"Pakistan Cricket Scam" <P...@SIBU.HQ> wrote in message
news:k7jqf2$75u$1...@dont-email.me...
> Mentalguy2k8 was thinking very hard :
>> "Pakistan Cricket Scam" <P...@SIBU.HQ> wrote in message
>> news:k7jpdv$h1$1...@dont-email.me...
>>> Mentalguy2k8 explained :
>>>> "Pakistan Cricket Scam" <P...@SIBU.HQ> wrote in message
>>>> news:k7jmpj$e7r$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>> Mentalguy2k8 formulated on Friday :
>>>>>> "Pakistan Cricket Scam" <P...@SIBU.HQ> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:k7jlum$8pu$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> After serious thinking W.Wots wrote :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's funny how ones allegiance to party politics can make one an
>>>>>>> apologist for (alledged) paedos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *alleged
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or one's allegiance to a crackpot religion.....
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://dictionary.die.net/alledge
>>>>
>>>> Ah yes, says that's the obsolete spelling. Try this pre-school site:
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.how-do-you-spell.com/alledge
>>>
>>>
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/alledge
>>>
>>> It's an alternative spelling.
>>
>> Obsolete. Adjective: no longer in use
>
> It's listed in the ditionary.
In the what?
Assuming you were educated sometime after the early 17th century, you'd have
been taught "allege". Let's move on.
>
>
>>
>>>>> And I don't bang on about religion as you suggest.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't suggest anything, Mr Touchy.
>>>
>>> Then explain yourself.
>>
>> Where does my post mention you "banging on about religion"? I merely
>> extended your claim to include skyfairy believers who aren't averse to
>> "looking the other way" regarding child abuse.
>
>
> I've still no idea what you're talking about man.
Of course you have, you're just being deliberately obtuse. I changed the
words "party politics" in your original premise to "religion", therefore I
can only assume that you don't understand your own post. Good luck with
that.