> Bill Turlock wrote, in <4B099C2D...@sonnnic.invalid>
> on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:16:45 -0800:
>
>> Nick Spalding wrote:
>> >
>> > John Hatpin wrote, in <nmpgg5phkef89gqnr...@4ax.com>
>> > on Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:25:29 +0000:
>> >
>> > > Anyway, I'm gradually abandoning some of the more rigid separations
>> I
>> > > have elsewhere on the internet. After all, I'm not interesting
>> enough
>> > > or have enough to hide to be worried. I'd just rather not be forced
>> > > along that road for no good reason.
>> >
>> > That has always been my attitude so I have never made any attempt to
>> > disguise myself.
>> >
>> > My email address attracts a little spam, averaging 15 a day over the
>> > last month all of which were directed to Junk by Agent. The last
>> month
>> > has been unusual in being totally effective, I keep tabs on what it
>> > misses and most months an average of ~3 end up in my Inbox. I can
>> live
>> > with that.
>> >
>> > I am in the Dublin phone book.
>>
>> I'll call, we'll chat. about the 1401, which IIRC had it's 50th
>> aniv. recently
>
> That would be very nice. It was a fine machine, and its reader, punch
> and printer were good enough to be relabeled for 360. I was actually
> more familiar with the 1440 which was almost identical cpu-wise but had
> really crappy i/o devices. The members of the family I really liked
> were the grown up ones, the 1410 and even more so the 7010 - 5 digit
> addresses, 15 index registers, 100k core.
>
> There was also the 1460 which was a 1440 speeded up by about 80% and
> given the 1402/3 i/o kit. I never saw one but like many who looked
> after 1440s I had a 1460 clock to overclock the 1440 to pick off dodgy
> cards.
I'm surprised you haven't gone over to alt.folklore.computers, where they
love to talk of 1401s.
(x-post added)
--
Nuns! Reverse!
I had, for reasons unimportant here, cleared out my 'groups list
on this reader, and hadn't been there in a while. Just last week
I scribed again, and a few nights ago was rummaging through the
subjects, and saw one on the 1401, thus my comment. I'm sure I've
seen Nick over there, too.
You have.
--
Nick Spalding