> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:15 -0800, Dave Bugg wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:32:37 -0800, Dave Bugg wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:28:52 -0600, Janet Wilder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/6/2012 4:33 PM, Dave Bugg wrote:
>>>>>>> Janet Wilder wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any suggestions for a substitute for the cork?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a picture of my setup:
>>>>>>>
http://tinypic.com/r/2hpr8sw/6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That looks like a great set up. I have wood clothes pins.
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> A set of binder clips works the same hanging upside down and don't
>>>>> take up grill space since the probe hangs just UNDER the grill.
>>>>
>>>> The space it takes up is really non-consequential. It fits nicely
>>>> into the space separation one would normally have for more than one
>>>> hunk-O-meat. In the decades I've used this configuration, I've
>>>> never been fretful of the loss of grill usage. Corks, potatoes,
>>>> etc take up more space than the clothes pins.
>>>
>>> Some of us, like the OP, use ECBG's. And if the meat is in the
>>> center as it should be, then you'd need to put the probe on one of
>>> the sides where it read hotter from the heat coming up over the
>>> sides of the pan.
>>
> It's a fact. It's much hotter on the sides of the grate than in the
I'm talking about placement. I've never had to place it to the side as