Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Who owns MAME?

4 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Annie Ryan

unread,
Mar 4, 2011, 10:39:51 PM3/4/11
to
On Mar 4, 9:46 pm, abaraba <zelko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> TABOO, CENSORSHIP, DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA
>
> There are many changes to MAME code which instead of to improve MAME
> and fix old bugs introduce new bugs, bloat and unnecessary hacks.
> However, we are not allowed to talk about it on MAME World, BYOAC or
> KLOV forum, they expect you will pretend those bugs and bloat do not
> exist.
>
> Perhaps Aaron is being paid by Microsoft to introduce bloat and
> slowdowns in MAME, for whatever reason Microsoft is doing the same
> with their own software. And as funny as that sounds, or not, the
> CONTROL of where the project is going, or what submission are
> accepted, is not openly discussed, it is not subject to public
> scrutiny nor there is any voting and majority consideration when those
> decisions are made.
>
> http://polarelephant.blogspot.com/
>
> Now, everyone knows about David R. Foley affair and supposedly stolen
> MAME trademark, which lifted up quite some dust and made a lot of
> people and general public angry. However, in the same time the
> ownership of far more important MAME assets are not even mentioned or
> discussed anywhere. -- How did MAME get from Italy to Canada and
> England? How did control over MAME get from Nicola to some Mr Mark
> Colgan and some proxy firm called 'contactprivacy' How is MAME a
> "public project" if all the decisions are made behind closed doors and
> everything is controlled by some unknown selected individuals?
>
> Who owns MAME?

YOU SIR, are on some good fucking crack.

Tim O

unread,
Mar 5, 2011, 5:43:24 AM3/5/11
to
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:39:51 -0800 (PST), Annie Ryan
<annier...@gmail.com> wrote:

>YOU SIR, are on some good fucking crack.

Think of him as a retarded robot. He does the same thing over and over
again just like a robot, but he does it wrong.

Message has been deleted

Tim O

unread,
Mar 6, 2011, 8:16:47 AM3/6/11
to
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 02:37:31 -0800 (PST), abaraba <zelk...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>You have every other thing in this world
>you could do, this is not your concern
>any more than you yourself make it so.
>
>There are plenty of other places where
>you can talk about ME, this discussion
>is about >> MAME <<.

Nobody cares about your shitty mod. Look through the posts for
confirmation of harsh reality. Its always been about you and your
defective personality.

I see KLOV is now rejecting you like a defective organ transplant.
Congratulations on alienating yourself from every web forum on the
internet.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 6, 2011, 9:26:52 AM3/6/11
to
On Mar 6, 1:29 pm, abaraba <zelko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, thank you for your input. If you will now let the rest of the
> world express their opinion and discuss the actual topic
> of this thread,

Dear sociopath,

The 'rest of the world' doesn't care about MAME drivers, only
retrogamers do. And retrogamers don't care about anything you have to
say. Thats why you've been removed from every forum like a cancerous
growth.

Signed

The rest of the world.


Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 6, 2011, 9:57:39 AM3/6/11
to
On Mar 6, 2:54 pm, abaraba <zelko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> .

Yep, thats about the size of your contribution to the community. An
ineffective dot on the retrogaming radar for everyone to ridicule.

Message has been deleted

None

unread,
Mar 6, 2011, 2:22:55 PM3/6/11
to
Abaraba, I am bored so I am here to poke you with a virtual stick to
see how you will react.

Definitely a "retarded robot". Posted 4 times to the same reply and
still didn't say anything worth reading.

Abaraba, we laugh at you and your pitiful "driver". It doesn't
document anything and that is the whole point of Mame. Ashame Abaraba
can't grasp the simplest concept of the whole project.

As for who "owns" Mame, nobody and everybody. As for control of Mame,
you seem to think that MAME and mamedev.org are the same thing. MAME
is a documentation project and mamedev.org is a website. These are 2
very different things. Perhaps you should watch some more Sesame
Street so you can tell different things apart. As for why mamedev.org
is registered to "ContactPrivacy.com", is to keep crackpots like you
away from them. If there wasn't crackpots like you,
contactprivacy.com wouldn't have any customers because there would be
no crackpots to hide from.

Abaraba, you keep coming up with new "crusades" in which you are the
only one who can see and fix the wrongs with things. Sadly you are
deluding yourself to make yourself feel important.

Let's see...

You've done "timesteps" and you were shown to be a crackpot.
You've done "USB vs PS/2 vs COM vs LPT" as "Driver-Man" and you were
shown to be a crackpot yet again.
Now you're doing MAME is all bloat and bugs and only Abraraba can fix
it and you are still being shown to be a crackpot.

What other "crusades" have you done that only you could fix?

>Ok, thank you for your input. If you will now let the rest of the
>world express their opinion and discuss the actual topic

>of this thread, which is not ME, so please go mind
>your own business, have a nice day.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 7:29:01 AM3/7/11
to
On Mar 6, 11:03 pm, abaraba <zelko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are many changes to MAME code which instead of to improve
> MAME and fix old bugs introduce new bugs, bloat and unnecessary
> hacks, however, we are not allowed to talk about it on MAME World,

> BYOAC or KLOV forum, they expect you will pretend those bugs
> and bloat do not exist.
>
> Perhaps Aaron is being paid by Microsoft to introduce bloat and
> slowdowns in MAME, for whatever reason Microsoft is doing the
> same with their own software.
>
> And as funny as that sounds, or not, the CONTROL of where the
> project is going, or what submission are accepted, is not openly
> discussed, it is not subject to public scrutiny nor there is any
> voting and majority consideration when decisions are made.

>
> http://polarelephant.blogspot.com/
>
> Now, everyone knows about David R. Foley affair and supposedly
> stolen MAME trademark, which lifted up quite some dust and made
> a lot of people and general public angry. However, in the same time
> the ownership of far more important MAME assets are not even
> mentioned or discussed anywhere.
>
> How did MAME get from Italy to Canada and England? How did
> control over MAME get from Nicola to some Mr Mark Colgan and
> some proxy firm called 'contactprivacy' ?

onky donk

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 7:29:37 AM3/7/11
to
And still no driver submission LOL!!
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 9:29:25 AM3/7/11
to
.And still a coward
Message has been deleted

John Harbl

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 4:42:20 PM3/7/11
to
On 3/7/11 7:29 AM, onky donk wrote:
> And still no driver submission LOL!!

A phrase that comes to mind for his situation:

"Put on your big girl panties and deal with it."

I love our resident batshit insane Serbian crackpot; watching him get
spun up into impotent rage over something nobody gives a damn about
always brings a smile to my face and puts a spring in my step.

- J.

abaraba

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 4:58:41 PM3/7/11
to
There are many changes to MAME code which instead of to improve
MAME and fix old bugs introduce new bugs, bloat and unnecessary
hacks, however, we are not allowed to talk about it on MAME World,

BYOAC or KLOV forum, they expect you will pretend those bugs
and bloat do not exist.

Perhaps Aaron is being paid by Microsoft to introduce bloat and
slowdowns in MAME, for whatever reason Microsoft is doing the
same with their own software.

And as funny as that sounds, or not, the CONTROL of where the
project is going, or what submission are accepted, is not openly
discussed, it is not subject to public scrutiny nor there is any

voting and majority consideration when decisions are made.

http://polarelephant.blogspot.com/

Now, everyone knows about David R. Foley affair and supposedly
stolen MAME trademark, which lifted up quite some dust and made
a lot of people and general public angry. However, in the same time
the ownership of far more important MAME assets are not even
mentioned or discussed anywhere.

How did MAME get from Italy to Canada and England? How did


control over MAME get from Nicola to some Mr Mark Colgan and

some proxy firm called 'contactprivacy' ?

onky donk

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 6:29:09 PM3/7/11
to
.
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 8, 2011, 4:56:51 AM3/8/11
to
Keep changing thread titles dickhead and everybody that visits this
group will read how your mom loves getting her asshole licked by
Derrick
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 8, 2011, 9:18:59 AM3/8/11
to
Derrick licks zeljkos moms asshole, and she loves it
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 8, 2011, 9:25:38 AM3/8/11
to
Message has been deleted

onky donk

unread,
Mar 8, 2011, 10:09:43 AM3/8/11
to
On Mar 5, 3:39 am, Annie Ryan <annieryan1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 9:46 pm, abaraba <zelko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > TABOO, CENSORSHIP, DOGMA AND PROPAGANDA

>
> > There are many changes to MAME code which instead of to improve MAME
> > and fix old bugs introduce new bugs, bloat and unnecessary hacks.
> > However, we are not allowed to talk about it on MAME World, BYOAC or

> > KLOV forum, they expect you will pretend those bugs and bloat do not
> > exist.
>
> > Perhaps Aaron is being paid by Microsoft to introduce bloat and
> > slowdowns in MAME, for whatever reason Microsoft is doing the same
> > with their own software. And as funny as that sounds, or not, the
> > CONTROL of where the project is going, or what submission are
> > accepted, is not openly discussed, it is not subject to public
> > scrutiny nor there is any voting and majority consideration when those

> > decisions are made.
>
> >http://polarelephant.blogspot.com/
>
> > Now, everyone knows about David R. Foley affair and supposedly stolen
> > MAME trademark, which lifted up quite some dust and made a lot of
> > people and general public angry. However, in the same time the
> > ownership of far more important MAME assets are not even mentioned or
> > discussed anywhere. -- How did MAME get from Italy to Canada and

> > England? How did control over MAME get from Nicola to some Mr Mark
> > Colgan and some proxy firm called 'contactprivacy' How is MAME a

> > "public project" if all the decisions are made behind closed doors and
> > everything is controlled by some unknown selected individuals?
>
> > Who owns MAME?
>
> YOU SIR, are on some good fucking crack.

Message has been deleted

Hurkle

unread,
Mar 8, 2011, 10:12:09 AM3/8/11
to
Your purposeless obsession is crossing far too many
lines now. Even your friends will hate your pathetic
stupidity, so keep it up, my little imbecilic bitch.
Message has been deleted
0 new messages