On Sun, 6 May 2012 12:44:23 +1000, "Bigbazza" <
ba...@bazlpus.org>
wrote:
[...]
>We..llll....A little too boisterous a wedding for me.....I think I would
>like, a a not so showy affair...:-)
>
:)
>Don't they have to apply for a license and have blood tests before a wedding
>in California?....
A license is needed for it to be legal in the view of the state.
A license is not required to have the ceremony, but without it, they
can't take advantage of any legal aspects of being married.
I don't think any state has required a blood test since the
early 70's.
>And they would need her full co-operation for this prior
>to a wedding?
No.
She would probably need to sign a release prior to it being
aired on TV.
>......Also, signing a register as well!......
She wouldn't sign the register. The guests would.
Unless it has a different meaning in Australia.
--
A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting.
Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?