In article <1104938105.372337.119...@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, Jeff
> Bro. Bennie,
> Please understand that I have the greatest admiration and respect for
If I based my information on the lies by yourself of others....
Sounds like the argument of another poster here actually. It's ok for him
> this discussion is about whether or not Ed King ever lies orPlease cite an example!
> purposefully deceives people on his web site MasonicInfo.com.
> It is a fact that Ed King does lie and misinform both Masons andI remember several attempts at your website using unsigned pages claiming
> non-Masons on his web site and elsewhere, and that these lies can be
> easily refuted when the facts are presented.
that you had turned the financial records over to.... who was it again?
> I would very much prefer to not continue on with this, but so long asPlease feel free.
> Ed sees fit to purposefully continue to spread lies and misinformation
> about me and the RRCG then I feel I have no other recourse than to
> coontinually re-state the facts.
> If it is the true desire of the brothers who frequent alt.freemasonry<chuckle>
> to re-establish "peace and harmony" then perhaps they should begin with
> a close look at themselves and what they are doing.
I notice, though, that when a certain Grand Hierophant of your
> If peace and harmony is the true goal, and brotherly love is the aimYes, Jeff: why ARE you slandering me on your website?
> of our great fraternity, then why should the brothers on this list
> continue to allow the purposeful slandering of another Master Mason,
> in good standing, on this news group, or on another Master Mason's
> web site?
Why did you do so towards a Georgia Past Grand Master?
Why did you then delete those pages from the Internet Archive website?
> If you truly want to see all of this end then I think it must beginBut forcing three Grand Jurisdictions to BAN YOUR organization is somehow
> by you doing what you say. Simply paying lip-service to the great
> tenants of Freemasonry does little to restore the integrity it has
> lost due to the actions of Masons such as Ed King.
supportive of Freemasonry, is it?
http://www.masonicinfo.com -- Anti-Masonry: Points of View
Internet newsgroup posting. Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.