Goo argues for the misnomer "animal rights"
dh
>I've kicked your ass the hardest of all.
You've just sung the elimination song stronger
and longer than anyone else Goo, that's all:
"ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any moral
consideration." - Goo
"We're ONLY talking about deliberate human killing" - Goo
"Fact: IF it is wrong to kill animals deliberately for food, then
having deliberately caused them to live in the first place does
not mitigate the wrong in any way." - Goo
""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
their deaths" - Goo
"the nutritionally unnecessary choice deliberately to kill an animal
ALWAYS causes a moral harm greater in magnitude than . . . the
moral "benefit" realized by the animal in existing at all" - Goo
"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
"The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get to
experience life" deserves no consideration when asking
whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo
"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
"Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it." - Goo
"you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not to raise the
animals as the only way to prevent the harm that results from
killing them." - Goo
"There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to
exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Goo
Mr.Smartypants
> ...not GooFuckwit's silly "getting to experience life" horseshit
>
> Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, a thoroughly *DISCCREDITED* cracker and
> liar - lied and presented no challenge:
>
> > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Rudy V. Canoza:
>
> >> I've kicked your ass the hardest of all.
>
> > You've just
>
> Fuckwit. You failed. You failed horribly.
That was your own ass you kicked, Boobs. Your fairy tale about degrees
fell apart like a water soaked paper bag.
Mr.Smartypants
> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
> > On May 2, 2:10 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >> ...not GooFuckwit's silly "getting to experience life" horseshit
>
> >> Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, a thoroughly *DISCCREDITED* cracker and
> >> liar - lied and presented no challenge:
>
> >>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Rudy V. Canoza:
> >>>> I've kicked your ass the hardest of all.
> >>> You've just
> >> I've just kicked your ass and *COMPLETELY* demolished your story,
> >> Fuckwit. You failed. You failed horribly.
>
> > That was your own ass you kicked,
>
> for nine years. I've kicked your head in only for about five years.
You've been kicking your own ass so thoroughly for 12 years that
there's a possibility you may earn a doctorate in outstupidification.
> You're an admitted do-nothing jerk-off. You're a cunt. You try to be a
> cunt, and you succeed.
Boobs, you seriously think you aren't a laughingstock don't you?
Let's see what all you've been up to recently:
1. Told a man pursuing a Ph.D in math that a math term he used doesn't
exist. Of course it turns out not surprisingly that the term does
exist.
2. You knew there was some confusion over whether YOU had a Ph.D and
you failed to correct the situation by saying you had NO Ph.D.
3. Hiding from Rupert whenever he asks you to post proof of any
degrees you claim you have.
4. Squealing at people to change their system times because YOU who
can't even look up a math term feel you are the world's arbiter of
matters of precision.
Boobs, the more you try to be taken seriously, the more we ROTFL.
Mr.Smartypants
> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 3, 12:52 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
> >>> On May 2, 2:10 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >>>> ...not GooFuckwit's silly "getting to experience life" horseshit
> >>>> Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, a thoroughly *DISCCREDITED* cracker and
> >>>> liar - lied and presented no challenge:
> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Rudy V. Canoza:
> >>>>>> I've kicked your ass the hardest of all.
> >>>>> You've just
> >>>> I've just kicked your ass and *COMPLETELY* demolished your story,
> >>>> Fuckwit. You failed. You failed horribly.
> >>> That was your own ass you kicked,
> >> Nope. I've kicked GooFuckwit's ass right up between his shoulder blades
> >> for nine years. I've kicked your head in only for about five years.
>
> > You've been kicking
>
>
> >> You're an admitted do-nothing jerk-off. You're a cunt. You try to be a
> >> cunt, and you succeed.
>
>
> No, we all *know* that you're an admitted do-nothing jerk-off; a cunt.-
Get a grip, Boobs!
Mr.Smartypants
> jerk-off.-
Still hallucinating I see.
Post your academic credentials or shut up and quit posting altogether.
Mr. Smartypants
That's your weenie you're choking Boobs.
Mr. Smartypants
> > That's your
>
> fist smashing your smirking mug.-
Tsk,tsk........your feeble grip on reality is slipping, Boobs.
Mr.Smartypants
> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
> >>> That's your
> >> fist smashing your smirking mug.-
>
> > Tsk,tsk.
>
You're undegreed, Boobs.
Mr. Smartypants
>
> You're stupid - you admit to being a do-nothing jerk-off, and that makes
> you stupid.
So what are the voices in your head telling you today, Boobs?
Mr.Smartypants
> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 8:00 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
> >>> On May 3, 1:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >>>> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
> >>>>> On May 3, 10:34 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>> That's your
> >>>>>> fist smashing your smirking mug.-
> >>>>> Tsk,tsk.
> >>>> You're stupid, runny - an admittedly stupid, do-nothing jerk-off.
> >>> You're undegreed
> >> Wrong.
>
> >> You're stupid - you admit to being a do-nothing jerk-off, and that makes
> >> you stupid.
>
> > So what
>
So who do you think you are fooling (besides yourself) when you alter
someone's post to avoid embarrassment?
Mr.Smartypants
> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 11:04 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
>
> >>> On May 4, 8:00 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >>>> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
> >>>>> On May 3, 1:08 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> >>>>>> the admitted jerk-off cunt runny hamilton lied:
> >>>>>>> On May 3, 10:34 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> That's your
> >>>>>>>> fist smashing your smirking mug.-
> >>>>>>> Tsk,tsk.
> >>>>>> You're stupid, runny - an admittedly stupid, do-nothing jerk-off.
> >>>>> You're undegreed
> >>>> Wrong.
> >>>> You're stupid - you admit to being a do-nothing jerk-off, and that makes
> >>>> you stupid.
> >>> So what
> >> So, you're stupid. And an admitted do-nothing jerk-off.-
>
> > So who
>
So you believe that you're fooling only you and me?
Mr.Smartypants
> jerk-off. It would really blow to be you.-
So apart from yourself you believe you are also fooling me.
It may come as a total shock to you Boobs but you're only fooling
YOURSELF!
Mr. Smartypants
> do-nothing jerk-off.-
are you still able to fool yourself Boobs?
dh
>On Thu, 01 May 2008 14:06:43 +0900, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Goo boasted:
>>
>>>I've kicked your ass the hardest of all.
>>
>> You've just sung the elimination song stronger
>>and longer than anyone else Goo, that's all:
>>
>>"ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any moral
>>consideration." - Goo
>>
>>"We're ONLY talking about deliberate human killing" - Goo
>>
>>"Fact: IF it is wrong to kill animals deliberately for food, then
>>having deliberately caused them to live in the first place does
>>not mitigate the wrong in any way." - Goo
>>
>>""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
>>their deaths" - Goo
>>
>>"the nutritionally unnecessary choice deliberately to kill an animal
>>ALWAYS causes a moral harm greater in magnitude than . . . the
>>moral "benefit" realized by the animal in existing at all" - Goo
>>
>>"the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude
>>than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo
>>
>>"The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get to
>>experience life" deserves no consideration when asking
>>whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo
>>
>>"no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing
>>of the animals erases all of it." - Goo
>>
>>"Humans could change it. They could change it by ending it." - Goo
>>
>>"you MUST believe that it makes moral sense not to raise the
>>animals as the only way to prevent the harm that results from
>>killing them." - Goo
>>
>>"There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to
>>exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Goo
>
>
>
>I've just kicked your ass and *COMPLETELY* demolished your story
Not by anything we can see Goo, but if you think any
of your above claims somehow prevent livestock from
experiencing decent lives of positive value then try
explaining what you think it is and how you think it does so.