Peter Flass <Peter_Fl...@Yahoo.com> writes:No. No way. HELL NO!
> On 10/7/2012 6:02 PM, hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> On Oct 5, 4:56 pm, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> <spamt...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Note above. The B2500 was the designated replacement for B300
>>> Just as the IBM S/360 was the designated successor for the 1400 and
> Wasn't the VAX the designated successor of the PDP-10?
DEC^wDigital may have wished their PDP-10 customers would go out and buy
The Vax was more reasonably called the successor of the PDP-11, but
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.