m8904...@redback.co.rmit.edu.au spake thusly:
> If you had sufficient brains you'd have observed that her name isI read quite well, thank you very much. I have to admit, however, that I
> within the first line of her sig. But then it is clear from your
> diatribe that neither observation or reading are of your better skills.
have had some difficulty with wfw's posts - possibly because she is one of
the most pitifuly inadequate writers I have had the misfortune to read.
She'd do better to stick to monosyllabic prose until she manages to make
some sense with it, and only then move on to those polysyllabic words she
now harnesses like sedated elephants into a circle. Anyway, her tortured,
somnambulant prose must have clouded my mind because - whad'ya know? -
her new email address *is* right there in her .sig, just as you say. I am
so relieved to know I can email her and ask for clarification.
As for my observation skills, I notice that you would be better to try
-Keith "Word 'slavery' Warrior: fighting to keep English shackled in the
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.