On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:44:44 -0400, "Pat in Atlanta"
<pa...@comcast.net> wrote:I can see possibly including him as adopted but I agree with you that
>Eons ago my Uncle Walter married a woman with a 5 year old son named Ed.
>Ed, now 70, has seen my genealogy and is furious. He wants me to name
>Uncle Walter as his biological father. I feel that puts a lie to everything
>I have accomplished. What is your opinion?
you should not be party to a lie. Does he have children ? If so do
they know ? If not I would simply exclude him altogether.
Every genealogy is different. It depends on what your purpose is. In
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.