Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Jahbulon
May 24, 2012, 4:26:53 PM5/24/12
to
Tony Dragon <tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in news:MN-
dnUwrpJpCDyPSn...@bt.com:
>>>> So what does prove a person is a Freemason?
>>>
>>> You are the one calling people Freemasons,
>>> so you tell me.
>>
>> What would you accept as proof
>> that someone is a Freemason?
>
> You tell us what you have accepted as proof.
This is one way to demonstrate how unreasonable you are: I do not require
proof, you do, but you will not say what constitutes proof. You're a
Freemason fraud.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
dnUwrpJpCDyPSn...@bt.com:
>>>> So what does prove a person is a Freemason?
>>>
>>> You are the one calling people Freemasons,
>>> so you tell me.
>>
>> What would you accept as proof
>> that someone is a Freemason?
>
> You tell us what you have accepted as proof.
This is one way to demonstrate how unreasonable you are: I do not require
proof, you do, but you will not say what constitutes proof. You're a
Freemason fraud.
--
Praise be to Jahbulon, holy god of Royal Arch Freemasons
Tony Dragon
May 24, 2012, 5:17:34 PM5/24/12
to
On 24/05/2012 21:26, Jahbulon wrote:
> Tony Dragon<tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in news:MN-
> dnUwrpJpCDyPSn...@bt.com:
>
>>>>> So what does prove a person is a Freemason?
>>>>
>>>> You are the one calling people Freemasons,
>>>> so you tell me.
>>>
>>> What would you accept as proof
>>> that someone is a Freemason?
>>
>> You tell us what you have accepted as proof.
>
> This is one way to demonstrate how unreasonable you are: I do not require
> proof, you do, but you will not say what constitutes proof. You're a
> Freemason fraud.
>
OK so we are agreed that you can't/wont back up your claims.
> Tony Dragon<tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in news:MN-
> dnUwrpJpCDyPSn...@bt.com:
>
>>>>> So what does prove a person is a Freemason?
>>>>
>>>> You are the one calling people Freemasons,
>>>> so you tell me.
>>>
>>> What would you accept as proof
>>> that someone is a Freemason?
>>
>> You tell us what you have accepted as proof.
>
> This is one way to demonstrate how unreasonable you are: I do not require
> proof, you do, but you will not say what constitutes proof. You're a
> Freemason fraud.
>
I have asked you to produce evidence to back up your claims, but you
can't/wont do that.
You then paste my e-mail as a subject line & accuse me of evasion.
You then name me as a Freemason.
Most normal people will have no trouble drawing their own conclusions.
Jahbulon
May 24, 2012, 6:13:04 PM5/24/12
to
Tony Dragon <tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in
news:_rydnboNF9ftOCPS...@bt.com:
> I have asked you to produce evidence to back
> up your claims, but you can't/wont do that.
you know the difference between proof and evidence.
Tony Dragon
May 24, 2012, 6:41:45 PM5/24/12
to
On 24/05/2012 23:13, Jahbulon wrote:
> Tony Dragon<tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in
> news:_rydnboNF9ftOCPS...@bt.com:
>
>> I have asked you to produce evidence to back
>> up your claims, but you can't/wont do that.
>
> You demand proof, but will not say what proof might be. You're not stupid,
> you know the difference between proof and evidence.
>
Your choice.
> Tony Dragon<tony....@btinternet.com> wrote in
> news:_rydnboNF9ftOCPS...@bt.com:
>
>> I have asked you to produce evidence to back
>> up your claims, but you can't/wont do that.
>
> You demand proof, but will not say what proof might be. You're not stupid,
> you know the difference between proof and evidence.
>
0 new messages