"Ed Conrad" <edco...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1139520211....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
<edco...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1139539568.8...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ed's right you know.
http://www.archaeologyanswers.com
"Artifacts deliberately dumped in the Atlantic Ocean... certain discovery
sites banned to researchers who ask embarrassing questions... an
archaeologist ordered to deny a major discovery..."
>
>"Hagar" <ha...@sahm.name> wrote in message
>news:3Nqdnbqgpcrsanbe...@giganews.com...
>> Ed, you rascal, you've given up on the "Old-as-Coal" crap and joined the
>> 9/11 conspiracy loonies ??
>> Good for you, for this proves that you are really over the edge, like
>crazy,
>> like fossilized cranium and brain.
>> The same lunatics (mostly of your Democratic ilk) who accused GWB that he
>> failed to connect the "DOTS" before 9/11, now conspire to deny him the
>tools
>> to do the connecting. You lefty puppies are sick mofos. You should stick
>> with the coal mines. Go find some more fossils.
>
>
>Ed's right you know.
Ed's a complete loon, you know?
I'm not surprised you would leap to his de fence
--
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
> >Ed's right you know.
>
> Ed's a complete loon, you know?
For somebody like yourself, who doesn't take it upon themselves to
investigate the theory that oil ISN'T a fossil fuel, I would expect nothing
else?
>
> I'm not surprised you would leap to his de fence
I'm not surprised, that you're not surprised.
Carole
http://www.conspiracee.com
>
>"Wally AngleseaT" <wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
>message news:d01tu1p5d6rjrq3eb...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:37:13 +1100, "Carole" <hubbc...@yahoo.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>
>> >Ed's right you know.
>>
>> Ed's a complete loon, you know?
>
>For somebody like yourself, who doesn't take it upon themselves to
>investigate the theory that oil ISN'T a fossil fuel,
There's no need to personally investigate every crackpot loon that
shouts at the top of his voice.
> I would expect nothing
>else?
>
>>
>> I'm not surprised you would leap to his de fence
>
>I'm not surprised, that you're not surprised.
Well, at least you begin to see you are a loon too.
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:02:09 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
><wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
>
>>Well, at least you begin to see you are a loon too.
>
>Why is it such an obsession for you to force your opinion
>on other people? Why can't you accept that "Carol" has
>her own views?
I accept that Carole lives in a different reality than the rest of the
world (apart perhaps from you and a few others).
Why do you believe Carole, and loons should be allowed to promulgate
rubbish without being called on it.?
>Why do you have to insult people?
I don't insult *everyone*. Why do you think everyone's fantasies
deserve respect?
> Does
>"her reality" endanger your peace?
Not at all. It's entertainment too.
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:07:30 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
><wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
>
>>I accept that Carole lives in a different reality than the rest of the
>>world (apart perhaps from you and a few others).
>
>Only little minds stick to the fiction of a common consensus reality.
>HTH.
>C.
Nice snip-n-run, Chu*k. Let's see what you ran away from:
Message-ID: <sn57v197kmq60245r...@4ax.com>
:On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:20:18 +0100, Charles D. Bohne
:<sp...@PasoSchweiz.de> wrote:
:>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:02:09 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
:><wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
:>
:>>Well, at least you begin to see you are a loon too.
:>
:>Why is it such an obsession for you to force your opinion
:>on other people? Why can't you accept that "Carol" has
:>her own views?
:
:I accept that Carole lives in a different reality than the rest of the
:world (apart perhaps from you and a few others).
:Why do you believe Carole, and loons should be allowed to promulgate
:rubbish without being called on it.?
:
:
:
:>Why do you have to insult people?
;
:
:I don't insult *everyone*. Why do you think everyone's fantasies
:deserve respect?
;
:> Does
:>"her reality" endanger your peace?
:
:Not at all. It's entertainment too.
Chu*k will never understand that he provides hours and hours of nearly
free entertainment.
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Have patience. First I shall deal with the State of Oregon
and County of Josephine, Then the AFAB, government/media
disinformation Agents with whom you conspire to libel me and my
family. Your time will come."
-- Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, usenet "christ"
"Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming from
someone who obviously has no understanding of what a signature is. Tell me,
Haslam, do you sign your checks as 'Can't you show a little restraint?'"
-- David Tholen, Clueless Newbie of the Month, February 2003
>Charles D. Bohne <sp...@PasoSchweiz.de> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:07:30 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
>><wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>>I accept that Carole lives in a different reality than the rest of the
>>>world (apart perhaps from you and a few others).
>>
>>Only little minds stick to the fiction of a common consensus reality.
>>HTH.
>>C.
>
>Nice snip-n-run, Chu*k. Let's see what you ran away from:
Well caught.
Like all credophiles, Chuckie doesn't like his reality bubble being
pricked.
>
>Message-ID: <sn57v197kmq60245r...@4ax.com>
>
>:On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:20:18 +0100, Charles D. Bohne
>:<sp...@PasoSchweiz.de> wrote:
>
>:>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:02:09 GMT, Wally Anglesea™
>:><wang...@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote:
>:>
>:>>Well, at least you begin to see you are a loon too.
>:>
>:>Why is it such an obsession for you to force your opinion
>:>on other people? Why can't you accept that "Carol" has
>:>her own views?
>:
>:I accept that Carole lives in a different reality than the rest of the
>:world (apart perhaps from you and a few others).
>:Why do you believe Carole, and loons should be allowed to promulgate
>:rubbish without being called on it.?
>:
>:
>:
>:>Why do you have to insult people?
>;
>:
>:I don't insult *everyone*. Why do you think everyone's fantasies
>:deserve respect?
>;
>:> Does
>:>"her reality" endanger your peace?
>:
>:Not at all. It's entertainment too.
>
>Chu*k will never understand that he provides hours and hours of nearly
>free entertainment.
--
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/Alien_recipes.html