Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Microsoft versus Digital Equipment Corporation
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Peter da Silva  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2008, 12:57 pm
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers, alt.sys.pdp10
From: pe...@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Thurs, May 15 2008 12:57 pm
Subject: Re: Microsoft versus Digital Equipment Corporation
In article <nK6dnQg0w_zAh7HVnZ2dnUVZ_r_in...@rcn.net>,

jmfbah  <jmfbahciv@aol> wrote:
>Stopping a job or process would
>require the OS to manipulate the cache.

Not with a physically-mapped cache, and even with a virtually-mapped cache
the MMU wshould take care of this, otherwise the pager needs to start doing
a bunch of unnecessary yak shaving.

>Tidying up files such as
>closing them requires the OS to sniff around and ensuring that the
>correct data gets written and that the incorrect data doesn't get
>written.

Are you talking about the buffer cache now? Well, if you think of RAM as
L4 cache for the disk, I guess that makes sense, but still...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.