Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
The canonical hanky code
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  14 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Lee Ayrton  
View profile  
 More options Aug 20 2006, 5:28 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Lee Ayrton <layrton@REMOVE_ME.panix.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:28:46 -0400
Local: Sun, Aug 20 2006 5:28 pm
Subject: The canonical hanky code

The idea that gay men have an elaborate hanky code to indicate
preferences has been referenced from time to time in AFU.  In a bizarre
fit of serendipity I happened upon this, The Canonical Hanky Code:

<URL:http://www.pendorwright.com/faqs/hankies.html>

Text only but, really, not at all work-safe.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack Campin - bogus address  
View profile  
 More options Aug 20 2006, 8:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Jack Campin - bogus address <bo...@purr.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:14:12 +0100
Local: Sun, Aug 20 2006 8:14 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

> The idea that gay men have an elaborate hanky code to indicate
> preferences has been referenced from time to time in AFU.  In a bizarre
> fit of serendipity I happened upon this, The Canonical Hanky Code:
> <URL:http://www.pendorwright.com/faqs/hankies.html>
> Text only but, really, not at all work-safe.

I first saw that list in a gay publication something like 20 years
ago, it hasn't changed much.  I've only seen a few being used, but
then I don't have that much contact with the gay scene these days.

I don't see how you could avoid making some rather serious mistakes
under typical club lighting.  And maybe there ought to be a black
and white striped one to mean "I'm colourblind, you'll have to ask"?

==============  j-c  ======  @  ======  purr . demon . co . uk  ==============
Jack Campin:  11 Third St, Newtongrange EH22 4PU, Scotland | tel 0131 660 4760
<http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/>   for CD-ROMs and free | fax 0870 0554 975
stuff: Scottish music, food intolerance, & Mac logic fonts | mob 07800 739 557


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gary G. Taylor  
View profile  
 More options Aug 22 2006, 3:20 am
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: "Gary G. Taylor" <knotg...@knotdonavan.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:20:20 GMT
Local: Tues, Aug 22 2006 3:20 am
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:28:46 -0400, Lee Ayrton wrote:

> The idea that gay men have an elaborate hanky code to indicate preferences
> has been referenced from time to time in AFU.  In a bizarre fit of
> serendipity I happened upon this, The Canonical Hanky Code:

> <URL:http://www.pendorwright.com/faqs/hankies.html>

> Text only but, really, not at all work-safe.

There are a few such pages on the 'Net, easily found by googling.

I'm a long-time practicing member of the gay leather community. In my
experience, the code began as an in-group thing among people into
kinky/"leather" sex, with only a few colors, and came into use by the
early 1960s although its origins probably go farther back. The original
colors I recall seeing were black, gray, red, blue [any shade, not
necessarily Navy], yellow, brown, orange, and green (indicating hustler).

In the early 1970s it appears that some entrepreneur(s) noticed that many
stores catering to gay people carried (and still carry) a selection of
hankies and decided to capitalize upon that by circulating flyers
resembling the list in the referenced URL. Anyone familiar with then-
current usage knew (and knows) that the vast majority of the colors were
entirely made up and remain so.

When the lists first came out, non-kinky people--particularly the twinky
set--immediately seized upon the colors as a fashion statement, and for
a while one could see queenyboys in the leather bars flying a veritable
rainbow from both sides. That fad soon passed, to the great relief of
serious leather people.

The basic colors I cited above, plus occasional variants which come and go
(black/white check for safe sex appears to have caught on), are still used
by the serious players and are a quite reliable guide. One should note,
however, that they generally indicate general interest and desire rather
than exclusive preference, particularly when it comes to which side they
are worn on.

--
Gary G. Taylor * Pomona, CA * 34.074°N 117.754°W
gary [] donavan [] org * http://www [] donavan [] org
"The two most abundant substance in the Universe are hydrogen
and stupidity." --Frank Zappa, R.A. Heinlein and many others


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gary G. Taylor  
View profile  
 More options Aug 22 2006, 11:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: "Gary G. Taylor" <knotg...@knotdonavan.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:00:51 GMT
Local: Tues, Aug 22 2006 11:00 am
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:20:20 +0000, Gary G. Taylor wrote:
> In the early 1970s

Whoops, make that 1980s.

--
Gary G. Taylor * Pomona, CA * 34.074°N 117.754°W
gary [] donavan [] org * http://www [] donavan [] org
"The two most abundant substance in the Universe are hydrogen
and stupidity." --Frank Zappa, R.A. Heinlein and many others


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
TOliver  
View profile  
 More options Aug 22 2006, 11:08 am
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: "TOliver" <toliverjr...@Hot.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:08:36 GMT
Local: Tues, Aug 22 2006 11:08 am
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

"Gary G. Taylor" <knotg...@knotdonavan.org> wrote ...

> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:20:20 +0000, Gary G. Taylor wrote:

>> In the early 1970s

> Whoops, make that 1980s.

In legend at least, "Green on Thursday" certainly dates from the 50s.

As for bandanna handkerchiefs, those of us who spent much tiome outddors in
the South/Southwest pretty routinely carried'em, big enough for duty as
sweatbands, but red and blue were the available or choice colors.  I see
more and more folks carrying them now, and various orientyal suppliers sell
all shades including various "day-glo" hues.

TM "Do rags before do rags" Oliver


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jennifer Smith  
View profile  
 More options Aug 22 2006, 8:15 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Jennifer Smith <jenni...@you-wish-you-knew.mine.nu>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:15:46 -0600
Local: Tues, Aug 22 2006 8:15 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

Lee Ayrton wrote:

> The idea that gay men have an elaborate hanky code to indicate
> preferences has been referenced from time to time in AFU.  In a bizarre
> fit of serendipity I happened upon this, The Canonical Hanky Code:

> <URL:http://www.pendorwright.com/faqs/hankies.html>

> Text only but, really, not at all work-safe.

It should be noted that the hanky code is by no means a definitive guide.
The major problem with it is that the _idea_ has travelled overseas, but
the color correlations differ in parts.

Jenni


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alfred Green  
View profile  
 More options Aug 28 2006, 8:24 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Alfred Green <n...@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:24:33 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 28 2006 8:24 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code
 > The original

> colors I recall seeing were black, gray, red, blue [any shade, not
> necessarily Navy], yellow, brown, orange, and green (indicating hustler).

I remember it as being:
Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

But there was some resistance to that.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lon  
View profile  
 More options Aug 28 2006, 9:48 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Lon <lon.stow...@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:48:21 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 28 2006 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code
Alfred Green proclaimed:

>  > The original

>> colors I recall seeing were black, gray, red, blue [any shade, not
>> necessarily Navy], yellow, brown, orange, and green (indicating hustler).

> I remember it as being:
> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

> But there was some resistance to that.

Only by the transexual named Violet.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob Church  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30 2006, 1:22 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Bob Church <chur...@ohio.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:22:14 -0400
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 1:22 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code
On 2006-08-28 20:24:33 -0400, Alfred Green <n...@cox.net> said:

>  > The original
>> colors I recall seeing were black, gray, red, blue [any shade, not
>> necessarily Navy], yellow, brown, orange, and green (indicating hustler).

> I remember it as being:
> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

> But there was some resistance to that.

Blue orange green brown slate, that's how I got my start.

Bob Church


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Le Trôle  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30 2006, 3:27 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: "Le Trôle" <letr...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:27:08 +0100
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 3:27 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code
"Bob Church" <chur...@ohio.edu> wrote in message

news:ed4hg7$jgp$1@allhats.xcski.com...

> On 2006-08-28 20:24:33 -0400, Alfred Green <n...@cox.net> said:

> >  > The original
> >> colors I recall seeing were black, gray, red, blue [any shade, not
> >> necessarily Navy], yellow, brown, orange, and green (indicating
hustler).

> > I remember it as being:
> > Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

> > But there was some resistance to that.

Bad Boys Rape Our Young Girls But Violet Gives Willingly

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alfred Green  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30 2006, 5:10 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Alfred Green <n...@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:10:04 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

Lon wrote:
>> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

>> But there was some resistance to that.

> Only by the transexual named Violet.

Okay,  bit of a mind-fade on that one. How about splitting the
difference and calling it purple?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Don Freeman  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30 2006, 5:36 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: "Don Freeman" <freem...@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:36:56 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 5:36 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

"Alfred Green" <n...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:Q8nJg.18380$RD.8841@fed1read08...
> Lon wrote:

>>> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

>>> But there was some resistance to that.

>> Only by the transexual named Violet.

> Okay,  bit of a mind-fade on that one. How about splitting the difference
> and calling it purple?

.
And everyone knew her as Rosie.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lon  
View profile  
 More options Aug 30 2006, 11:10 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Lon <lon.stow...@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:10:08 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 11:10 pm
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code
Alfred Green proclaimed:

> Lon wrote:

>>> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

>>> But there was some resistance to that.

>> Only by the transexual named Violet.

> Okay,  bit of a mind-fade on that one. How about splitting the
> difference and calling it purple?

?  .. our young girls but [the artist formerly known as] prince gives
willingly?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alfred Green  
View profile  
 More options Aug 31 2006, 12:40 am
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
From: Alfred Green <n...@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:21 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 31 2006 12:40 am
Subject: Re: The canonical hanky code

>>>> Black, Brown, Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Magenta, Grey, White.

>>>> But there was some resistance to that.>>>

>>> Only by the transexual named Violet.

>> Okay,  bit of a mind-fade on that one. How about splitting the
>> difference and calling it purple?

> ?  .. our young girls but [the artist formerly known as] prince gives
> willingly?

No, that conjures up some unpleasant images. How about Penelope?
Yep, Penelope will work just fine.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »