Re: The New Nazis

[The Revd]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:17:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44580
>
>The New Nazis
>
>By Daniel Greenfield

Greenfeld????

Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
<b'rissed>

[The Revd]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:46:11 -0700 (PDT), Mildred
<parkstre...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Michael, people who go out and murder Jews; it's despicable.

Why is it "despicable"? They deserve it. So do those who suck their
fat jew rectums.

[The Peeler]

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:48:26 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:

>>
>>By Daniel Greenfield
>
> Greenfeld????
>
> Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
> <b'rissed>

No longer able to talk like a half-way normal human being, you poor
housebound psychopathic idiot?

How about you getting out of the house for a change and starting breathing
in something different than the stench emanating constantly from your
leaking colostomy bag? LOL

--
The top 5 truths about our colostomy bag wearing resident psychopath, aka
"The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 22, 12:48 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:17:51 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>

> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44580
>
> >The New Nazis
>
> >By Daniel Greenfield
>
> Greenfeld????

GreenFIELD.

>
> Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
> <b'rissed>

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.

Michael

[PaxPerPoten]

You are the groups Idiot.

[The Revd]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 22, 12:46 pm, Mildred <parkstreetboo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Michael, people who go out and murder Jews; it's despicable.  But
>> there were many cases where other peoples were targeted for
>> extermination.
>> I'm going to use the case of the Germans.  How many innocent Germans
>> died because of allied murder campaigns, and Stalinist policies?  I
>> don't see what happened in the CCCP under Stalin; the killing of his
>> own people, I don't see that in the main stream media they mention
>> this fact very often.  In fact hardly ever.
> Was there ever a policy of exterminating all persons of German
>descent, EVERYWHERE?

Was there ever a policy of exterminating all creatures of jew descent
EVERYWHERE, gook?

[The Revd]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 22, 12:48 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:17:51 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44580
>>
>> >The New Nazis
>>
>> >By Daniel Greenfield
>>
>> Greenfeld????
> GreenFIELD.

GreenFELD...a jew name, pathetically anglicised in a vain attempt to
escape detection.

>>
>> Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
>> <b'rissed>
> You are a Nazi.

You are a gook.

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook, you are, below all else.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 23, 11:47 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>

Yes.


Michael

[The Revd]

Prove it, gook. When were the jews of South America ever threatened?

[The Revd]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:12:43 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 23, 12:28 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 22, 12:46 pm, Mildred <parkstreetboo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Michael, people who go out and murder Jews; it's despicable.  But
>> >> there were many cases where other peoples were targeted for
>> >> extermination.
>> >> I'm going to use the case of the Germans.  How many innocent Germans
>> >> died because of allied murder campaigns, and Stalinist policies?  I
>> >> don't see what happened in the CCCP under Stalin; the killing of his
>> >> own people, I don't see that in the main stream media they mention
>> >> this fact very often.  In fact hardly ever.
>> >   Was there ever a policy of exterminating all persons of German
>> >descent, EVERYWHERE?
>>

>> The real issue is: what ideology exemplifies mass murder, or acts
>> associated with totalitarians?
>>
>> Regardless of what economic systems a despot uses---the core of a
>> totalitarian, right or left, have similar characters.
>>
>> Militaristic
>>
>> Racist.
>>
>> Scapegoat
>>
>> Fearmonger
>>
>> Ultranationalistic
>>
>> Anti-immigrant
>>
>> Most use religion as legitimacy
>>
>> Whether it's a Rightwing Conservative American like Jesse Helms, a
>> righwing totalitarian like Hitler, or a Totalitarian like Stalin--they
>> share the same goals and and exhibit similar behavior.
>>
>> Hitler gained power legitimately, packed high courts, and proceeded to
>> institute many of American programs---like the social policies of the
>> American south.
> He instituted eugenics, which was widely popular at the time.

Eugenics are appropriate for ridding the world of gooks and other
subhumans, gook.

[The Revd]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:44:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 23, 11:27 am, "Freedom Man" <freespe...@4eva.com> wrote:
>> See what RELIGION does to peoples' minds?
>>
>> Adults no longer believe in the Tooth Fairy - but they still torture and
>> kill each other over ancient myths and superstitions.
> What matters is obedience to the Lord of Lords and King of Kings,
>who created an inescapable, everlasting torture chamber. None of us
>can cast him there, stop Him from casting anyone there, or rescue
>anyone from there. His might makes right.

LOL! Are you on drugs, gook?

BTW the jews whose rectums you suck KILLED your lord of lords.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 24, 3:27 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:12:43 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito

It would have eliminated you.


Michael

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 24, 3:27 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:00:55 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito

>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 23, 11:47 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   Was there ever a policy of exterminating all persons of German
> >> >descent, EVERYWHERE?
>
> >> Was there ever a policy of exterminating all creatures of jew descent
> >> EVERYWHERE, gook?
> >   Yes.
>
> Prove it, gook.  When were the jews of South America ever threatened?

http://www.nizkor.org

http://www.deathcamps.org/

http://www.ushmm.org/

http://www.holocaustsurvivors.org/


Michael

[The Peeler]

On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:05 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito wrote:

>>>   He instituted eugenics, which was widely popular at the time.
>>
>> Eugenics are appropriate for ridding the world of gooks and other
>> subhumans, gook.
> It would have eliminated you.

Perfect reply!

[The Revd]

LOL! More jew lies sucked out of jew rectums.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 23, 11:48 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>

> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 22, 12:48 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:17:51 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44580
>
> >> >The New Nazis
>
> >> >By Daniel Greenfield
>
> >> Greenfeld????
> >   GreenFIELD.
>
> GreenFELD...a jew name, pathetically anglicised in a vain attempt to
> escape detection.
>
>
>
> >> Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
> >> <b'rissed>
> >   You are a Nazi.
>
> You are a gook.

So what?

>
> >   As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> As a craven gook, you are, below all else.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

[The Revd]

It would have eliminated YOU and your entire gook race, gook!

[The Peeler]

On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:47:00 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:

>>> Eugenics are appropriate for ridding the world of gooks and other
>>> subhumans, gook.
>> It would have eliminated you.
>
> It would have eliminated YOU and your entire gook race, gook!

Bullshit! The Nazis would quickly have euthanized a subnormal, incapable,
degenerate swine like you because they would have considered you a freak of
nature unfit for life.

[The Revd]

On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 23, 11:48 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 22, 12:48 pm, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:17:51 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/44580
>>
>> >> >The New Nazis
>>
>> >> >By Daniel Greenfield
>>
>> >> Greenfeld????
>> >   GreenFIELD.
>>
>> GreenFELD...a jew name, pathetically anglicised in a vain attempt to
>> escape detection.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> Another jew asshole whose rectum you suck, gook.
>> >> <b'rissed>
>> >   You are a Nazi.
>>
>> You are a gook.
> So what?

WE aks the questions, gook.

>>
>> >   As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> As a craven gook, you are, below all else.
> You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

You are a gook - subhuman BY BIRTH. You have no CHOICES. The key
word is GOOK.

> Bill explains what nithings are.

I explain what Bill is.

http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

[The Peeler]

On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 06:41:09 -0400, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of

sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:

> I explain what Bill is.
>
> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

Your "link" is EXACTLY like you and your "life": dead, defunct,
malfunctioning ...and a laugh!

LOL

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 25, 3:41 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito

>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 23, 11:48 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   You are a Nazi.
>
> >> You are a gook.
> >   So what?
>
> WE aks the questions, gook.

Your failure to answer the question is noted, boy.

>
>
>
> >> >   As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>
> >> As a craven gook, you are, below all else.
> >   You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
> >key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
> >rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>
> You are a gook - subhuman BY BIRTH.  You have no CHOICES.  The key
> word is GOOK.

That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

>
> >   Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> I explain what Bill is.
>
> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole

The following article explains your pathology.

History's oldest hatred

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
March 11, 2009

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."

So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."

Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)

[The Revd]

On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 25, 3:41 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 23, 11:48 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   You are a Nazi.
>>
>> >> You are a gook.
>> >   So what?
>>
>> WE aks the questions, gook.
> Your failure to answer the question is noted, boy.

YOUR failure to understand that WE aks the questions is noted, gook.

>>
>>
>>
>> >> >   As a Nazi, you are, above all else
>>
>> >> As a craven gook, you are, below all else.
>> >   You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>> >key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>> >rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>>
>> You are a gook - subhuman BY BIRTH.  You have no CHOICES.  The key
>> word is GOOK.
> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

How the fuck can it be, you slant-eyed subhuman gook?

>>
>> >   Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> I explain what Bill is.
>>
>> http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
> The following article explains your pathology.

Sucking Bill's fat jew rectum explains YOUR pathology, gook.

>History's oldest hatred
>
>by Jeff Jacoby

History's oldest reason for hatred: jew behaviour.

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 25, 10:58 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 3:41 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
> >> >key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
> >> >rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>
> >> You are a gook - subhuman BY BIRTH.  You have no CHOICES.  The key
> >> word is GOOK.
> >   That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>
> How the fuck can it be, you slant-eyed subhuman gook?

You have no credibility calling someone else a subhuman, you
nithing.

Your use of racial slurs is noted.

>
>
>
> >> >   Bill explains what nithings are.
>
> >> I explain what Bill is.
>
> >>http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
> >   The following article explains your pathology.
>
> Sucking Bill's fat jew rectum explains YOUR pathology, gook.

I suck no rectums, boy.

>
> >History's oldest hatred
>
> >by Jeff Jacoby
>
> History's oldest reason for hatred:  jew behaviour.

And that Jewish behaviour is standing for God-based morals and
ethics.

The following poem was dedicated to you.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.usa/msg/9a7063668ce49326

THE REVD WENT PODY BIG

The Revd went pody big in the street,
The Revd usually jacks his meat.
Oh that we gun him down,
Because he is a homosexual clown.
He’s a pedophile and an asshole to be,
His main pastime is playing with his pee-pee.
He smells like a sewer and farts real loud,
Of him the gays are very proud.
He molests his hand in an unnatural way.
That is why he’s a queer that is why he is gay.
Everybody hates his guts all the time,
In his ass he stuck a very ripe lime.
He’s a sodomite and a moron that needs to die,
He jacked-off in his mothers cherry pie.
He has zits and pimples all over his face,
He’s a monkey that was kicked out of the human race.
His penis is small,
Not big at all.
He’s an anti-Semitic prick,
With a midget dick.
So if you see the Revd do him one kind deed,
Kick him hard in the gut so out of his mouth he will bleed!

[The Revd]

On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Mar 25, 10:58 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Mar 25, 3:41 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>>
>> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >   You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
>> >> >key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
>> >> >rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
>>
>> >> You are a gook - subhuman BY BIRTH.  You have no CHOICES.  The key
>> >> word is GOOK.
>> >   That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
>>
>> How the fuck can it be, you slant-eyed subhuman gook?
> You have no credibility calling someone else a subhuman, you
>nithing.

As a craven gook who sucks jew rectums, you ARE subhuman, gook.

> Your use of racial slurs is noted.

What "racial slurs" would they be, gook?

>>
>>
>> >> >   Bill explains what nithings are.
>>
>> >> I explain what Bill is.
>>
>> >>http://bill_levinstein_is_a_jew_asshole
>> >   The following article explains your pathology.
>>
>> Sucking Bill's fat jew rectum explains YOUR pathology, gook.
> I suck no rectums, boy.

You suck jew rectums 24/7, gook.

>>
>> >History's oldest hatred
>>
>> >by Jeff Jacoby
>>
>> History's oldest reason for hatred:  jew behaviour.
> And that Jewish behaviour is standing for God-based morals and
>ethics.

LOL! That's fucking hysterical, gook!

> The following poem was dedicated to you.

Poem? You call the drug-fucked rants of some braindead nigger
'poetry'???

[Michael Ejercito]

On Mar 26, 3:14 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:06:08 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito

>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 25, 10:58 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:21:25 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >   The following article explains your pathology.
>
> >> Sucking Bill's fat jew rectum explains YOUR pathology, gook.
> >   I suck no rectums, boy.
>
> You suck jew rectums 24/7, gook.

You equate defending the truth with sucking rectums.

>
>
>
> >> >History's oldest hatred
>
> >> >by Jeff Jacoby
>
> >> History's oldest reason for hatred:  jew behaviour.
> >   And that Jewish behaviour is standing for God-based morals and
> >ethics.
>
> LOL!  That's fucking hysterical, gook!

Nothing hysterical about God-based morals and ethics.

>
> >   The following poem was dedicated to you.
>
> Poem?  You call the drug-fucked rants of some braindead nigger
> 'poetry'???

The following Usenet post reveals your sexual disorientation.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/744028e4fe196d22

"Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse? If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.

The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing
consent. To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look
it up, Levinstein). Do we ask animals for their consent before we
kill them and eat them? By comparison, getting fucked is a minor
inconvenience"- The Revd