Gaggia Coffee (not classic)
Gaggia Baby
Starbucks Barista (not stainless)
please give reasons why...
thanks!
Between the Coffee and the Barista, I would say buy the
Coffee given the price is the same. While both machines
appear to be constructed of heavy duty materials, the Coffee
has a portafilter that makes the Barista's pale. I believe
the Coffee consistently delivers a much, much better quality
shot than does the Barista.
All of this assumes an equally good grinder, by the way.
Good Luck.
Anyone have any experience with these vs the Gaggia Coffee?
"Dan White" <danw...@inetport.com> wrote in message news:38C28BF8.3A89F46@i
netport.com...
It is the most solid of the 3. It has the same internals as the classic,
including the 3 way solenoid valve (which neither of the other 2 have).
I have used the Barista and the Classic, and IMHO there is no comparison.
The Barista is an OK machine, but the Classic outclasses it. More steam
power, and better overall construction.
David
"persa" <persa_anima @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dhqw4.50411$_G1.6...@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com...
However, I am wondering if I would be better off retiring it and buying
either a Coffee Gaggia or a Gaggia Classic.
I can buy a new Coffee Gaggia locally for $299. However,
http://www.best-of-italy.com has the Gaggia Classic for $345. Locally, the
Classic is $449.
So, what is the best option - refurbishing the Baby, buying a Coffee Gaggia
locally, or buying a Gaggia Classic from Italy over the net?
Has anybody tried best-of-italy.com? How is their service? Their web site
says they were picked as a top shopping site by Newsweek and Business Week.
Al Shing
David Strom <dms...@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:Swww4.300$2c1....@news.uswest.net...
David
I thought the only difference between the Coffee and the Classic Coffee
was the Classic had the 3-way valve and a nicer exterior.
Antony Prince
Manchester, UK
Here's a comparison chart for all the Gaggia's:
http://www.wholelattelove.com/forms/gaggia_comp.htm
David
David L.
In article <MPG.1340d74d6...@news.demon.co.uk>,
Cof...@bloodmoon.deletethis.demon.co.uk (Antony Prince) wrote:
>In article <38D6AFD0...@home.com>, fdl...@home.com
says...
>> Coffee's pump slightly less powerful (16 bar as opposed to
17.5 for
>> Classic) - no solenoid valve - turbo frother is plastic
instead of
>> chrome plated brass - weighs 3 lbs. less (not sure why this
matters just
>> thought I'd throw it in).
>>
>
>Thanks for that :)
>
>I almost bought a Baby a few months back, but seeing as though I
did not
>have a decent grinder, I figured why blow all my budget on
*just* a
>machine, so I settled for the Coffee and MDF
>
>I almost wish I had the solenoid sometimes, as my Coffee tends
to dribble
>quite a lot :(
>
>
>
>Antony Prince
>Manchester, UK
>
>>
>
>
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
| Coffee's pump slightly less powerful (16 bar as opposed to 17.5 for
| Classic)
So they say. When I replaced the pump on a Coffee some years back I got a
Baby pump (complete with some extra electrical connections not used by the
Coffee) and could detect no difference at all in the operation.
| turbo frother is plastic instead of
| chrome plated brass
I have one of each, and the plastic is an improvement; the higher air hole
results in a creamier froth. Of course, one generally just removes the
froth tube altogether.
- David R.
From where did you acquire the pump, Gaggia?
Antony Prince
Manchester, UK
- David R.
So does mine - do you think its an age thing? or do i need descaling.
ken
(sorry)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
David L.