Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Is it true Fuckwit David Harrison - a convicted felon - doesn't care about animal welfare at all?

Received: by 10.224.138.142 with SMTP id a14mr600543qau.4.1351847756727;
        Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.192.164 with SMTP id i24mr45519yhn.14.1351847756699; Fri,
 02 Nov 2012 02:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: gf5ni14056677qab.0!nntp.google.com!c7no2920143qap.0!postnews.google.com!c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.food.vegan,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 02:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.176.181.49; posting-account=QWNvHAkAAAAMkEJLeYjo1aXo1CZIR1Tf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.176.181.49
References: <ybKdnSISM4wmIA_NnZ2dnUVZ5t6dnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.9)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.9,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <9222b1ae-d123-4e4c-8a9a-0406888617cd@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is it true Fuckwit David Harrison - a convicted felon - doesn't
 care about animal welfare at all?
From: Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:15:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov 1, 7:21=A0pm, George Plimpton <geo...@si.not> wrote:
> It is true.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0It's not out of consideration for porcupines
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that we don't raise them for food. It's because
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0they would be a pain in the ass to raise. We
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0don't raise cattle out of consideration for them
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0either, but because they're fairly easy to
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0raise.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sep 26, 2005
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I am not an extremist about it, and if I thought
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that all of the animals I eat had terrible
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0lives, I would still eat meat. That is not
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0because I don't care about them at all, but I
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0would just ignore their suffering.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Nov 29, 1999
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I would eat animals even if I thought that it was
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cruel to them, and even if they gained nothing from
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0the deal. Is that what you want me to say? It is true.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0But that doesn't mean that I can't still like the anim=
als
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0also....
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - Sept 23, 1999
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I don't try to eat ethically, because I don't really c=
are enough
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0to make the effort.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Goo/Fuckwit David Harrison - July 31, 2003
>
> Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison - only cares about the products and
> services they provide - mainly meat, but also disgusting animal combats
> that Goo enjoys watching.

How about you; do you care about animal welfare at all?