and with various installment payment plans. These sales
are not in the GLO database.
In 1820, Congreess put federal land sales on a cash-only basis
and sales from that time forward are the ones in the database.
The GLO has the records prior to 1820 but has not yet put them on
line. If you have the legal description of the land, you should
be able to get the record.
If you think the land was acquired prior to the area being ceded
to the U.S., that would take some study. Probably, though, it
would be the subject of a private bill in Congress to legitimize
the claim.
Richard
Yeah, prolly acquired ca 1814 or so ... so, oh JOY! I get to
read the Globe/Cong Rec?!? Bah, humbug. Race you for the
Johnny Walker.
The ILPDLG was at UIUC gopher site back when gopher-space
was new territory. (g)
Cheryl
Cheryl, I guess I'm not explaining this right. Let me try again:
If the land was purchased / homesteaded after May, 1820, the
chances are the information is on line at the GLO site.
If the land was bought between 1785 and 1820, the record probably
will not be on line, but the Eastern States Land Office should
have the record. You will need the exact legal description. Also,
the case file, which will have additional informaiton, will be at
NARA.
It is only prior to 1785 or prior to the land being surveyed and
open for development that they may have been some Congressional
action. In the latter case, Congress passed dozens of bills
giving pre-emption to squatters, sometimes generically, sometimes
specifically.
In 1814 in Illinois the land may not have been surveyed, but it
was owned by the federal government.
You attended my lecture on this at Kensington. Didn't you save
the notes? <<vbg>>
Regards,
Richard
OH! Is _that_ what's sticking out of that syllabus! :^) Hmmm,
now is that in the pile in the dining room, or the one in the
basement, or ... No! Good grief, looks like I FILED it!! OK ...
(student retires to corner)...
Cheryl
These records are generally indexed alphabetically two ways, by Grantor,
and by Grantee, in my case both indexes in one book. If your ancestor is
the borrower, look in the "Grantor" index. [As a buyer they would be in
the "Grantee" index.]
In the instances I found, money was being borrowed to "make a crop,"
either on the borrower's own land or on some other party's land, usually
spelled out in the deed. For example: Harry Jones borrows money for a
crop "to be grown on the Richwoods farm of John Doe" or "to be grown on
his own land."
The collateral on these loans was the crop(s) to be grown, plus in many
cases, the livestock as well, with detailed descriptions of the horses,
pigs., etc.
Researching:
A D K I N S O N - A T K I N S O N - D A N I E L -
D A V I S - J O N E S - All N Carolina ->Tenn -> Ark;
G I L L E T T E - G I L L E T - Va -> Ala -> Ark;
S P E N C E - Va -> Ala -> Ark;
H E A R D Arkansas;
All in Clark County, Arkansas by 1870
G I L L E T / G I L L E T T E - Va -> Missouri -> Ark
In Prairie County, Arkansas by 1880
> If your ancestor was a farmer, whether or not they owned land, look for
> "deeds of trust" or "mortgage deeds" as well. In my 'home' county, I
> have found these deeds mixed in with the land sale records, in the same
> book. In other places there may be a separate book for mortgages.
>
I found out where my great grandfather and family lived before they bought a
farm in VT by finding a deed for a farm he bought in the County Clerk's
Office. At the bottom of the deed, it read something like,
'So and So, of Whitehall, New York'.....
So, I went right to Whitehall and found all sorts of information I never
would have found had it not been for that deed!
KathyP