Taco Bell Sign
Jerry Sauk
our discussion many months ago about what a typical Taco Bell order is. I
posted MY idea of what a typical order is, and of course everyone
immediately said I was wrong and started calling me names and said no way.
Well the sign read, "Are you Hungry? 10 Tacos for 8.90 (plus TAX) So I
guess my idea was not so far off after all.
Zilbandy
My biggest gripe with Taco Bell, at least the local one nearest me, is
with consistency of their product. One day, I'll get a taco and it
will have a decent amount of taco filling... let's call it 'meat' for
lack of a purely technical term. The next time, it looks like the
'meat' was literally painted on with a grease brush... errr, paint
brush. I wish our TB would take a little time and train employees to
be consistent with the quantity of fillings in their products. I had
two tacos this evening and they were stuffed with 'meat'. They aren't
great for my diet, but they were sure good. :)
--
Zilbandy
Jerry Sauk
"Zilbandy" <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote in message
news:d2e6g3l2ljv4n7fds...@4ax.com...
I agree 100%. And they should train the employees to properly fill the
orders as well. I went to Burger King and ordered a double Whopper with
cheese and no mayo, and I said it twice, and when I got it the little mayo
jar was crossed off on the wrapper BUT IT STILL HAD MAYO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn
I was pissed off that entire day.
kilikini
What is with mayo on a burger anyway? I know it's just my opinion, but it
doesn't belong on there. I can deal with it on a ham sandwich and it works
for some potato salads, deviled eggs, but that's it.
kili
Zilbandy
<kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
>> the orders as well. I went to Burger King and ordered a double
>> Whopper with cheese and no mayo, and I said it twice, and when I got
>> it the little mayo jar was crossed off on the wrapper BUT IT STILL
>> HAD MAYO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Damn I was pissed off that entire day.
>
>What is with mayo on a burger anyway? I know it's just my opinion, but it
>doesn't belong on there. I can deal with it on a ham sandwich and it works
>for some potato salads, deviled eggs, but that's it.
My wife loves mayo on hamburgers. She always orders them with no
sauce, ketchup, mustard, add mayo with extra mayo. She rarely gets
them the way she likes them, though. :(
--
Zilbandy
Albert Worschey
Mayo is the great melding agent, the middleman between the ketchup and
the mustard. I've never had a burger that was greater than the sum of
it's parts that did not have a bit of mayo on it. I hate mayo
everywhere else, but it just brings things together on a burger.
--
Albert Worschey
Albert Worschey
afraid this might end in a cascade of flaming debris.
The job of an advertiser is to wrap an egregious deception in a tortilla
of truth so that the little man-on-the-street type-o-guy will eat the
whole thing. You may point to the fact that a very hungry person could
plod through 10 tacos at a relatively cheap price (I've done it once or
twice myself), but in the end, you're still swallowing a lie. No
reasonable individual would pay nearly 10 dollars for 10 tacos, with the
intent of eating them all by themselves in one meal, and not believe it
to be an exceptional occasion. Would they? It's not socially
acceptable, it's not healthy, and it make little economic sense beyond
the immediate short-term.
That sign is the fast food equivalent of a syphilitic hooker making
"come here" gestures with her finger while a blind man plays a muted
trumpet in a nearby alley, everything awash in deep red light. The
thrills are cheap and sleazy, and totally gratuitous.
Beware man!
--
Albert Worschey
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<lol> I can't eat more than 3 or 4 of those without making myself sick
from gorging!
That's enough food for one meal for 2 to 3 normal people.
There is no rule that YOU have to eat all 10 tacos!
You can split meals.
Mom and I used to split one of those Denny's "Grand Slam" breakfasts
when we were travelling. It was perfect and saved us money. :-)
--
Peace, Om
Remove _ to validate e-mails.
"Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their foot down." -- Steve Rothstein
Omelet
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
Ooh hon, I live to drown my burger in Mayo! ;-d
Hellman's or Best Foods.
Dan
Are you nuts? You eat everything with PEAS and you don't like a little
mayo?
Dan
Reverend Rafe Hollister
IOW, you've never had a good burger.
--
Da Rev
Reverend Rafe Hollister
> In article <13g6bin...@news.supernews.com>,
> "Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Driving past Taco bell after work today I saw there outside sign,
>> and about our discussion many months ago about what a typical Taco
>> Bell order is. I posted MY idea of what a typical order is, and of
>> course everyone immediately said I was wrong and started calling me
>> names and said no way.
>>
>> Well the sign read, "Are you Hungry? 10 Tacos for 8.90 (plus TAX)
>> So I guess my idea was not so far off after all.
>
> <lol> I can't eat more than 3 or 4 of those without making myself sick
> from gorging!
>
> That's enough food for one meal for 2 to 3 normal people.
> There is no rule that YOU have to eat all 10 tacos!
I have to take Jerry's side here. I *would* eat 10 of them, and I swear to
God, if I was really hungry, I could eat 15 and do the other 5 in for
breakfast.
Jerry's only a freak in that he's not a lumberjack yet eats like one.
--
Da Rev
kilikini
Peas, good. Mayo not-so-good. Hey, in the words of Gwen Stefani, "I'm
just a girl. Little ole me...."
kili
Albert Worschey
I've had great ones without mayo.
--
Albert Worschey
Bobo Bonobo®
Del Taco has "Taco Night" on Tuesdays after 3pm. Three tacos for
$1.09, which works out to 12 for $4.36+tax. Pity to you who don't
have a Del Taco nearby.
Dan
That's an OPINION, not a FACT. There are also no peas (thank God) in
fast food so you are also off-topic.
This portion of the TDS thread is closed. Only this portion. Others
may carry on as necessary.
-dk
kilikini
> kilikini wrote:
>> Dan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Are you nuts? You eat everything with PEAS and you don't like a
>>> little mayo?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>
>> Peas, good. Mayo not-so-good. Hey, in the words of Gwen Stefani, "I'm
>> just a girl. Little ole me...."
>>
>> kili
>>
>>
>
> That's an OPINION, not a FACT. There are also no peas (thank God) in
> fast food so you are also off-topic.
>
> This portion of the TDS thread is closed. Only this portion. Others
> may carry on as necessary.
>
> -dk
Spoilsport, :P
kili
kilikini
I used to love going to Del Taco in the mornings for a breakfast burrito
when I lived in Orange County, CA. That was 20 years ago, though, and I'm
sure the menu has changed.
kili
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:xlmr2ehdgt7p$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 01:53:01 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > I agree 100%. And they should train the employees to properly fill the
> > orders as well. I went to Burger King and ordered a double Whopper with
> > cheese and no mayo, and I said it twice, and when I got it the little
mayo
> > jar was crossed off on the wrapper BUT IT STILL HAD MAYO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Damn
> > I was pissed off that entire day.
>
> morning, before you've had those extra 2 hours to get likkered up
> and post at 3:30am.
>
> -sw
and I've noticed that your stalking every second of time I post, which may
require serious phsycological help.
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:53:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > Driving past Taco bell after work today...
>
> You want us to believe you drove *past* a Taco Bell? Uh-huh.
> Do you think they intend for a single person to eat all 10
> pieces?
>
> Really, Jerry - buy a clue.
>
> Are TB Tacos really $.89/ea nowdays? Sheeeit. No wonder I don't
> eat there anymore. I'd much rather have 10 pieces of chicken for
> $2 less (and eat no more than 5 pieces, having plenty left over
> for another meal - Jerry would of course eat all 10 at one
> oinking).
>
> -sw
I can eat a 6.99 meal no problem. (double it even) Who's to say that a
skinny fuck's order like yourself's is the typical fast-food order?????????
Jerry Sauk
"Albert Worschey" <"worldwar666[at]gmail.com"> wrote in message
news:LaGdncPto6-_MJ7a...@comcast.com...
That's all opinion and hear-say. The FACTS is that Taco Bell is offering
TEN TACOS FOR 8:90, which must be in thier opinion a typical order.
Jerry Sauk
"Omelet" <omp_o...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:omp_omelet-AF090...@news.giganews.com...
It's common knowledge, and most people agree, that you have to eat the
taco's right away or they get soggy, so your theory is false.
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:gtd83zpq6f9q$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:53:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > Driving past Taco bell after work today...
>
> You want us to believe you drove *past* a Taco Bell? Uh-huh.
>
Steve, try to think real hard a minute. Remember back a while ago when I
said I boycotted the taco bell by my house? Well how can I get from another
taco bell to my house without driving past it? Try to remember real hard, I
know for a fact you were drinking that night irregardless I don't know
actually what day it was I said that.
Albert Worschey
Come off it, man. Accusing me of hear-say, while you're citing a
sparsely worded roadside advertisement for your shitty argument, which
you've already shape-shifted (again) to avoid anything beyond a
superficial debate. Could I have a little more constructive feedback?
Pleeeeeeeeeeaaaasssseeeee?
--
Albert Worschey
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's common knowledge, and most people agree, that you have to eat the
> taco's right away or they get soggy, so your theory is false.
The tacos are $.89 each.
There is no law that says you have to purchase 10 of them, even tho' the
ad says "10 for $8.90".
Unless you are a sucker for a sales strategy...
Dan
Yeah. No kidding.
-dk
Dan
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:50:06 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> and I've noticed that your stalking every second of time I post, which may
>> require serious phsycological help.
>
> quick-witted doesn't make one a stalker. Nor does reading your
> posts.
>
> So how many drunk driving's does this make for you, Jerry? Looks
> like you won't have to worry about fixing that car going or going
> 30mph anymore, since you won't be driving it, that is.
>
> -sw
How do you know Jerry got a DUI?
-dk
Reverend Rafe Hollister
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:45:50 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> I can eat a 6.99 meal no problem.
>
> not the price, it's the amount of food given to you that's the
> point (and 10 tacos for $9 is a huge rip-off).
>
> That ad is for suckers like you. They think that by advertising
> it, it must be a good deal when in fact that's their regular
> everyday price with a humongous markup.
I'm reminded of current grocery store pricing techniques. 10/$10.00 comes
to mind as does 3/$4.00
I'm in constant wonderment as to how many dipshits think you have to buy
said amount in order to recieve said price.
But I digress, a genuine Mexican taco (I know you've seen 'em) is worth a
buck.
--
The Honorable Reverend Rafe Hollister
Reverend Rafe Hollister
Sqwertz has connections in the can and one of them purportedly cornholed
Jerry...repeatedly.
--
Da Rev
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:58:10 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > It's common knowledge, and most people agree, that you have to eat the
>
> Kinda like a colostomy bag?
>
> -sw
Couldn't tell you, I never tasted a colostomy bag.
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:58:10 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > taco's right away or they get soggy, so your theory is false.
>
> Of course, since you don't eat the soft tacos, you would insist
> they don't exist.
>
> -sw
I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
Jerry Sauk
BUT it's obviously the reccomended serving size, which is why they
advertised it. Why else would they have put it up?
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:45:50 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>
> not the price, it's the amount of food given to you that's the
> point (and 10 tacos for $9 is a huge rip-off).
>
> That ad is for suckers like you. They think that by advertising
> it, it must be a good deal when in fact that's their regular
> everyday price with a humongous markup.
>
> people such as yourself.
>
> > Who's to say that a
> > skinny fuck's order like yourself's is the typical
> > fast-food order?????????
>
> Not a fat slob such as yourself.
>
> -sw
Yes I know that, but it's reflected in what they advertise. And I noticed
you once again resorted to name calling, which means you must realized that
you lost the argument.
Zilbandy
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> The tacos are $.89 each.
>>
>> There is no law that says you have to purchase 10 of them, even tho' the
>> ad says "10 for $8.90".
>>
>> Unless you are a sucker for a sales strategy...
>BUT it's obviously the reccomended serving size, which is why they
>advertised it. Why else would they have put it up?
Jerry, you're beginning to worry me. Are you suggesting that 10 tacos
is a 'normal' serving size? The 10 pack of tacos to me sounds more
like a 'family pack'. I have been known to eat 10 tacos at a time in
the past, but then, that's why I got up to over 600 pounds, too. Trust
me, 10 tacos is NOT a suggested serving size for any half way normal
person. Dammit, Jerry! Now I want a frickin' taco. :)
--
Zilbandy
Zilbandy
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
As long as I have two opposing teeth, I will not eat a soft taco. One
more trip to the dentist, though, I may be changing that. :( I MIGHT
eat a soft taco if it's made with a corn tortilla, but around here,
everyone seems to think soft tacos are made with flour tortillas.
Flour tortillas make burros and chimichangas, not tacos. Now I want a
chimichanga. I gotta quit reading this thread. LOL
--
Zilbandy
Jerry Sauk
"Zilbandy" <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote in message
news:1iceg3lof6v9om5vs...@4ax.com...
No, not at all Zilbandy. I normal serving size is 1 taco, not ten. What we
were discusiing is a typical taco Bell order, which some claimed here as
riduculously small (ie one taco, a nachos, and a small water). MY point is
that your average Taco-Bell customer order much more then that for a meal,
proved by what what people order in front of me at the drive-thru and inside
the store. And the fact that Taco Bell advertises 10 tacos a crack just
provides more eveidence that MY estimations are more accurate.
Peace,
Jerry
Jerry Sauk
"Zilbandy" <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote in message
Thier not that bad, I usually get them when I in a big hurry since they
aren't as messy as the hard shell. And their easier to eat since you can
roll them up.
Peace,
Jerry
Zilbandy
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>No, not at all Zilbandy. I normal serving size is 1 taco, not ten. What we
>were discusiing is a typical taco Bell order,
Ah, I got you. Now it makes sense. :)
--
Zilbandy
Zilbandy
<jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Thier not that bad, I usually get them when I in a big hurry since they
>aren't as messy as the hard shell. And their easier to eat since you can
>roll them up.
Like I said, a burro. :)
--
Zilbandy
Reverend Rafe Hollister
Chick Fil-A delivers! But only on orders of $75 and up, so that must be the
recommended serving size for housebound, corpulent fucks such as the Jerry
Sauk from 6 months in the future.
--
The Dishonorable Reverend
Reverend Rafe Hollister
The people in front of you are 6 people! In one minivan. And you won't go
inside, so stop your lying.
Can you honestly look in the mirror, then look at the television and *still*
make these ridiculous claims of normalcy?
I've seen your picture, Fat-Ass.
Albert Worschey
>> Normal sized people dictate what a normal order is comprised of.
>> Not a fat slob such as yourself.
>>
>> -sw
>
> Yes I know that, but it's reflected in what they advertise.
>
>
--
Albert Worschey
Albert Worschey
> BUT it's obviously the reccomended serving size, which is why they
> advertised it. Why else would they have put it up?
>
>
announcement.
--
Albert Worschey
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Omelet" <omp_o...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:omp_omelet-723E0...@news.giganews.com...
> > In article <13gbohc...@news.supernews.com>,
> > "Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It's common knowledge, and most people agree, that you have to eat the
> > > taco's right away or they get soggy, so your theory is false.
> >
> > The tacos are $.89 each.
> >
> > There is no law that says you have to purchase 10 of them, even tho' the
> > ad says "10 for $8.90".
> >
> > Unless you are a sucker for a sales strategy...
> > --
> > Peace, Om
> >
> > Remove _ to validate e-mails.
> >
> > "Human nature seems to be to control other people until they put their
> foot down." -- Steve Rothstein
>
> BUT it's obviously the reccomended serving size, which is why they
> advertised it. Why else would they have put it up?
<stunned look>
Are you really that gullible Jerry?
It's a standard marketing scam to get you to buy more than you need!
To get you to over eat!
Marketing is probably the #1 reason most of America is so bloody obese.
Did you ever consider Jerry that if you'd eat smaller portions, your
body might shrink and you might actually be able to keep an erection?
Most really obese guys can't. Not enough blood circulation.
You'd pass out. ;-)
Omelet
Zilbandy <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
I actually could eat 10 tacos, but it would take me ALL day and 3 to 4
meals!
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
And the majority of Taco Bell customers that order and eat those huge
portions weigh over 300 lbs.
Why why why would you WANT to eat 10 tacos in one meal? :-P
Omelet
Reverend Rafe Hollister
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:31:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
>
>
> -sw
He loves a big, hard taco and a tall, stiff drink.
Dan
Damn!
aaronhi...@yahoo.com
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:31:13 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> > BUT it's obviously the reccomended serving size, which is why they
> > advertised it. Why else would they have put it up?
>
> with three toppings, an order of breadsticks, and a 2-Liter Coke
> for $19.95, does that mean it's all for one person?
>
> Think hard, you obnoxious drunkard.
It is if you are the fictional character Homer J Simpson. He can eat
all that, and more! I could probably have done that 25 years ago.
Mr. Museum
Zilbandy
wrote:
>> Jerry, you're beginning to worry me. Are you suggesting that 10 tacos
>> is a 'normal' serving size? The 10 pack of tacos to me sounds more
>> like a 'family pack'. I have been known to eat 10 tacos at a time in
>> the past, but then, that's why I got up to over 600 pounds, too. Trust
>> me, 10 tacos is NOT a suggested serving size for any half way normal
>> person. Dammit, Jerry! Now I want a frickin' taco. :)
>
>I actually could eat 10 tacos, but it would take me ALL day and 3 to 4
>meals!
LOL, what I failed to mention in my previous post is that I would eat
10 tacos in one sitting as well as two or three half pound burros and
a bladder buster size Coke or Pepsi. Now, a taco bell splurge for me
is a couple of tacos and a single burro and a diet soda. :)
--
Zilbandy
TFM®
I had at least 1, perhaps 2 of their half pound burritos today, and man,
have they shrunk! They used to be the size of a 24 oz. beer can. Now
they're barely bigger than my pecker. :-(
Also I forgot to include my opinion of their tortillas in my review. Just
about the worst *ever*. Yeah, I know they don't make 'em there, but neither
does the grocery store but they can sell decent stuff most of the time.
Mebbe one of these days the ol' lady will wake up and put the pics I took
summers where y'all can see 'em.
TFM®
Dan
You are worse than TFM. Go back to your baby killing group.
-dk
Reverend Rafe Hollister
TFM's daddy should have killed him when he was a baby! He claims he went to
Taco Bell today, I think he ate his colostomy bag. Where's the fucking
pictures fat boy?
--
Da Rev
TFM®
>> Chick Fil-A delivers! But only on orders of $75 and up, so that
>> must be the recommended serving size for housebound, corpulent fucks
>> such as the Jerry Sauk from 6 months in the future.
>>
>> --
>> The Dishonorable Reverend
>>
>>
>
> You are worse than TFM. Go back to your baby killing group.
>
> -dk
That's "TFM®", bitch.
Rafe Hollister's a rope suckin' queer. Don't compare me to the likes of
him.
TFM®
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
news:1391faqqyek3z$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:31:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
>
> So you like hard ones?
>
> -sw
Yes, I just said that, Steve.
Jerry Sauk
> The people in front of you are 6 people! In one minivan. And you won't
go
> inside, so stop your lying.
WRONG dammit it's ONE person. Stop griping.
> Can you honestly look in the mirror, then look at the television and
*still*
> make these ridiculous claims of normalcy?
Yep. This is MY group, BTW, since I'm the only serious fast-food fan
here. I'm entitled to say whatever the hell I want to say. (so is everyone
else, if they can back them up with facts)
> I've seen your picture, Fat-Ass.
Good for you, but I don't recall ever posting a pic of my ass to the
internet.
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:30:12 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > you once again resorted to name calling, which means you must realized
that
> > you lost the argument.
>
> Oh, so when you called me a "skinny fuck" yesterday, you were
> admitting defeat... again?
>
> I'll make a note of that.
>
> -sw
Uhhh Steve? "skinny fuck" is a compliment these days, because the
complimenter actually regrets having to say it.
Jerry Sauk
"Albert Worschey" <"worldwar666[at]gmail.com"> wrote in message
news:u5Gdnb-VCZNxNJra...@comcast.com...
?????????
Omelet
Zilbandy <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
And you no longer weigh 600 lbs. ;-)
Quality of life, not quantity of food.
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > The people in front of you are 6 people! In one minivan. And you won't
> go
> > inside, so stop your lying.
>
>
> WRONG dammit it's ONE person. Stop griping.
>
> > Can you honestly look in the mirror, then look at the television and
> *still*
> > make these ridiculous claims of normalcy?
>
> Yep. This is MY group,
Oh? You personally opened the charter?
> BTW, since I'm the only serious fast-food fan
> here. I'm entitled to say whatever the hell I want to say. (so is everyone
> else, if they can back them up with facts)
Anyone on usenet can say any damned thing they please withOUT any facts
to back them up. Usenet is an anarchy and we like it that way dammit!
>
> > I've seen your picture, Fat-Ass.
>
>
> Good for you, but I don't recall ever posting a pic of my ass to the
> internet.
ROFL!
Ok, that was funny!
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Jerry Jerry Jerry...
You totally missed the innuendo!
Go purchase a clu' please?
Omelet
"Jerry Sauk" <jerr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Nevermind Albert.
He's a Sheeople.
He also probably votes Democrat.
Reverend Rafe Hollister
Your ass, your face, what's the difference...Oh!
--
Da Rev (wondering who will get that somewhat obscure reference)
Reverend Rafe Hollister
Is this perhaps admission of your regret for being morbidly obese?
I think it is.
--
Da Rev
Reverend Rafe Hollister
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:28:51 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
>> news:1391faqqyek3z$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
>>> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:31:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>>>
>>>> I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
>>>
>>> So you like hard ones?
>>
>
>
> -sw
A tall, stiff drink, and a hard shell taco
--
Da Rev
Dan
What pictures, asshole? At least TFM is a coherent drunk...
-dk
Reverend Rafe Hollister
But you digress...
Next time, try to at least click on the links before initiating flame mode.
It doesn't suit you well.
Zilbandy
wrote:
>And you no longer weigh 600 lbs. ;-)
Nope, I'm down to 403, looking to break into the 300 pound range later
this month. It's been an interesting 14 months. The really good thing
is that I feel pretty good. I don't feel hungry all the time which
means MAYBE this time I have actually modified my eating habits for
good. BTW, I am still logging everything that goes into my mouth...
well, almost everything. Boobs don't count! :)
--
Zilbandy
Reverend Rafe Hollister
Applause!!!!
Well fucking done man!
--
Da Rev
Albert Worschey
> BTW, I am still logging everything that goes into my mouth...
> well, almost everything. Boobs don't count! :)
>
--
Albert Worschey
Omelet
Zilbandy <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
I feel your pain... ;-)
I've never been quite that heavy (272 was my max) but I still understand.
Permanent diet modification is indeed the key, and logging everything
keeps one honest. I need to consider doing that again!
It's also very educational. I used to track not only calories, but fat
grams, protein and carb grams, and sodium milligrams.
Cutting starch and sugar seems to curb hunger more than anything else.
Congratulations!
> Boobs don't count! :)
<lol>!
--
Peace, Om
Remove both _ (underscores) to validate gmail e-mails.
Omelet
You misspelled "Posterior". <g>
--
Peace, Om
Remove both _ (underscores) to validate gmail e-mails.
kilikini
> In article <v2vig39v91bpi43bt...@4ax.com>,
> Zilbandy <zilb...@comcastREMOVETHIS.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 06:12:23 -0500, Omelet <omp_o...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And you no longer weigh 600 lbs. ;-)
>>
>> Nope, I'm down to 403, looking to break into the 300 pound range
>> later this month. It's been an interesting 14 months. The really
>> good thing is that I feel pretty good. I don't feel hungry all the
>> time which means MAYBE this time I have actually modified my eating
>> habits for good. BTW, I am still logging everything that goes into
>> my mouth... well, almost everything.
>
> I feel your pain... ;-)
>
> I've never been quite that heavy (272 was my max) but I still
> understand. Permanent diet modification is indeed the key, and
> logging everything keeps one honest. I need to consider doing that
> again!
>
> It's also very educational. I used to track not only calories, but fat
> grams, protein and carb grams, and sodium milligrams.
>
> Cutting starch and sugar seems to curb hunger more than anything else.
>
> Congratulations!
>
>> Boobs don't count! :)
>
> <lol>!
I've never understood the over-eating thing. I've always been borderline
anorexic. Kudos to those of you who have lost weight and can modify your
eating habits. My husband has to practically force feed me. In the past
couple of days, I've had 2 tacos and the last one was about 24 hours ago.
I've been this way for years.
kili
Omelet
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
Try taking B vitamins. :-)
Jerry Sauk
"Reverend Rafe Hollister" <ra...@paducah.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4708e4bf$0$20573$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
No it's not at all, but it's a sign of comtept for people who get thru life
so easy being skinny.
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:24:53 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > Uhhh Steve? "skinny fuck" is a compliment these days, because the
> > complimenter actually regrets having to say it.
>
> people would be jealous of all the heroin addicts and crackheads?
>
> Uh-huh. Face it, Jerry - I trapped you in your own double-talk.
> You're nothing but a pathetic, fat slob hypocrite.
>
> -sw
Uh steve, I didn't understand your point at all. perhaps you could explain
in agaim using straightforward language and not double-talk.
IE... what at all does this have to do with drug-users??????
Jerry Sauk
"Sqwertz" <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote in message
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:28:51 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
>
> > news:1391faqqyek3z$.dlg@sqwertz.com...
> >> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 01:31:39 -0500, Jerry Sauk wrote:
> >>
> >>> I eat the soft tacos regularly, just not as often as the hard.
> >>
> >> So you like hard ones?
> >
>
>
> -sw
I fail to see what "innuendo" has to do with taco's, Steve, GET A LIFE, if
at all possible, with a non-imgainary human female.
And keep the crap out of alt-fast.food.
kilikini
>>
>> I've never understood the over-eating thing. I've always been
>> borderline anorexic. Kudos to those of you who have lost weight and
>> can modify your eating habits. My husband has to practically force
>> feed me. In the past couple of days, I've had 2 tacos and the last
>> one was about 24 hours ago. I've been this way for years.
>>
>> kili
>
> Try taking B vitamins. :-)
B complex?
kili
Bobo Bonobo®
> Zilbandy wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:40:41 -0500, Omelet <omp_ome...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >>> Jerry, you're beginning to worry me. Are you suggesting that 10
> >>> tacos is a 'normal' serving size? The 10 pack of tacos to me sounds
> >>> more like a 'family pack'. I have been known to eat 10 tacos at a
> >>> time in the past, but then, that's why I got up to over 600 pounds,
> >>> too. Trust me, 10 tacos is NOT a suggested serving size for any
> >>> half way normal person. Dammit, Jerry! Now I want a frickin' taco.
> >>> :)
>
> >> I actually could eat 10 tacos, but it would take me ALL day and 3 to
> >> 4 meals!
>
> > LOL, what I failed to mention in my previous post is that I would eat
> > 10 tacos in one sitting as well as two or three half pound burros and
> > a bladder buster size Coke or Pepsi. Now, a taco bell splurge for me
> > is a couple of tacos and a single burro and a diet soda. :)
>
> have they shrunk! They used to be the size of a 24 oz. beer can. Now
> they're barely bigger than my pecker. :-(
>
> Also I forgot to include my opinion of their tortillas in my review. Just
> about the worst *ever*. Yeah, I know they don't make 'em there, but neither
> does the grocery store but they can sell decent stuff most of the time.
>
> Mebbe one of these days the ol' lady will wake up and put the pics I took
> summers where y'all can see 'em.
Do you not live in an area served by Del Taco?
>
> TFM®
--Bryan
Big Jon
"Omelet" <omp_omelet@g_mail.com> wrote in message
news:omp_omelet-53361...@news.giganews.com...
Morphed again? What's with that?
> In article <O5ednSGiuIwODZTa...@comcast.com>,
> Albert Worschey <"worldwar666[at]gmail.com"> wrote:
>
>> Zilbandy wrote:
>> > BTW, I am still logging everything that goes into my mouth...
>> > well, almost everything. Boobs don't count! :)
>> >
>> They may not count, but they could still be logged for posterity's sake.
>
> You misspelled "Posterior". <g>
Are you really that fucked up? You have boobs on your posterior? Most
women and/or girls have them up top, in the front.
No wonder they make you clean the terlits in the medical lab at night.
Keeps you out of the public's view.
Big Jon
I see you are still trying to give medical information.
Where did you say you got your degree, again? Cleaning the mess in the lab
and the terlits doesn't count. Can you say lawsuit?
kilikini
Nope. All we have is Wendy's, Taco Bell, KFC, McD's and Burger King. We're
in Florida.
kili
Omelet
"kilikini" <kili...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote:
Yes...
Helps with energy levels and for many people, appetite.
"Now" brand B-100 is inexpensive and excellent.
Omelet
"Big Jon" <big...@cheddar.net> wrote:
<shakes head>
Sorry you missed the humor...
Of course what should I expect from someone that can't spell "Toilet"?