VOMIT 43/99
avenge...@my-deja.com
Victims Of Masonic Ill-Treatment 23 October 1999
Anyone criticised or maligned in these publications has a guaranteed
right of reply. JMF or P2 Lodge UK stands for the hierarchies of the
Judaeo/Masonic Faction. The ordinary Mason and Jew are as likely to
suffer from the machinations
of the JMF as non-Masons and non-Jews are.
WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS OR NEW LAWS. WE
MUST FIND A BETTER WAY OF APPOINTING AND GETTING RID OF JUDGES.
THE POLICE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OMBUDSMEN
We would be preaching to the converted if we were to say that
LGOs are the scum of the earth. Our wide experience with Laws,
Osmotherley, White and Yardley showed us that they did not have a clue
about and were not interested in fair play. Osmotherley denies being
a Mason. Jerry "Pisspot" White had a direct line to the Grand
Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of England when the Isle of Wight
Masonic scandal was being investigated. If these men had been
impartial many lives would have been saved as would vast amounts of
court and police time. The misery arising from their misconduct in
public office would justify their being incarcerated in a labour camp
for life.
Here is what the Pisspot states on 4 October 1999 - not to us.
### The Police Authority falls within the Local Government
Ombudsman's jurisdiction…… The Police Authority acts as a
disciplinary Authority for Chief Constables, Deputy Chief Constables
and Chief Superintendents. If any of these has personally
investigated the crimes you wish to report and you have first
complained in writing to the Clerk to the Police Authority and he has
declined to investigate the issue you could then complain to the Local
Government Ombudsman. ###
Note that there is no mention of the Police Complaints
Authority. Neither Norman Scarth nor James Todd have had any action
taken against West Yorkshire and Thames Valley Police corruption which
occurred on 8 August and of 18, 21 and 22 August when 7 police officers
were unlawfully engaged in attacking two septuagenarians. Blair and
Straw know all about the police corruption. They seem to protect
policemen on a reciprocal basis.
A Metropolitan policeman telephoned a radio station on 21
October to explain that the police were acting on the instructions of
the government when they banned protests against the Chinese
President. Blair gags his MPs. He is responsible for having sent
the police after Todd and Scarth. The five policemen who beat up a
Tibetan protester were like the seven policemen who tried to beat up
and silence Scarth and Todd. Our policemen have taken a leaf out of
the Chinese book. Welcome on board Chairman Mao Blair!
GEOFFREY SCRIVEN
Blair is running scared over the vigils, which will be held in
support of Scriven at Downing Street while Blair is collecting in the
Seychelles. He or his manic depressive alcoholic pornographic
mentor, Campbell, has decided to drop the charge of scandalising the
judiciary but to leave the charge of having committed contempt of court
for not having adhered to an undertaking not to scandalise the
judiciary. Read that again! A man's freedom depends on an
undertaking given before a judge acting in his own cause. He put the
man under duress for an alleged offence which has not been an offence
for years and which the Attorney General no longer considers an offence
because the whole world has been laughing at him. The judge said that
Scriven had acted with admirable motives. Scriven thought that the
judiciary had learned its lesson. The judiciary committed treasonable
acts. Scriven didn't scandalise the judges at any time before or
after his undertaking. He told the truth. They scandalised
themselves. Arising from the misconduct of the judges, Scriven
initiated fresh proceedings because bent judges were protecting bent
judges. Scriven went to the top of the judicial tree and involved
the Lord Chancellor, the Master of the Rolls and the senior Law Lord
Goff over Irvine's secret briefing of judges. Woolf approved
the "secret briefings", "bench memoranda" or "case summaries". It
was judicial misconduct, which caused repeated actions and not
Scriven. Now the Attorney General (Blair himself) wants Scriven
declared a vexatious litigant. Our advice to Blair would
be "Don't! Investigate Scriven's complaints. While you keep
Scriven within the system you can limit the damage. Sow a wind and
you will reap a whirlwind".
MAURICE KELLET IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
Mr Kellett (Ph/Fax 0191 526 4555) writes rather long letters.
We would like to thank him publicly.
Mr Kellet's letter to B J Inglis, the Official Receiver (Fax
01642 618644) on 18 October 1999 reads,
### I write in the matter of my appeal against alleged
bankruptcy which was heard before Mr Peter Lever, Q.C. on Friday
October 15 1999 at The London High Court.
(cut)…….the judge misconducted himself by failing to give due
consideration to the evidence I had placed before him (cut)……………………The
Appeal will be lodged as soon as I receive the requisite forms from the
Appeal court.
I am further to apply for Judicial Review in the matters of the
above mentioned misconduct (cut)……………
In the interests of justice I consider that (cut)………you should
not take further action until the above matters have been concluded.
The Official Receiver's representative was in court,(cut)……..Yours
sincerely, M Kellett ###
His Judicial Review will be against the police, the Official
Receiver and Lever presumably. The letter could persuade Inglis to
hasten the bankruptcy and the death of Mr Kellett. Mr Kellett proved
fraud and perjury and pointed out some of the culprits in court.
Even the court usher should have taken action on that but Lever - and
he is not alone in this unacceptable behaviour - stated that such
matters were irrelevant. So there was a man facing bankruptcy
arising from fraud and perjury but Lever said that such matters were
irrelevant. The Law may be an ass but not to that extent. Make a
note of the name Peter Lever Q C. He has earned promotion.
DIRTY DACORUM BOROUGH COUNCIL
Normally we would not publish the following letter. Mr
Beresford is so determined to get justice that we feel that he will
take the law into his own hands. Hunt has refused to answer
correspondence.
Letter dated 16 October from Mr Charles Beresford, D.O.T. A.D.I., (Fax
01442 249999) to K Hunt, Chief Executive of Dacorum Borough Council,
Civic Centre Marlowes, Hemel Hempstead.
### Dear K Hunt, I understand that you are taking early
retirement from the council. This is a good thing for the public. I
hope your replacement will operate in a fair and legal manner, which
cannot be said about you, when you cover up the misconduct of your
officers.
I also understand that you are seeking to get an enhanced
pension, when you have not completed the full service period. It
would be in the public interest to pay off dishonest officers like you
and the Director of Housing, if it were not illegal under Section 19
and 20 of the Local Authority Finance Act.
However the District Auditors keep playing musical chairs, in
order to cover up misconduct in your borough and others. They should
be charged with misconduct in public office, inter alia, neglect of
duty, along with you criminals.
You should forward this letter to the District Auditor and
other appropriate bodies. I shall forward it to VOMIT, which will
publish it on the Internet News Groups including uk.legal.
You and Pugsley think you were clever by getting the ISP to remove
VOMIT's URL but it has been published on the News Groups every week
since. Yours sincerely, C A
Beresford D.O.T A.D I. ###
Note: The District Auditor is one of the Deloitte Touche
mob. We wouldn't touche them with a barge pole. As we recall it
Mr Beresford's persecution was caused by all sorts of corrupt
authorities including, the police, Ordnance Survey, the Land Registry
and the Health and Safety Executive. Mr Beresford is a hard working
man who has had his life and that of his family turned upside down by a
bunch of crooked Masons in the council and in local businesses. Hunt
is a Jewish Mason as is the editor of the local newspaper, which is a
propaganda organ for the council.
The Labour Party is responsible for keeping us off the Internet. It
used a variety of contacts, all of which acted unlawfully. We
finished up with a confrontation with Thames Valley Police after we
were set up by OFGEM. Callum McCarthy, Director General of OFGEM,
has sent us numerous cards telling us he will reply to us in due
course. He must be a stinking Mason from the tartan Mafia. He
should have his office and salary terminated. If Mr Hunt gives us his
story we will publish it and explain why there are 7 sides on a 50
pence coin.
DR STUART HILL - CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR - THE MASEFIELDS
Mr and Mrs Masefield (Fax 01308 485729), two octogenarians.
have been persecuted for years after having been swindled out of their
property. On 18 October 1999 they wrote to Hill. Following a
County Court hearing the Registrar at Weymouth Land Registry advised an
appeal to the House of Lords presumably because he/she considered that
a bent Registrar and a bent Ordnance Survey Director (Fax 01703 792782)
constituted a new point in law. Actually it comes under corruption
and fraud - criminal matters - Butch Stichbury. The Masefields say
that they could not afford the £18,000 to mount a challenge in the
Lords. Usually a bent civil servant prevents cases being heard and
there isn't much anyone can do about that with or without £18,000.
These land swindles occur every day promoted by local Masons
usually aided and abetted by the courts, the Land Registry and Ordnance
Survey. This ratbag Hill wrote to us and did not address a single
issue. He said he could find no evidence of corruption in Leicester
Land Registry. He did not say "The three plans submitted for
property adjacent to yours are in conflict because we want to ensure
that the drug site can claim your property at a later date either by
adverse possession or by reliance on the maps doctored by OS". Hill
is another one whose position and salary should be terminated. If we
were violent he would be pushing up the daisies.
Interestingly the Masefields state that Weymouth Land Registry
used a 1992 OS Plan rather than a 1963 OS Plan to swindle them. In
our case the OS produced a false Plan in 1992 to replace 1972 OS Plan
and gave instructions to the OS Map Centre in Victoria, London, that
the false plan was not to be issued to the public. From that OS crime
many other crimes flowed involving Bucks County Council, Chiltern
District Council, the District Valuer etc. The man responsible at O S
(Romsey) was a Mason named Mouncey. Can you see why Blair and
company sent the police after us? We have three individuals in this
issue alone pointing the finger at Ordnance Survey. There are
hundreds of such victims of Ordnance Survey and Land Registry. Two
organisations, which are supposed to be absolutely fair, thorough and
honest form in fact the ground rock of corruption. The courts never
seem to find against them.
ALBERT DRYDEN'S LONG STRAW
### Dear Home Secretary, Re C K 0635 Dryden, Albert
C Wing H M Prison Garth Ulnes Walton Lane Leyland Lancs.
I have today (18 October) heard again from Mr Dryden whose case
you have failed to review. Representations on his behalf you have
ignored. This very fit man has suffered more than one heart
attack. Currently he complains of violent headaches and loss of hair.
Mr Dryden complains that his mail is being opened and that this
is unlawful unless, of course, you have authorised it.
Should this man suffer serious illness or death you will be
held responsible.
Perhaps you would care to comment on the criminal behaviour of
Thames Valley police officers here on 18, 21 and 22 August 1999.
Please do not deny knowledge of the raids.
Yours faithfully, JAMES M TODD. Copied to the Prime Minister.
###
LETTER TO LORD MILLETT, THE MASON
From Mr Geoffrey Scriven (Fax 0161 428 1159) on 18 October 1999.
Subject: High Treason by Judicial Mafia Organised Crime
### On 6 May 1997, in the Court of Appeal, wilfully and
knowingly, in breach of your Oath to the Crown, in the matter of
Parimtree Limited, you adjudicated in favour of your employer, Lloyds
of London.
I therefore demand that you resign immediately from Judicial
Office, informing "the Mafia Godfather," (Irvine) forthwith.
If you have the courage to contest my statement my address for
service is:-
C/o Nasa, 85 High Street, Cheadle, Cheshire SK8 1AB. Tel.No. 0161 428
0764 Fax 0161 428 1159. ###
Now you know why Blair ordered the Attorney General to commit
Mr Scriven to prison . We were led to believe that Millett was a Name
in a Lloyd's syndicate that swindled Parimtree Limited. Mr Scriven
must not criticise the numerous bent judges kept in position by the
charismatic Cardinal Irvine.
TIME TO INVESTIGATE BLAIR AND MANDELSON
These two politicians are coated with Teflon and so too was
John Gotti. Neither has any experience of government. Both are
wordsmiths skilled in the art of deceit. Mandelson, having suffered
the pricks of adversity, knows that he should maintain a low
profile. Blair will rabbit himself into a hole.
Some months ago Mandelson bought a tatty flat in Notting Hill,
West London, but made no attempt to refurbish it and live in it. The
suggestion is that he was aware in July that he was about to get an
improvement in his financial circumstances. As soon as he was
appointed Ulster Secretary work commenced on his tatty flat. With his
salary increase of £64,307 plus his MP's salary of £47,008 he could
well afford to do the repairs. As Northern Ireland Secretary he will
have many of the repairs done free of charge and, if we know the
beggars on horseback, all refurbishment will be covered by the bill to
cover his bomb proof floors, windows and doors.
Bear in mind that there were protests when Mandelson was
appointed to the DTI, which was investigating Geoffrey Robinson's
affairs. Obviously Robinson interested Blair and Mandelson because
he was wealthy. Robinson was persuaded to part with more than one
million pounds to Mandelson and to the "blind trust" which financed
Blair's office and probably a lot more. The blind trust donation has
been denied. The Charity Commission cannot be trusted. There is no
smoke without fire. Robinson also bought the New Statesman and made
it Blair friendly. A man like Robinson does not part with money
unless there is a profit to be had. Mandelson was made Minister for
Trade and Industry where he could have influenced the outcome of the
DTI enquiry. As with the Blair blind trust Mandelson claimed
separation from the enquiry. Yet now we find that Robinson believes
that the threat of an adverse DTI finding is being used to persuade him
to omit information from his forthcoming book. The corruption cuts
both ways.
Blair's good luck also poses problems. Did Robinson's money
buy Blair's Islington house? If not who did buy the house? What
are the connections between the pharmaceutical companies and this
government? It appears that aspirin and vitamins were not the only
items that had their prices artificially inflated. There is a whole
range of drugs involved causing health authorities to run out of
funds. Where does Grand Prix motor racing and tobacco advertising
come into the picture? Why should Blair drag his family half way
across the world on successive Christmases to an island, which is the
home of the recycled proceeds of organised crime? Then we have all
the free holidays enjoyed by Blair and other beggars on horseback.
They will all deny these but common sense says that they are receiving
gifts and that they will return the favours. Who in their right
senses would give the bloated Prescott a Jaguar car if they did not
expect favours in return? A responsible Prime Minister would set an
example and would ensure that his beggars did not behave in a manner
which causes public outrage. The Italians call Blair "The Scrounger"
(Scroccone).
Dismore, Porter, 3 cemeteries, Hendon Hospital, Holocaust Memorial,
Right to Buy, Butler-Sloss, Homosexuals, Honours, Database, Norman
Scarth, ECHR, Byatt, OFWAT, McCarthy, OFGEM, CPRE, Robinson, Gillan,
Chilterns Society, Ramblers Association, Cullen, Brown, Robertson,
Lamont, Paedophiles, Blair, Mandelson, Shirtlifters, Hearn, Cuckold,
Coppers' Nark, Cocaine, Icy Cools, Capricorn, Simon Elvin, Enforcement,
Septic Tank, Aquifer pollution, Riverbed damage, drugs, Hellmanns,
Osnabruk.
CONTACTS
CAMPAIGN FOR A FAIR HEARING, PO Box 54, Cambridge CB5 8BB. Fax 01223
327042.
Ph 01223 327634 (Organiser - Suzon Forscey-Moore, American
Law Researcher)
POW TRUST, (A registered benevolent and social welfare charity) 295a
Queenstown Road, London SW8 3NP. Tel.0171 720 9767 Fax 0171 498 0477
(Gen.Secy. Peter Sainsbury).
TRY “PUNCH” AND BUY “PUNCH”(£1.50 fortnightly) Punch Letters,100
Brompton Road, LONDON SW3 1ER. ed...@punch.co.uk Fax 0171 225 6766.
DACORUM ACTION GROUP v. Labour's Masons in the Borough Council
Contact David Fisher Phone 01442 260329.
Lloyd's world-wide swindles http://www.truthaboutlloyds.com email
in...@lliarsoflondon.com
Published by J M Todd, Misbourne Farmhouse, Amersham Road,
Chalfont St Giles, Bucks. HP8 4RU
Per pro Vomit. No copyright. Tel 01494 871204. Fax 01494 870031 .
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Marshall Rice
writes
>WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS OR NEW LAWS. WE
>MUST FIND A BETTER WAY OF APPOINTING AND GETTING RID OF JUDGES.
Urk! VOMIT is starting to make sense to me. I must go and lie down.
>Dismore, Porter, 3 cemeteries, Hendon Hospital, Holocaust Memorial,
>Right to Buy, Butler-Sloss, Homosexuals, Honours, Database, Norman
>Scarth, ECHR, Byatt, OFWAT, McCarthy, OFGEM, CPRE, Robinson, Gillan,
>Chilterns Society, Ramblers Association, Cullen, Brown, Robertson,
>Lamont, Paedophiles, Blair, Mandelson, Shirtlifters, Hearn, Cuckold,
>Coppers' Nark, Cocaine, Icy Cools, Capricorn, Simon Elvin, Enforcement,
>Septic Tank, Aquifer pollution, Riverbed damage, drugs, Hellmanns,
>Osnabruk.
Then again...
--
Marshall Rice
Anthony Edwards
<Mars...@msrice.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <7usa86$jbc$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, avenge...@my-deja.com
>writes
>
>>WE DON'T NEED ANY MORE HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS OR NEW LAWS. WE
>>MUST FIND A BETTER WAY OF APPOINTING AND GETTING RID OF JUDGES.
>
>Urk! VOMIT is starting to make sense to me. I must go and lie down.
>
<snip>
Whilst I don't give credence these days to most of VOMIT's anti
masonic propaganda, the following does seem rather strange,
particularly the apparent leniency in sentencing; do lawyers here
share my view that this seems very odd?
From a Masonic point of view, I presume this guy is not a Mason? If
he is (which I doubt), is it likely that his local Lodge may attempt
to steer him towards a more socially acceptable pattern of behaviour?
From Friday's London Evening Standard 22/10/99 :-
------------------------
Terror of victim as stalker goes free
A stalker who hounded a young medical student for two years in a
crazed campaign of harassment walked free from court today.
Now police are renewing their watch on the home of the student who has
been bombarded with more than 500 disturbing letters, received scores
of phone calls and saw posters in the street accusing her of being a
witch.
As Mark Colley was released from court, 24-year-old Jessica O'Rourke
said: "How bad does stalking have to get? I can hardly believe it."
Today His Honour Judge Rose imposed a sentence of six months -
although he had powers to jail Colley for five years - for breaching a
court order. Colley was released because he has already served the
equivalent of six months' jail after being arrested outside Miss
O'Rourke's home in the early hours, last July.
The judge imposed the sentence despite observing: "There are matters
about this case that are profoundly disturbing."
Colley had been sent to Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court precisely
because the stipendiary magistrate at Horseferry Road who heard the
original case believed his sentencing powers were insufficient.
At earlier hearings Colley had claimed from the dock that he was a
god. In one of many interruptions in court today he contented himself
with the observation: "I am the greatest Freemason on the planet."
His obsession with Miss O'Rourke began two years ago when he met her
through a mutual friend one boozy Sunday lunchtime.
She talked to him for an hour or so, not realising she was about to
become the focus of his crazy and sometimes sinister ideas. He
bombarded her with letters, sometimes 18 pages of tiny handwriting. He
put up posters in the street describing her as a witch and banged on
the door of her west London home in the early hours.
He sent a flatmate a letter asking for her underwear and copied her
voice from her answering machine and put it on a CD with a cover of a
naked woman on it. For the last year Miss O'Rourke has had to be
escorted from her home by police and has had a panic alarm installed.
The campaign against her became so bad she considered moving and
changing her name but police persuaded her not to.
"Right from the start that lunchtime I realised he was weird, that he
wasn't all there," she said. "He was going through his divorce and we
talked about his kids. Four days later he rang saying he had VIP
tickets to an Oasis concert.
"All I did was to be friendly and talk to him. I never gave him any
encouragement. I never accepted anything from him."
Mr Colley, 34, described himself as a record producer. She says he is
a painter and decorator.
"Most of what he wrote was just mad twaddle," she said. "He called me
his 'Princess of Darkness' and said he was building a time machine. He
wrote saying, 'Ever since I have met you aliens have spoken to me in
the street'. It was crazy, but he has a very sinister satanic side as
well."
Paul Feldberg, prosecuting, said Miss O'Rourke's relationship with a
boyfriend had collapsed under the strain of the harassment. At one
stage Colley even rang from prison. His letters talked of "friends
from above" and told of 25 space ships flying around the moon that he
was in contact with.
Police described today's case as the kind recent anti-harassment laws
were designed to prevent. Colley was jailed several times for
breaching restraining orders Miss O'Rourke obtained but was given bail
and within hours was back outside her flat.
Today Judge Rose told Colley: "We are seriously concerned about this.
If you contact this lady again or attempt to contact her or harass her
we can send you to prison for up to five years and we will.
"This lady must and will be protected from you."
Š Associated Newspapers Ltd., 22 October 1999
------------------------
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/dynamic/news/story.html?in_review_id=221584&in_review_text_id=171977
--
Anthony Edwards
ant...@catfish.nildram.co.uk
The Arcane Chas
contemplation, Anthony Edwards <ant...@catfish.nildram.co.uk> put
finger to keyboard and produced the following;
>
>From a Masonic point of view, I presume this guy is not a Mason? If
>he is (which I doubt), is it likely that his local Lodge may attempt
>to steer him towards a more socially acceptable pattern of behaviour?
If what you tell us is true and he is actually a Mason, it's much more
likely that he would be expelled.
--
Cheers,
Chas.
http://www.lindsayc.force9.co.uk (updated 19/8/99)
Joe Schmuckatelli
wrote:
> From a Masonic point of view, I presume this guy is not a Mason? If
> he is (which I doubt), is it likely that his local Lodge may attempt
> to steer him towards a more socially acceptable pattern of behaviour?
He isn't, and not bloody likely.
------------------------------------------------+------------------
"One World, One Web, One Program." -- Microsoft | OS/2 Warp
| Solid like Linux
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer." -- Hitler | Easy like Windows
------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Ruth Hine
news:381343f8...@news.nildram.co.uk...
>
> Whilst I don't give credence these days to most of VOMIT's anti
> masonic propaganda, the following does seem rather strange,
> particularly the apparent leniency in sentencing; do lawyers here
> share my view that this seems very odd?
Perhaps the Judge was religious and believed the guy to be God as he also
claimed?
Yes it does seem lenient. I would have expected about a year (or some sort
of psychiatric order) However, whilst the Judge's views seem to conflict
with those of the Magistrate who convicted him they do accord with those of
the Magistrates who accepted jurisdiction in the first case. I suppose that
the reason he didn't get a higher sentence was that there appears to have
been no threats of violence - not that that will be of any comfort to the
victim. The sentencing practice in this area is very ill-developed.
--
Ruth Hine
" What about Magna Carta? Did she die in vain?"
Galton and Simpson's "Twelve Angry Men"
Marshall Rice
<ant...@catfish.nildram.co.uk> writes
>At earlier hearings Colley had claimed from the dock that he was a
>god. In one of many interruptions in court today he contented himself
>with the observation: "I am the greatest Freemason on the planet."
That sort of comment is most unlikely to have come from a Freemason -
bonkers, as this chap clearly is, or not. One of the fundamental tenets
of Freemasonry is equality; no Mason should regard himself as any
"greater" than anyone else.
--
Marshall Rice